Discussion:
— I CHANCED UPON A LEVI’S JEAN SIGN
(too old to reply)
dolf
2018-08-10 23:01:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
<https://www.facebook.com/Levis/>

@ 1433 hours I was lucky to chance upon a Levi sign whilst passing a local
store (Sale, Victoria, Australia} and sought to buy some 501 jeans 👖 {

#263 as [#200, #20, #5, #30, #8] = skelos (G4628): {UMBRA: #12 as #525 %
#41 = #33} 1) the leg, from the hip to the toes inclusive;

} and the older male shop assistant said to me, “People generally have
problems with the buttons.”

To which I quipped, “I don’t have anything which needs to come out in a
hurry {

#462 as [#6, #20, #30, #6, #400] = kaleh (H3616): {UMBRA: #4 as #55 % #41 =
#14} 1) failing with desire, longing, longing for

} these days.”

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#462 / #399} / HETEROS {#426 / #381} / TORAH {#405 /
#411}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:6,col:6,nous:42&idea:{m,130}&idea:{f,142}&idea:{m,462}&idea:{f,399}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

And by 1623 hours {

#197 as [#2, #90, #100, #5] = batseq (H1216): {UMBRA: #2 as #192 % #41 =
#28} 1) (Qal) to swell, become blistered;

} how fortune changes ...

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#197 / #263} / HETEROS {#228 / #238} / TORAH {#204 /
#226}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:7,col:4,nous:2&idea:{m,2}&idea:{f,2}&idea:{m,197}&idea:{f,263}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

- dolf

Initial Post: 11 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Government Shill #2
2018-08-11 02:39:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by dolf
<https://www.facebook.com/Levis/>
@ 1433 hours I was lucky to chance upon a Levi sign whilst passing a local
store (Sale, Victoria, Australia} and sought to buy some 501 jeans ? {
#263 as [#200, #20, #5, #30, #8] = skelos (G4628): {UMBRA: #12 as #525 %
#41 = #33} 1) the leg, from the hip to the toes inclusive;
} and the older male shop assistant said to me, “People generally have
problems with the buttons.”
To which I quipped, “I don’t have anything which needs to come out in a
hurry {
#462 as [#6, #20, #30, #6, #400] = kaleh (H3616): {UMBRA: #4 as #55 % #41 =
#14} 1) failing with desire, longing, longing for
} these days.”
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#462 / #399} / HETEROS {#426 / #381} / TORAH {#405 /
#411}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:6,col:6,nous:42&idea:{m,130}&idea:{f,142}&idea:{m,462}&idea:{f,399}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
And by 1623 hours {
#197 as [#2, #90, #100, #5] = batseq (H1216): {UMBRA: #2 as #192 % #41 =
#28} 1) (Qal) to swell, become blistered;
} how fortune changes ...
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#197 / #263} / HETEROS {#228 / #238} / TORAH {#204 /
#226}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:7,col:4,nous:2&idea:{m,2}&idea:{f,2}&idea:{m,197}&idea:{f,263}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
- dolf
Initial Post: 11 August 2018
So, you were walking along the street, bought some jeans, made a silly joke,
then... something happened?

Which is the remarkable bit?

Shill #2
--
My favorite thing about the Internet is that you get to go into the private
world of real creeps without having to smell them.
- Penn Jillette
dolf
2018-08-11 05:42:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Such natural causality is to convey that the supranatural assimilation with
the MIND as ONE has now occurred which is exemplified by the mathematical
categories of understanding conveying a temporal relativity and singularity
of apperception.

IMHO

- dolf
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by dolf
<https://www.facebook.com/Levis/>
@ 1433 hours I was lucky to chance upon a Levi sign whilst passing a local
store (Sale, Victoria, Australia} and sought to buy some 501 jeans ? {
#263 as [#200, #20, #5, #30, #8] = skelos (G4628): {UMBRA: #12 as #525 %
#41 = #33} 1) the leg, from the hip to the toes inclusive;
} and the older male shop assistant said to me, “People generally have
problems with the buttons.”
To which I quipped, “I don’t have anything which needs to come out in a
hurry {
#462 as [#6, #20, #30, #6, #400] = kaleh (H3616): {UMBRA: #4 as #55 % #41 =
#14} 1) failing with desire, longing, longing for
} these days.”
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#462 / #399} / HETEROS {#426 / #381} / TORAH {#405 /
#411}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:6,col:6,nous:42&idea:{m,130}&idea:{f,142}&idea:{m,462}&idea:{f,399}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
And by 1623 hours {
#197 as [#2, #90, #100, #5] = batseq (H1216): {UMBRA: #2 as #192 % #41 =
#28} 1) (Qal) to swell, become blistered;
} how fortune changes ...
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#197 / #263} / HETEROS {#228 / #238} / TORAH {#204 /
#226}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:7,col:4,nous:2&idea:{m,2}&idea:{f,2}&idea:{m,197}&idea:{f,263}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
- dolf
Initial Post: 11 August 2018
So, you were walking along the street, bought some jeans, made a silly joke,
then... something happened?
Which is the remarkable bit?
Shill #2
--
My favorite thing about the Internet is that you get to go into the private
world of real creeps without having to smell them.
- Penn Jillette
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-11 05:45:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by dolf
Such natural causality is to convey that the supranatural assimilation with
the MIND as ONE has now occurred which is exemplified by the mathematical
categories of understanding conveying a temporal relativity and singularity
of apperception.
IMHO
- dolf
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by dolf
<https://www.facebook.com/Levis/>
@ 1433 hours I was lucky to chance upon a Levi sign whilst passing a local
store (Sale, Victoria, Australia} and sought to buy some 501 jeans ? {
#263 as [#200, #20, #5, #30, #8] = skelos (G4628): {UMBRA: #12 as #525 %
#41 = #33} 1) the leg, from the hip to the toes inclusive;
} and the older male shop assistant said to me, “People generally have
problems with the buttons.”
To which I quipped, “I don’t have anything which needs to come out in a
hurry {
#462 as [#6, #20, #30, #6, #400] = kaleh (H3616): {UMBRA: #4 as #55 % #41 =
#14} 1) failing with desire, longing, longing for
} these days.”
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#462 / #399} / HETEROS {#426 / #381} / TORAH {#405 /
#411}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:6,col:6,nous:42&idea:{m,130}&idea:{f,142}&idea:{m,462}&idea:{f,399}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
And by 1623 hours {
#197 as [#2, #90, #100, #5] = batseq (H1216): {UMBRA: #2 as #192 % #41 =
#28} 1) (Qal) to swell, become blistered;
} how fortune changes ...
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#197 / #263} / HETEROS {#228 / #238} / TORAH {#204 /
#226}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:7,col:4,nous:2&idea:{m,2}&idea:{f,2}&idea:{m,197}&idea:{f,263}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
- dolf
Initial Post: 11 August 2018
So, you were walking along the street, bought some jeans, made a silly joke,
then... something happened?
Which is the remarkable bit?
Shill #2
--
My favorite thing about the Internet is that you get to go into the private
world of real creeps without having to smell them.
- Penn Jillette
Nous: #55
Time: 15:40 hrs
Date: 2018.11.18
Torah: [#1, #6, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 7 (#8); Ego: 6 (#7),
@3: Sup: 47 (#55); Ego: 40 (#47),
Male: #55; Feme: #47
} // #47

Dao: Abstruse Mysterious Signs
Tetra: #54 - Unity
I-Ching: H22 - Elegance, Grace, Adorning, Luxuriance

Latin: Annunciatus {Patient God} Alt: Lalahel {That Which is Not is Not of
God} {

1. AIDS AGAINST DESPERATION & TROUBLE, ALSO STRENGTHENS PATIENCE
2. THE GENERATION OF MEN & ANIMALS
3. CHEMIST, DOCTORS & SURGEONS
4. Phuonisie
}

Solar Eclipse: 21 August 1914 [During World War I: 28 July 1914 to 11
November 1918]
21 (UTC) / 22 August 2017 (AEST)

Boaz {In strength}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#400 / #396} / HETEROS {#347 / #410} / TORAH {#356 /
#374}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:6,col:2,nous:55&idea:{m,55}&idea:{f,55}&idea:{m,400}&idea:{f,396}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 1, row: 6, col: 2, nous: 55 [Date: 2018.11.18, Time: 15:40
hrs, Super: #400 / #55 - Abstruse Mysterious Signs; I-Ching: H22 -
Elegance, Grace, Adorning, Luxuriance; Tetra: 54 - Unity, Ego: #396 / #55 -
Abstruse Mysterious Signs; I-Ching: H22 - Elegance, Grace, Adorning,
Luxuriance; Tetra: 54 - Unity]

H4915@{
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 60 (#80); Ego: 40 (#60),
@3: Sup: 36 (#116); Ego: 57 (#117),
@4: Sup: 66 (#182); Ego: 30 (#147),
@5: Sup: 72 (#254); Ego: 6 (#153),
Male: #254; Feme: #153
} // #396

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #370 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;

THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance in
Annu; I am not a doer of wrong.

#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45

#396 as [#20, #40, #300, #30, #6] = moshel (H4915): {UMBRA: #3 as #370 %
#41 = #1} 1) dominion from 04911; TWOT - 1258c; n m; 2) likeness, one like,
similitude

"And I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem,
and the battle bow shall be cut off: and he shall speak peace unto the
heathen: and his dominion {#396 as [#20, #40, #300, #30, #6] = moshel
(H4915): dominion} shall be from sea even to sea, and from the river even
to the ends of the earth." [Zechariah 9:10]

H5397@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
@3: Sup: 31 (#91); Ego: 57 (#112),
@4: Sup: 71 (#162); Ego: 40 (#152),
@5: Sup: 76 (#238); Ego: 5 (#157),
Male: #238; Feme: #157
} // #400

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #395 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching:
H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the
beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;

THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait;
I am not the cause of weeping to any.

#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
"And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into
his nostrils the breath {#400 as [#5, #50, #300, #40, #5] = neshamah
(H5397): breath} of life; and man became a living soul." [Genesis 2:7]

"All in whose nostrils was the breath {#400 as [#5, #50, #300, #40, #5] =
neshamah (H5397): breath} of life, of all that was in the dry land, died."
[Genesis 7:22]
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-11 05:58:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
Such natural causality is to convey that the supranatural assimilation with
the MIND as ONE has now occurred which is exemplified by the mathematical
categories of understanding conveying a temporal relativity and singularity
of apperception.
IMHO
- dolf
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by dolf
<https://www.facebook.com/Levis/>
@ 1433 hours I was lucky to chance upon a Levi sign whilst passing a local
store (Sale, Victoria, Australia} and sought to buy some 501 jeans ? {
#263 as [#200, #20, #5, #30, #8] = skelos (G4628): {UMBRA: #12 as #525 %
#41 = #33} 1) the leg, from the hip to the toes inclusive;
} and the older male shop assistant said to me, “People generally have
problems with the buttons.”
To which I quipped, “I don’t have anything which needs to come out in a
hurry {
#462 as [#6, #20, #30, #6, #400] = kaleh (H3616): {UMBRA: #4 as #55 % #41 =
#14} 1) failing with desire, longing, longing for
} these days.”
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#462 / #399} / HETEROS {#426 / #381} / TORAH {#405 /
#411}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:6,col:6,nous:42&idea:{m,130}&idea:{f,142}&idea:{m,462}&idea:{f,399}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
And by 1623 hours {
#197 as [#2, #90, #100, #5] = batseq (H1216): {UMBRA: #2 as #192 % #41 =
#28} 1) (Qal) to swell, become blistered;
} how fortune changes ...
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#197 / #263} / HETEROS {#228 / #238} / TORAH {#204 /
#226}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:7,col:4,nous:2&idea:{m,2}&idea:{f,2}&idea:{m,197}&idea:{f,263}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
- dolf
Initial Post: 11 August 2018
So, you were walking along the street, bought some jeans, made a silly joke,
then... something happened?
Which is the remarkable bit?
Shill #2
--
My favorite thing about the Internet is that you get to go into the private
world of real creeps without having to smell them.
- Penn Jillette
Nous: #55
Time: 15:40 hrs
Date: 2018.11.18
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 7 (#8); Ego: 6 (#7),
@3: Sup: 47 (#55); Ego: 40 (#47),
Male: #55; Feme: #47
} // #47
Dao: Abstruse Mysterious Signs
Tetra: #54 - Unity
I-Ching: H22 - Elegance, Grace, Adorning, Luxuriance
Latin: Annunciatus {Patient God} Alt: Lalahel {That Which is Not is Not of
God} {
1. AIDS AGAINST DESPERATION & TROUBLE, ALSO STRENGTHENS PATIENCE
2. THE GENERATION OF MEN & ANIMALS
3. CHEMIST, DOCTORS & SURGEONS
4. Phuonisie
}
Solar Eclipse: 21 August 1914 [During World War I: 28 July 1914 to 11
November 1918]
21 (UTC) / 22 August 2017 (AEST)
Boaz {In strength}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#400 / #396} / HETEROS {#347 / #410} / TORAH {#356 /
#374}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:6,col:2,nous:55&idea:{m,55}&idea:{f,55}&idea:{m,400}&idea:{f,396}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
hrs, Super: #400 / #55 - Abstruse Mysterious Signs; I-Ching: H22 -
Elegance, Grace, Adorning, Luxuriance; Tetra: 54 - Unity, Ego: #396 / #55 -
Abstruse Mysterious Signs; I-Ching: H22 - Elegance, Grace, Adorning,
Luxuriance; Tetra: 54 - Unity]
@1: Sup: 20 (#20); Ego: 20 (#20),
@2: Sup: 60 (#80); Ego: 40 (#60),
@3: Sup: 36 (#116); Ego: 57 (#117),
@4: Sup: 66 (#182); Ego: 30 (#147),
@5: Sup: 72 (#254); Ego: 6 (#153),
Male: #254; Feme: #153
} // #396
UMBRA: #370 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance in
Annu; I am not a doer of wrong.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
#396 as [#20, #40, #300, #30, #6] = moshel (H4915): {UMBRA: #3 as #370 %
#41 = #1} 1) dominion from 04911; TWOT - 1258c; n m; 2) likeness, one like,
similitude
"And I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from Jerusalem,
and the battle bow shall be cut off: and he shall speak peace unto the
heathen: and his dominion {#396 as [#20, #40, #300, #30, #6] = moshel
(H4915): dominion} shall be from sea even to sea, and from the river even
to the ends of the earth." [Zechariah 9:10]
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 55 (#60); Ego: 50 (#55),
@3: Sup: 31 (#91); Ego: 57 (#112),
@4: Sup: 71 (#162); Ego: 40 (#152),
@5: Sup: 76 (#238); Ego: 5 (#157),
Male: #238; Feme: #157
} // #400
H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the
beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait;
I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
"And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into
his nostrils the breath {#400 as [#5, #50, #300, #40, #5] = neshamah
(H5397): breath} of life; and man became a living soul." [Genesis 2:7]
"All in whose nostrils was the breath {#400 as [#5, #50, #300, #40, #5] =
neshamah (H5397): breath} of life, of all that was in the dry land, died."
[Genesis 7:22]
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Government Shill #2
2018-08-11 06:02:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by dolf
Such natural causality is to convey that the supranatural assimilation with
the MIND as ONE has now occurred which is exemplified by the mathematical
categories of understanding conveying a temporal relativity and singularity
of apperception.
IMHO
- dolf
Word. Salad.

Shill #2
--
http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_sounds/hg/looney.wav
dolf
2018-08-11 06:14:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Did you check the mathematical proof you neo Nazi piece if ***@t because as
I suggest you do and then apologise as I am going to come after you in a
court of law for your anti Dutch, anti Semitic and anti homosexual racial
and religious slander and hatred due to your irrationality in the mistaken
belief that your association with our ANZAC heritage has any validity or
merit.

If you are going to make rational and reasoned comment then please do
without any further #325 - DETRUDE as defamation.

-- MR RAYMOND'S BISCUIT --

"OH YES DETAILS
AND EVERMORE IN.
SO MANY IT FAILS.
'TWAS SUCH A SIN.

CREME OF THE DO 💩.
WAS EVER SO FINE.
WHIPPED AVOCADO 🥑.
JUST SUBLIME."

YOUTUBE: "Anthony Hopkins as Harvey Kellogg in Road to Wellville - Hot
Biscuit!"



I know that since #168 - CONDEMNATION / #541 - CONTEMN is coming your way
this Remembrance / Armistice Day 11 November Centennial 2018 that you must
take any irrational means to defame.

- dolf
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by dolf
Such natural causality is to convey that the supranatural assimilation with
the MIND as ONE has now occurred which is exemplified by the mathematical
categories of understanding conveying a temporal relativity and singularity
of apperception.
IMHO
- dolf
Word. Salad.
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Sociability.pdf>

As is conveyed by the factual instance of TEMPORAL ASSOCIATIONS given of
the GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS AS PAPAL BULL EDICT MADE OF 4 OCTOBER 1582
(but within the BRITISH EMPIRE by Calendar New Style Act 1750 given Royal
assent: 27 May 1751; Commencement: 1 January 1752) you would not be
deploying a delusional characteristic by the Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#349 /
#300} / HETEROS {#249 / #331} / TORAH {#291 / #271} but a cohesive /
coherence as conformity with Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#481 / #391} / HETEROS
{#369 / #416} / TORAH {#369 / #416} being the discriminating NORM having
resumptive as continuing fidelity to the #391 - HOMOIOS basis of
governance:

@1 - #17 - 2017
@2 - #33 - #INR
@3 - #65 - SOLDIER
@4 - #390 - WREATHS / CROWN / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 (HOMOIOS)

#390 as [#5, #90, #80, #10, #200, #5] = tsephiyrah (H6843): {#8 as #385} 1)
plait, chaplet, *WREATH*, *CROWN*; 1a) plait, coronet, *DIADEM*;

@5 - #288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
@6 - #419 - SLAUGHTER
@7 - #391 - HOMOIOS
@8 - #13 - Letters Patent
@9 - #21 - Bequeathed to Sovereign Heirs in perpetuity

@10 - #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 -
Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release;

ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE TALK AS IDEA @215: "TO MY WAY OF THINKING, THE REAL
IDEAL IS THAT TWO BEINGS SHOULD UNITE FOR LIFE {

#541 as [#20, #300, #1, #200, #9, #1, #10] = ktaomai (G2932): {#63 as #541
% #41 = #8} 1) to acquire, get, or procure a thing for one's self, to
possess; 1a) to marry a wife;

} AND THAT THEIR LOVE SHOULD BE SANCTIFIED BY THE PRESENCE OF CHILDREN. IF
OUR FARMS HAVE REMAINED OFTEN FOR CENTURIES, IN SOME CASES FOR AS LONG AS
SEVEN HUNDRED YEARS, IN THE POSSESSION OF THE SAME FAMILY, IT IS FOR THE
MOST PART BECAUSE MARRIAGES WERE ARRANGED ONLY WHEN AN INFANT WAS ON THE
WAY. AND FOR CENTURIES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BOWED TO THIS CUSTOM AND
TOLERATED WHAT WAS CALLED 'THE TRIAL'. WHEN THE BIRTH OF THE INFANT WAS
IMMINENT, THE PRIEST WOULD REMIND THE FUTURE FATHER OF HIS DUTY TO MARRY.
UNFORTUNATELY THE PROTESTANT CHURCH HAS BROKEN WITH THESE HEALTHY CUSTOMS
AND HAS PREPARED THE WAY, WITH THE AID OF LAWS WRITTEN OR UNWRITTEN, FOR A
HYPOCRISY WHOSE OBJECT IT IS TO STIGMATISE AS SOMETHING SHAMEFUL A MARRIAGE
WHICH HAS BEEN PROVOKED BY THE ARRIVAL OF A CHILD. AND DON'T LET US FORGET,
IF WE ARE GOING TO BE COMPLETELY TRUTHFUL, THAT A LARGE PART OF THE
PRUSSIAN NOBILITY OWES ITS EXISTENCE TO A FAUX-PAS ON THE PART OF ONE OF
THE GIRLS OF THE BOURGEOISIE.

MOREOVER, THESE PREJUDICES ONLY OPERATE IN REVERSE, AND LOGIC HAS NO
BEARING ON THE TREND OF OUR DESIRES--FOR THE *ADMISSIBILITY* *OF* *THE*
*DISSOLUTION* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *ON* *ACCOUNT* *OF* *INCOMPATIBILITY* *IS*
*LEGALLY* *RECOGNISED*. IF IT IS CONTRARY TO THE LAW OF NATURE TO INSIST ON
THE MAINTENANCE OF A UNION IN WHICH THE PARTNERS ARE UNABLE TO AGREE, IT IS
NO LESS WRONG TO PUT OBSTACLES IN THE WAY OF A MARRIAGE JUSTIFIABLE ON THE
GROUNDS OF PERFECT RECIPROCAL UNITY. MY AGE SAVES ME FROM THE SUSPICION
THAT I AM PERHAPS PLEADING #321 - *PRO* *DOMO* {ie.

*FOR* (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the interests
of a given perspective or for the benefit of any small powerful or
influential #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION / FIELD / CLIQUE
which places a prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious
construct {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of
unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct
of #325 - DETRUDE.

G3622@{
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235); Ego: 50 (#220),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288 - UMBRA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS) / BEERSHEBA /
ANTI-SEMITISM); Ego: 40 (#330), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* /
*ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
@8: Sup: 16 (#304); Ego: 10 (#340),
@9: Sup: 17 (#321 as *PRO* *DOMO*); Ego: 1 (#341),
@10: Sup: 67 (#388); Ego: 50 (#391),
Male: #388; Feme: #391
} // #391

#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;

#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
#41 = #9} 1) like, similar, resembling; 1a) like: ie. resembling; 1b) like:
ie. corresponding to a thing;

#541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
(G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*, *TO*
*ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous cloud that
casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud surrounding and
enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy Spirit exerting
creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and impregnating it (a use
of the word which seems to have been drawn from the familiar Old Testament
idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate presence and power of God);

#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;

}, AND SO I AM ABLE TO INVITE ATTENTION TO THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM.

I SHALL HAVE NO PEACE OF MIND UNTIL I HAVE SUCCEEDED IN PLANTING A SEED OF
NORDIC BLOOD WHEREVER THE POPULATION STAND IN NEED OF REGENERATION." [ADOLF
HITLER'S (1941 - 1944) TABLE TALK AS IDEA: @215 ON 12th MAY 1942 / PAGE:
#475]
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-11 06:15:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by dolf
I suggest you do and then apologise as I am going to come after you in a
court of law for your anti Dutch, anti Semitic and anti homosexual racial
and religious slander and hatred due to your irrationality in the mistaken
belief that your association with our ANZAC heritage has any validity or
merit.
If you are going to make rational and reasoned comment then please do
without any further #325 - DETRUDE as defamation.
-- MR RAYMOND'S BISCUIT --
"OH YES DETAILS
AND EVERMORE IN.
SO MANY IT FAILS.
'TWAS SUCH A SIN.
CREME OF THE DO 💩.
WAS EVER SO FINE.
WHIPPED AVOCADO 🥑.
JUST SUBLIME."
YOUTUBE: "Anthony Hopkins as Harvey Kellogg in Road to Wellville - Hot
Biscuit!"
http://youtu.be/RblbZQth0KE
I know that since #168 - CONDEMNATION / #541 - CONTEMN is coming your way
this Remembrance / Armistice Day 11 November Centennial 2018 that you must
take any irrational means to defame.
- dolf
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by dolf
Such natural causality is to convey that the supranatural assimilation with
the MIND as ONE has now occurred which is exemplified by the mathematical
categories of understanding conveying a temporal relativity and singularity
of apperception.
IMHO
- dolf
Word. Salad.
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Sociability.pdf>
As is conveyed by the factual instance of TEMPORAL ASSOCIATIONS given of
the GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS AS PAPAL BULL EDICT MADE OF 4 OCTOBER 1582
(but within the BRITISH EMPIRE by Calendar New Style Act 1750 given Royal
assent: 27 May 1751; Commencement: 1 January 1752) you would not be
deploying a delusional characteristic by the Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#349 /
#300} / HETEROS {#249 / #331} / TORAH {#291 / #271} but a cohesive /
coherence as conformity with Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#481 / #391} / HETEROS
{#369 / #416} / TORAH {#369 / #416} being the discriminating NORM having
resumptive as continuing fidelity to the #391 - HOMOIOS basis of
@1 - #17 - 2017
@2 - #33 - #INR
@3 - #65 - SOLDIER
@4 - #390 - WREATHS / CROWN / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE 4 JULY 1776 (HOMOIOS)
#390 as [#5, #90, #80, #10, #200, #5] = tsephiyrah (H6843): {#8 as #385} 1)
plait, chaplet, *WREATH*, *CROWN*; 1a) plait, coronet, *DIADEM*;
@5 - #288 - UMBRA / BEERSHEBA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS)
@6 - #419 - SLAUGHTER
@7 - #391 - HOMOIOS
@8 - #13 - Letters Patent
@9 - #21 - Bequeathed to Sovereign Heirs in perpetuity
@10 - #37 - Non-Deeming Action, Government Administration; I-Ching: H40 -
Release, Deliverance, Taking-Apart, Untangled; Tetra: 21 - Release;
IDEAL IS THAT TWO BEINGS SHOULD UNITE FOR LIFE {
#541 as [#20, #300, #1, #200, #9, #1, #10] = ktaomai (G2932): {#63 as #541
% #41 = #8} 1) to acquire, get, or procure a thing for one's self, to
possess; 1a) to marry a wife;
} AND THAT THEIR LOVE SHOULD BE SANCTIFIED BY THE PRESENCE OF CHILDREN. IF
OUR FARMS HAVE REMAINED OFTEN FOR CENTURIES, IN SOME CASES FOR AS LONG AS
SEVEN HUNDRED YEARS, IN THE POSSESSION OF THE SAME FAMILY, IT IS FOR THE
MOST PART BECAUSE MARRIAGES WERE ARRANGED ONLY WHEN AN INFANT WAS ON THE
WAY. AND FOR CENTURIES THE CATHOLIC CHURCH BOWED TO THIS CUSTOM AND
TOLERATED WHAT WAS CALLED 'THE TRIAL'. WHEN THE BIRTH OF THE INFANT WAS
IMMINENT, THE PRIEST WOULD REMIND THE FUTURE FATHER OF HIS DUTY TO MARRY.
UNFORTUNATELY THE PROTESTANT CHURCH HAS BROKEN WITH THESE HEALTHY CUSTOMS
AND HAS PREPARED THE WAY, WITH THE AID OF LAWS WRITTEN OR UNWRITTEN, FOR A
HYPOCRISY WHOSE OBJECT IT IS TO STIGMATISE AS SOMETHING SHAMEFUL A MARRIAGE
WHICH HAS BEEN PROVOKED BY THE ARRIVAL OF A CHILD. AND DON'T LET US FORGET,
IF WE ARE GOING TO BE COMPLETELY TRUTHFUL, THAT A LARGE PART OF THE
PRUSSIAN NOBILITY OWES ITS EXISTENCE TO A FAUX-PAS ON THE PART OF ONE OF
THE GIRLS OF THE BOURGEOISIE.
MOREOVER, THESE PREJUDICES ONLY OPERATE IN REVERSE, AND LOGIC HAS NO
BEARING ON THE TREND OF OUR DESIRES--FOR THE *ADMISSIBILITY* *OF* *THE*
*DISSOLUTION* *OF* *MARRIAGE* *ON* *ACCOUNT* *OF* *INCOMPATIBILITY* *IS*
*LEGALLY* *RECOGNISED*. IF IT IS CONTRARY TO THE LAW OF NATURE TO INSIST ON
THE MAINTENANCE OF A UNION IN WHICH THE PARTNERS ARE UNABLE TO AGREE, IT IS
NO LESS WRONG TO PUT OBSTACLES IN THE WAY OF A MARRIAGE JUSTIFIABLE ON THE
GROUNDS OF PERFECT RECIPROCAL UNITY. MY AGE SAVES ME FROM THE SUSPICION
THAT I AM PERHAPS PLEADING #321 - *PRO* *DOMO* {ie.
*FOR* (*ONE'S* *OWN*) #391 - *HOME* *OR* *HOUSE* as serving the interests
of a given perspective or for the benefit of any small powerful or
influential #123 - GROUP within an #369 - ORGANISATION / FIELD / CLIQUE
which places a prerogative upon subjectivism {#114 / #342} within the pious
construct {#78 / #234 and #99 / #297} as the #288 - UMBRA ADVANCEMENT of
unconscionable collectivism {ie. #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL} by conduct
of #325 - DETRUDE.
@1: Sup: 70 (#70); Ego: 70 (#70),
@2: Sup: 80 (#150); Ego: 10 (#80),
@3: Sup: 19 (#169); Ego: 20 (#100),
@4: Sup: 8 (#177); Ego: 70 (#170),
@5: Sup: 58 (#235); Ego: 50 (#220),
@6: Sup: 47 (#282); Ego: 70 (#290),
@7: Sup: 6 (#288 - UMBRA / 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 (HETEROS) / BEERSHEBA /
ANTI-SEMITISM); Ego: 40 (#330), <-- *MAPPED* *TO* *EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* /
*ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* *GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* #EIGHT: #120 / #360
@8: Sup: 16 (#304); Ego: 10 (#340),
@9: Sup: 17 (#321 as *PRO* *DOMO*); Ego: 1 (#341),
@10: Sup: 67 (#388); Ego: 50 (#391),
Male: #388; Feme: #391
} // #391
#391 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #50] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#11 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;
#391 as [#70, #40, #70, #10, #1, #200] = homoios (G3664): {#12 as #460 %
ie. corresponding to a thing;
#541 as [#5, #80, #10, #200, #20, #10, #1, #200, #5, #10] = episkiazo
(G1982): {#55 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *TO* *THROW* *A* *SHADOW* *UPON*, *TO*
*ENVELOP* *IN* *A* *SHADOW*, *TO* *OVERSHADOW* from a vaporous cloud that
casts a shadow the word is transferred to a shining cloud surrounding and
enveloping persons with brightness. Used of the Holy Spirit exerting
creative energy upon the womb of the virgin Mary and impregnating it (a use
of the word which seems to have been drawn from the familiar Old Testament
idea of a cloud as symbolising the immediate presence and power of God);
#541 as [#70, #10, #20, #70, #50, #70, #40, #10, #1, #200] = oikonomia
(G3622): {#56 as #541 % #41 = #8} 1) *THE* *MANAGEMENT* *OF* *A*
*HOUSEHOLD* *OR* *OF* *HOUSEHOLD* *AFFAIRS*; 1a) specifically, the
management, oversight, administration, of other's property; 1b) the office
of a manager or overseer, stewardship; 1c) administration, dispensation;
}, AND SO I AM ABLE TO INVITE ATTENTION TO THE IMPORTANCE OF THIS PROBLEM.
I SHALL HAVE NO PEACE OF MIND UNTIL I HAVE SUCCEEDED IN PLANTING A SEED OF
NORDIC BLOOD WHEREVER THE POPULATION STAND IN NEED OF REGENERATION." [ADOLF
#475]
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Government Shill #2
2018-08-11 06:55:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by dolf
Did you check the mathematical proof
Mathematical proof? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Post by dolf
I suggest you do and then apologise as I am going to come after you in a
court of law for your anti Dutch, anti Semitic and anti homosexual racial
and religious slander and hatred due to your irrationality in the mistaken
belief that your association with our ANZAC heritage has any validity or
merit.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

Are you frothing at the mouth while writing this? I bet you are. Spit flying
everywhere.
Post by dolf
If you are going to make rational and reasoned comment then please do
without any further #325 - DETRUDE as defamation.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

If I type this slowly will you get it?

The... only... person... who... understands... your... mathematical...
"proof"... is... you,... and... maybe... 6... other... crazy... people.
Your... writing... makes... no... sense... to... sane... people... either.

Shill #2
--
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
Henrik Tikkanen
dolf
2018-08-11 10:02:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by dolf
Did you check the mathematical proof
Mathematical proof? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
<— *WHAT* SORT OF RAVING LUNATIC RESPONSE IS THAT?
Yes a trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon (cf: Immanuel Kant’s
Critique of Pure Reason published in 1781 / 1787) and you could have
checked that with any of the links as VALIDATION for the transaction
purchase time when I apologised for my sweaty feet and SMS time when I had
replied to a proposition—yeah really at my age!

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>

From which each of the CATEGORIES OF UNDERSTANDING were obtained as having
temporal relativity as EVIDENCE of a coherent mind and thusly I am being
entirely reasoned and you are not.

So piss off you RAVING LUNATIC neo Nazi as your irrationality in the
mistaken belief that your association with our ANZAC heritage has any
validity or merit.

— I CHANCED UPON A LEVI’S JEAN SIGN

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 11 August 2018

<https://www.levi.com/US/en_US/>
<https://www.facebook.com/Levis/>

@ 1433 hours I was lucky to chance upon a Levi sign whilst passing a local
store (Sale, Victoria, Australia} and sought to buy some 501 jeans 👖 {

#263 as [#200, #20, #5, #30, #8] = skelos (G4628): {UMBRA: #12 as #525 %
#41 = #33} 1) the leg, from the hip to the toes inclusive;

} and the older male shop assistant said to me, “People generally have
problems with the buttons.”

To which I quipped, “I don’t have anything which needs to come out in a
hurry {

#462 as [#6, #20, #30, #6, #400] = kaleh (H3616): {UMBRA: #4 as #55 % #41 =
#14} 1) failing with desire, longing, longing for

} these days.”

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#462 / #399} / HETEROS {#426 / #381} / TORAH {#405 /
#411}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:6,col:6,nous:42&idea:{m,130}&idea:{f,142}&idea:{m,462}&idea:{f,399}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

And by 1623 hours {

#197 as [#2, #90, #100, #5] = batseq (H1216): {UMBRA: #2 as #192 % #41 =
#28} 1) (Qal) to swell, become blistered;

} how fortune changes ...

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#197 / #263} / HETEROS {#228 / #238} / TORAH {#204 /
#226}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:7,col:4,nous:2&idea:{m,2}&idea:{f,2}&idea:{m,197}&idea:{f,263}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

- dolf

Initial Post: 11 August 2018
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by dolf
I suggest you do and then apologise as I am going to come after you in a
court of law for your anti Dutch, anti Semitic and anti homosexual racial
and religious slander and hatred due to your irrationality in the mistaken
belief that your association with our ANZAC heritage has any validity or
merit.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Are you frothing at the mouth while writing this? I bet you are. Spit flying
everywhere.
Post by dolf
If you are going to make rational and reasoned comment then please do
without any further #325 - DETRUDE as defamation.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
If I type this slowly will you get it?
The... only... person... who... understands... your... mathematical...
"proof"... is... you,... and... maybe... 6... other... crazy... people.
Your... writing... makes... no... sense... to... sane... people... either.
Shill #2
--
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
Henrik Tikkanen
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-13 01:45:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Kant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS mathematical
conception of number and obliviously he had need to reconcile such
postulates with the existing binomial HETEROS mathematical worldview.

Your statements are prejudices made as unreasoned and irrational impost
upon the autonomy of being / ousia against which you have no entitlement...

And if you do make quotes then provide the reference links.

And if you cannot then shut the ***@ck up because because I’m sick of your
luny tunes defamation as fodder for your holocaust of political
aspirations.

- dolf
Post by dolf
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by dolf
Did you check the mathematical proof
Mathematical proof? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
<— *WHAT* SORT OF RAVING LUNATIC RESPONSE IS THAT?
Yes a trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon (cf: Immanuel Kant’s
Critique of Pure Reason published in 1781 / 1787) and you could have
checked that with any of the links as VALIDATION for the transaction
purchase time when I apologised for my sweaty feet and SMS time when I had
replied to a proposition—yeah really at my age!
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/kant-first-critique-cambridge.pdf>
Kant says mathematics is a method separate from and, that contrasts with philosophy.
He says that mathematics is about the concrete, that it derives from real
objects and leads to real objects, whereas philosophy is about abstract ideas not objects.
Not only that, but Kant's "philosophy" is basically useless because he
bases it entirely on irrational beliefs involving "god" - a non-existent
object that the irrational believe joins the abstract to the concrete,
thus completely invalidating any logic their "philosophy" might otherwise have had.
-Kant isn't gibberish
-Kant can be read
-Kant contains discernable meaning
-Kant doesn't use words he doesn't understand
-Kant understands the difference between "who" and "whom"
-Kant doesn't use maths, be it fantasy-maths or otherwise
-Kant doesn't pretend his ideas have "mathematic proofs"
-Kant doesn't confuse the concrete with the abstract
-Kant doesn't do buddhist nonsense or numerology
-Kant doesn't write letters to the Attorney Generals telling them that he
correctly predicted stuff after it happened
-Kant doesn't threaten to sue people
""A second crimen carnis contra naturam is intercourse between sexus
homogenii, in which the object of sexual impulse is a human being but
there is homogeneity instead of heterogeneity of sex, as when a woman
satisfies her desire on a woman or a man on a man. This practice too is
contrary to the ends of humanity: for the end of humanity in respect of
sexuality is to preserve the species without debasing the person: but in
this instance the species is not being preserved.""
In other words, homosexuality is illogical and therefore a crime against nature.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-13 02:28:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant with
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
THE WORLD IS GIVEN BY AS:

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of Progression of
individual phenomena}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {IE. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}

There is no value having a discussion with and accordingly I don’t need to
labour on your behalf so as to convey the explicit quotes which I have
narrated elsewhere.

- dolf
Post by dolf
Kant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS mathematical
I'm going to stop you right there for some hit-counts.
"Cognisant" - 0 (zero)
"trinomial" - 0 (zero)
"HOMOIOS" - 0 (zero).
So stop pretending your gibberish has anything to do with Kant's writings.
Kant's intention was to synthesise Empiricism with Rationalism, NOT to play
quantum-mumbo-jumbo with eastern mysticism and numerology and the bible.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-13 03:10:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
WORK IN PROGRESS NOTES OF 15 JULY 2006 [SUBJECT TO REVISION]: WAS
GOVERNOR PHILLIP (11 October 1738 – 31 August 1814) A BETTER VISIONARY
LEADER THAN JOHN HOWARD?

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Flanders.pdf>

Kant’s *MOST* *INFLUENTIAL* *POSITIONS* *IN* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY* *ARE*
*FOUND* *IN* *THE* *GROUNDWORK* *OF* *THE* *METAPHYSICS* *OF* *MORALS*
(*HEREAFTER*, “*GROUNDWORK*” published 1785) *BUT* *HE* *DEVELOPED*,
*ENRICHED*, *AND* *IN* *SOME* *CASES* *MODIFIED* *THOSE* *VIEWS* *IN*
*LATER* *WORKS* *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *CRITIQUE* *OF* *PRACTICAL* *REASON*
(published 1781 / 1787)

<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>

The Groundwork is divided into three sections:

I. Transition from common rational cognition to philosophic moral cognition

II. Transition from popular moral philosophy to metaphysics of morals

III. Transition from metaphysics of morals to the critique of pure
practical reason

It would be followed by two more books on ethics: Critique of Practical
Reason (1788), The Metaphysics of Morals (1797), Anthropology from a
Pragmatic Point of View, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason
as well as his essays on history and related topics. Kant’s Lectures on
Ethics, which were lecture notes taken by three of his students on the
courses he gave in moral philosophy, also include relevant material for
understanding his views. We will mainly focus on the foundational
doctrines of the Groundwork, even though in recent years some scholars
have become dissatisfied with this standard approach to Kant’s views and
have turned their attention to the later works. We find the standard
approach most illuminating, though we will highlight important positions
from the later works where needed.

With respects to the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}
claim to a Sovereign State as that which was then later the basis of
Roman Empire Governance, we draw upon this observation: "And Moses
{taken out; drawn forth} was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians
{that troubles or oppresses; anguish}, and was mighty in words and in
deeds." [Acts 7:22 (KJV)]

+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. Formula of Progression of individual phenomena} = GENESIS
DAY #4

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE = GENESIS DAY #1
H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU = GENESIS DAY #2

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE} = GENESIS DAY #3

FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THESE PRINCIPLES REFER TO IMMANUEL KANT'S TREATISE
ON GROUNDWORK OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS (1785) ET AL:

FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW:
Kant's supreme moral principle or "categorical imperative"; Variant
translations:
- Act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will that it
should become a universal law.
- Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a
universal law of nature.
- So act that your principle of action might safely be made a law for
the whole world.
- May you live your life as if the maxim of your actions were to become
universal law.
- Live your life as though your every act were to become a universal law.
- Do not feel forced to act, as you're only willing to act according to
your own universal laws. And that's good. For only willful acts are
universal. And that's your maxim.

I do not, therefore, need any penetrating acuteness to see what I have
to do in order that my volition be morally good. Inexperienced in the
course of the world, incapable of being prepared for whatever might come
to pass in it, I ask myself only: can you also will that your maxim
become a universal law?

Even if there never have been actions arising from such pure sources,
what is at issue here is not whether this or that happened; that,
instead, reason by itself and independently of all appearances commands
what ought to happen; that, accordingly, actions of which the world has
perhaps so far given no example, and whose very practicability might be
very much doubted by one who bases everything on experience, are still
inflexibly commanded by reason … because … duty … lies, prior to all
experience, in the idea of a reason determining the will by means of a
priori grounds.

Morality is thus the relation of actions to the autonomy of the will,
that is, to a possible giving of universal law through its maxims. An
action that can coexist with the autonomy of the will is permitted; one
that does not accord with it is forbidden. A will whose maxims
necessarily harmonize with the laws of autonomy is a holy, absolutely
good will. The dependence upon the principle of autonomy of a will that
is not absolutely good (moral necessitation) is obligation. This,
accordingly, cannot be attributed to a holy being. The objective of an
action from obligation is called duty.
[<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant>]

FORMULA OF HUMANITY:
Kant developed three principal formulas of the categorical imperative.
The first and most well known of these is the so-called "formula of
universal law." The second is the "formula of humanity." This one has
been almost as interesting to commentators and critics as the first
formula. To some, in fact, the formula of humanity is an even more
interesting expression of Kant’s basic insights in ethics.

If the validity of the categorical imperative depends on humanity’s
existing as an end in itself, as it does according to Kant’s moral
realism, then the categorical imperative should forbid any action that
treats humanity merely as a means. By this line of reasoning Kant sees
that an alternative version of the categorical imperative can now be
expressed as: "So act that you use humanity, whether in your own person
or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never
merely as a means " (Kant 1997, 38/4:429).

THE FORMULA OF AUTONOMY
A third version of the categorical imperative follows in Kant’s text
almost immediately upon the four examples of duties derived from the
second version, the formula of humanity. This new formula, emphasizing
the way we may be supposed to have acquired our subjection to moral
requirements, is called the formula of autonomy. It says that we are
subject to the requirement of our maxims’ conformity to universal law
through our own free will. That is what Kant indicated in the quotation
above, referring to the will’s "giving the law to itself" (Kant 1997,
39/4:431).

The derivation of the formula of autonomy. The premises by which we
arrive at a version of the categorical imperative referencing
autonomy—the self-legislation of moral requirements—are the previous two
versions. Kant presents the argument as follows:

the ground of all practical lawgiving lies (in accordance with the first
principle) objectively in the rule and the form of universality which
makes it fit to be a universal law (possibly a law of nature);
subjectively, however, it lies in the end; but the subject of all ends
is every rational being as an end in itself (in accordance with the
second principle); from this there follows now the third practical
principle of the will, as supreme limiting condition of its harmony with
universal practical reason, the idea of the will of every rational being
as a will giving universal law. (Kant 1997, 39/4:431)

In order to see how we arrive at the formula of autonomy at the
conclusion of this derivation it is necessary to focus on the second
premise, the formula of humanity. Here the important concept of an "end"
implies legislation, or lawgiving. It is possible to see an end, like a
law, as something making it necessary to will an action—either as a
means of bringing about its existence, or in order not to bring about
its non-existence. If every rational being is an end in the latter
sense, as implied by the formula of humanity, then every rational being
is lawgiving. Here we do not conceive of something else—like
God—legislating that all rational beings are to be treated always as
ends, on account of their intrinsic value. Instead, the idea is that
each rational being, simply in virtue of being an end in itself, makes
necessary (legislates) that it be treated always as an end. The
legislation given by each is also universal, applying to itself as well
as to every other rational being. Hence, the third version of the
categorical imperative commands not acting on any maxim that could not
qualify as giving universal law.
[<http://myweb.ecu.edu/mccartyr/GW/FormulaOfHumanity.asp>]
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant with
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of Progression of
individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {IE. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
There is no value having a discussion with and accordingly I don’t need to
labour on your behalf so as to convey the explicit quotes which I have
narrated elsewhere.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Kant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS mathematical
I'm going to stop you right there for some hit-counts.
"Cognisant" - 0 (zero)
"trinomial" - 0 (zero)
"HOMOIOS" - 0 (zero).
So stop pretending your gibberish has anything to do with Kant's writings.
Kant's intention was to synthesise Empiricism with Rationalism, NOT to play
quantum-mumbo-jumbo with eastern mysticism and numerology and the bible.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-13 03:40:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Thus on make reasonably critique Immanuel Kant's perspectives as
conforming to the #391 - HOMOIOS perspective of NUMBER and accordingly
we may then consider the CANONIC merit of the T’AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR
OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason’s Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;

THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine
appearance in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.

    #VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
    #TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
    #POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
    #TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
    #CANON: #45

As thereby providing the *ONTIC* mathematical *MORAL* premises which are
central to existence of being and its integrity, as the means one most
certainly and prudently can make #123 - JUDGEMENT:

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]

45: [1]
68: [42]
84: [2]
86: [10]
102: [4]
104: [7]
115: [5]
130: [3]
139: [13]
140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15]
148: [12]
150: [28]
156: [21]
157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE
NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23]
161: [9]
166: [11]
168: [26]
169: [18]
171: [20]
173: [27]
175: [22]
177: [29]
180: [19]
181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6]
184: [36]
185: [25]
186: [31]
191: [32]
192: [39]
196: [37]
197: [33]
200: [8]
210: [30]
215: [34]
220: [38]
228: [40]

Of which the TEN COMMANDMENTS (ie. the TRIAD MICROCOSM / SEPTET
MACROCOSM) given by MOSES conform as *ONTIC* postulates (ie. #41 x n) of
NATURE {

7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]

} as similarly being mathematical *MORAL* premises:

THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES*
*OF* *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364
associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30
day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days.

"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]

THE *MINOR* *PREMISE* {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]

THE *CONCLUSION* {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369
with SEPTET #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1
Tishri 5762.

The Roman writer Censorinus, who in his 238 CE publication De Die
Natali, claims that the Pythagorean advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) as
preceeding PLATO (c. 429–347 BCE), as the principle proponent of the
Pythagorean doctrines, considered the natural year as also consisting of
364 and a half days and consistent with the Chinese HAN Dynasty (206
BCE-220CE) understanding (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days) of them.
[Pythagorean Sourcebook p 171]

The Chinese DAOist perspective of the natural year (as equivalent to the
New Testament notion as TROCHOS-course of NATURE-genesis [James 3:6])
associated to Yang Hsiung's treatise that was published within 4 BCE and
known as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery", reconciled it's unified
arrangement of the DAO TE CHING's #81 sections as specifically the
ternary (tetragrammaton) HOMOIOS paradigm value: TETRA: 60 -
ACCUMULATION, which is mapped to the I CHING's H64 designations (of
necessity some are repeated) as the binary paradigm value: H26 - GREAT
DOMESTICATION, RESTRAINING FORCE, GREAT ACCUMULATING, THE TAMING POWER
OF THE GREAT, GREAT STORAGE, POTENTIAL ENERGY;

According to the 4.5 day designations of this natural year cycle into
#81 sections, this would then equate the #CENTRE as 13 to 17 September;

"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]

THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is
also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the Gregorian
calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made divisible by 22
to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew letters in a pattern
which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of the Chinese 4 BCE
published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year into 364.5 days
and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic square of #369
having a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for the
equivalent date of 13 September.

#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}

As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle

FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY PROPOSITION
OF A HYPOTHETICAL Y-M-T-A MODEL WHICH I EQUALLY APPLY TO CHROMOSOMES:

#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD

#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD

#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS AS
DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS

#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: The eye {Y-M-T-A} glyph]

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
was God.

The same was in the beginning with God.

All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that
was made.

In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it
not.” [John 1:1-5 (KJV)]

Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension
can become impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing
of any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a
car exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an
earlier experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards
it's final comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and correct
orthography as Category of Understanding.

Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD /
#MEM amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so that
the apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and becomes
de-stressed.

Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC {ie. the *TROPICAL* year is
determined by: #364 x 6 x 49 or #364 x 294 = #107016 days / 293 =
365.242321 days} pharmaceutical which whilst not impeding either the
apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the “central nervous
system and de-stressing of the startle reflex”.

But I am after all, seeking the advice of MENTAL HEALTH professionals on
how best to resolve such an injury given they do not have any
substantial practical clinical and case study expertise with instances
of bomb blasts experience and how to prevent it from progressing towards
a chronic condition known as POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.

Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as
elimination--is the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring
knowledge and explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.

That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic
correspondence and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is
intrinsic of the mind and this process is not all unlike the initial
starting point of this chapter by its specific construction of
meticulous narrative as neural linguistic streaming and it's subsequent
refinement until it was satisfactory.

For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence, as Cambridge University researchers have
suggested:

"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc
conrecoednprse and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."

<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>

And therefore confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and
habitually refuses to overcome its ignorant state by informing itself,
can then be considered delusional.

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT.

/ MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

I HEAR THE CLARION.

/ CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2 -
Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents} /
#14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

CALL AWAKE FOR WAR.

/ VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123} 1) son, grandson, child, member of
a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and
female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons
(as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or
sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of
lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF*
*A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

STEADFAST MIGHT.

/ POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

MARCHING TO SION.

/ RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

AGAINST THIS WHORE.

/ CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

ARREST THE BLIGHT."

/ ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 = #287
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in excelso
{#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do
Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous Nature]

7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
Post by dolf
WORK IN PROGRESS NOTES OF 15 JULY 2006 [SUBJECT TO REVISION]: WAS
GOVERNOR PHILLIP (11 October 1738 – 31 August 1814) A BETTER VISIONARY
LEADER THAN JOHN HOWARD?
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Flanders.pdf>
Kant’s *MOST* *INFLUENTIAL* *POSITIONS* *IN* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY* *ARE*
*FOUND* *IN* *THE* *GROUNDWORK* *OF* *THE* *METAPHYSICS* *OF* *MORALS*
(*HEREAFTER*, “*GROUNDWORK*” published 1785) *BUT* *HE* *DEVELOPED*,
*ENRICHED*, *AND* *IN* *SOME* *CASES* *MODIFIED* *THOSE* *VIEWS* *IN*
*LATER* *WORKS* *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *CRITIQUE* *OF* *PRACTICAL* *REASON*
(published 1781 / 1787)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>
I. Transition from common rational cognition to philosophic moral cognition
II. Transition from popular moral philosophy to metaphysics of morals
III. Transition from metaphysics of morals to the critique of pure
practical reason
PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + GEN (ie. #8) above],
H54 - GUIMEI [*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7) below + ZHEN (ie. #3)
above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}

SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6) below + SUN (ie.
#4) above], H18 - GU [Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4) below + GEN (ie.
#8) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above]
as 'fundamentality [yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy
[zhen]', H6 - SONG / *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1) below + QIAN (ie.
#6) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea - Formula of Autonomy}

THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6) above + QIAN (ie. #6)
below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure Yin / KUN (ie. #2) above + KUN
(ie. #2) below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie.
#3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of Progression
of individual phenomena}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
Post by dolf
It would be followed by two more books on ethics: Critique of Practical
Reason (1788), The Metaphysics of Morals (1797), Anthropology from a
Pragmatic Point of View, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason
as well as his essays on history and related topics. Kant’s Lectures on
Ethics, which were lecture notes taken by three of his students on the
courses he gave in moral philosophy, also include relevant material for
understanding his views. We will mainly focus on the foundational
doctrines of the Groundwork, even though in recent years some scholars
have become dissatisfied with this standard approach to Kant’s views and
have turned their attention to the later works. We find the standard
approach most illuminating, though we will highlight important positions
from the later works where needed.
With respects to the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}
claim to a Sovereign State as that which was then later the basis of
Roman Empire Governance, we draw upon this observation: "And Moses
{taken out; drawn forth} was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians
{that troubles or oppresses; anguish}, and was mighty in words and in
deeds." [Acts 7:22 (KJV)]
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. Formula of Progression of individual phenomena} = GENESIS
DAY #4
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE = GENESIS DAY #1
H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU = GENESIS DAY #2
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE} = GENESIS DAY #3
FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THESE PRINCIPLES REFER TO IMMANUEL KANT'S TREATISE
Kant's supreme moral principle or "categorical imperative"; Variant
- Act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will that it
should become a universal law.
- Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a
universal law of nature.
- So act that your principle of action might safely be made a law for
the whole world.
- May you live your life as if the maxim of your actions were to become
universal law.
- Live your life as though your every act were to become a universal law.
- Do not feel forced to act, as you're only willing to act according to
your own universal laws. And that's good. For only willful acts are
universal. And that's your maxim.
I do not, therefore, need any penetrating acuteness to see what I have
to do in order that my volition be morally good. Inexperienced in the
course of the world, incapable of being prepared for whatever might come
to pass in it, I ask myself only: can you also will that your maxim
become a universal law?
Even if there never have been actions arising from such pure sources,
what is at issue here is not whether this or that happened; that,
instead, reason by itself and independently of all appearances commands
what ought to happen; that, accordingly, actions of which the world has
perhaps so far given no example, and whose very practicability might be
very much doubted by one who bases everything on experience, are still
inflexibly commanded by reason … because … duty … lies, prior to all
experience, in the idea of a reason determining the will by means of a
priori grounds.
Morality is thus the relation of actions to the autonomy of the will,
that is, to a possible giving of universal law through its maxims. An
action that can coexist with the autonomy of the will is permitted; one
that does not accord with it is forbidden. A will whose maxims
necessarily harmonize with the laws of autonomy is a holy, absolutely
good will. The dependence upon the principle of autonomy of a will that
is not absolutely good (moral necessitation) is obligation. This,
accordingly, cannot be attributed to a holy being. The objective of an
action from obligation is called duty.
[<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant>]
Kant developed three principal formulas of the categorical imperative.
The first and most well known of these is the so-called "formula of
universal law." The second is the "formula of humanity." This one has
been almost as interesting to commentators and critics as the first
formula. To some, in fact, the formula of humanity is an even more
interesting expression of Kant’s basic insights in ethics.
If the validity of the categorical imperative depends on humanity’s
existing as an end in itself, as it does according to Kant’s moral
realism, then the categorical imperative should forbid any action that
treats humanity merely as a means. By this line of reasoning Kant sees
that an alternative version of the categorical imperative can now be
expressed as: "So act that you use humanity, whether in your own person
or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never
merely as a means " (Kant 1997, 38/4:429).
THE FORMULA OF AUTONOMY
A third version of the categorical imperative follows in Kant’s text
almost immediately upon the four examples of duties derived from the
second version, the formula of humanity. This new formula, emphasizing
the way we may be supposed to have acquired our subjection to moral
requirements, is called the formula of autonomy. It says that we are
subject to the requirement of our maxims’ conformity to universal law
through our own free will. That is what Kant indicated in the quotation
above, referring to the will’s "giving the law to itself" (Kant 1997,
39/4:431).
The derivation of the formula of autonomy. The premises by which we
arrive at a version of the categorical imperative referencing
autonomy—the self-legislation of moral requirements—are the previous two
the ground of all practical lawgiving lies (in accordance with the first
principle) objectively in the rule and the form of universality which
makes it fit to be a universal law (possibly a law of nature);
subjectively, however, it lies in the end; but the subject of all ends
is every rational being as an end in itself (in accordance with the
second principle); from this there follows now the third practical
principle of the will, as supreme limiting condition of its harmony with
universal practical reason, the idea of the will of every rational being
as a will giving universal law.  (Kant 1997, 39/4:431)
In order to see how we arrive at the formula of autonomy at the
conclusion of this derivation it is necessary to focus on the second
premise, the formula of humanity. Here the important concept of an "end"
implies legislation, or lawgiving. It is possible to see an end, like a
law, as something making it necessary to will an action—either as a
means of bringing about its existence, or in order not to bring about
its non-existence. If every rational being is an end in the latter
sense, as implied by the formula of humanity, then every rational being
is lawgiving. Here we do not conceive of something else—like
God—legislating that all rational beings are to be treated always as
ends, on account of their intrinsic value. Instead, the idea is that
each rational being, simply in virtue of being an end in itself, makes
necessary (legislates) that it be treated always as an end. The
legislation given by each is also universal, applying to itself as well
as to every other rational being. Hence, the third version of the
categorical imperative commands not acting on any maxim that could not
qualify as giving universal law.
[<http://myweb.ecu.edu/mccartyr/GW/FormulaOfHumanity.asp>]
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant with
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of
Progression of
individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {IE. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS  (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
There is no value having a discussion with and accordingly I don’t need to
labour on your behalf so as to convey the explicit quotes which I have
narrated elsewhere.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Kant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS mathematical
I'm going to stop you right there for some hit-counts.
Here are the hit-counts for the following words within Kant's
"Cognisant" - 0 (zero)
"trinomial" - 0 (zero)
"HOMOIOS"   - 0 (zero).
So stop pretending your gibberish has anything to do with Kant's writings.
Kant's intention was to synthesise Empiricism with Rationalism, NOT to play
quantum-mumbo-jumbo with eastern mysticism and numerology and the bible.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-13 03:41:18 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Thus one may make reasonably critique Immanuel Kant's CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE perspectives as conforming to the #391 - HOMOIOS perspective
of NUMBER and accordingly we may then consider the CANONIC merit of the
T’AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason’s Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;

THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine
appearance in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.

    #VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
    #TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
    #POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
    #TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
    #CANON: #45

As thereby providing the *ONTIC* mathematical *MORAL* premises which are
central to existence of being and its integrity, as the means one most
certainly and prudently can make #123 - JUDGEMENT:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/thoth9.gif>

[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]

45: [1]
68: [42]
84: [2]
86: [10]
102: [4]
104: [7]
115: [5]
130: [3]
139: [13]
140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15]
148: [12]
150: [28]
156: [21]
157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE
NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23]
161: [9]
166: [11]
168: [26]
169: [18]
171: [20]
173: [27]
175: [22]
177: [29]
180: [19]
181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6]
184: [36]
185: [25]
186: [31]
191: [32]
192: [39]
196: [37]
197: [33]
200: [8]
210: [30]
215: [34]
220: [38]
228: [40]

Of which the TEN COMMANDMENTS (ie. the TRIAD MICROCOSM / SEPTET
MACROCOSM) given by MOSES conform as *ONTIC* postulates (ie. #41 x n) of
NATURE {

7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]

} as similarly being mathematical *MORAL* premises:

THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES*
*OF* *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364
associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30
day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days.

"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]

THE *MINOR* *PREMISE* {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;

"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]

THE *CONCLUSION* {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369
with SEPTET #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1
Tishri 5762.

The Roman writer Censorinus, who in his 238 CE publication De Die
Natali, claims that the Pythagorean advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) as
preceeding PLATO (c. 429–347 BCE), as the principle proponent of the
Pythagorean doctrines, considered the natural year as also consisting of
364 and a half days and consistent with the Chinese HAN Dynasty (206
BCE-220CE) understanding (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days) of them.
[Pythagorean Sourcebook p 171]

The Chinese DAOist perspective of the natural year (as equivalent to the
New Testament notion as TROCHOS-course of NATURE-genesis [James 3:6])
associated to Yang Hsiung's treatise that was published within 4 BCE and
known as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery", reconciled it's unified
arrangement of the DAO TE CHING's #81 sections as specifically the
ternary (tetragrammaton) HOMOIOS paradigm value: TETRA: 60 -
ACCUMULATION, which is mapped to the I CHING's H64 designations (of
necessity some are repeated) as the binary paradigm value: H26 - GREAT
DOMESTICATION, RESTRAINING FORCE, GREAT ACCUMULATING, THE TAMING POWER
OF THE GREAT, GREAT STORAGE, POTENTIAL ENERGY;

According to the 4.5 day designations of this natural year cycle into
#81 sections, this would then equate the #CENTRE as 13 to 17 September;

"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]

THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is
also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the Gregorian
calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made divisible by 22
to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew letters in a pattern
which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of the Chinese 4 BCE
published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year into 364.5 days
and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic square of #369
having a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for the
equivalent date of 13 September.

#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}

As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle

FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY PROPOSITION
OF A HYPOTHETICAL Y-M-T-A MODEL WHICH I EQUALLY APPLY TO CHROMOSOMES:

#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD

#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD

#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS AS
DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS

#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>

[IMAGE: The eye {Y-M-T-A} glyph]

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
was God.

The same was in the beginning with God.

All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that
was made.

In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it
not.” [John 1:1-5 (KJV)]

Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension
can become impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing
of any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a
car exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an
earlier experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards
it's final comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and correct
orthography as Category of Understanding.

Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD /
#MEM amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so that
the apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and becomes
de-stressed.

Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC {ie. the *TROPICAL* year is
determined by: #364 x 6 x 49 or #364 x 294 = #107016 days / 293 =
365.242321 days} pharmaceutical which whilst not impeding either the
apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the “central nervous
system and de-stressing of the startle reflex”.

But I am after all, seeking the advice of MENTAL HEALTH professionals on
how best to resolve such an injury given they do not have any
substantial practical clinical and case study expertise with instances
of bomb blasts experience and how to prevent it from progressing towards
a chronic condition known as POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.

Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as
elimination--is the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring
knowledge and explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.

That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic
correspondence and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is
intrinsic of the mind and this process is not all unlike the initial
starting point of this chapter by its specific construction of
meticulous narrative as neural linguistic streaming and it's subsequent
refinement until it was satisfactory.

For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence, as Cambridge University researchers have
suggested:

"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc
conrecoednprse and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."

<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>

And therefore confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and
habitually refuses to overcome its ignorant state by informing itself,
can then be considered delusional.

— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —

"IN DEAD OF NIGHT.

/ MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

I HEAR THE CLARION.

/ CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2 -
Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents} /
#14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

CALL AWAKE FOR WAR.

/ VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#3 - disposition towards (something or someone):
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]

3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123} 1) son, grandson, child, member of
a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and
female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons
(as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or
sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of
lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF*
*A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

STEADFAST MIGHT.

/ POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]

MARCHING TO SION.

/ RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]

AGAINST THIS WHORE.

/ CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

ARREST THE BLIGHT."

/ ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 = #287
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in excelso
{#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do
Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous Nature]

7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
Post by dolf
WORK IN PROGRESS NOTES OF 15 JULY 2006 [SUBJECT TO REVISION]: WAS
GOVERNOR PHILLIP (11 October 1738 – 31 August 1814) A BETTER VISIONARY
LEADER THAN JOHN HOWARD?
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Flanders.pdf>
Kant’s *MOST* *INFLUENTIAL* *POSITIONS* *IN* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY* *ARE*
*FOUND* *IN* *THE* *GROUNDWORK* *OF* *THE* *METAPHYSICS* *OF* *MORALS*
(*HEREAFTER*, “*GROUNDWORK*” published 1785) *BUT* *HE* *DEVELOPED*,
*ENRICHED*, *AND* *IN* *SOME* *CASES* *MODIFIED* *THOSE* *VIEWS* *IN*
*LATER* *WORKS* *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *CRITIQUE* *OF* *PRACTICAL* *REASON*
(published 1781 / 1787)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>
I. Transition from common rational cognition to philosophic moral cognition
II. Transition from popular moral philosophy to metaphysics of morals
III. Transition from metaphysics of morals to the critique of pure
practical reason
PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + GEN (ie. #8) above],
H54 - GUIMEI [*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7) below + ZHEN (ie. #3)
above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}

SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6) below + SUN (ie.
#4) above], H18 - GU [Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4) below + GEN (ie.
#8) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}

ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above]
as 'fundamentality [yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy
[zhen]', H6 - SONG / *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1) below + QIAN (ie.
#6) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea - Formula of Autonomy}

THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6) above + QIAN (ie. #6)
below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure Yin / KUN (ie. #2) above + KUN
(ie. #2) below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie.
#3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of Progression
of individual phenomena}

= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.

+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
Post by dolf
It would be followed by two more books on ethics: Critique of Practical
Reason (1788), The Metaphysics of Morals (1797), Anthropology from a
Pragmatic Point of View, Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason
as well as his essays on history and related topics. Kant’s Lectures on
Ethics, which were lecture notes taken by three of his students on the
courses he gave in moral philosophy, also include relevant material for
understanding his views. We will mainly focus on the foundational
doctrines of the Groundwork, even though in recent years some scholars
have become dissatisfied with this standard approach to Kant’s views and
have turned their attention to the later works. We find the standard
approach most illuminating, though we will highlight important positions
from the later works where needed.
With respects to the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}
claim to a Sovereign State as that which was then later the basis of
Roman Empire Governance, we draw upon this observation: "And Moses
{taken out; drawn forth} was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians
{that troubles or oppresses; anguish}, and was mighty in words and in
deeds." [Acts 7:22 (KJV)]
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. Formula of Progression of individual phenomena} = GENESIS
DAY #4
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE = GENESIS DAY #1
H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU = GENESIS DAY #2
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE} = GENESIS DAY #3
FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THESE PRINCIPLES REFER TO IMMANUEL KANT'S TREATISE
Kant's supreme moral principle or "categorical imperative"; Variant
- Act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will that it
should become a universal law.
- Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a
universal law of nature.
- So act that your principle of action might safely be made a law for
the whole world.
- May you live your life as if the maxim of your actions were to become
universal law.
- Live your life as though your every act were to become a universal law.
- Do not feel forced to act, as you're only willing to act according to
your own universal laws. And that's good. For only willful acts are
universal. And that's your maxim.
I do not, therefore, need any penetrating acuteness to see what I have
to do in order that my volition be morally good. Inexperienced in the
course of the world, incapable of being prepared for whatever might come
to pass in it, I ask myself only: can you also will that your maxim
become a universal law?
Even if there never have been actions arising from such pure sources,
what is at issue here is not whether this or that happened; that,
instead, reason by itself and independently of all appearances commands
what ought to happen; that, accordingly, actions of which the world has
perhaps so far given no example, and whose very practicability might be
very much doubted by one who bases everything on experience, are still
inflexibly commanded by reason … because … duty … lies, prior to all
experience, in the idea of a reason determining the will by means of a
priori grounds.
Morality is thus the relation of actions to the autonomy of the will,
that is, to a possible giving of universal law through its maxims. An
action that can coexist with the autonomy of the will is permitted; one
that does not accord with it is forbidden. A will whose maxims
necessarily harmonize with the laws of autonomy is a holy, absolutely
good will. The dependence upon the principle of autonomy of a will that
is not absolutely good (moral necessitation) is obligation. This,
accordingly, cannot be attributed to a holy being. The objective of an
action from obligation is called duty.
[<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant>]
Kant developed three principal formulas of the categorical imperative.
The first and most well known of these is the so-called "formula of
universal law." The second is the "formula of humanity." This one has
been almost as interesting to commentators and critics as the first
formula. To some, in fact, the formula of humanity is an even more
interesting expression of Kant’s basic insights in ethics.
If the validity of the categorical imperative depends on humanity’s
existing as an end in itself, as it does according to Kant’s moral
realism, then the categorical imperative should forbid any action that
treats humanity merely as a means. By this line of reasoning Kant sees
that an alternative version of the categorical imperative can now be
expressed as: "So act that you use humanity, whether in your own person
or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never
merely as a means " (Kant 1997, 38/4:429).
THE FORMULA OF AUTONOMY
A third version of the categorical imperative follows in Kant’s text
almost immediately upon the four examples of duties derived from the
second version, the formula of humanity. This new formula, emphasizing
the way we may be supposed to have acquired our subjection to moral
requirements, is called the formula of autonomy. It says that we are
subject to the requirement of our maxims’ conformity to universal law
through our own free will. That is what Kant indicated in the quotation
above, referring to the will’s "giving the law to itself" (Kant 1997,
39/4:431).
The derivation of the formula of autonomy. The premises by which we
arrive at a version of the categorical imperative referencing
autonomy—the self-legislation of moral requirements—are the previous two
the ground of all practical lawgiving lies (in accordance with the first
principle) objectively in the rule and the form of universality which
makes it fit to be a universal law (possibly a law of nature);
subjectively, however, it lies in the end; but the subject of all ends
is every rational being as an end in itself (in accordance with the
second principle); from this there follows now the third practical
principle of the will, as supreme limiting condition of its harmony with
universal practical reason, the idea of the will of every rational being
as a will giving universal law.  (Kant 1997, 39/4:431)
In order to see how we arrive at the formula of autonomy at the
conclusion of this derivation it is necessary to focus on the second
premise, the formula of humanity. Here the important concept of an "end"
implies legislation, or lawgiving. It is possible to see an end, like a
law, as something making it necessary to will an action—either as a
means of bringing about its existence, or in order not to bring about
its non-existence. If every rational being is an end in the latter
sense, as implied by the formula of humanity, then every rational being
is lawgiving. Here we do not conceive of something else—like
God—legislating that all rational beings are to be treated always as
ends, on account of their intrinsic value. Instead, the idea is that
each rational being, simply in virtue of being an end in itself, makes
necessary (legislates) that it be treated always as an end. The
legislation given by each is also universal, applying to itself as well
as to every other rational being. Hence, the third version of the
categorical imperative commands not acting on any maxim that could not
qualify as giving universal law.
[<http://myweb.ecu.edu/mccartyr/GW/FormulaOfHumanity.asp>]
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant with
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of
Progression of
individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {IE. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS  (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
There is no value having a discussion with and accordingly I don’t need to
labour on your behalf so as to convey the explicit quotes which I have
narrated elsewhere.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Kant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS mathematical
I'm going to stop you right there for some hit-counts.
Here are the hit-counts for the following words within Kant's
"Cognisant" - 0 (zero)
"trinomial" - 0 (zero)
"HOMOIOS"   - 0 (zero).
So stop pretending your gibberish has anything to do with Kant's writings.
Kant's intention was to synthesise Empiricism with Rationalism, NOT to play
quantum-mumbo-jumbo with eastern mysticism and numerology and the bible.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-13 03:48:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
I think that just about nails our dialogue ...

YOUTUBE: "Elvis Presley asks 'Who Am I'"



... it's time for you to die off!
Post by dolf
Thus one may make reasonably critique Immanuel Kant's CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE perspectives as conforming to the #391 - HOMOIOS perspective
of NUMBER and accordingly we may then consider the CANONIC merit of the
UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason’s Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine
appearance in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
    #VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
    #TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
    #POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
    #TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
    #CANON: #45
As thereby providing the *ONTIC* mathematical *MORAL* premises which are
central to existence of being and its integrity, as the means one most
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/thoth9.gif>
[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]
    45: [1]
    68: [42]
    84: [2]
    86: [10]
    102: [4]
    104: [7]
    115: [5]
    130: [3]
    139: [13]
    140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
    146: [15]
    148: [12]
    150: [28]
    156: [21]
    157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE
NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
    158: [23]
    161: [9]
    166: [11]
    168: [26]
    169: [18]
    171: [20]
    173: [27]
    175: [22]
    177: [29]
    180: [19]
    181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
    182: [6]
    184: [36]
    185: [25]
    186: [31]
    191: [32]
    192: [39]
    196: [37]
    197: [33]
    200: [8]
    210: [30]
    215: [34]
    220: [38]
    228: [40]
Of which the TEN COMMANDMENTS (ie. the TRIAD MICROCOSM / SEPTET
MACROCOSM) given by MOSES conform as *ONTIC* postulates (ie. #41 x n) of
NATURE {
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES*
*OF* *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364
associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30
day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days.
"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
THE *MINOR* *PREMISE* {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
THE *CONCLUSION* {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369
with SEPTET #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1
Tishri 5762.
The Roman writer Censorinus, who in his 238 CE publication De Die
Natali, claims that the Pythagorean advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) as
preceeding PLATO (c. 429–347 BCE), as the principle proponent of the
Pythagorean doctrines, considered the natural year as also consisting of
364 and a half days and consistent with the Chinese HAN Dynasty (206
BCE-220CE) understanding (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days) of them.
[Pythagorean Sourcebook p 171]
The Chinese DAOist perspective of the natural year (as equivalent to the
New Testament notion as TROCHOS-course of NATURE-genesis [James 3:6])
associated to Yang Hsiung's treatise that was published within 4 BCE and
known as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery", reconciled it's unified
arrangement of the DAO TE CHING's #81 sections as specifically the
ternary (tetragrammaton) HOMOIOS paradigm value: TETRA: 60 -
ACCUMULATION, which is mapped to the I CHING's H64 designations (of
necessity some are repeated) as the binary paradigm value: H26 - GREAT
DOMESTICATION, RESTRAINING FORCE, GREAT ACCUMULATING, THE TAMING POWER
OF THE GREAT, GREAT STORAGE, POTENTIAL ENERGY;
According to the 4.5 day designations of this natural year cycle into
#81 sections, this would then equate the #CENTRE as 13 to 17 September;
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is
also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the Gregorian
calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made divisible by 22
to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew letters in a pattern
which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of the Chinese 4 BCE
published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year into 364.5 days
and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic square of #369
having a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for the
equivalent date of 13 September.
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY PROPOSITION
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS AS
DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
[IMAGE: The eye {Y-M-T-A} glyph]
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that
was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it
not.” [John 1:1-5 (KJV)]
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension
can become impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing
of any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a
car exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an
earlier experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards
it's final comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and correct
orthography as Category of Understanding.
Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD /
#MEM amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so that
the apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and becomes
de-stressed.
Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC {ie. the *TROPICAL* year is
determined by: #364 x 6 x 49 or #364 x 294 = #107016 days / 293 =
365.242321 days} pharmaceutical which whilst not impeding either the
apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the “central nervous
system and de-stressing of the startle reflex”.
But I am after all, seeking the advice of MENTAL HEALTH professionals on
how best to resolve such an injury given they do not have any
substantial practical clinical and case study expertise with instances
of bomb blasts experience and how to prevent it from progressing towards
a chronic condition known as POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as
elimination--is the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring
knowledge and explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic
correspondence and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is
intrinsic of the mind and this process is not all unlike the initial
starting point of this chapter by its specific construction of
meticulous narrative as neural linguistic streaming and it's subsequent
refinement until it was satisfactory.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence, as Cambridge University researchers have
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc
conrecoednprse and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
And therefore confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and
habitually refuses to overcome its ignorant state by informing itself,
can then be considered delusional.
— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —
"IN DEAD OF NIGHT.
/ MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

I HEAR THE CLARION.
/ CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2 -
Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents} /
#14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

CALL AWAKE FOR WAR.
/ VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]
3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123} 1) son, grandson, child, member of
a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and
female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons
(as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or
sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of
lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF*
*A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

STEADFAST MIGHT.
/ POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]
MARCHING TO SION.
/ RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]
AGAINST THIS WHORE.
/ CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

ARREST THE BLIGHT."
/ ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 = #287
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in excelso
{#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do
Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous Nature]
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
Post by dolf
WORK IN PROGRESS NOTES OF 15 JULY 2006 [SUBJECT TO REVISION]: WAS
GOVERNOR PHILLIP (11 October 1738 – 31 August 1814) A BETTER VISIONARY
LEADER THAN JOHN HOWARD?
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Flanders.pdf>
Kant’s *MOST* *INFLUENTIAL* *POSITIONS* *IN* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY*
*ARE* *FOUND* *IN* *THE* *GROUNDWORK* *OF* *THE* *METAPHYSICS* *OF*
*MORALS* (*HEREAFTER*, “*GROUNDWORK*” published 1785) *BUT* *HE*
*DEVELOPED*, *ENRICHED*, *AND* *IN* *SOME* *CASES* *MODIFIED* *THOSE*
*VIEWS* *IN* *LATER* *WORKS* *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *CRITIQUE* *OF*
*PRACTICAL* *REASON* (published 1781 / 1787)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>
I. Transition from common rational cognition to philosophic moral cognition
II. Transition from popular moral philosophy to metaphysics of morals
III. Transition from metaphysics of morals to the critique of pure
practical reason
PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + GEN (ie. #8) above],
H54 - GUIMEI [*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7) below + ZHEN (ie. #3)
above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6) below + SUN (ie.
#4) above], H18 - GU [Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4) below + GEN (ie.
#8) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above]
as 'fundamentality [yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy
[zhen]', H6 - SONG / *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1) below + QIAN (ie.
#6) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea - Formula of Autonomy}
THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6) above + QIAN (ie. #6)
below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure Yin / KUN (ie. #2) above + KUN
(ie. #2) below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie.
#3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of Progression
of individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
Post by dolf
It would be followed by two more books on ethics: Critique of
Practical Reason (1788), The Metaphysics of Morals (1797),
Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, Religion within the
Boundaries of Mere Reason as well as his essays on history and related
topics. Kant’s Lectures on Ethics, which were lecture notes taken by
three of his students on the courses he gave in moral philosophy, also
include relevant material for understanding his views. We will mainly
focus on the foundational doctrines of the Groundwork, even though in
recent years some scholars have become dissatisfied with this standard
approach to Kant’s views and have turned their attention to the later
works. We find the standard approach most illuminating, though we will
highlight important positions from the later works where needed.
With respects to the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}
claim to a Sovereign State as that which was then later the basis of
Roman Empire Governance, we draw upon this observation: "And Moses
{taken out; drawn forth} was learned in all the wisdom of the
Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}, and was mighty in
words and in deeds." [Acts 7:22 (KJV)]
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. Formula of Progression of individual phenomena} =
GENESIS DAY #4
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE = GENESIS DAY #1
H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU = GENESIS DAY #2
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER*
OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE} = GENESIS DAY #3
FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THESE PRINCIPLES REFER TO IMMANUEL KANT'S
Kant's supreme moral principle or "categorical imperative"; Variant
- Act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will that it
should become a universal law.
- Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a
universal law of nature.
- So act that your principle of action might safely be made a law for
the whole world.
- May you live your life as if the maxim of your actions were to
become universal law.
- Live your life as though your every act were to become a universal law.
- Do not feel forced to act, as you're only willing to act according
to your own universal laws. And that's good. For only willful acts are
universal. And that's your maxim.
I do not, therefore, need any penetrating acuteness to see what I have
to do in order that my volition be morally good. Inexperienced in the
course of the world, incapable of being prepared for whatever might
come to pass in it, I ask myself only: can you also will that your
maxim become a universal law?
Even if there never have been actions arising from such pure sources,
what is at issue here is not whether this or that happened; that,
instead, reason by itself and independently of all appearances
commands what ought to happen; that, accordingly, actions of which the
world has perhaps so far given no example, and whose very
practicability might be very much doubted by one who bases everything
on experience, are still inflexibly commanded by reason … because …
duty … lies, prior to all experience, in the idea of a reason
determining the will by means of a priori grounds.
Morality is thus the relation of actions to the autonomy of the will,
that is, to a possible giving of universal law through its maxims. An
action that can coexist with the autonomy of the will is permitted;
one that does not accord with it is forbidden. A will whose maxims
necessarily harmonize with the laws of autonomy is a holy, absolutely
good will. The dependence upon the principle of autonomy of a will
that is not absolutely good (moral necessitation) is obligation. This,
accordingly, cannot be attributed to a holy being. The objective of an
action from obligation is called duty.
[<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant>]
Kant developed three principal formulas of the categorical imperative.
The first and most well known of these is the so-called "formula of
universal law." The second is the "formula of humanity." This one has
been almost as interesting to commentators and critics as the first
formula. To some, in fact, the formula of humanity is an even more
interesting expression of Kant’s basic insights in ethics.
If the validity of the categorical imperative depends on humanity’s
existing as an end in itself, as it does according to Kant’s moral
realism, then the categorical imperative should forbid any action that
treats humanity merely as a means. By this line of reasoning Kant sees
that an alternative version of the categorical imperative can now be
expressed as: "So act that you use humanity, whether in your own
person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an
end, never merely as a means " (Kant 1997, 38/4:429).
THE FORMULA OF AUTONOMY
A third version of the categorical imperative follows in Kant’s text
almost immediately upon the four examples of duties derived from the
second version, the formula of humanity. This new formula, emphasizing
the way we may be supposed to have acquired our subjection to moral
requirements, is called the formula of autonomy. It says that we are
subject to the requirement of our maxims’ conformity to universal law
through our own free will. That is what Kant indicated in the
quotation above, referring to the will’s "giving the law to itself"
(Kant 1997, 39/4:431).
The derivation of the formula of autonomy. The premises by which we
arrive at a version of the categorical imperative referencing
autonomy—the self-legislation of moral requirements—are the previous
the ground of all practical lawgiving lies (in accordance with the
first principle) objectively in the rule and the form of universality
which makes it fit to be a universal law (possibly a law of nature);
subjectively, however, it lies in the end; but the subject of all ends
is every rational being as an end in itself (in accordance with the
second principle); from this there follows now the third practical
principle of the will, as supreme limiting condition of its harmony
with universal practical reason, the idea of the will of every
rational being as a will giving universal law.  (Kant 1997, 39/4:431)
In order to see how we arrive at the formula of autonomy at the
conclusion of this derivation it is necessary to focus on the second
premise, the formula of humanity. Here the important concept of an
"end" implies legislation, or lawgiving. It is possible to see an end,
like a law, as something making it necessary to will an action—either
as a means of bringing about its existence, or in order not to bring
about its non-existence. If every rational being is an end in the
latter sense, as implied by the formula of humanity, then every
rational being is lawgiving. Here we do not conceive of something
else—like God—legislating that all rational beings are to be treated
always as ends, on account of their intrinsic value. Instead, the idea
is that each rational being, simply in virtue of being an end in
itself, makes necessary (legislates) that it be treated always as an
end. The legislation given by each is also universal, applying to
itself as well as to every other rational being. Hence, the third
version of the categorical imperative commands not acting on any maxim
that could not qualify as giving universal law.
[<http://myweb.ecu.edu/mccartyr/GW/FormulaOfHumanity.asp>]
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant with
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of
Progression of
individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {IE. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS  (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
There is no value having a discussion with [you] and accordingly I don’t
need to
labour on your behalf so as to convey the explicit quotes which I have
narrated elsewhere.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Kant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS mathematical
I'm going to stop you right there for some hit-counts.
Here are the hit-counts for the following words within Kant's
"Cognisant" - 0 (zero)
"trinomial" - 0 (zero)
"HOMOIOS"   - 0 (zero).
So stop pretending your gibberish has anything to do with Kant's writings.
Kant's intention was to synthesise Empiricism with Rationalism, NOT to play
quantum-mumbo-jumbo with eastern mysticism and numerology and the bible.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-13 04:12:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
I think that just about nails our dialogue ...

YOUTUBE: "Elvis Presley asks 'Who Am I'"

http://youtu.be/0bxPJJ7vhK0

... it's time for you to die off!

"For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through
the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean
escaped from them who live in error.

While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of
corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in
bondage.

YOUTUBE: "They Don’t Care About Us (Michael Jackson)"


Post by dolf
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 =
anagkaios (G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or
friendship; 1c) what ought according to the law of duty be done, what
is required by the circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the
knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled
therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the
beginning.

For it had been better for them not to have known the way of
righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy
commandment delivered unto them." [2 Peter 2:18-21 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
Thus one may make reasonably critique Immanuel Kant's CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE perspectives as conforming to the #391 - HOMOIOS
perspective of NUMBER and accordingly we may then consider the
CANONIC merit of the T’AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY
UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason’s Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine
appearance in Annu; THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who
makest thine appearance in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF*
*WRONG*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins. #TOOLS: With
Center (no. #1), it begins. #POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41),
then yin is born. #TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
As thereby providing the *ONTIC* mathematical *MORAL* premises which
are central to existence of being and its integrity, as the means one
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/thoth9.gif>
[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D
/ #0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY
PERENNIAL SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9
METHODOLOGY FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]
[3] 139: [13] 140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I
[17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE NO
[19] 181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
[8] 210: [30] 215: [34] 220: [38] 228: [40]
Of which the TEN COMMANDMENTS (ie. the TRIAD MICROCOSM / SEPTET
MACROCOSM) given by MOSES conform as *ONTIC* postulates (ie. #41 x n)
of NATURE {
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c)
what ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by
the circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES*
*OF* *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364
associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30
day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days.
"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or
oppresses; anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no
other gods before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
THE *MINOR* *PREMISE* {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with
the law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 =
6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox
Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I
the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the
fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of
them that hate me; And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love
me, and keep my commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
THE *CONCLUSION* {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down
as right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as
#369 with SEPTET #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September =
1 Tishri 5762.
The Roman writer Censorinus, who in his 238 CE publication De Die
Natali, claims that the Pythagorean advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE)
as preceeding PLATO (c. 429–347 BCE), as the principle proponent of
the Pythagorean doctrines, considered the natural year as also
consisting of 364 and a half days and consistent with the Chinese HAN
Dynasty (206 BCE-220CE) understanding (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days)
of them. [Pythagorean Sourcebook p 171]
The Chinese DAOist perspective of the natural year (as equivalent to
the New Testament notion as TROCHOS-course of NATURE-genesis [James
3:6]) associated to Yang Hsiung's treatise that was published within
4 BCE and known as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery", reconciled it's
unified arrangement of the DAO TE CHING's #81 sections as
TETRA: 60 - ACCUMULATION, which is mapped to the I CHING's H64
designations (of necessity some are repeated) as the binary paradigm
value: H26 - GREAT DOMESTICATION, RESTRAINING FORCE, GREAT
ACCUMULATING, THE TAMING POWER OF THE GREAT, GREAT STORAGE, POTENTIAL
ENERGY;
According to the 4.5 day designations of this natural year cycle into
#81 sections, this would then equate the #CENTRE as 13 to 17
September;
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'"
[Exodus 20:7 (KJV)]
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is
also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the
Gregorian calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made
divisible by 22 to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew
letters in a pattern which has a remainder of #13 as being in the
middle of the Chinese 4 BCE published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division
of the year into 364.5 days and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which
deployed a magic square of #369 having a distinct mathematical
property at centre of #41 for the equivalent date of 13 September.
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that
unties; that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of
Torah being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of
Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* =
Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23)
commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY
PROPOSITION OF A HYPOTHETICAL Y-M-T-A MODEL WHICH I EQUALLY APPLY TO
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS
AS DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
[IMAGE: The eye {Y-M-T-A} glyph]
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the
Word was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made
that was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it
not.” [John 1:1-5 (KJV)]
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension
can become impeded and stressed as then either discordant or
unknowing of any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can
distinguish a car exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable
bang from an earlier experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and
transitional towards it's final comprehension by it's acceptable,
customary and correct orthography as Category of Understanding.
Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD
/ #MEM amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so
that the apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and
becomes de-stressed.
Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC {ie. the *TROPICAL* year
is determined by: #364 x 6 x 49 or #364 x 294 = #107016 days / 293 =
365.242321 days} pharmaceutical which whilst not impeding either the
apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the “central
nervous system and de-stressing of the startle reflex”.
But I am after all, seeking the advice of MENTAL HEALTH professionals
on how best to resolve such an injury given they do not have any
substantial practical clinical and case study expertise with
instances of bomb blasts experience and how to prevent it from
progressing towards a chronic condition known as POST TRAUMATIC
STRESS DISORDER.
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and
hypothetical proposition, which is then predicated upon by a
determined course of affirmative action to inform oneself through
inquisition as elimination--is the process of a rational mind
practiced in acquiring knowledge and explicit specification within
Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic
correspondence and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is
intrinsic of the mind and this process is not all unlike the initial
starting point of this chapter by its specific construction of
meticulous narrative as neural linguistic streaming and it's
subsequent refinement until it was satisfactory.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and
the sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the
word and fully comprehend the sentence, as Cambridge University
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc
conrecoednprse and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
And therefore confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and
habitually refuses to overcome its ignorant state by informing
itself, can then be considered delusional.
— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —
"IN DEAD OF NIGHT.
/ MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature] 
I HEAR THE
CLARION.
/ CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi
{#2 - Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour
Parents} / #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 -
Engendering Nature] 
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR.
/ VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]
3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50,
#10, #5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123} 1) son, grandson, child,
member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children
(pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of
animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a
nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows
(fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

STEADFAST MIGHT.
/ POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4
- Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and
#INR / Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against
Autonomy)}, [John 5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its
Nature [#111 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]
MARCHING TO SION.
/ RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam
{#5 - Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do
Not Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8
- Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]
AGAINST THIS WHORE.
/ CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL
[Luke 1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam
HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False
Witness} / #18 / #6 - Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming
Nature] 
ARREST THE BLIGHT."
/ ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c)
what ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by
the circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
Post by dolf
WORK IN PROGRESS NOTES OF 15 JULY 2006 [SUBJECT TO REVISION]: WAS
GOVERNOR PHILLIP (11 October 1738 – 31 August 1814) A BETTER
VISIONARY LEADER THAN JOHN HOWARD?
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Flanders.pdf>
Kant’s *MOST* *INFLUENTIAL* *POSITIONS* *IN* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY*
*ARE* *FOUND* *IN* *THE* *GROUNDWORK* *OF* *THE* *METAPHYSICS* *OF*
*MORALS* (*HEREAFTER*, “*GROUNDWORK*” published 1785) *BUT* *HE*
*DEVELOPED*, *ENRICHED*, *AND* *IN* *SOME* *CASES* *MODIFIED*
*THOSE* *VIEWS* *IN* *LATER* *WORKS* *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *CRITIQUE*
*OF* *PRACTICAL* *REASON* (published 1781 / 1787)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>
I. Transition from common rational cognition to philosophic moral cognition
II. Transition from popular moral philosophy to metaphysics of morals
III. Transition from metaphysics of morals to the critique of pure
practical reason
PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal) + 0, H27 -
YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + GEN (ie. #8) above], H54 -
GUIMEI [*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7) below + ZHEN (ie. #3) above]
{ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon) + 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie.
#6) below + SUN (ie. #4) above], H18 - GU [Ills to Be Cured / SUN
(ie. #4) below + GEN (ie. #8) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth
- Formula of Humanity}
ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood) + 0, H3 -
ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above] as
'fundamentality [yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy
[zhen]', H6 - SONG / *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1) below + QIAN
(ie. #6) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea - Formula of Autonomy}
THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun) + H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6)
above + QIAN (ie. #6) below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure Yin /
ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above] {ie.
Fountains as Formula of Progression of individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER*
OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
Post by dolf
It would be followed by two more books on ethics: Critique of
Practical Reason (1788), The Metaphysics of Morals (1797),
Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, Religion within the
Boundaries of Mere Reason as well as his essays on history and
related topics. Kant’s Lectures on Ethics, which were lecture notes
taken by three of his students on the courses he gave in moral
philosophy, also include relevant material for understanding his
views. We will mainly focus on the foundational doctrines of the
Groundwork, even though in recent years some scholars have become
dissatisfied with this standard approach to Kant’s views and have
turned their attention to the later works. We find the standard
approach most illuminating, though we will highlight important
positions from the later works where needed.
With respects to the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish} claim to a Sovereign State as that which was then later
the basis of Roman Empire Governance, we draw upon this
observation: "And Moses {taken out; drawn forth} was learned in all
the wisdom of the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish},
and was mighty in words and in deeds." [Acts 7:22 (KJV)]
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of
Universal Law} + 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth -
Formula of Humanity} + 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of
Autonomy} + 1, 2, 3 {ie. Formula of Progression of individual
phenomena} = GENESIS DAY #4
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE = GENESIS DAY #1 H54 + H18 + H6
+ H3 = #81 as #WAN WU = GENESIS DAY #2
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR
*NUMBER* OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE} = GENESIS DAY
#3
FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THESE PRINCIPLES REFER TO IMMANUEL KANT'S
FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: Kant's supreme moral principle or
"categorical imperative"; Variant translations: - Act only on that
maxim which you can at the same time will that it should become a
universal law. - Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become
by thy will a universal law of nature. - So act that your principle
of action might safely be made a law for the whole world. - May you
live your life as if the maxim of your actions were to become
universal law. - Live your life as though your every act were to
become a universal law. - Do not feel forced to act, as you're only
willing to act according to your own universal laws. And that's
good. For only willful acts are universal. And that's your maxim.
I do not, therefore, need any penetrating acuteness to see what I
have to do in order that my volition be morally good. Inexperienced
in the course of the world, incapable of being prepared for
whatever might come to pass in it, I ask myself only: can you also
will that your maxim become a universal law?
Even if there never have been actions arising from such pure
sources, what is at issue here is not whether this or that
happened; that, instead, reason by itself and independently of all
appearances commands what ought to happen; that, accordingly,
actions of which the world has perhaps so far given no example, and
whose very practicability might be very much doubted by one who
bases everything on experience, are still inflexibly commanded by
reason … because … duty … lies, prior to all experience, in the
idea of a reason determining the will by means of a priori
grounds.
Morality is thus the relation of actions to the autonomy of the
will, that is, to a possible giving of universal law through its
maxims. An action that can coexist with the autonomy of the will is
permitted; one that does not accord with it is forbidden. A will
whose maxims necessarily harmonize with the laws of autonomy is a
holy, absolutely good will. The dependence upon the principle of
autonomy of a will that is not absolutely good (moral
necessitation) is obligation. This, accordingly, cannot be
attributed to a holy being. The objective of an action from
obligation is called duty.
[<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant>]
FORMULA OF HUMANITY: Kant developed three principal formulas of the
categorical imperative. The first and most well known of these is
the so-called "formula of universal law." The second is the
"formula of humanity." This one has been almost as interesting to
commentators and critics as the first formula. To some, in fact,
the formula of humanity is an even more interesting expression of
Kant’s basic insights in ethics.
If the validity of the categorical imperative depends on humanity’s
existing as an end in itself, as it does according to Kant’s moral
realism, then the categorical imperative should forbid any action
that treats humanity merely as a means. By this line of reasoning
Kant sees that an alternative version of the categorical imperative
can now be expressed as: "So act that you use humanity, whether in
your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same
time as an end, never merely as a means " (Kant 1997, 38/4:429).
THE FORMULA OF AUTONOMY A third version of the categorical
imperative follows in Kant’s text almost immediately upon the four
examples of duties derived from the second version, the formula of
humanity. This new formula, emphasizing the way we may be supposed
to have acquired our subjection to moral requirements, is called
the formula of autonomy. It says that we are subject to the
requirement of our maxims’ conformity to universal law through our
own free will. That is what Kant indicated in the quotation above,
referring to the will’s "giving the law to itself" (Kant 1997,
39/4:431).
The derivation of the formula of autonomy. The premises by which we
arrive at a version of the categorical imperative referencing
autonomy—the self-legislation of moral requirements—are the
the ground of all practical lawgiving lies (in accordance with the
first principle) objectively in the rule and the form of
universality which makes it fit to be a universal law (possibly a
law of nature); subjectively, however, it lies in the end; but the
subject of all ends is every rational being as an end in itself (in
accordance with the second principle); from this there follows now
the third practical principle of the will, as supreme limiting
condition of its harmony with universal practical reason, the idea
of the will of every rational being as a will giving universal law.
(Kant 1997, 39/4:431)
In order to see how we arrive at the formula of autonomy at the
conclusion of this derivation it is necessary to focus on the
second premise, the formula of humanity. Here the important concept
of an "end" implies legislation, or lawgiving. It is possible to
see an end, like a law, as something making it necessary to will an
action—either as a means of bringing about its existence, or in
order not to bring about its non-existence. If every rational being
is an end in the latter sense, as implied by the formula of
humanity, then every rational being is lawgiving. Here we do not
conceive of something else—like God—legislating that all rational
beings are to be treated always as ends, on account of their
intrinsic value. Instead, the idea is that each rational being,
simply in virtue of being an end in itself, makes necessary
(legislates) that it be treated always as an end. The legislation
given by each is also universal, applying to itself as well as to
every other rational being. Hence, the third version of the
categorical imperative commands not acting on any maxim that could
not qualify as giving universal law.
[<http://myweb.ecu.edu/mccartyr/GW/FormulaOfHumanity.asp>]
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are
compliant with the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of
Universal Law} + 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth -
Formula of Humanity} + 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of
Autonomy} + *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie.
Formula of Progression of individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {IE. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR
*NUMBER* OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
There is no value having a discussion with [you] and accordingly
I don’t need to labour on your behalf so as to convey the
explicit quotes which I have narrated elsewhere.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Kant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS
mathematical
I'm going to stop you right there for some hit-counts. Here are
the hit-counts for the following words within Kant's 'Critique
of Pure Reason': "Cognisant" - 0 (zero) "trinomial" - 0 (zero)
"HOMOIOS" - 0 (zero). So stop pretending your gibberish has
anything to do with Kant's writings. Kant's intention was to
synthesise Empiricism with Rationalism, NOT to play
quantum-mumbo-jumbo with eastern mysticism and numerology and the bible.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-13 05:06:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
I think that just about nails our dialogue ...

YOUTUBE: "Elvis Presley asks 'Who Am I'"

http://youtu.be/0bxPJJ7vhK0

... it's time for you to die off!

"For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through
the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean
escaped from them who live in error.

While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of
corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in
bondage.

YOUTUBE: "They Don’t Care About Us (Michael Jackson)"

http://youtu.be/QNJL6nfu__Q
Post by dolf
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 =
anagkaios (G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or
friendship; 1c) what ought according to the law of duty be done, what
is required by the circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the
knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled
therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the
beginning.

For it had been better for them not to have known the way of
righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy
commandment delivered unto them." [2 Peter 2:18-21 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
Thus one may reasonably critique Immanuel Kant's CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE perspectives as conforming to the #391 - HOMOIOS
perspective of NUMBER and accordingly we may then consider the
CANONIC merit of the T’AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY
UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason’s Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine
appearance in Annu; THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who
makest thine appearance in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF*
*WRONG*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins. #TOOLS: With
Center (no. #1), it begins. #POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41),
then yin is born. #TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
As thereby providing the *ONTIC* mathematical *MORAL* premises which
are central to existence of being and its integrity, as the means one
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/thoth9.gif>
[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D
/ #0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY
PERENNIAL SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9
METHODOLOGY FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]
[3] 139: [13] 140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I
[17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE NO
[19] 181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
[8] 210: [30] 215: [34] 220: [38] 228: [40]
Of which the TEN COMMANDMENTS (ie. the TRIAD MICROCOSM / SEPTET
MACROCOSM) given by MOSES conform as *ONTIC* postulates (ie. #41 x n)
of NATURE {
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c)
what ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by
the circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES*
*OF* *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364
associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30
day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days.
"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or
oppresses; anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no
other gods before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
THE *MINOR* *PREMISE* {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with
the law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 =
6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox
Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I
the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the
fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of
them that hate me; And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love
me, and keep my commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
THE *CONCLUSION* {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down
as right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as
#369 with SEPTET #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September =
1 Tishri 5762.
The Roman writer Censorinus, who in his 238 CE publication De Die
Natali, claims that the Pythagorean advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE)
as preceeding PLATO (c. 429–347 BCE), as the principle proponent of
the Pythagorean doctrines, considered the natural year as also
consisting of 364 and a half days and consistent with the Chinese HAN
Dynasty (206 BCE-220CE) understanding (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days)
of them. [Pythagorean Sourcebook p 171]
The Chinese DAOist perspective of the natural year (as equivalent to
the New Testament notion as TROCHOS-course of NATURE-genesis [James
3:6]) associated to Yang Hsiung's treatise that was published within
4 BCE and known as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery", reconciled it's
unified arrangement of the DAO TE CHING's #81 sections as
TETRA: 60 - ACCUMULATION, which is mapped to the I CHING's H64
designations (of necessity some are repeated) as the binary paradigm
value: H26 - GREAT DOMESTICATION, RESTRAINING FORCE, GREAT
ACCUMULATING, THE TAMING POWER OF THE GREAT, GREAT STORAGE, POTENTIAL
ENERGY;
According to the 4.5 day designations of this natural year cycle into
#81 sections, this would then equate the #CENTRE as 13 to 17
September;
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'"
[Exodus 20:7 (KJV)]
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is
also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the
Gregorian calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made
divisible by 22 to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew
letters in a pattern which has a remainder of #13 as being in the
middle of the Chinese 4 BCE published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division
of the year into 364.5 days and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which
deployed a magic square of #369 having a distinct mathematical
property at centre of #41 for the equivalent date of 13 September.
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that
unties; that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of
Torah being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of
Wednesday DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* =
Wednesday DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23)
commencing the Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY
PROPOSITION OF A HYPOTHETICAL Y-M-T-A MODEL WHICH I EQUALLY APPLY TO
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS
AS DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
[IMAGE: The eye {Y-M-T-A} glyph]
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the
Word was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made
that was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it
not.” [John 1:1-5 (KJV)]
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension
can become impeded and stressed as then either discordant or
unknowing of any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can
distinguish a car exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable
bang from an earlier experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and
transitional towards it's final comprehension by it's acceptable,
customary and correct orthography as Category of Understanding.
Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD
/ #MEM amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so
that the apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and
becomes de-stressed.
Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC {ie. the *TROPICAL* year
is determined by: #364 x 6 x 49 or #364 x 294 = #107016 days / 293 =
365.242321 days} pharmaceutical which whilst not impeding either the
apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the “central
nervous system and de-stressing of the startle reflex”.
But I am after all, seeking the advice of MENTAL HEALTH professionals
on how best to resolve such an injury given they do not have any
substantial practical clinical and case study expertise with
instances of bomb blasts experience and how to prevent it from
progressing towards a chronic condition known as POST TRAUMATIC
STRESS DISORDER.
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and
hypothetical proposition, which is then predicated upon by a
determined course of affirmative action to inform oneself through
inquisition as elimination--is the process of a rational mind
practiced in acquiring knowledge and explicit specification within
Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic
correspondence and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is
intrinsic of the mind and this process is not all unlike the initial
starting point of this chapter by its specific construction of
meticulous narrative as neural linguistic streaming and it's
subsequent refinement until it was satisfactory.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and
the sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the
word and fully comprehend the sentence, as Cambridge University
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc
conrecoednprse and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
And therefore confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and
habitually refuses to overcome its ignorant state by informing
itself, can then be considered delusional.
— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —
"IN DEAD OF NIGHT.
/ MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature] 
I HEAR THE
CLARION.
/ CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi
{#2 - Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour
Parents} / #14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 -
Engendering Nature] 
CALL AWAKE FOR WAR.
/ VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]
3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50,
#10, #5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123} 1) son, grandson, child,
member of a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children
(pl. - male and female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of
animals); 1f) sons (as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for
un- righteous men] or sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a
nation) (pl.); 1h) of lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows
(fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF* *A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

STEADFAST MIGHT.
/ POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4
- Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and
#INR / Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against
Autonomy)}, [John 5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its
Nature [#111 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature]
MARCHING TO SION.
/ RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam
{#5 - Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do
Not Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8
- Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]
AGAINST THIS WHORE.
/ CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL
[Luke 1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam
HETEROS (binomial / bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False
Witness} / #18 / #6 - Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming
Nature] 
ARREST THE BLIGHT."
/ ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 =
#287 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in
excelso {#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO
ANAGRAM / Do Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 -
Autonomous Nature]
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c)
what ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by
the circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
Post by dolf
WORK IN PROGRESS NOTES OF 15 JULY 2006 [SUBJECT TO REVISION]: WAS
GOVERNOR PHILLIP (11 October 1738 – 31 August 1814) A BETTER
VISIONARY LEADER THAN JOHN HOWARD?
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Flanders.pdf>
Kant’s *MOST* *INFLUENTIAL* *POSITIONS* *IN* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY*
*ARE* *FOUND* *IN* *THE* *GROUNDWORK* *OF* *THE* *METAPHYSICS* *OF*
*MORALS* (*HEREAFTER*, “*GROUNDWORK*” published 1785) *BUT* *HE*
*DEVELOPED*, *ENRICHED*, *AND* *IN* *SOME* *CASES* *MODIFIED*
*THOSE* *VIEWS* *IN* *LATER* *WORKS* *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *CRITIQUE*
*OF* *PRACTICAL* *REASON* (published 1781 / 1787)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>
I. Transition from common rational cognition to philosophic moral cognition
II. Transition from popular moral philosophy to metaphysics of morals
III. Transition from metaphysics of morals to the critique of pure
practical reason
PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal) + 0, H27 -
YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + GEN (ie. #8) above], H54 -
GUIMEI [*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7) below + ZHEN (ie. #3) above]
{ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon) + 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie.
#6) below + SUN (ie. #4) above], H18 - GU [Ills to Be Cured / SUN
(ie. #4) below + GEN (ie. #8) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth
- Formula of Humanity}
ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood) + 0, H3 -
ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above] as
'fundamentality [yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy
[zhen]', H6 - SONG / *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1) below + QIAN
(ie. #6) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea - Formula of Autonomy}
THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun) + H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6)
above + QIAN (ie. #6) below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure Yin /
ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above] {ie.
Fountains as Formula of Progression of individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER*
OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
Post by dolf
It would be followed by two more books on ethics: Critique of
Practical Reason (1788), The Metaphysics of Morals (1797),
Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, Religion within the
Boundaries of Mere Reason as well as his essays on history and
related topics. Kant’s Lectures on Ethics, which were lecture notes
taken by three of his students on the courses he gave in moral
philosophy, also include relevant material for understanding his
views. We will mainly focus on the foundational doctrines of the
Groundwork, even though in recent years some scholars have become
dissatisfied with this standard approach to Kant’s views and have
turned their attention to the later works. We find the standard
approach most illuminating, though we will highlight important
positions from the later works where needed.
With respects to the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish} claim to a Sovereign State as that which was then later
the basis of Roman Empire Governance, we draw upon this
observation: "And Moses {taken out; drawn forth} was learned in all
the wisdom of the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish},
and was mighty in words and in deeds." [Acts 7:22 (KJV)]
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of
Universal Law} + 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth -
Formula of Humanity} + 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of
Autonomy} + 1, 2, 3 {ie. Formula of Progression of individual
phenomena} = GENESIS DAY #4
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE = GENESIS DAY #1 H54 + H18 + H6
+ H3 = #81 as #WAN WU = GENESIS DAY #2
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR
*NUMBER* OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE} = GENESIS DAY
#3
FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THESE PRINCIPLES REFER TO IMMANUEL KANT'S
FORMULA OF UNIVERSAL LAW: Kant's supreme moral principle or
"categorical imperative"; Variant translations: - Act only on that
maxim which you can at the same time will that it should become a
universal law. - Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become
by thy will a universal law of nature. - So act that your principle
of action might safely be made a law for the whole world. - May you
live your life as if the maxim of your actions were to become
universal law. - Live your life as though your every act were to
become a universal law. - Do not feel forced to act, as you're only
willing to act according to your own universal laws. And that's
good. For only willful acts are universal. And that's your maxim.
I do not, therefore, need any penetrating acuteness to see what I
have to do in order that my volition be morally good. Inexperienced
in the course of the world, incapable of being prepared for
whatever might come to pass in it, I ask myself only: can you also
will that your maxim become a universal law?
Even if there never have been actions arising from such pure
sources, what is at issue here is not whether this or that
happened; that, instead, reason by itself and independently of all
appearances commands what ought to happen; that, accordingly,
actions of which the world has perhaps so far given no example, and
whose very practicability might be very much doubted by one who
bases everything on experience, are still inflexibly commanded by
reason … because … duty … lies, prior to all experience, in the
idea of a reason determining the will by means of a priori
grounds.
Morality is thus the relation of actions to the autonomy of the
will, that is, to a possible giving of universal law through its
maxims. An action that can coexist with the autonomy of the will is
permitted; one that does not accord with it is forbidden. A will
whose maxims necessarily harmonize with the laws of autonomy is a
holy, absolutely good will. The dependence upon the principle of
autonomy of a will that is not absolutely good (moral
necessitation) is obligation. This, accordingly, cannot be
attributed to a holy being. The objective of an action from
obligation is called duty.
[<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant>]
FORMULA OF HUMANITY: Kant developed three principal formulas of the
categorical imperative. The first and most well known of these is
the so-called "formula of universal law." The second is the
"formula of humanity." This one has been almost as interesting to
commentators and critics as the first formula. To some, in fact,
the formula of humanity is an even more interesting expression of
Kant’s basic insights in ethics.
If the validity of the categorical imperative depends on humanity’s
existing as an end in itself, as it does according to Kant’s moral
realism, then the categorical imperative should forbid any action
that treats humanity merely as a means. By this line of reasoning
Kant sees that an alternative version of the categorical imperative
can now be expressed as: "So act that you use humanity, whether in
your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same
time as an end, never merely as a means " (Kant 1997, 38/4:429).
THE FORMULA OF AUTONOMY A third version of the categorical
imperative follows in Kant’s text almost immediately upon the four
examples of duties derived from the second version, the formula of
humanity. This new formula, emphasizing the way we may be supposed
to have acquired our subjection to moral requirements, is called
the formula of autonomy. It says that we are subject to the
requirement of our maxims’ conformity to universal law through our
own free will. That is what Kant indicated in the quotation above,
referring to the will’s "giving the law to itself" (Kant 1997,
39/4:431).
The derivation of the formula of autonomy. The premises by which we
arrive at a version of the categorical imperative referencing
autonomy—the self-legislation of moral requirements—are the
the ground of all practical lawgiving lies (in accordance with the
first principle) objectively in the rule and the form of
universality which makes it fit to be a universal law (possibly a
law of nature); subjectively, however, it lies in the end; but the
subject of all ends is every rational being as an end in itself (in
accordance with the second principle); from this there follows now
the third practical principle of the will, as supreme limiting
condition of its harmony with universal practical reason, the idea
of the will of every rational being as a will giving universal law.
(Kant 1997, 39/4:431)
In order to see how we arrive at the formula of autonomy at the
conclusion of this derivation it is necessary to focus on the
second premise, the formula of humanity. Here the important concept
of an "end" implies legislation, or lawgiving. It is possible to
see an end, like a law, as something making it necessary to will an
action—either as a means of bringing about its existence, or in
order not to bring about its non-existence. If every rational being
is an end in the latter sense, as implied by the formula of
humanity, then every rational being is lawgiving. Here we do not
conceive of something else—like God—legislating that all rational
beings are to be treated always as ends, on account of their
intrinsic value. Instead, the idea is that each rational being,
simply in virtue of being an end in itself, makes necessary
(legislates) that it be treated always as an end. The legislation
given by each is also universal, applying to itself as well as to
every other rational being. Hence, the third version of the
categorical imperative commands not acting on any maxim that could
not qualify as giving universal law.
[<http://myweb.ecu.edu/mccartyr/GW/FormulaOfHumanity.asp>]
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are
compliant with the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of
Universal Law} + 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth -
Formula of Humanity} + 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of
Autonomy} + *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie.
Formula of Progression of individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {IE. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR
*NUMBER* OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
There is no value having a discussion with [you] and accordingly
I don’t need to labour on your behalf so as to convey the
explicit quotes which I have narrated elsewhere.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Kant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS
mathematical
I'm going to stop you right there for some hit-counts. Here are
the hit-counts for the following words within Kant's 'Critique
of Pure Reason': "Cognisant" - 0 (zero) "trinomial" - 0 (zero)
"HOMOIOS" - 0 (zero). So stop pretending your gibberish has
anything to do with Kant's writings. Kant's intention was to
synthesise Empiricism with Rationalism, NOT to play
quantum-mumbo-jumbo with eastern mysticism and numerology and the bible.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Government Shill #2
2018-08-13 06:27:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant
... was a real pissant
who was very rarely stable.
Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
who could think you under the table.

David Hume could out-consume
Wilhelm Freidrich Hegel.

And Wittgenstein was a beery swine
who was just as schloshed as Schlegel.

There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya
'bout the raising of the wrist,
Socrates, himself, was permanently pissed.

John Stuart Mill, of his own free will,
On half a pint of shandy was particularly ill.

Plato, they say, could stick it away,
Half a crate of whiskey every day.

Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle,
And Hobbes was fond of his dram.

- Monty Python



Shill #2
--
My favorite thing about the Internet is that you get to go into the private
world of real creeps without having to smell them.
- Penn Jillette
dolf
2018-08-13 07:09:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
You missed the evidence {ie. probably due to your Sisyphus life of
diseased immorality but check the grammar on that} so I've repeated it
for you...

Unless Kant's critics are aware of his implied use of:

Formula of Universal Law
Formula of Humanity
Formula of Autonomy

They are likely to make some progression as formula of argumentation
that is not their intended meaning: "obscure and unintelligible disputes
and discourses"

For example, if I were to say: 'You dense ***@t and stupid ***@nt'

Such as parody conforms to what is Immanuel Kant’s meaning of the term
"noumena" which he says is not that which is self evident, since it
literally means not "things as they are in dependently of appearing to
us" but something more like "things as they are understood by pure thought."

I HAVE AN EXQUISITE COGNITIVE CAPABILITY AND CAN CONVEY SUCH WITH A RICH
VOCABULARY WHICH IS TEMPORALLY COMPLIANT WITH A TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL
THEORETICAL NOUMENON AS THE BASIS OF IMMANUEL KANT’S CRITIQUE OF PURE
REASON (1781 / 1787)

Nous: #29
Time: 17:05 hrs
Date: 2018.12.9
Torah: [#5, #5, #5]@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 10 (#15); Ego: 5 (#10),
@3: Sup: 15 (#30); Ego: 5 (#15),
Male: #30; Feme: #15
} // #15

Dao: Deeming, Non-Assertion
Tetra: #67 - Darkening
I-Ching: H36 - Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light,
Brilliance injured, Intelligence hidden

Latin: Dominator {God in three persons} Alt: Lavyah {Absence of Desire
Before God} {

1. HELPS AGAINST THE UNGODLY & SLANDERERS
2. MISSIONARIES
3. PRIESTS & PRELATES
4. Chantare
}

Jotham {The perfection of the Lord}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#334 / #280} / HETEROS {#378 / #302} / TORAH {#326
/ #276}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:6,nous:29&idea:{m,106}&idea:{f,108}&idea:{m,334}&idea:{f,280}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 6, nous: 29 [Date: 2018.12.9, Time: 17:05
hrs, Super: #334 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes;
I-Ching: H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 -
Closure, Ego: #280 / #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 -
Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance
injured, Intelligence hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening]

- dolf
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant with
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
Well, they are roughly compliant with gibberish, that's for sure.
"obscure and unintelligible disputes and discourses"
"curious and inexplicable web of perplexed words"
"this artificial ignorance and learned gibberish"
"the interest and artifice of those who found no easier way to that pitch of authority and dominion they have attained than by answering men of business and ignorant with hard words or using the ingenious and idle in intricate dispute about unintelligible terms and holding them perpetually entangled in that endless labyrinth"
"For untruth being unacceptable to the mind of man, there is no other defence left for absurdity but obscurity".
In other words, if your ideas are rubbish, the best thing to do is to turn them into gibberish so nobody knows you're simply lying.
I think that just about nails our dialogue ...

YOUTUBE: "Elvis Presley asks 'Who Am I'"

http://youtu.be/0bxPJJ7vhK0

... it's time for you to die off!

"For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through
the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean
escaped from them who live in error.

While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of
corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in
bondage.

YOUTUBE: "They Don’t Care About Us (Michael Jackson)"

http://youtu.be/QNJL6nfu__Q
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 =
anagkaios (G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or
friendship; 1c) what ought according to the law of duty be done, what
is required by the circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the
knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled
therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the
beginning.

For it had been better for them not to have known the way of
righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy
commandment delivered unto them." [2 Peter 2:18-21 (KJV)]

On 13/8/18 1:41 pm, dolf wrote:> Thus one may make reasonably critique
Immanuel Kant's CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE perspectives as conforming to the #391 - HOMOIOS perspective
of NUMBER and accordingly we may then consider the CANONIC merit of the
UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason’s Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine
appearance in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
As thereby providing the *ONTIC* mathematical *MORAL* premises which are
central to existence of being and its integrity, as the means one most
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/thoth9.gif>
[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]
45: [1]
68: [42]
84: [2]
86: [10]
102: [4]
104: [7]
115: [5]
130: [3]
139: [13]
140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15]
148: [12]
150: [28]
156: [21]
157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE
NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23]
161: [9]
166: [11]
168: [26]
169: [18]
171: [20]
173: [27]
175: [22]
177: [29]
180: [19]
181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6]
184: [36]
185: [25]
186: [31]
191: [32]
192: [39]
196: [37]
197: [33]
200: [8]
210: [30]
215: [34]
220: [38]
228: [40]
Of which the TEN COMMANDMENTS (ie. the TRIAD MICROCOSM / SEPTET
MACROCOSM) given by MOSES conform as *ONTIC* postulates (ie. #41 x n) of
NATURE {
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES*
*OF* *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364
associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30
day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days.
"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
THE *MINOR* *PREMISE* {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
THE *CONCLUSION* {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369
with SEPTET #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1
Tishri 5762.
The Roman writer Censorinus, who in his 238 CE publication De Die
Natali, claims that the Pythagorean advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) as
preceeding PLATO (c. 429–347 BCE), as the principle proponent of the
Pythagorean doctrines, considered the natural year as also consisting of
364 and a half days and consistent with the Chinese HAN Dynasty (206
BCE-220CE) understanding (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days) of them.
[Pythagorean Sourcebook p 171]
The Chinese DAOist perspective of the natural year (as equivalent to the
New Testament notion as TROCHOS-course of NATURE-genesis [James 3:6])
associated to Yang Hsiung's treatise that was published within 4 BCE and
known as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery", reconciled it's unified
arrangement of the DAO TE CHING's #81 sections as specifically the
ternary (tetragrammaton) HOMOIOS paradigm value: TETRA: 60 -
ACCUMULATION, which is mapped to the I CHING's H64 designations (of
necessity some are repeated) as the binary paradigm value: H26 - GREAT
DOMESTICATION, RESTRAINING FORCE, GREAT ACCUMULATING, THE TAMING POWER
OF THE GREAT, GREAT STORAGE, POTENTIAL ENERGY;
According to the 4.5 day designations of this natural year cycle into
#81 sections, this would then equate the #CENTRE as 13 to 17 September;
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is
also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the Gregorian
calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made divisible by 22
to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew letters in a pattern
which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of the Chinese 4 BCE
published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year into 364.5 days
and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic square of #369
having a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for the
equivalent date of 13 September.
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY PROPOSITION
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS AS
DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
[IMAGE: The eye {Y-M-T-A} glyph]
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that
was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it
not.” [John 1:1-5 (KJV)]
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension
can become impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing
of any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a
car exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an
earlier experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards
it's final comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and correct
orthography as Category of Understanding.
Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD /
#MEM amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so that
the apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and becomes
de-stressed.
Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC {ie. the *TROPICAL* year is
determined by: #364 x 6 x 49 or #364 x 294 = #107016 days / 293 =
365.242321 days} pharmaceutical which whilst not impeding either the
apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the “central nervous
system and de-stressing of the startle reflex”.
But I am after all, seeking the advice of MENTAL HEALTH professionals on
how best to resolve such an injury given they do not have any
substantial practical clinical and case study expertise with instances
of bomb blasts experience and how to prevent it from progressing towards
a chronic condition known as POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as
elimination--is the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring
knowledge and explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic
correspondence and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is
intrinsic of the mind and this process is not all unlike the initial
starting point of this chapter by its specific construction of
meticulous narrative as neural linguistic streaming and it's subsequent
refinement until it was satisfactory.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence, as Cambridge University researchers have
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc
conrecoednprse and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
And therefore confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and
habitually refuses to overcome its ignorant state by informing itself,
can then be considered delusional.
— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —
"IN DEAD OF NIGHT.
/ MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

I HEAR THE CLARION.
/ CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2 -
Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents} /
#14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

CALL AWAKE FOR WAR.
/ VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]
3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123} 1) son, grandson, child, member of
a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and
female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons
(as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or
sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of
lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF*
*A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

STEADFAST MIGHT.
/ POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]
MARCHING TO SION.
/ RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]
AGAINST THIS WHORE.
/ CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

ARREST THE BLIGHT."
/ ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 = #287
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in excelso
{#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do
Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous
Nature]
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
Post by dolf
WORK IN PROGRESS NOTES OF 15 JULY 2006 [SUBJECT TO REVISION]: WAS
GOVERNOR PHILLIP (11 October 1738 – 31 August 1814) A BETTER VISIONARY
LEADER THAN JOHN HOWARD?
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Flanders.pdf>
Kant’s *MOST* *INFLUENTIAL* *POSITIONS* *IN* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY*
*ARE* *FOUND* *IN* *THE* *GROUNDWORK* *OF* *THE* *METAPHYSICS* *OF*
*MORALS* (*HEREAFTER*, “*GROUNDWORK*” published 1785) *BUT* *HE*
*DEVELOPED*, *ENRICHED*, *AND* *IN* *SOME* *CASES* *MODIFIED* *THOSE*
*VIEWS* *IN* *LATER* *WORKS* *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *CRITIQUE* *OF*
*PRACTICAL* *REASON* (published 1781 / 1787)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>
I. Transition from common rational cognition to philosophic moral
cognition
II. Transition from popular moral philosophy to metaphysics of morals
III. Transition from metaphysics of morals to the critique of pure
practical reason
PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + GEN (ie. #8) above],
H54 - GUIMEI [*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7) below + ZHEN (ie. #3)
above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6) below + SUN (ie.
#4) above], H18 - GU [Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4) below + GEN (ie.
#8) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above]
as 'fundamentality [yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy
[zhen]', H6 - SONG / *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1) below + QIAN (ie.
#6) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea - Formula of Autonomy}
THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6) above + QIAN (ie. #6)
below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure Yin / KUN (ie. #2) above + KUN
(ie. #2) below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie.
#3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of Progression
of individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
Post by dolf
It would be followed by two more books on ethics: Critique of
Practical Reason (1788), The Metaphysics of Morals (1797),
Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, Religion within the
Boundaries of Mere Reason as well as his essays on history and related
topics. Kant’s Lectures on Ethics, which were lecture notes taken by
three of his students on the courses he gave in moral philosophy, also
include relevant material for understanding his views. We will mainly
focus on the foundational doctrines of the Groundwork, even though in
recent years some scholars have become dissatisfied with this standard
approach to Kant’s views and have turned their attention to the later
works. We find the standard approach most illuminating, though we will
highlight important positions from the later works where needed.
With respects to the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}
claim to a Sovereign State as that which was then later the basis of
Roman Empire Governance, we draw upon this observation: "And Moses
{taken out; drawn forth} was learned in all the wisdom of the
Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}, and was mighty in
words and in deeds." [Acts 7:22 (KJV)]
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. Formula of Progression of individual phenomena} =
GENESIS DAY #4
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE = GENESIS DAY #1
H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU = GENESIS DAY #2
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER*
OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE} = GENESIS DAY #3
FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THESE PRINCIPLES REFER TO IMMANUEL KANT'S
Kant's supreme moral principle or "categorical imperative"; Variant
- Act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will that it
should become a universal law.
- Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a
universal law of nature.
- So act that your principle of action might safely be made a law for
the whole world.
- May you live your life as if the maxim of your actions were to
become universal law.
- Live your life as though your every act were to become a universal
law.
Post by dolf
- Do not feel forced to act, as you're only willing to act according
to your own universal laws. And that's good. For only willful acts are
universal. And that's your maxim.
I do not, therefore, need any penetrating acuteness to see what I have
to do in order that my volition be morally good. Inexperienced in the
course of the world, incapable of being prepared for whatever might
come to pass in it, I ask myself only: can you also will that your
maxim become a universal law?
Even if there never have been actions arising from such pure sources,
what is at issue here is not whether this or that happened; that,
instead, reason by itself and independently of all appearances
commands what ought to happen; that, accordingly, actions of which the
world has perhaps so far given no example, and whose very
practicability might be very much doubted by one who bases everything
on experience, are still inflexibly commanded by reason … because …
duty … lies, prior to all experience, in the idea of a reason
determining the will by means of a priori grounds.
Morality is thus the relation of actions to the autonomy of the will,
that is, to a possible giving of universal law through its maxims. An
action that can coexist with the autonomy of the will is permitted;
one that does not accord with it is forbidden. A will whose maxims
necessarily harmonize with the laws of autonomy is a holy, absolutely
good will. The dependence upon the principle of autonomy of a will
that is not absolutely good (moral necessitation) is obligation. This,
accordingly, cannot be attributed to a holy being. The objective of an
action from obligation is called duty.
[<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant>]
Kant developed three principal formulas of the categorical imperative.
The first and most well known of these is the so-called "formula of
universal law." The second is the "formula of humanity." This one has
been almost as interesting to commentators and critics as the first
formula. To some, in fact, the formula of humanity is an even more
interesting expression of Kant’s basic insights in ethics.
If the validity of the categorical imperative depends on humanity’s
existing as an end in itself, as it does according to Kant’s moral
realism, then the categorical imperative should forbid any action that
treats humanity merely as a means. By this line of reasoning Kant sees
that an alternative version of the categorical imperative can now be
expressed as: "So act that you use humanity, whether in your own
person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an
end, never merely as a means " (Kant 1997, 38/4:429).
THE FORMULA OF AUTONOMY
A third version of the categorical imperative follows in Kant’s text
almost immediately upon the four examples of duties derived from the
second version, the formula of humanity. This new formula, emphasizing
the way we may be supposed to have acquired our subjection to moral
requirements, is called the formula of autonomy. It says that we are
subject to the requirement of our maxims’ conformity to universal law
through our own free will. That is what Kant indicated in the
quotation above, referring to the will’s "giving the law to itself"
(Kant 1997, 39/4:431).
The derivation of the formula of autonomy. The premises by which we
arrive at a version of the categorical imperative referencing
autonomy—the self-legislation of moral requirements—are the previous
the ground of all practical lawgiving lies (in accordance with the
first principle) objectively in the rule and the form of universality
which makes it fit to be a universal law (possibly a law of nature);
subjectively, however, it lies in the end; but the subject of all ends
is every rational being as an end in itself (in accordance with the
second principle); from this there follows now the third practical
principle of the will, as supreme limiting condition of its harmony
with universal practical reason, the idea of the will of every
rational being as a will giving universal law. (Kant 1997, 39/4:431)
In order to see how we arrive at the formula of autonomy at the
conclusion of this derivation it is necessary to focus on the second
premise, the formula of humanity. Here the important concept of an
"end" implies legislation, or lawgiving. It is possible to see an end,
like a law, as something making it necessary to will an action—either
as a means of bringing about its existence, or in order not to bring
about its non-existence. If every rational being is an end in the
latter sense, as implied by the formula of humanity, then every
rational being is lawgiving. Here we do not conceive of something
else—like God—legislating that all rational beings are to be treated
always as ends, on account of their intrinsic value. Instead, the idea
is that each rational being, simply in virtue of being an end in
itself, makes necessary (legislates) that it be treated always as an
end. The legislation given by each is also universal, applying to
itself as well as to every other rational being. Hence, the third
version of the categorical imperative commands not acting on any maxim
that could not qualify as giving universal law.
[<http://myweb.ecu.edu/mccartyr/GW/FormulaOfHumanity.asp>]
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant with
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of
Progression of
individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {IE. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
There is no value having a discussion with [you] and accordingly I
don’t
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
need to
labour on your behalf so as to convey the explicit quotes which I have
narrated elsewhere.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Kant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS mathematical
I'm going to stop you right there for some hit-counts.
Here are the hit-counts for the following words within Kant's
"Cognisant" - 0 (zero)
"trinomial" - 0 (zero)
"HOMOIOS" - 0 (zero).
So stop pretending your gibberish has anything to do with Kant's writings.
Kant's intention was to synthesise Empiricism with Rationalism, NOT to play
quantum-mumbo-jumbo with eastern mysticism and numerology and the bible.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-13 07:47:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by dolf
You missed the evidence {ie. probably due to your Sisyphus life of
diseased immorality but check the grammar on that} so I've repeated it
for you...
Formula of Universal Law
Formula of Humanity
Formula of Autonomy
They are likely to make some progression as formula of argumentation
that is not their intended meaning: "obscure and unintelligible disputes
and discourses"
Just in case you missed that, those words:

YOU
DUNG
LOINS
WOMB

Are all associated by temporal relativity and integrity with the trinomial
mathematical theoretical noumenon as *PROOF* of concept...

- dolf
Post by dolf
Such as parody conforms to what is Immanuel Kant’s meaning of the term
"noumena" which he says is not that which is self evident, since it
literally means not "things as they are in dependently of appearing to
us" but something more like "things as they are understood by pure thought."
I HAVE AN EXQUISITE COGNITIVE CAPABILITY AND CAN CONVEY SUCH WITH A RICH
VOCABULARY WHICH IS TEMPORALLY COMPLIANT WITH A TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL
THEORETICAL NOUMENON AS THE BASIS OF IMMANUEL KANT’S CRITIQUE OF PURE
REASON (1781 / 1787)
Nous: #29
Time: 17:05 hrs
Date: 2018.12.9
Torah: [#5, #5, #5]@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 10 (#15); Ego: 5 (#10),
@3: Sup: 15 (#30); Ego: 5 (#15),
Male: #30; Feme: #15
} // #15

Dao: Deeming, Non-Assertion
Tetra: #67 - Darkening
I-Ching: H36 - Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light,
Brilliance injured, Intelligence hidden

Latin: Dominator {God in three persons} Alt: Lavyah {Absence of Desire
Before God} {

1. HELPS AGAINST THE UNGODLY & SLANDERERS
2. MISSIONARIES
3. PRIESTS & PRELATES
4. Chantare
}

Jotham {The perfection of the Lord}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#334 / #280} / HETEROS {#378 / #302} / TORAH {#326 /
#276}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:6,nous:29&idea:{m,106}&idea:{f,108}&idea:{m,334}&idea:{f,280}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 7, col: 6, nous: 29 [Date: 2018.12.9, Time: 17:05
hrs, Super: #334 / #27 - Greatest Functional Skill in Paradoxes; I-Ching:
H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure,
Ego: #280 / #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 - Suppression of the
Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance injured, Intelligence
hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening]

H2755@{
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 46 (#54); Ego: 38 (#46),
@3: Sup: 56 (#110); Ego: 10 (#56),
@4: Sup: 66 (#176); Ego: 10 (#66),
@5: Sup: 72 (#248); Ego: 6 (#72),
@6: Sup: 41 (#289); Ego: 50 (#122),
@7: Sup: 51 (#340); Ego: 10 (#132),
@8: Sup: 10 (#350); Ego: 40 (#172),
Male: #350; Feme: #172
} // #334

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #334 % #41 = #6 - Female Superiority, Completion of Form; I-Ching:
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;

THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am not fraudulent in measures of grain.

#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_182@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 52 (#58); Ego: 46 (#52),
@3: Sup: 34 (#92); Ego: 63 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 20 (#112); Ego: 67 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
Male: #112; Feme: #182
} // #182

#334 as [#8, #200, #10, #10, #6, #50, #10, #40] = charey-yowniym (H2755):
{UMBRA: #4 as #334 % #41 = #6} 1) dung, doves' dung;

H7356@{
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
@3: Sup: 74 (#116); Ego: 38 (#74),
@4: Sup: 1 (#117); Ego: 8 (#82),
@5: Sup: 41 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 40 (#122),
@6: Sup: 51 (#209); Ego: 10 (#132),
@7: Sup: 10 (#219); Ego: 40 (#172),
Male: #219; Feme: #172
} // #334

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #248 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;

THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.

#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_84@{
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84

#334 as [#6, #30, #200, #8, #40, #10, #40] = racham (H7356): {UMBRA: #12 as
#248 % #41 = #2} 1) womb n m abs pl intens; 2) compassion;

G1408@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 23 (#27); Ego: 19 (#23),
@3: Sup: 12 (#39); Ego: 70 (#93),
@4: Sup: 52 (#91); Ego: 40 (#133),
@5: Sup: 41 (#132); Ego: 70 (#203),
@6: Sup: 10 (#142); Ego: 50 (#253),
Male: #142; Feme: #253
} // #334

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #484 % #41 = #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination;
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering;

THOTH MEASURE: #33 - Oh thou Horned one, who makest thine appearance at
Sais; I am not noisy in my speech.

#VIRTUE: With Closeness (no. #33), no possible gap, but
#TOOLS: With Completion (no. #73), no possible change.
#POSITION: With Massing (no. #59), affairs emptying.
#TIME: With Legion (no. #32), affairs filling.
#CANON: #197

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_197@{
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 25 (#58); Ego: 73 (#106),
@3: Sup: 3 (#61); Ego: 59 (#165),
@4: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 32 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
Male: #96; Feme: #197
} // #197

#334 as [#4, #100, #70, #40, #70, #50] = dromos (G1408): {UMBRA: #16 as
#484 % #41 = #33} 1) a course; 1a) in the NT figuratively, the course of
life or of office;

G4771@{
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 27 (#65); Ego: 70 (#108),
@3: Sup: 37 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 10 (#118),
Male: #102; Feme: #118
} // #280

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #600 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching:
H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the
beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;

THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait;
I am not the cause of weeping to any.

#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 26 (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 (#37); Ego: 66 (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 (#67); Ego: 19 (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 (#73); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168

#280 as [#200, #70, #10] = su (G4771): {UMBRA: #16 as #600 % #41 = #26} 1)
you;

H6329@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
@3: Sup: 49 (#128); Ego: 10 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
@4: Sup: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 19 (#149),
@5: Sup: 78 (#274); Ego: 10 (#159),
@6: Sup: 37 (#311); Ego: 40 (#199),
Male: #311; Feme: #199
} // #280

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #186 % #41 = #22 - Point to Reversal?, Humility's Increase; I-Ching:
H8 - Closeness, Seeking Unity, Grouping, Holding together, Alliance; Tetra:
34 - Kinship;

THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.

#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_175@{
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175

#280 as [#40, #80, #10, #100, #10, #40] = puwq (H6329): {UMBRA: #8 as #186
% #41 = #22} 1) to bring out, furnish, promote, go out, issue; 1a)
(Hiphil); 1a1) to produce, furnish; 1a2) to bring out, elicit, obtain,
cause to come out from; 1a3) to promote; 1a4) to cause to go out to;

H5362@{
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 59 (#99); Ego: 19 (#59),
@3: Sup: 69 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 10
(#69),
@4: Sup: 68 (#236); Ego: 80 (#149),
@5: Sup: 78 (#314); Ego: 10 (#159),
@6: Sup: 37 (#351); Ego: 40 (#199),
Male: #351; Feme: #199
} // #280

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #230 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;

THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; I am not boisterous in behaviour.

#VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
#TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
#TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
#CANON: #185

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
@3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
@4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185

#280 as [#40, #100, #10, #80, #10, #40] = naqaph (H5362): {UMBRA: #4 as
#230 % #41 = #25} 1) to strike, strike off; 2) to go around, compass,
round; 1a) (Piel) to strike off skin; 2a) (Qal) to go around; 2b) (Hiphil);
2b1) to go around, surround, encompass, enclose; 2b2) to make the round,
complete the circuit; 2b3) to make round, round off;

H3409@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 48 (#58); Ego: 38 (#48),
@3: Sup: 68 (#126); Ego: 20 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 78 (#204); Ego: 10 (#78),
@5: Sup: 37 (#241); Ego: 40 (#118),
Male: #241; Feme: #118
} // #280

#280 as [#10, #200, #20, #10, #40] = yarek (H3409): {UMBRA: #3 as #230 %
#41 = #25} 1) thigh, side, loin, base; 1a) thigh; 1a1) outside of thigh
(where sword was worn); 1a2) loins (as the seat of procreative power); 1b)
side (flank) (of object); 1c) base;
Post by dolf
- dolf
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant with
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
Well, they are roughly compliant with gibberish, that's for sure.
"obscure and unintelligible disputes and discourses"
"curious and inexplicable web of perplexed words"
"this artificial ignorance and learned gibberish"
"the interest and artifice of those who found no easier way to that
pitch of authority and dominion they have attained than by answering men
of business and ignorant with hard words or using the ingenious and idle
in intricate dispute about unintelligible terms and holding them
perpetually entangled in that endless labyrinth"
"For untruth being unacceptable to the mind of man, there is no other
defence left for absurdity but obscurity".
In other words, if your ideas are rubbish, the best thing to do is to
turn them into gibberish so nobody knows you're simply lying.
I think that just about nails our dialogue ...
YOUTUBE: "Elvis Presley asks 'Who Am I'"
http://youtu.be/0bxPJJ7vhK0
... it's time for you to die off!
"For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through
the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean
escaped from them who live in error.
While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of
corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in
bondage.
YOUTUBE: "They Don’t Care About Us (Michael Jackson)"
http://youtu.be/QNJL6nfu__Q
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 =
anagkaios (G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or
friendship; 1c) what ought according to the law of duty be done, what
is required by the circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the
knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled
therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the
beginning.
For it had been better for them not to have known the way of
righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy
commandment delivered unto them." [2 Peter 2:18-21 (KJV)]
On 13/8/18 1:41 pm, dolf wrote:> Thus one may make reasonably critique
Immanuel Kant's CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE perspectives as conforming to the #391 - HOMOIOS perspective
of NUMBER and accordingly we may then consider the CANONIC merit of the
UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason’s Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine
appearance in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
As thereby providing the *ONTIC* mathematical *MORAL* premises which are
central to existence of being and its integrity, as the means one most
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/thoth9.gif>
[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]
45: [1]
68: [42]
84: [2]
86: [10]
102: [4]
104: [7]
115: [5]
130: [3]
139: [13]
140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15]
148: [12]
150: [28]
156: [21]
157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE
NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23]
161: [9]
166: [11]
168: [26]
169: [18]
171: [20]
173: [27]
175: [22]
177: [29]
180: [19]
181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6]
184: [36]
185: [25]
186: [31]
191: [32]
192: [39]
196: [37]
197: [33]
200: [8]
210: [30]
215: [34]
220: [38]
228: [40]
Of which the TEN COMMANDMENTS (ie. the TRIAD MICROCOSM / SEPTET
MACROCOSM) given by MOSES conform as *ONTIC* postulates (ie. #41 x n) of
NATURE {
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES*
*OF* *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364
associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30
day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days.
"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
THE *MINOR* *PREMISE* {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
THE *CONCLUSION* {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369
with SEPTET #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1
Tishri 5762.
The Roman writer Censorinus, who in his 238 CE publication De Die
Natali, claims that the Pythagorean advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) as
preceeding PLATO (c. 429–347 BCE), as the principle proponent of the
Pythagorean doctrines, considered the natural year as also consisting of
364 and a half days and consistent with the Chinese HAN Dynasty (206
BCE-220CE) understanding (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days) of them.
[Pythagorean Sourcebook p 171]
The Chinese DAOist perspective of the natural year (as equivalent to the
New Testament notion as TROCHOS-course of NATURE-genesis [James 3:6])
associated to Yang Hsiung's treatise that was published within 4 BCE and
known as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery", reconciled it's unified
arrangement of the DAO TE CHING's #81 sections as specifically the
ternary (tetragrammaton) HOMOIOS paradigm value: TETRA: 60 -
ACCUMULATION, which is mapped to the I CHING's H64 designations (of
necessity some are repeated) as the binary paradigm value: H26 - GREAT
DOMESTICATION, RESTRAINING FORCE, GREAT ACCUMULATING, THE TAMING POWER
OF THE GREAT, GREAT STORAGE, POTENTIAL ENERGY;
According to the 4.5 day designations of this natural year cycle into
#81 sections, this would then equate the #CENTRE as 13 to 17 September;
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is
also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the Gregorian
calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made divisible by 22
to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew letters in a pattern
which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of the Chinese 4 BCE
published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year into 364.5 days
and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic square of #369
having a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for the
equivalent date of 13 September.
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY PROPOSITION
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS AS
DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
[IMAGE: The eye {Y-M-T-A} glyph]
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that
was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it
not.” [John 1:1-5 (KJV)]
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension
can become impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing
of any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a
car exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an
earlier experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards
it's final comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and correct
orthography as Category of Understanding.
Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD /
#MEM amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so that
the apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and becomes
de-stressed.
Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC {ie. the *TROPICAL* year is
determined by: #364 x 6 x 49 or #364 x 294 = #107016 days / 293 =
365.242321 days} pharmaceutical which whilst not impeding either the
apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the “central nervous
system and de-stressing of the startle reflex”.
But I am after all, seeking the advice of MENTAL HEALTH professionals on
how best to resolve such an injury given they do not have any
substantial practical clinical and case study expertise with instances
of bomb blasts experience and how to prevent it from progressing towards
a chronic condition known as POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as
elimination--is the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring
knowledge and explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic
correspondence and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is
intrinsic of the mind and this process is not all unlike the initial
starting point of this chapter by its specific construction of
meticulous narrative as neural linguistic streaming and it's subsequent
refinement until it was satisfactory.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence, as Cambridge University researchers have
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc
conrecoednprse and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
And therefore confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and
habitually refuses to overcome its ignorant state by informing itself,
can then be considered delusional.
— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —
"IN DEAD OF NIGHT.
/ MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

I HEAR THE CLARION.
/ CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2 -
Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents} /
#14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

CALL AWAKE FOR WAR.
/ VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]
3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123} 1) son, grandson, child, member of
a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and
female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons
(as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or
sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of
lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF*
*A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

STEADFAST MIGHT.
/ POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]
MARCHING TO SION.
/ RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]
AGAINST THIS WHORE.
/ CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

ARREST THE BLIGHT."
/ ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 = #287
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in excelso
{#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do
Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous
Nature]
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
Post by dolf
WORK IN PROGRESS NOTES OF 15 JULY 2006 [SUBJECT TO REVISION]: WAS
GOVERNOR PHILLIP (11 October 1738 – 31 August 1814) A BETTER VISIONARY
LEADER THAN JOHN HOWARD?
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Flanders.pdf>
Kant’s *MOST* *INFLUENTIAL* *POSITIONS* *IN* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY*
*ARE* *FOUND* *IN* *THE* *GROUNDWORK* *OF* *THE* *METAPHYSICS* *OF*
*MORALS* (*HEREAFTER*, “*GROUNDWORK*” published 1785) *BUT* *HE*
*DEVELOPED*, *ENRICHED*, *AND* *IN* *SOME* *CASES* *MODIFIED* *THOSE*
*VIEWS* *IN* *LATER* *WORKS* *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *CRITIQUE* *OF*
*PRACTICAL* *REASON* (published 1781 / 1787)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>
I. Transition from common rational cognition to philosophic moral
cognition
II. Transition from popular moral philosophy to metaphysics of morals
III. Transition from metaphysics of morals to the critique of pure
practical reason
PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + GEN (ie. #8) above],
H54 - GUIMEI [*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7) below + ZHEN (ie. #3)
above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6) below + SUN (ie.
#4) above], H18 - GU [Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4) below + GEN (ie.
#8) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above]
as 'fundamentality [yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy
[zhen]', H6 - SONG / *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1) below + QIAN (ie.
#6) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea - Formula of Autonomy}
THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6) above + QIAN (ie. #6)
below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure Yin / KUN (ie. #2) above + KUN
(ie. #2) below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie.
#3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of Progression
of individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
Post by dolf
It would be followed by two more books on ethics: Critique of
Practical Reason (1788), The Metaphysics of Morals (1797),
Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, Religion within the
Boundaries of Mere Reason as well as his essays on history and related
topics. Kant’s Lectures on Ethics, which were lecture notes taken by
three of his students on the courses he gave in moral philosophy, also
include relevant material for understanding his views. We will mainly
focus on the foundational doctrines of the Groundwork, even though in
recent years some scholars have become dissatisfied with this standard
approach to Kant’s views and have turned their attention to the later
works. We find the standard approach most illuminating, though we will
highlight important positions from the later works where needed.
With respects to the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}
claim to a Sovereign State as that which was then later the basis of
Roman Empire Governance, we draw upon this observation: "And Moses
{taken out; drawn forth} was learned in all the wisdom of the
Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}, and was mighty in
words and in deeds." [Acts 7:22 (KJV)]
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. Formula of Progression of individual phenomena} =
GENESIS DAY #4
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE = GENESIS DAY #1
H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU = GENESIS DAY #2
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER*
OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE} = GENESIS DAY #3
FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THESE PRINCIPLES REFER TO IMMANUEL KANT'S
Kant's supreme moral principle or "categorical imperative"; Variant
- Act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will that it
should become a universal law.
- Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a
universal law of nature.
- So act that your principle of action might safely be made a law for
the whole world.
- May you live your life as if the maxim of your actions were to
become universal law.
- Live your life as though your every act were to become a universal
law.
Post by dolf
- Do not feel forced to act, as you're only willing to act according
to your own universal laws. And that's good. For only willful acts are
universal. And that's your maxim.
I do not, therefore, need any penetrating acuteness to see what I have
to do in order that my volition be morally good. Inexperienced in the
course of the world, incapable of being prepared for whatever might
come to pass in it, I ask myself only: can you also will that your
maxim become a universal law?
Even if there never have been actions arising from such pure sources,
what is at issue here is not whether this or that happened; that,
instead, reason by itself and independently of all appearances
commands what ought to happen; that, accordingly, actions of which the
world has perhaps so far given no example, and whose very
practicability might be very much doubted by one who bases everything
on experience, are still inflexibly commanded by reason … because …
duty … lies, prior to all experience, in the idea of a reason
determining the will by means of a priori grounds.
Morality is thus the relation of actions to the autonomy of the will,
that is, to a possible giving of universal law through its maxims. An
action that can coexist with the autonomy of the will is permitted;
one that does not accord with it is forbidden. A will whose maxims
necessarily harmonize with the laws of autonomy is a holy, absolutely
good will. The dependence upon the principle of autonomy of a will
that is not absolutely good (moral necessitation) is obligation. This,
accordingly, cannot be attributed to a holy being. The objective of an
action from obligation is called duty.
[<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant>]
Kant developed three principal formulas of the categorical imperative.
The first and most well known of these is the so-called "formula of
universal law." The second is the "formula of humanity." This one has
been almost as interesting to commentators and critics as the first
formula. To some, in fact, the formula of humanity is an even more
interesting expression of Kant’s basic insights in ethics.
If the validity of the categorical imperative depends on humanity’s
existing as an end in itself, as it does according to Kant’s moral
realism, then the categorical imperative should forbid any action that
treats humanity merely as a means. By this line of reasoning Kant sees
that an alternative version of the categorical imperative can now be
expressed as: "So act that you use humanity, whether in your own
person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an
end, never merely as a means " (Kant 1997, 38/4:429).
THE FORMULA OF AUTONOMY
A third version of the categorical imperative follows in Kant’s text
almost immediately upon the four examples of duties derived from the
second version, the formula of humanity. This new formula, emphasizing
the way we may be supposed to have acquired our subjection to moral
requirements, is called the formula of autonomy. It says that we are
subject to the requirement of our maxims’ conformity to universal law
through our own free will. That is what Kant indicated in the
quotation above, referring to the will’s "giving the law to itself"
(Kant 1997, 39/4:431).
The derivation of the formula of autonomy. The premises by which we
arrive at a version of the categorical imperative referencing
autonomy—the self-legislation of moral requirements—are the previous
the ground of all practical lawgiving lies (in accordance with the
first principle) objectively in the rule and the form of universality
which makes it fit to be a universal law (possibly a law of nature);
subjectively, however, it lies in the end; but the subject of all ends
is every rational being as an end in itself (in accordance with the
second principle); from this there follows now the third practical
principle of the will, as supreme limiting condition of its harmony
with universal practical reason, the idea of the will of every
rational being as a will giving universal law. (Kant 1997, 39/4:431)
In order to see how we arrive at the formula of autonomy at the
conclusion of this derivation it is necessary to focus on the second
premise, the formula of humanity. Here the important concept of an
"end" implies legislation, or lawgiving. It is possible to see an end,
like a law, as something making it necessary to will an action—either
as a means of bringing about its existence, or in order not to bring
about its non-existence. If every rational being is an end in the
latter sense, as implied by the formula of humanity, then every
rational being is lawgiving. Here we do not conceive of something
else—like God—legislating that all rational beings are to be treated
always as ends, on account of their intrinsic value. Instead, the idea
is that each rational being, simply in virtue of being an end in
itself, makes necessary (legislates) that it be treated always as an
end. The legislation given by each is also universal, applying to
itself as well as to every other rational being. Hence, the third
version of the categorical imperative commands not acting on any maxim
that could not qualify as giving universal law.
[<http://myweb.ecu.edu/mccartyr/GW/FormulaOfHumanity.asp>]
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant
with
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of Progression of
individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {IE. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
There is no value having a discussion with [you] and accordingly I
don’t
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
need to
labour on your behalf so as to convey the explicit quotes which I have
narrated elsewhere.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Kant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS mathematical
I'm going to stop you right there for some hit-counts.
Here are the hit-counts for the following words within Kant's
"Cognisant" - 0 (zero)
"trinomial" - 0 (zero)
"HOMOIOS" - 0 (zero).
So stop pretending your gibberish has anything to do with Kant's writings.
Kant's intention was to synthesise Empiricism with Rationalism, NOT to play
quantum-mumbo-jumbo with eastern mysticism and numerology and the bible.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-14 03:46:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
YOU Lions Growl of Butchers Foul <***@gmail.com> ARE ADVISED
TO CEASE ENGAGING WITHIN A CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY ANONYMOUS INTERNET #235 -
DETRUDE AS CLAIMED  BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING RACIAL AND
RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE AS A LEGAL CLAIM WILL AT SOME TIME IN
THE FUTURE (IN THE TIME OF MY CONVENIENCE) BE MADE AGAINST YOURSELF

<Loading Image...>
Post by dolf
You missed the evidence {ie. probably due to your Sisyphus life of
diseased immorality but check the grammar on that} so I've repeated it
for you...
Formula of Universal Law
Formula of Humanity
Formula of Autonomy
They are likely to make some progression as formula of argumentation
that is not their intended meaning: "obscure and unintelligible disputes
and discourses"
Such as parody conforms to what is Immanuel Kant’s meaning of the term
"noumena" which he says is not that which is self evident, since it
literally means not "things as they are in dependently of appearing to
us" but something more like "things as they are understood by pure thought."
...which is evident self-contradictory balderdash.
If, as Kant says, there can never be an absence of perspective, then his
claim to be able to arrive at an objective truth is only arrived at
through copious application of "obscure and unintelligible disputes and discourses".
Kant can't have it both ways.
-- ADVICE GIVEN TO MR RAYMOND CAFE AND PARTICIPANTS WITHIN THE WELLINGTON
LIQUOR ACCORD OF A LEGAL CLAIM OF BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING
RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 August 2018

<https://www.facebook.com/MisterRaymond.Sale/>

This is to formerly advise MR RAYMOND CAFE and participants within the
WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD by means of the accompanying photographic evidence
to the contrary that a legal claim of BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION occasioning
racial and religious hatred and sexual prejudice will at some time in the
future (in the time of my convenience) be made against yourselves and your
residual ESTATES for an equivalent sum of an INSURANCE CLAIM for DAMAGES
(sought: $154 million) which as MATERIAL DETAILS were made to the FINANCIAL
SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION AS EARLIER SUBMISSIONS DATED 17 TO 20 JULY 2018
AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY THEM WITH AN EMAIL @ 1234 HOURS 24 JULY 2018.

WHILST IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE THAT DOCUMENT A SUMMARY OF THE CLAIM
IS CONVEYED WITHIN THE DOCUMENT TITLED: "SOME FREE SPEECH IS A SOCIAL
DISEASE"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Sociability.pdf>

Nous: #50
Time: 09:25 hrs
Date: 2018.8.14
Torah: [#4, #50, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#58); Ego: 50 (#54),
@3: Sup: 64 (#122); Ego: 10 (#64),
Male: #122; Feme: #64
} // #64

Dao: Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of Life
Tetra: #77 - Compliance
I-Ching: H2 - Pure Yin, Passive Principle/Earth, Field, The receptive,
Acquiescence, The flow

Latin: Invacandus {Sign of mercy} Alt: Haayah {Behold God} {

1. PROTECTS & CONSOLES. INSPIRES IN DECISIONS
2. JUSTICE AND LAWYERS
3. JUDGES
4. Eregbuo
}

Abiud {Father of praise}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#433 / #346} / HETEROS {#433 / #346} / TORAH {#398 /
#369}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:4,col:7,nous:50&idea:{m,77}&idea:{f,104}&idea:{m,433}&idea:{f,346}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 4, col: 7, nous: 50 [Date: 2018.8.14, Time: 09:25
hrs, Super: #433 / #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra:
26 - Endeavour, Ego: #346 / #50 - Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of
Life; I-Ching: H2 - Pure Yin, Passive Principle/Earth, Field, The
receptive, Acquiescence, The flow; Tetra: 77 - Compliance]

H6696@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 59 (#109); Ego: 9 (#59),
@3: Sup: 65 (#174); Ego: 6 (#65),
@4: Sup: 22 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #196; Feme: #103
} // #346

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity;
I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#346 as [#50, #90, #6, #200] = tsuwr (H6696): {UMBRA: #14 as #296 % #41 =
#9} 1) to bind, besiege, confine, cramp; 2) (Qal) *TO* *SHOW* *HOSTILITY*
*TO*, be an adversary, treat as foe; 3) (Qal) to form, fashion, delineate;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to confine, secure; 1a2) to shut in, beseige; 1a3) to shut
up, enclose;

FROM THIS DAY OF 14 AUGUST 2018 IT IS IMMATERIAL WHETHER ANY OF THE PARTIES
WITHIN THE WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD AGAINST WHICH THE LEGAL CLAIM OF
UNSOCIABILITY OCCASIONING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE
IS MADE CONTINUE TO LIVE OR DIE, AND REGARDLESS OF INTENTION AS BOER /
ANZAC DEFAMATION AND ACTION TO DISPOSE YOUR RESIDUAL ESTATE AND PROPERTY
AGAINST SUCH ABHORRENT CONDUCT OF UNLAWFUL INHOSPITALITY AND AN ABJECT
UNWILLINGNESS TO RESOLVE THE MATTER IN ANY REGARD FOR THE DIGNITY OF
PERSONS .

-- MR RAYMOND'S BISCUIT --

"OH YES DETAILS
AND EVERMORE IN.
SO MANY IT FAILS.
'TWAS SUCH A SIN.

CREME OF THE DO 💩.
WAS EVER SO FINE.
WHIPPED AVOCADO 🥑.
JUST SUBLIME."

YOUTUBE: "Anthony Hopkins as Harvey Kellogg in Road to Wellville - Hot
Biscuit!"

http://youtu.be/RblbZQth0KE

TROLLING_MILITIA@{
@1: Sup: 60 (#60); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 48 (#108); Ego: 7 (#23),
@3: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 80 (#103),
@4: Sup: 18 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 10 (#113),
@5: Sup: 6 (#162); Ego: 76 (#189),
@6: Sup: 64 (#226); Ego: 81 (#270),
@7: Sup: 59 (#285); Ego: 35 (#305),
@8: Sup: 9 (#294); Ego: 61 (#366),
@9: Sup: 25 (#319); Ego: 43 (#409),
Male: #319; Feme: #409
}

If you are going to make rational and reasoned comment in refutation of the
LEGAL CLAIM made against ANY OF THE PARTIES WITHIN THE WELLINGTON LIQUOR
ACCORD then please do without any further #325 - DETRUDE as defamation.
However I know that since #168 - CONDEMNATION / #541 - CONTEMN is coming
your way this Remembrance / Armistice Day 11 November Centennial 2018 that
you must take any irrational means by self justification to defame.

As Police independence within my matters are seriously prejudiced by an
unlawful liquor ban not undertaken in a prescribed manner relating a
reasonable objection made of a boisterous female customer within a supposed
quiet amenity reaching for an eating utensil as weapon incident at the Star
Hotel on 26 March 2017 I have no further confidence within the Victoria
Police addressing my matters of complaint.

<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

Apart from reporting the matter to yourselves by mail only should you
stubbornly wish to take any action, I am intentioned to direct the matter
of BOER / ANZAC defamation and of racial hatred against this person and
yourselves to lawyers in due course.

- dolf

Initial Post: 14 August 2018

#MR #RAYMOND #CAFE #WELLINGTON #LIQUOR #ACCORD
Post by dolf
You missed the evidence {ie. probably due to your Sisyphus life of
diseased immorality but check the grammar on that} so I've repeated it
for you...
Formula of Universal Law
Formula of Humanity
Formula of Autonomy
They are likely to make some progression as formula of argumentation
that is not their intended meaning: "obscure and unintelligible disputes
and discourses"
YOU
DUNG
LOINS
WOMB
Are all associated by temporal relativity and integrity with the trinomial
mathematical theoretical noumenon as *PROOF* of concept...
- dolf
Post by dolf
Such as parody conforms to what is Immanuel Kant’s meaning of the term
"noumena" which he says is not that which is self evident, since it
literally means not "things as they are in dependently of appearing to
us" but something more like "things as they are understood by pure thought."
I HAVE AN EXQUISITE COGNITIVE CAPABILITY AND CAN CONVEY SUCH WITH A RICH
VOCABULARY WHICH IS TEMPORALLY COMPLIANT WITH A TRINOMIAL MATHEMATICAL
THEORETICAL NOUMENON AS THE BASIS OF IMMANUEL KANT’S CRITIQUE OF PURE
REASON (1781 / 1787)
Nous: #29
Time: 17:05 hrs
Date: 2018.12.9
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 5 (#5),
@2: Sup: 10 (#15); Ego: 5 (#10),
@3: Sup: 15 (#30); Ego: 5 (#15),
Male: #30; Feme: #15
} // #15
Dao: Deeming, Non-Assertion
Tetra: #67 - Darkening
I-Ching: H36 - Suppression of the Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light,
Brilliance injured, Intelligence hidden
Latin: Dominator {God in three persons} Alt: Lavyah {Absence of Desire
Before God} {
1. HELPS AGAINST THE UNGODLY & SLANDERERS
2. MISSIONARIES
3. PRIESTS & PRELATES
4. Chantare
}
Jotham {The perfection of the Lord}
Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#334 / #280} / HETEROS {#378 / #302} / TORAH {#326 /
#276}
<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:7,col:6,nous:29&idea:{m,106}&idea:{f,108}&idea:{m,334}&idea:{f,280}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>
H21 - Bite Together, Biting Through, Gnawing Bite; Tetra: 74 - Closure,
Ego: #280 / #29 - Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 - Suppression of the
Light, Sinking/Darkening of the Light, Brilliance injured, Intelligence
hidden; Tetra: 67 - Darkening]
@1: Sup: 8 (#8); Ego: 8 (#8),
@2: Sup: 46 (#54); Ego: 38 (#46),
@3: Sup: 56 (#110); Ego: 10 (#56),
@4: Sup: 66 (#176); Ego: 10 (#66),
@5: Sup: 72 (#248); Ego: 6 (#72),
@6: Sup: 41 (#289); Ego: 50 (#122),
@7: Sup: 51 (#340); Ego: 10 (#132),
@8: Sup: 10 (#350); Ego: 40 (#172),
Male: #350; Feme: #172
} // #334
H25 - No Errancy, Without Embroiling, Innocence, Pestilence; Tetra: 66 -
Departure;
THOTH MEASURE: #6 - Oh thou of Lion form, who makest thine appearance in
Heaven; I am not fraudulent in measures of grain.
#VIRTUE: With Contrariety (no. #6), internal contradiction.
#TOOLS: Enlargement (no. #46) means external opposition.
#POSITION: As to Watch (no. #63), it is the apparent.
#TIME: As to Darkening (no. #67), it is the indistinct.
#CANON: #182
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 52 (#58); Ego: 46 (#52),
@3: Sup: 34 (#92); Ego: 63 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}),
@4: Sup: 20 (#112); Ego: 67 (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF
GRAIN {%6}),
Male: #112; Feme: #182
} // #182
{UMBRA: #4 as #334 % #41 = #6} 1) dung, doves' dung;
@1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
@2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
@3: Sup: 74 (#116); Ego: 38 (#74),
@4: Sup: 1 (#117); Ego: 8 (#82),
@5: Sup: 41 (#158 - I AM NOT HOT OF SPEECH {%23}); Ego: 40 (#122),
@6: Sup: 51 (#209); Ego: 10 (#132),
@7: Sup: 10 (#219); Ego: 40 (#172),
Male: #219; Feme: #172
} // #334
UMBRA: #248 % #41 = #2 - Contrast of Terms, Self-Culture; I-Ching: H11 -
Peace, Pervading, Greatness; Tetra: 16 - Contact;
THOTH MEASURE: #2 - Oh thou who boldest the fire, and makest thine
appearance in Cher-aba; I am not a man of violence.
#VIRTUE: With Full Circle (no. #2), a return to virtue.
#TOOLS: With Defectiveness (no. #10), the crooked.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), a counter turn towards
punishment.
#TIME: With Bold Resolution (no. #30), the straight?
#CANON: #84
@1: Sup: 2 (#2); Ego: 2 (#2),
@2: Sup: 12 (#14); Ego: 10 (#12),
@3: Sup: 54 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN
{%42}); Ego: 42 (#54),
@4: Sup: 3 (#71); Ego: 30 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
Male: #71; Feme: #84
} // #84
#334 as [#6, #30, #200, #8, #40, #10, #40] = racham (H7356): {UMBRA: #12 as
#248 % #41 = #2} 1) womb n m abs pl intens; 2) compassion;
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 23 (#27); Ego: 19 (#23),
@3: Sup: 12 (#39); Ego: 70 (#93),
@4: Sup: 52 (#91); Ego: 40 (#133),
@5: Sup: 41 (#132); Ego: 70 (#203),
@6: Sup: 10 (#142); Ego: 50 (#253),
Male: #142; Feme: #253
} // #334
UMBRA: #484 % #41 = #33 - Achievable Goals, Virtue of Discrimination;
I-Ching: H9 - Lesser Domestication, Minor Restraint, Small Accumulating,
The taming power of the small, Small harvest; Tetra: 35 - Gathering;
THOTH MEASURE: #33 - Oh thou Horned one, who makest thine appearance at
Sais; I am not noisy in my speech.
#VIRTUE: With Closeness (no. #33), no possible gap, but
#TOOLS: With Completion (no. #73), no possible change.
#POSITION: With Massing (no. #59), affairs emptying.
#TIME: With Legion (no. #32), affairs filling.
#CANON: #197
@1: Sup: 33 (#33); Ego: 33 (#33),
@2: Sup: 25 (#58); Ego: 73 (#106),
@3: Sup: 3 (#61); Ego: 59 (#165),
@4: Sup: 35 (#96); Ego: 32 (#197 - I AM NOT NOISY IN MY SPEECH {%33}),
Male: #96; Feme: #197
} // #197
#334 as [#4, #100, #70, #40, #70, #50] = dromos (G1408): {UMBRA: #16 as
#484 % #41 = #33} 1) a course; 1a) in the NT figuratively, the course of
life or of office;
@1: Sup: 38 (#38); Ego: 38 (#38),
@2: Sup: 27 (#65); Ego: 70 (#108),
@3: Sup: 37 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 10 (#118),
Male: #102; Feme: #118
} // #280
H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the
beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait;
I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
@1: Sup: 26 (#26); Ego: 26 (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 (#37); Ego: 66 (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 (#67); Ego: 19 (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 (#73); Ego: 57 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY
{%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168
#280 as [#200, #70, #10] = su (G4771): {UMBRA: #16 as #600 % #41 = #26} 1)
you;
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 39 (#79); Ego: 80 (#120),
@3: Sup: 49 (#128); Ego: 10 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
@4: Sup: 68 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 19 (#149),
@5: Sup: 78 (#274); Ego: 10 (#159),
@6: Sup: 37 (#311); Ego: 40 (#199),
Male: #311; Feme: #199
} // #280
34 - Kinship;
THOTH MEASURE: #22 - Oh Chemiu, who makest thine appearance in Kauu; I am
not a transgressor.
#VIRTUE: What Resistance (no. #22) approves is right while
#TOOLS: What Doubt (no. #62) abhors is wrong.
#POSITION: With Advance (no. #20), the desire to proceed.
#TIME: With Stoppage (no. #71), the desire for constraints.
#CANON: #175
@1: Sup: 22 (#22); Ego: 22 (#22),
@2: Sup: 3 (#25); Ego: 62 (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
@3: Sup: 23 (#48); Ego: 20 (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
@4: Sup: 13 (#61); Ego: 71 (#175 - I AM NOT A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}),
Male: #61; Feme: #175
} // #175
#280 as [#40, #80, #10, #100, #10, #40] = puwq (H6329): {UMBRA: #8 as #186
% #41 = #22} 1) to bring out, furnish, promote, go out, issue; 1a)
(Hiphil); 1a1) to produce, furnish; 1a2) to bring out, elicit, obtain,
cause to come out from; 1a3) to promote; 1a4) to cause to go out to;
@1: Sup: 40 (#40); Ego: 40 (#40),
@2: Sup: 59 (#99); Ego: 19 (#59),
@3: Sup: 69 (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 10
(#69),
@4: Sup: 68 (#236); Ego: 80 (#149),
@5: Sup: 78 (#314); Ego: 10 (#159),
@6: Sup: 37 (#351); Ego: 40 (#199),
Male: #351; Feme: #199
} // #280
UMBRA: #230 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;
THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; I am not boisterous in behaviour.
#VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
#TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
#POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
#TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
#CANON: #185
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
@3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
@4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185
#280 as [#40, #100, #10, #80, #10, #40] = naqaph (H5362): {UMBRA: #4 as
#230 % #41 = #25} 1) to strike, strike off; 2) to go around, compass,
round; 1a) (Piel) to strike off skin; 2a) (Qal) to go around; 2b) (Hiphil);
2b1) to go around, surround, encompass, enclose; 2b2) to make the round,
complete the circuit; 2b3) to make round, round off;
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 48 (#58); Ego: 38 (#48),
@3: Sup: 68 (#126); Ego: 20 (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD
OF MY DOMAIN {%42}),
@4: Sup: 78 (#204); Ego: 10 (#78),
@5: Sup: 37 (#241); Ego: 40 (#118),
Male: #241; Feme: #118
} // #280
#280 as [#10, #200, #20, #10, #40] = yarek (H3409): {UMBRA: #3 as #230 %
#41 = #25} 1) thigh, side, loin, base; 1a) thigh; 1a1) outside of thigh
(where sword was worn); 1a2) loins (as the seat of procreative power); 1b)
side (flank) (of object); 1c) base;
Post by dolf
- dolf
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant with
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
Well, they are roughly compliant with gibberish, that's for sure.
"obscure and unintelligible disputes and discourses"
"curious and inexplicable web of perplexed words"
"this artificial ignorance and learned gibberish"
"the interest and artifice of those who found no easier way to that
pitch of authority and dominion they have attained than by answering men
of business and ignorant with hard words or using the ingenious and idle
in intricate dispute about unintelligible terms and holding them
perpetually entangled in that endless labyrinth"
"For untruth being unacceptable to the mind of man, there is no other
defence left for absurdity but obscurity".
In other words, if your ideas are rubbish, the best thing to do is to
turn them into gibberish so nobody knows you're simply lying.
I think that just about nails our dialogue ...
YOUTUBE: "Elvis Presley asks 'Who Am I'"
http://youtu.be/0bxPJJ7vhK0
... it's time for you to die off!
"For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through
the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean
escaped from them who live in error.
While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of
corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in
bondage.
YOUTUBE: "They Don’t Care About Us (Michael Jackson)"
http://youtu.be/QNJL6nfu__Q
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 =
anagkaios (G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do
without, indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or
friendship; 1c) what ought according to the law of duty be done, what
is required by the circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the
knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled
therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the
beginning.
For it had been better for them not to have known the way of
righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy
commandment delivered unto them." [2 Peter 2:18-21 (KJV)]
On 13/8/18 1:41 pm, dolf wrote:> Thus one may make reasonably critique
Immanuel Kant's CATEGORICAL
IMPERATIVE perspectives as conforming to the #391 - HOMOIOS perspective
of NUMBER and accordingly we may then consider the CANONIC merit of the
UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason’s Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine
appearance in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
As thereby providing the *ONTIC* mathematical *MORAL* premises which are
central to existence of being and its integrity, as the means one most
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/thoth9.gif>
[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D /
#0 - 21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY
FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]
45: [1]
68: [42]
84: [2]
86: [10]
102: [4]
104: [7]
115: [5]
130: [3]
139: [13]
140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15]
148: [12]
150: [28]
156: [21]
157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE
NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23]
161: [9]
166: [11]
168: [26]
169: [18]
171: [20]
173: [27]
175: [22]
177: [29]
180: [19]
181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6]
184: [36]
185: [25]
186: [31]
191: [32]
192: [39]
196: [37]
197: [33]
200: [8]
210: [30]
215: [34]
220: [38]
228: [40]
Of which the TEN COMMANDMENTS (ie. the TRIAD MICROCOSM / SEPTET
MACROCOSM) given by MOSES conform as *ONTIC* postulates (ie. #41 x n) of
NATURE {
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law}, which contains the law of that will: 7 x 24 *COURSES*
*OF* *PRIESTS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364
associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30
day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days.
"And God spake all these words, saying, 'I am the LORD thy God, which
have brought thee out of the land of Egypt {that troubles or oppresses;
anguish}, out of the house of bondage. Thou shalt have no other gods
before me..." [Exodus 20:1-3 (KJV)]
THE *MINOR* *PREMISE* {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity}, which contains the command to behave in accordance with the
law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the law: x 49 = 6J or
294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20
March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756;
"... Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the
LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon
the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
And showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my
commandments..." [Exodus 20:5-6 (KJV)]
THE *CONCLUSION* {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), what is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 as 122J3W1D + 9(9²+1)/2 as #369
with SEPTET #41 centric on 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1
Tishri 5762.
The Roman writer Censorinus, who in his 238 CE publication De Die
Natali, claims that the Pythagorean advocate Philolaus (470-385 BCE) as
preceeding PLATO (c. 429–347 BCE), as the principle proponent of the
Pythagorean doctrines, considered the natural year as also consisting of
364 and a half days and consistent with the Chinese HAN Dynasty (206
BCE-220CE) understanding (#81 x 4.5 days = 364.5 days) of them.
[Pythagorean Sourcebook p 171]
The Chinese DAOist perspective of the natural year (as equivalent to the
New Testament notion as TROCHOS-course of NATURE-genesis [James 3:6])
associated to Yang Hsiung's treatise that was published within 4 BCE and
known as the "Canon of Supreme Mystery", reconciled it's unified
arrangement of the DAO TE CHING's #81 sections as specifically the
ternary (tetragrammaton) HOMOIOS paradigm value: TETRA: 60 -
ACCUMULATION, which is mapped to the I CHING's H64 designations (of
necessity some are repeated) as the binary paradigm value: H26 - GREAT
DOMESTICATION, RESTRAINING FORCE, GREAT ACCUMULATING, THE TAMING POWER
OF THE GREAT, GREAT STORAGE, POTENTIAL ENERGY;
According to the 4.5 day designations of this natural year cycle into
#81 sections, this would then equate the #CENTRE as 13 to 17 September;
"...Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the
LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.'" [Exodus
20:7 (KJV)]
THE *RESTATEMENT* *OF* *A* *SACRED* / *SOVEREIGN* *PRINCIPLE*: It is
also possible to divide the number of days in 400 years in the Gregorian
calendar reforms as 146,097 days by 7 and that when made divisible by 22
to obtain the remainder, and to arrange the Hebrew letters in a pattern
which has a remainder of #13 as being in the middle of the Chinese 4 BCE
published DAO TE CHING / I CHING division of the year into 364.5 days
and the Jewish Kabbalah equivalent which deployed a magic square of #369
having a distinct mathematical property at centre of #41 for the
equivalent date of 13 September.
#6000 MOD 22 = 13 [#MEM / #40 - Shelah {Sprout/That breaks; that unties;
that undresses}
As waters, peoples, nations, languages and tongues; the spring of Torah
being the source of knowledge and wisdom] = EQUINOX of Wednesday
DATE(1996,3,20) + (5 * #364) + #182 days <-- *LIMIT* = Wednesday
DATE(2001,9,12) with Equinox of Saturday DATE(2001,9,23) commencing the
Sabbath year of 'oth cycle
FIRSTLY I AM GOING TO SELF-DESCRIBE THE COGNITIVE PROCESS BY PROPOSITION
#YOD - IS THE #CENTRE OF REALITY AS THE BEGINNING OF A WORD
#MEM - IS THE DELIMITATION OF ANY COGNITIVE EVENT AS THE ENDING OF A WORD
#TAU - IS THE CIRCUMSCRIBING OF ANY REALITY EVENT WHEREBY THE PROCESS AS
DISAMBIGUATION OF A WORD OCCURS
#ALEPH - IS THEN THE NEUROLOGICAL STREAMING OF THE COMPREHENSION
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Circle.jpeg>
[IMAGE: The eye {Y-M-T-A} glyph]
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word
was God.
The same was in the beginning with God.
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that
was made.
In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it
not.” [John 1:1-5 (KJV)]
Whereby in terms of the WORD example the mind's phonetic apprehension
can become impeded and stressed as then either discordant or unknowing
of any word's entity (ie. as the manner by which you can distinguish a
car exhaust blow back as a sudden and an inexplicable bang from an
earlier experience of a bomb blast) is a priori and transitional towards
it's final comprehension by it's acceptable, customary and correct
orthography as Category of Understanding.
Thus the recourse in my view is to either effect a stratagem of #YOD /
#MEM amplification THERAPY by which AMBIGUITY is delimited and so that
the apprehension process occurs normally as unimpeded and becomes
de-stressed.
Or whether a prescription of a PSYCHOTROPIC {ie. the *TROPICAL* year is
determined by: #364 x 6 x 49 or #364 x 294 = #107016 days / 293 =
365.242321 days} pharmaceutical which whilst not impeding either the
apprehension or cognitive process is able to sedate the “central nervous
system and de-stressing of the startle reflex”.
But I am after all, seeking the advice of MENTAL HEALTH professionals on
how best to resolve such an injury given they do not have any
substantial practical clinical and case study expertise with instances
of bomb blasts experience and how to prevent it from progressing towards
a chronic condition known as POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.
Making a reasonable supposition as a logical, probable and hypothetical
proposition, which is then predicated upon by a determined course of
affirmative action to inform oneself through inquisition as
elimination--is the process of a rational mind practiced in acquiring
knowledge and explicit specification within Categories of Understanding.
That in my view, punctiliousness has an intrinsic phonetic
correspondence and is a functional cognitive characteristic which is
intrinsic of the mind and this process is not all unlike the initial
starting point of this chapter by its specific construction of
meticulous narrative as neural linguistic streaming and it's subsequent
refinement until it was satisfactory.
For example, if all but the first and last letters are scrambled and the
sentence is entirely ambiguous, you can still disambiguate the word and
fully comprehend the sentence, as Cambridge University researchers have
"Taht in my veiw, psciiouelnunsts is an insniirtc phteinoc
conrecoednprse and fancounitl cvgiinote cartarseiichtc of mnid."
<http://douglastwitchell.com/scrambled_words.php>
And therefore confusion like fear and paranoia which steadfastly and
habitually refuses to overcome its ignorant state by informing itself,
can then be considered delusional.
— ESPRIT DE CORPS: 'FLANDERS SOIL' AS EXEMPLAR TRUE #CENTRE OF WILL
{INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS} —
"IN DEAD OF NIGHT.
/ MENTALISM {#260 - Raven (Corax): Mercury}: 1 x #41 = #41 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#1 - Will, free will, choice / VIRTUE: 64 meta
descriptor prototypes: Omne Datum Optimum {#1 - Every perfect gift}
(1139 CE) / Remember the Sabbath Day} / #13 / #1 - Nature Contains
Nature {MOTHER (INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS) - The tongue of
decree deciding between them} [#15 / #6 - Form of Nature]

I HEAR THE CLARION.
/ CORRESPONDENCE {#175 - Bridegroom (Nymphus): Venus}: 2 x #41 = #82 as
#INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#2 - desire, inclination: Milites Templi {#2 -
Soldiers of the Temple} (1144 CE) / TOOLS: marriage / Honour Parents} /
#14 / #2 - Nature Rejoices in its Nature [#34 / #7 - Engendering Nature]

CALL AWAKE FOR WAR.
/ VIBRATION {#65 - *SOLDIER* (Miles): Mars}: 3 x #41 = #123 as #INNER
Militia Dei {#3 - Soldiers of God} (1145 CE) / POSITION: Soldier / Do
Not Kill} / #15 / #3 - Nature Surmounts Nature [#65 / #2 - Nature
Rejoices in its Nature]
3 x #41 = #123 as #6, #2, #50, #10, #5, #50 or #773 as #6, #2, #50, #10,
#5, #700 = ben (H1121): {#75 as #123} 1) son, grandson, child, member of
a group; 1a) son, male child; 1b) grandson; 1c) children (pl. - male and
female); 1d) youth, young men (pl.); 1e) young (of animals); 1f) sons
(as characterisation, ie sons of injustice [for un- righteous men] or
sons of God [for angels]; 1g) people (of a nation) (pl.); 1h) of
lifeless things, ie sparks, stars, arrows (fig.); 1i) *A* *MEMBER* *OF*
*A* *GUILD*, *ORDER*, *CLASS*;

STEADFAST MIGHT.
/ POLARITY {#34 - *LION* (Leo): Jupiter}: 4 x #41 = #164 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} {#4 - favour, affection: Pastoralis Praeeminentiae {#4 -
Pastoral Pre-eminence to monarchs} (1307 CE) / TIME: #CENTRE and #INR /
Do Not Commit Adultery (ie. Avoid Heteronomy Against Autonomy)}, [John
5:39-47 (KJV)] / #16 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature [#111 / #3 -
Nature Surmounts Nature]
MARCHING TO SION.
/ RHYTHM {#369 - Persian (Perses): Lunar}: 5 x #41 = #205 as #INNER
{FEMALE (EGO)} / {#5 - last will, testament: Faciens misericordiam {#5 -
Granting forgiveness} (1308 CE) / CANON: RHYTHM & HARMONY / Do Not
Steal} / #17 / #5 - Act of Nature {DOUBLE: #5 - Act of Nature {#8 -
Transforming Nature}} [#175 / #4 - Nature Amended in its Nature]
AGAINST THIS WHORE.
/ CAUSE AND EFFECT {#111 - Runner of the Sun (Heliodromus): Sol
Invictus}: 6 x #41 = #246 as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} *ANGEL* GABRIEL [Luke
1:19-38] / {#6 - goal, object, purpose, intention: Ad providam {#6 - To
Foresee / For Providence} (1312 CE) / IMPLEMENTATION: HETEROS (binomial
/ bifurcated) THEORY OF NUMBER / Do Not Bear False Witness} / #18 / #6 -
Form of Nature [#260 / #8 - Transforming Nature]

ARREST THE BLIGHT."
/ ENGENDERING / ENUMERATE {#15 - Father (Pater): Saturn}: 7 x #41 = #287
as #INNER {FEMALE (EGO)} / {#7 - signification, import: Vox in excelso
{#7 - The voice on high} (1312 CE) / LIMIT: #INR AS TERNIO ANAGRAM / Do
Not Covet} / #19 / #7 - Engendering Nature [#369 / #9 - Autonomous
Nature]
7 x #41 = #287 as #1, #50, #1, #3, #20, #1, #10, #1, #200 = anagkaios
(G316): {#9 as #356} 1) necessary; 1a) what one can not do without,
indispensable; 1b) connected by bonds of nature or friendship; 1c) what
ought according to the law of duty be done, what is required by the
circumstances; [LATIN definition: VOLUNTĀTIS]
Post by dolf
WORK IN PROGRESS NOTES OF 15 JULY 2006 [SUBJECT TO REVISION]: WAS
GOVERNOR PHILLIP (11 October 1738 – 31 August 1814) A BETTER VISIONARY
LEADER THAN JOHN HOWARD?
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Flanders.pdf>
Kant’s *MOST* *INFLUENTIAL* *POSITIONS* *IN* *MORAL* *PHILOSOPHY*
*ARE* *FOUND* *IN* *THE* *GROUNDWORK* *OF* *THE* *METAPHYSICS* *OF*
*MORALS* (*HEREAFTER*, “*GROUNDWORK*” published 1785) *BUT* *HE*
*DEVELOPED*, *ENRICHED*, *AND* *IN* *SOME* *CASES* *MODIFIED* *THOSE*
*VIEWS* *IN* *LATER* *WORKS* *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *CRITIQUE* *OF*
*PRACTICAL* *REASON* (published 1781 / 1787)
<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-moral/>
I. Transition from common rational cognition to philosophic moral
cognition
II. Transition from popular moral philosophy to metaphysics of morals
III. Transition from metaphysics of morals to the critique of pure
practical reason
PROGRESSION: Lesser Yin (shaoyin: West / Autumn / Metal)
+ 0, H27 - YI [Nourishment / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + GEN (ie. #8) above],
H54 - GUIMEI [*MARRYING* *MAID* / DUI (ie. #7) below + ZHEN (ie. #3)
above] {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
SYNTHESIS: Greater Yin (taiyin: North / Winter / Water and which also
refers to the Moon)
+ 0, H9 - XIAOXU [Lesser Domestication/QIAN (ie. #6) below + SUN (ie.
#4) above], H18 - GU [Ills to Be Cured / SUN (ie. #4) below + GEN (ie.
#8) above] {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
ANTI-THESIS: Lesser Yang (shaoyang: East / Spring / Wood)
+ 0, H3 - ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie. #3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above]
as 'fundamentality [yuan], prevalence [heng], fitness [li] and constancy
[zhen]', H6 - SONG / *JIHAD*? [Contention/KAN (ie. #1) below + QIAN (ie.
#6) above] {ie. Self identity as Sea - Formula of Autonomy}
THESIS: Greater Yang (taiyang: South / Summer / Fire and which also
refers to the Sun)
+ H1 - *MONAD*: QIAN [Pure Yang / QIAN (ie. #6) above + QIAN (ie. #6)
below] as MALE, H2 - *DUAD*: KUN [Pure Yin / KUN (ie. #2) above + KUN
(ie. #2) below] as FEMALE, H3 - *TRIAD*: ZHUN [Birth Throws / ZHEN (ie.
#3) below + KAN (ie. #1) above] {ie. Fountains as Formula of Progression
of individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
Post by dolf
It would be followed by two more books on ethics: Critique of
Practical Reason (1788), The Metaphysics of Morals (1797),
Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, Religion within the
Boundaries of Mere Reason as well as his essays on history and related
topics. Kant’s Lectures on Ethics, which were lecture notes taken by
three of his students on the courses he gave in moral philosophy, also
include relevant material for understanding his views. We will mainly
focus on the foundational doctrines of the Groundwork, even though in
recent years some scholars have become dissatisfied with this standard
approach to Kant’s views and have turned their attention to the later
works. We find the standard approach most illuminating, though we will
highlight important positions from the later works where needed.
With respects to the Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}
claim to a Sovereign State as that which was then later the basis of
Roman Empire Governance, we draw upon this observation: "And Moses
{taken out; drawn forth} was learned in all the wisdom of the
Egyptians {that troubles or oppresses; anguish}, and was mighty in
words and in deeds." [Acts 7:22 (KJV)]
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ 1, 2, 3 {ie. Formula of Progression of individual phenomena} =
GENESIS DAY #4
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
H27 + H9 + H3 + H2 = #41 as #CENTRE = GENESIS DAY #1
H54 + H18 + H6 + H3 = #81 as #WAN WU = GENESIS DAY #2
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {ie. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER*
OF THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE} = GENESIS DAY #3
FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THESE PRINCIPLES REFER TO IMMANUEL KANT'S
Kant's supreme moral principle or "categorical imperative"; Variant
- Act only on that maxim which you can at the same time will that it
should become a universal law.
- Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a
universal law of nature.
- So act that your principle of action might safely be made a law for
the whole world.
- May you live your life as if the maxim of your actions were to
become universal law.
- Live your life as though your every act were to become a universal
law.
Post by dolf
- Do not feel forced to act, as you're only willing to act according
to your own universal laws. And that's good. For only willful acts are
universal. And that's your maxim.
I do not, therefore, need any penetrating acuteness to see what I have
to do in order that my volition be morally good. Inexperienced in the
course of the world, incapable of being prepared for whatever might
come to pass in it, I ask myself only: can you also will that your
maxim become a universal law?
Even if there never have been actions arising from such pure sources,
what is at issue here is not whether this or that happened; that,
instead, reason by itself and independently of all appearances
commands what ought to happen; that, accordingly, actions of which the
world has perhaps so far given no example, and whose very
practicability might be very much doubted by one who bases everything
on experience, are still inflexibly commanded by reason … because …
duty … lies, prior to all experience, in the idea of a reason
determining the will by means of a priori grounds.
Morality is thus the relation of actions to the autonomy of the will,
that is, to a possible giving of universal law through its maxims. An
action that can coexist with the autonomy of the will is permitted;
one that does not accord with it is forbidden. A will whose maxims
necessarily harmonize with the laws of autonomy is a holy, absolutely
good will. The dependence upon the principle of autonomy of a will
that is not absolutely good (moral necessitation) is obligation. This,
accordingly, cannot be attributed to a holy being. The objective of an
action from obligation is called duty.
[<https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant>]
Kant developed three principal formulas of the categorical imperative.
The first and most well known of these is the so-called "formula of
universal law." The second is the "formula of humanity." This one has
been almost as interesting to commentators and critics as the first
formula. To some, in fact, the formula of humanity is an even more
interesting expression of Kant’s basic insights in ethics.
If the validity of the categorical imperative depends on humanity’s
existing as an end in itself, as it does according to Kant’s moral
realism, then the categorical imperative should forbid any action that
treats humanity merely as a means. By this line of reasoning Kant sees
that an alternative version of the categorical imperative can now be
expressed as: "So act that you use humanity, whether in your own
person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an
end, never merely as a means " (Kant 1997, 38/4:429).
THE FORMULA OF AUTONOMY
A third version of the categorical imperative follows in Kant’s text
almost immediately upon the four examples of duties derived from the
second version, the formula of humanity. This new formula, emphasizing
the way we may be supposed to have acquired our subjection to moral
requirements, is called the formula of autonomy. It says that we are
subject to the requirement of our maxims’ conformity to universal law
through our own free will. That is what Kant indicated in the
quotation above, referring to the will’s "giving the law to itself"
(Kant 1997, 39/4:431).
The derivation of the formula of autonomy. The premises by which we
arrive at a version of the categorical imperative referencing
autonomy—the self-legislation of moral requirements—are the previous
the ground of all practical lawgiving lies (in accordance with the
first principle) objectively in the rule and the form of universality
which makes it fit to be a universal law (possibly a law of nature);
subjectively, however, it lies in the end; but the subject of all ends
is every rational being as an end in itself (in accordance with the
second principle); from this there follows now the third practical
principle of the will, as supreme limiting condition of its harmony
with universal practical reason, the idea of the will of every
rational being as a will giving universal law. (Kant 1997, 39/4:431)
In order to see how we arrive at the formula of autonomy at the
conclusion of this derivation it is necessary to focus on the second
premise, the formula of humanity. Here the important concept of an
"end" implies legislation, or lawgiving. It is possible to see an end,
like a law, as something making it necessary to will an action—either
as a means of bringing about its existence, or in order not to bring
about its non-existence. If every rational being is an end in the
latter sense, as implied by the formula of humanity, then every
rational being is lawgiving. Here we do not conceive of something
else—like God—legislating that all rational beings are to be treated
always as ends, on account of their intrinsic value. Instead, the idea
is that each rational being, simply in virtue of being an end in
itself, makes necessary (legislates) that it be treated always as an
end. The legislation given by each is also universal, applying to
itself as well as to every other rational being. Hence, the third
version of the categorical imperative commands not acting on any maxim
that could not qualify as giving universal law.
[<http://myweb.ecu.edu/mccartyr/GW/FormulaOfHumanity.asp>]
Post by dolf
Immanuel Kant’s postulates as transcendent principles are compliant
with
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
the HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER AS THE REAL-NATURE OF THE SOUL OF MAN WITHIN
+ 0, 27, 54 {ie. Realm of its Nature as Heaven - Formula of Universal Law}
+ 0, 9, 18 {ie. System's Cosmology as Earth - Formula of Humanity}
+ 0, 3, 6 {ie. Self identity - Formula of Autonomy}
+ *1* - *MONAD*, *2* - *DUAD*, *3* - *TRIAD* {ie. Formula of Progression of
individual phenomena}
= TETRAGRAMMATON HIERARCHY VALUE AS HOMOIOS THEORY OF *NUMBER*.
+ 0, 81, 9(9²+1)/2 = #369 {IE. ORGANIZATION OF THE MYRIAD OR *NUMBER* OF
THINGS (WAN WU) OF SOCIETY AND NATURE}
There is no value having a discussion with [you] and accordingly I
don’t
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
need to
labour on your behalf so as to convey the explicit quotes which I have
narrated elsewhere.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Kant’s writings are cognisant of a trinomial HOMOIOS mathematical
I'm going to stop you right there for some hit-counts.
Here are the hit-counts for the following words within Kant's
"Cognisant" - 0 (zero)
"trinomial" - 0 (zero)
"HOMOIOS" - 0 (zero).
So stop pretending your gibberish has anything to do with Kant's writings.
Kant's intention was to synthesise Empiricism with Rationalism, NOT to play
quantum-mumbo-jumbo with eastern mysticism and numerology and the bible.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-14 05:02:17 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
ONCE AGAIN Lions Growl of Butchers Foul <***@gmail.com> YOU
ARE ADVISED TO CEASE ENGAGING WITHIN A CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY ANONYMOUS INTERNET
#235 - DETRUDE AS CLAIMED  BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING RACIAL AND
RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE AS A LEGAL CLAIM WILL AT SOME TIME IN
THE FUTURE (IN THE TIME OF MY CONVENIENCE) BE MADE AGAINST YOURSELF

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Screaming-Nutbag.jpeg>
Post by dolf
TO CEASE ENGAGING WITHIN A CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY ANONYMOUS INTERNET #235 -
DETRUDE AS CLAIMED  BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING RACIAL AND
RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE AS A LEGAL CLAIM WILL AT SOME TIME IN
THE FUTURE (IN THE TIME OF MY CONVENIENCE) BE MADE AGAINST YOURSELF
No, and make my day.
Post by dolf
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Screaming-Nutbag.jpeg>
Post by dolf
You missed the evidence {ie. probably due to your Sisyphus life of
diseased immorality but check the grammar on that} so I've repeated it
for you...
Formula of Universal Law
Formula of Humanity
Formula of Autonomy
They are likely to make some progression as formula of argumentation
that is not their intended meaning: "obscure and unintelligible disputes
and discourses"
Such as parody conforms to what is Immanuel Kant’s meaning of the term
"noumena" which he says is not that which is self evident, since it
literally means not "things as they are in dependently of appearing to
us" but something more like "things as they are understood by pure thought."
...which is evident self-contradictory balderdash.
If, as Kant says, there can never be an absence of perspective, then his
claim to be able to arrive at an objective truth is only arrived at
through copious application of "obscure and unintelligible disputes and discourses".
Kant can't have it both ways.
-- ADVICE GIVEN TO MR RAYMOND CAFE AND PARTICIPANTS WITHIN THE WELLINGTON
LIQUOR ACCORD OF A LEGAL CLAIM OF BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING
RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE
(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 August 2018
<https://www.facebook.com/MisterRaymond.Sale/>
This is to formerly advise MR RAYMOND CAFE and participants within the
WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD by means of the accompanying photographic evidence
to the contrary that a legal claim of BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION occasioning
racial and religious hatred and sexual prejudice will at some time in the
future (in the time of my convenience) be made against yourselves and your
residual ESTATES for an equivalent sum of an INSURANCE CLAIM for DAMAGES
(sought: $154 million) which as MATERIAL DETAILS were made to the FINANCIAL
SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION AS EARLIER SUBMISSIONS DATED 17 TO 20 JULY 2018
Do you, in your confused state, somehow not see the difference between
ludicrous threats and actual legal action?
Why do you think the Wellington Liquor Accord is in any way interested by your "notice"?
-- ADVICE GIVEN TO MR RAYMOND CAFE AND PARTICIPANTS WITHIN THE WELLINGTON
LIQUOR ACCORD OF A LEGAL CLAIM OF BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING
RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 August 2018

<https://www.facebook.com/MisterRaymond.Sale/>

This is to formerly advise MR RAYMOND CAFE and participants within the
WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD by means of the accompanying photographic evidence
to the contrary that a legal claim of BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION occasioning
racial and religious hatred and sexual prejudice will at some time in the
future (in the time of my convenience) be made against yourselves and your
residual ESTATES for an equivalent sum of an INSURANCE CLAIM for DAMAGES
(sought: $154 million) which as MATERIAL DETAILS were made to the FINANCIAL
SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION AS EARLIER SUBMISSIONS DATED 17 TO 20 JULY 2018
AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY THEM WITH AN EMAIL @ 1234 HOURS 24 JULY 2018.

WHILST IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE THAT DOCUMENT A SUMMARY OF THE CLAIM
IS CONVEYED WITHIN THE DOCUMENT TITLED: "SOME FREE SPEECH IS A SOCIAL
DISEASE"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Sociability.pdf>

Nous: #50
Time: 09:25 hrs
Date: 2018.8.14
Torah: [#4, #50, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#58); Ego: 50 (#54),
@3: Sup: 64 (#122); Ego: 10 (#64),
Male: #122; Feme: #64
} // #64

Dao: Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of Life
Tetra: #77 - Compliance
I-Ching: H2 - Pure Yin, Passive Principle/Earth, Field, The receptive,
Acquiescence, The flow

Latin: Invacandus {Sign of mercy} Alt: Haayah {Behold God} {

1. PROTECTS & CONSOLES. INSPIRES IN DECISIONS
2. JUSTICE AND LAWYERS
3. JUDGES
4. Eregbuo
}

Abiud {Father of praise}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#433 / #346} / HETEROS {#433 / #346} / TORAH {#398 /
#369}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:4,col:7,nous:50&idea:{m,77}&idea:{f,104}&idea:{m,433}&idea:{f,346}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 4, col: 7, nous: 50 [Date: 2018.8.14, Time: 09:25
hrs, Super: #433 / #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra:
26 - Endeavour, Ego: #346 / #50 - Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of
Life; I-Ching: H2 - Pure Yin, Passive Principle/Earth, Field, The
receptive, Acquiescence, The flow; Tetra: 77 - Compliance]

H6696@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 59 (#109); Ego: 9 (#59),
@3: Sup: 65 (#174); Ego: 6 (#65),
@4: Sup: 22 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #196; Feme: #103
} // #346

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity;
I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#346 as [#50, #90, #6, #200] = tsuwr (H6696): {UMBRA: #14 as #296 % #41 =
#9} 1) to bind, besiege, confine, cramp; 2) (Qal) *TO* *SHOW* *HOSTILITY*
*TO*, be an adversary, treat as foe; 3) (Qal) to form, fashion, delineate;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to confine, secure; 1a2) to shut in, beseige; 1a3) to shut
up, enclose;

FROM THIS DAY OF 14 AUGUST 2018 IT IS IMMATERIAL WHETHER ANY OF THE PARTIES
WITHIN THE WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD AGAINST WHICH THE LEGAL CLAIM OF
UNSOCIABILITY OCCASIONING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE
IS MADE CONTINUE TO LIVE OR DIE, AND REGARDLESS OF INTENTION AS BOER /
ANZAC DEFAMATION AND ACTION TO DISPOSE YOUR RESIDUAL ESTATE AND PROPERTY
AGAINST SUCH ABHORRENT CONDUCT OF UNLAWFUL INHOSPITALITY AND AN ABJECT
UNWILLINGNESS TO RESOLVE THE MATTER IN ANY REGARD FOR THE DIGNITY OF
PERSONS .

-- MR RAYMOND'S BISCUIT --

"OH YES DETAILS
AND EVERMORE IN.
SO MANY IT FAILS.
'TWAS SUCH A SIN.

CREME OF THE DO 💩.
WAS EVER SO FINE.
WHIPPED AVOCADO 🥑.
JUST SUBLIME."

YOUTUBE: "Anthony Hopkins as Harvey Kellogg in Road to Wellville - Hot
Biscuit!"

http://youtu.be/RblbZQth0KE

TROLLING_MILITIA@{
@1: Sup: 60 (#60); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 48 (#108); Ego: 7 (#23),
@3: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 80 (#103),
@4: Sup: 18 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 10 (#113),
@5: Sup: 6 (#162); Ego: 76 (#189),
@6: Sup: 64 (#226); Ego: 81 (#270),
@7: Sup: 59 (#285); Ego: 35 (#305),
@8: Sup: 9 (#294); Ego: 61 (#366),
@9: Sup: 25 (#319); Ego: 43 (#409),
Male: #319; Feme: #409
}

If you are going to make rational and reasoned comment in refutation of the
LEGAL CLAIM made against ANY OF THE PARTIES WITHIN THE WELLINGTON LIQUOR
ACCORD then please do without any further #325 - DETRUDE as defamation.
However I know that since #168 - CONDEMNATION / #541 - CONTEMN is coming
your way this Remembrance / Armistice Day 11 November Centennial 2018 that
you must take any irrational means by self justification to defame.

As Police independence within my matters are seriously prejudiced by an
unlawful liquor ban not undertaken in a prescribed manner relating a
reasonable objection made of a boisterous female customer within a supposed
quiet amenity reaching for an eating utensil as weapon incident at the Star
Hotel on 26 March 2017 I have no further confidence within the Victoria
Police addressing my matters of complaint.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170326%20-%201.JPG>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170326%20-%202.JPG>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170326%20-%203.JPG>

Apart from reporting the matter to yourselves by mail only should you
stubbornly wish to take any action, I am intentioned to direct the matter
of BOER / ANZAC defamation and of racial hatred against this person and
yourselves to lawyers in due course.

- dolf

Initial Post: 14 August 2018

#MR #RAYMOND #CAFE #WELLINGTON #LIQUOR #ACCORD
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-14 07:52:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
ONCE AGAIN Lions Growl of Butchers Foul <***@gmail.com> YOU
ARE ADVISED TO CEASE ENGAGING WITHIN A CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY ANONYMOUS INTERNET
#235 - DETRUDE AS CLAIMED  BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING RACIAL AND
RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE AS A LEGAL CLAIM WILL AT SOME TIME IN
THE FUTURE (IN THE TIME OF MY CONVENIENCE) BE MADE AGAINST YOURSELF

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Screaming-Nutbag.jpeg>

*CEASE* *YOUR* *ANONYMOUS* *INTERNET* #235 - *DETRUDE* *AS* *CLAIMED*
*BOER* / *ANZAC* *DEFAMATION* OCCASIONING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND
SEXUAL PREJUDICE
I lost you after "advised". Can you rephrase the gibberish that followed
into something more like english?
-- ADVICE GIVEN TO MR RAYMOND CAFE AND PARTICIPANTS WITHIN THE WELLINGTON
LIQUOR ACCORD OF A LEGAL CLAIM OF BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING
RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 August 2018

<https://www.facebook.com/MisterRaymond.Sale/>

This is to formerly advise MR RAYMOND CAFE and participants within the
WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD by means of the accompanying photographic evidence
to the contrary that a legal claim of BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION occasioning
racial and religious hatred and sexual prejudice will at some time in the
future (in the time of my convenience) be made against yourselves and your
residual ESTATES for an equivalent sum of an INSURANCE CLAIM for DAMAGES
(sought: $154 million) which as MATERIAL DETAILS were made to the FINANCIAL
SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION AS EARLIER SUBMISSIONS DATED 17 TO 20 JULY 2018
AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY THEM WITH AN EMAIL @ 1234 HOURS 24 JULY 2018.

WHILST IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE THAT DOCUMENT A SUMMARY OF THE CLAIM
IS CONVEYED WITHIN THE DOCUMENT TITLED: "SOME FREE SPEECH IS A SOCIAL
DISEASE"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Sociability.pdf>

Nous: #50
Time: 09:25 hrs
Date: 2018.8.14
Torah: [#4, #50, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#58); Ego: 50 (#54),
@3: Sup: 64 (#122); Ego: 10 (#64),
Male: #122; Feme: #64
} // #64

Dao: Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of Life
Tetra: #77 - Compliance
I-Ching: H2 - Pure Yin, Passive Principle/Earth, Field, The receptive,
Acquiescence, The flow

Latin: Invacandus {Sign of mercy} Alt: Haayah {Behold God} {

1. PROTECTS & CONSOLES. INSPIRES IN DECISIONS
2. JUSTICE AND LAWYERS
3. JUDGES
4. Eregbuo
}

Abiud {Father of praise}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#433 / #346} / HETEROS {#433 / #346} / TORAH {#398 /
#369}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:4,col:7,nous:50&idea:{m,77}&idea:{f,104}&idea:{m,433}&idea:{f,346}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 4, col: 7, nous: 50 [Date: 2018.8.14, Time: 09:25
hrs, Super: #433 / #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch; Tetra:
26 - Endeavour, Ego: #346 / #50 - Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of
Life; I-Ching: H2 - Pure Yin, Passive Principle/Earth, Field, The
receptive, Acquiescence, The flow; Tetra: 77 - Compliance]

H6696@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 59 (#109); Ego: 9 (#59),
@3: Sup: 65 (#174); Ego: 6 (#65),
@4: Sup: 22 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #196; Feme: #103
} // #346

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing Placidity;
I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18});
Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#346 as [#50, #90, #6, #200] = tsuwr (H6696): {UMBRA: #14 as #296 % #41 =
#9} 1) to bind, besiege, confine, cramp; 2) (Qal) *TO* *SHOW* *HOSTILITY*
*TO*, be an adversary, treat as foe; 3) (Qal) to form, fashion, delineate;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to confine, secure; 1a2) to shut in, beseige; 1a3) to shut
up, enclose;

FROM THIS DAY OF 14 AUGUST 2018 IT IS IMMATERIAL WHETHER ANY OF THE PARTIES
WITHIN THE WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD AGAINST WHICH THE LEGAL CLAIM OF
UNSOCIABILITY OCCASIONING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE
IS MADE CONTINUE TO LIVE OR DIE, AND REGARDLESS OF INTENTION AS BOER /
ANZAC DEFAMATION AND ACTION TO DISPOSE YOUR RESIDUAL ESTATE AND PROPERTY
AGAINST SUCH ABHORRENT CONDUCT OF UNLAWFUL INHOSPITALITY AND AN ABJECT
UNWILLINGNESS TO RESOLVE THE MATTER IN ANY REGARD FOR THE DIGNITY OF
PERSONS .

-- MR RAYMOND'S BISCUIT --

"OH YES DETAILS
AND EVERMORE IN.
SO MANY IT FAILS.
'TWAS SUCH A SIN.

CREME OF THE DO 💩.
WAS EVER SO FINE.
WHIPPED AVOCADO 🥑.
JUST SUBLIME."

YOUTUBE: "Anthony Hopkins as Harvey Kellogg in Road to Wellville - Hot
Biscuit!"

http://youtu.be/RblbZQth0KE

TROLLING_MILITIA@{
@1: Sup: 60 (#60); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 48 (#108); Ego: 7 (#23),
@3: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 80 (#103),
@4: Sup: 18 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 10 (#113),
@5: Sup: 6 (#162); Ego: 76 (#189),
@6: Sup: 64 (#226); Ego: 81 (#270),
@7: Sup: 59 (#285); Ego: 35 (#305),
@8: Sup: 9 (#294); Ego: 61 (#366),
@9: Sup: 25 (#319); Ego: 43 (#409),
Male: #319; Feme: #409
}

If you are going to make rational and reasoned comment in refutation of the
LEGAL CLAIM made against ANY OF THE PARTIES WITHIN THE WELLINGTON LIQUOR
ACCORD then please do without any further #325 - DETRUDE as defamation.
However I know that since #168 - CONDEMNATION / #541 - CONTEMN is coming
your way this Remembrance / Armistice Day 11 November Centennial 2018 that
you must take any irrational means by self justification to defame.

As Police independence within my matters are seriously prejudiced by an
unlawful liquor ban not undertaken in a prescribed manner relating a
reasonable objection made of a boisterous female customer within a supposed
quiet amenity reaching for an eating utensil as weapon incident at the Star
Hotel on 26 March 2017 I have no further confidence within the Victoria
Police addressing my matters of complaint.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170326%20-%201.JPG>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170326%20-%202.JPG>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170326%20-%203.JPG>

Apart from reporting the matter to yourselves by mail only should you
stubbornly wish to take any action, I am intentioned to direct the matter
of BOER / ANZAC defamation and of racial hatred against this person and
yourselves to lawyers in due course.

- dolf

Initial Post: 14 August 2018

#MR #RAYMOND #CAFE #WELLINGTON #LIQUOR #ACCORD
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-14 22:47:59 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Thank-you for your update. I hope that your night-shift regime wasn't
too taxing.

I'm having continuous difficulties with PERSON 'B' whom due to his
maladjusted criminality has shown both a disdain for the probity of the
court and an unwillingness to adhere to the decorum which is mandated by
the ORDERS so I am hopeful that the matter will come to some finality
and there is substantial cause to criminally prosecute him.

ONCE AGAIN Lions Growl of Butchers Foul <***@gmail.com> YOU
ARE ADVISED TO CEASE ENGAGING WITHIN A CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY ANONYMOUS
INTERNET #235 - DETRUDE AS CLAIMED  BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING
RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE AS A LEGAL CLAIM WILL
AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE (IN THE TIME OF MY CONVENIENCE) BE MADE
AGAINST YOURSELF

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Screaming-Nutbag.jpeg>

*CEASE* *YOUR* *ANONYMOUS* *INTERNET* #235 - *DETRUDE* *AS* *CLAIMED*
*BOER* / *ANZAC* *DEFAMATION* OCCASIONING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED
AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE
Post by dolf
ARE ADVISED TO CEASE ENGAGING WITHIN A CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY ANONYMOUS INTERNET
#235 - DETRUDE AS CLAIMED  BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING RACIAL AND
RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE AS A LEGAL CLAIM WILL AT SOME TIME IN
THE FUTURE (IN THE TIME OF MY CONVENIENCE) BE MADE AGAINST YOURSELF
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/Screaming-Nutbag.jpeg>
*CEASE* *YOUR* *ANONYMOUS* *INTERNET* #235 - *DETRUDE* *AS* *CLAIMED*
*BOER* / *ANZAC* *DEFAMATION* OCCASIONING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND
SEXUAL PREJUDICE
I lost you after "advised". Can you rephrase the gibberish that followed
into something more like english?
No, I didn't say, "Could you please repeat", I said, "Could you please translate it into english because I don't speak gibberish".
-- ADVICE GIVEN TO MR RAYMOND CAFE AND PARTICIPANTS WITHIN THE
WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD OF A LEGAL CLAIM OF BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION
OCCASIONING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 August 2018

<https://www.facebook.com/MisterRaymond.Sale/>

This is to formerly advise MR RAYMOND CAFE and participants within the
WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD by means of the accompanying photographic
evidence to the contrary that a legal claim of BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION
occasioning racial and religious hatred and sexual prejudice will at
some time in the future (in the time of my convenience) be made against
yourselves and your residual ESTATES for an equivalent sum of an
INSURANCE CLAIM for DAMAGES (sought: $154 million) which as MATERIAL
DETAILS were made to the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION AS EARLIER
SUBMISSIONS DATED 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY THEM WITH AN
EMAIL @ 1234 HOURS 24 JULY 2018.

WHILST IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE THAT DOCUMENT A SUMMARY OF THE
CLAIM IS CONVEYED WITHIN THE DOCUMENT TITLED: "SOME FREE SPEECH IS A
SOCIAL DISEASE"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Sociability.pdf>

Nous: #50
Time: 09:25 hrs
Date: 2018.8.14
Torah: [#4, #50, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#58); Ego: 50 (#54),
@3: Sup: 64 (#122); Ego: 10 (#64),
Male: #122; Feme: #64
} // #64

Dao: Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of Life
Tetra: #77 - Compliance
I-Ching: H2 - Pure Yin, Passive Principle/Earth, Field, The receptive,
Acquiescence, The flow

Latin: Invacandus {Sign of mercy} Alt: Haayah {Behold God} {

1. PROTECTS & CONSOLES. INSPIRES IN DECISIONS
2. JUSTICE AND LAWYERS
3. JUDGES
4. Eregbuo
}

Abiud {Father of praise}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#433 / #346} / HETEROS {#433 / #346} / TORAH {#398
/ #369}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:4,col:7,nous:50&idea:{m,77}&idea:{f,104}&idea:{m,433}&idea:{f,346}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 4, col: 7, nous: 50 [Date: 2018.8.14, Time: 09:25
hrs, Super: #433 / #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour, Ego: #346 / #50 - Fantasies of Avoiding Death,
Value of Life; I-Ching: H2 - Pure Yin, Passive Principle/Earth, Field,
The receptive, Acquiescence, The flow; Tetra: 77 - Compliance]

H6696@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 59 (#109); Ego: 9 (#59),
@3: Sup: 65 (#174); Ego: 6 (#65),
@4: Sup: 22 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #196; Feme: #103
} // #346

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#346 as [#50, #90, #6, #200] = tsuwr (H6696): {UMBRA: #14 as #296 % #41
= #9} 1) to bind, besiege, confine, cramp; 2) (Qal) *TO* *SHOW*
*HOSTILITY* *TO*, be an adversary, treat as foe; 3) (Qal) to form,
fashion, delineate; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to confine, secure; 1a2) to shut in,
beseige; 1a3) to shut up, enclose;

FROM THIS DAY OF 14 AUGUST 2018 IT IS IMMATERIAL WHETHER ANY OF THE
PARTIES WITHIN THE WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD AGAINST WHICH THE LEGAL
CLAIM OF UNSOCIABILITY OCCASIONING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND
SEXUAL PREJUDICE IS MADE CONTINUE TO LIVE OR DIE, AND REGARDLESS OF
INTENTION AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION AND ACTION TO DISPOSE YOUR RESIDUAL
ESTATE AND PROPERTY AGAINST SUCH ABHORRENT CONDUCT OF UNLAWFUL
INHOSPITALITY AND AN ABJECT UNWILLINGNESS TO RESOLVE THE MATTER IN ANY
REGARD FOR THE DIGNITY OF PERSONS .

-- MR RAYMOND'S BISCUIT --

"OH YES DETAILS
AND EVERMORE IN.
SO MANY IT FAILS.
'TWAS SUCH A SIN.

CREME OF THE DO 💩.
WAS EVER SO FINE.
WHIPPED AVOCADO 🥑.
JUST SUBLIME."

YOUTUBE: "Anthony Hopkins as Harvey Kellogg in Road to Wellville - Hot
Biscuit!"

http://youtu.be/RblbZQth0KE

TROLLING_MILITIA@{
@1: Sup: 60 (#60); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 48 (#108); Ego: 7 (#23),
@3: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 80 (#103),
@4: Sup: 18 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 10 (#113),
@5: Sup: 6 (#162); Ego: 76 (#189),
@6: Sup: 64 (#226); Ego: 81 (#270),
@7: Sup: 59 (#285); Ego: 35 (#305),
@8: Sup: 9 (#294); Ego: 61 (#366),
@9: Sup: 25 (#319); Ego: 43 (#409),
Male: #319; Feme: #409
}

If you are going to make rational and reasoned comment in refutation of
the LEGAL CLAIM made against ANY OF THE PARTIES WITHIN THE WELLINGTON
LIQUOR ACCORD then please do without any further #325 - DETRUDE as
defamation. However I know that since #168 - CONDEMNATION / #541 -
CONTEMN is coming your way this Remembrance / Armistice Day 11 November
Centennial 2018 that you must take any irrational means by self
justification to defame.

As Police independence within my matters are seriously prejudiced by an
unlawful liquor ban not undertaken in a prescribed manner relating a
reasonable objection made of a boisterous female customer within a
supposed quiet amenity reaching for an eating utensil as weapon incident
at the Star Hotel on 26 March 2017 I have no further confidence within
the Victoria Police addressing my matters of complaint.

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170326%20-%201.JPG>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170326%20-%202.JPG>

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/DISRESPECT%2020170326%20-%203.JPG>

Apart from reporting the matter to yourselves by mail only should you
stubbornly wish to take any action, I am intentioned to direct the
matter of BOER / ANZAC defamation and of racial hatred against this
person and yourselves to lawyers in due course.

- dolf

Initial Post: 14 August 2018

#MR #RAYMOND #CAFE #WELLINGTON #LIQUOR #ACCORD
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Loading...