Discussion:
— GRAPPLE prototype plans for update 12 August 2018
Add Reply
dolf
2018-08-11 09:51:13 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
We’ve had our little break after making a submission to the Financial
Services Royal Commission and it’s now time to return to a further
prototype update.

Our first priority is to visualise any REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR
ONTIC functionality which might occur within any GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET associated to Hebrew / Greek lexicon entries within our
trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon (cf: Immanuel Kant’s Critique
of Pure Reason published 1781 / 1787).

1) Firstly we are going to extend the OBLIGANS {} array that convey the #41
x ONTIC values which under Roman Empire HETEROS Governance was the binomial
marriage apparatus as objectively the TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 -
“Marriageable Maiden, Converting the Maiden” only.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Obligans.pdf>

Thus in this example, we’re going to extend the numerical bounds of the
OBLIGANS {} array by the possibility of a non-unique CANON value and convey
it as an array of any #41 possible values:

14: {
thoth: "Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at Mabit; I deal
not fraudulently.",
virtue: [14 ,"With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but"],
tools: [54 ,"With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord."],
position: [11 ,"With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing."],
time: [61 ,"With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love."],
canon: 140,
ankh: 0
}

Thusly there will be an entry:

140 : [14]

2) Secondly we want to create a new DICTUM entry for each of the OBLIGANS
ONTIC proscriptions:

DICTUM: “I deal not fraudulently”

3) Thirdly I then desire to propagate each GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION
SET with any instances of these DICTUM (s) which are then A PRIORI to any
ONTOLOGICAL circumscribing of the TAXI experience.

G611@{
   @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
   @2: Sup: 81 (#82); Ego: 80 (#81),
   @3: Sup: 70 (#152); Ego: 70 (#151),
   @4: Sup: 9 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {#9}); Ego: 20 (#171),
   @5: Sup: 28 (#189); Ego: 19 (#190),
   @6: Sup: 38 (#227); Ego: 10 (#200),
   @7: Sup: 47 (#274); Ego: 9 (#209),
   @8: Sup: 52 (#326); Ego: 5 (#214),
   @9: Sup: 62 (#388); Ego: 10 (#224),
   @10: Sup: 19 (#407); Ego: 38 (#262),
   @11: Sup: 20 (#427); Ego: 1 (#263),
   Male: #427; Feme: #263
} // #506

#506 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #100, #10, #9, #5, #10, #200, #1] = apokrinomai
(G611): {UMBRA: #24 as #452 % #41 = #1} 1) to give an answer to a question
proposed, to answer; 2) to begin to speak, but always where something has
preceded (either said or done) to which the remarks refer

4) Whilst it is outside the scope of my prototype, this will then convey
the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {#9, #49, #45, #58} within the #41 x n as SEPTET
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS where the probability function () as hot
zones ought to apply.

9: {
thoth: "Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in Sutenhunen; I
am not a teller of lies.",
virtue: [9 ,"If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but"],
tools: [49 ,"If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees."],
position: [45 ,"As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but"],
time: [58 ,"As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside."],
canon: 161,
ankh: 0
}
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-11 22:01:27 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Here is the updated OBLIGANS {} array as a JSON file:

<http://www.grapple369.com/obligans.json>

And its currently 0801 hours on the 12 August 2018 and the code is
currently only available within the develop.html version at the present
time:

<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>

And once we've included the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET
expansions, we'll release it into the general production versions
grapple.html and index.html

As surmised there were several repetitions which appear to be concerned
primarily with speech as seemingly conforming to the Biblical narrative:

"My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the
greater condemnation.

For in many things we offend all. If any man offend not in word, the
same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the whole body. Behold,
we put bits in the horses’ mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn
about their whole body.

Behold also the ships, which though they be so great, and are driven of
fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm,
whithersoever the governor listeth.

Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things.
Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth!

And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among
our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the
course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.

For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things
in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind: But the tongue can
no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.

Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men,
which are made after the similitude of God. Out of the same mouth
proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so
to be.

Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet water and bitter?
Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? either a vine, figs?
so can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh.

Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? let him show out
of a good conversation his works with meekness of wisdom.

But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and
lie not against the truth.

This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish.

For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.
But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle,
and easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without
partiality, and without hypocrisy.

And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make
peace." [James 3:1-18 (KJV)]

45: [1],
68: [42],
84: [2],
86: [10],
102: [4],
104: [7],
115: [5],
130: [3],
148: [12],
161: [9],
166: [11],
139: [13],
140: [14, 16], // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15],
150: [28],
156: [21],
157: [17, 41], // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23],
166: [11],
168: [26],
169: [18],
171: [20],
173: [27],
175: [22],
177: [29],
180: [19],
181: [24, 35], // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6],
184: [36],
185: [25],
186: [31],
191: [32],
192: [39],
196: [37],
197: [33],
200: [8],
210: [30],
215: [34],
220: [38],
228: [40]
If I may make a further postulation upon my earlier informal research
statement upon the shared hymeneal / racialism characteristic between
Islam
/ Fascism: “extend the OBLIGANS {} array that convey the #41 x ONTIC
values
which under Roman Empire HETEROS Governance was the binomial marriage
apparatus as objectively the TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 -
“Marriageable Maiden, Converting the Maiden” only.”
Part of the problem relates to the speech dynamic reflexive function ()
itself as we have noted earlier as a process of extrusion has the vowels
conforming to the same metaphysical / metempirical model {NORTH / SOUTH /
EAST / WEST} which religion itself deploys for its binomial 64 element
GIVEN THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law} of circa 1550 BCE, which contains the law of that
will: 7 x
24 *COURSES* *OF* *PRIESTLY* *DIVISIONS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth
cycle
= 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as
354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days
<— RATIONAL PI AS THE BASIS FOR RATIOCINATION IS IMPLICIT WITHIN THIS
COSMOLOGICAL COMPREHENSION
<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html?OVERVIEW>
We ought then to be able to deploy Hebrew (22) / Greek (24) Categories of
Understanding interchangeably and we also can use English.
BECAUSE THE ENGLISH VOWELS: A-E-I-O-U APPEAR TO BE DERIVED FROM THE
#A (#1) = {Inner?} - #SOUTH
#E (#5) = {Totality?} - #CENTRE
#I (#9) = {Sphere?} - #NORTH
#O (#60) = {Polarity?} - #WEST? {#SAMEK as the 15th Hebrew Letter}
#U (#300) = {Harmony?} - #EAST {ie. determined as such by Pythagorean
redaction method using the Greco-Roman magic square as frame of
reference}
You’ll notice from the Kabbalist notion of the #VOWELS which I have just
summarily conveyed above, that they may well conform to our RATIOCINATION
paradigm and thusly given the #231 / #351 inclusions within this
INDESTRUCTIBLE THOUGHT ATOM it then provides the best natural defence
The metempirical / metaphysical (ie. outside time) consideration is then
whether the English language itself is an extrusion of the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS par excellence.
However as we see below the ONTIC values for the SPEECH RESPONSE dynamic
below: #45 (3x3 = #15) are themselves trinomial as #81 element and the
discriminating NORM is #369.
The problem arises therefore that the Islamic / Fascism comparator can be
sustained upon the observation that there is a common deployment of the
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL within the PYTHAGOREAN notion of the HETEROS
theory of number.
But the #CENTRE point of contention is that Islamic belief establishes a
contrived ONTIC premise by deploying #FIVE sequential elements {#41 ...}
within the {3x3 = #123} array by a quadratic STOICHEION TRANSFORMATION of
this same #45 array as each totalling #135.
Thus whilst it is difficult to explain in WORDS, Islam attempts to impose
itself as claimed SUPERIORITY by being HOOKED into the #CENTRE of
CONSCIOUSNESS as VOLUNTARY WILL and against the natural order of
things as
OBLIGANS which are ONTIX PRINCIPLES of CIVIL SOCIETY that are DICTUMs
defined MATHEMATICALLY as NOUMENON function () of MIND / GODHEAD
UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine
appearance in
Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
A. If one has the *ONTIC* mathematical premises which are central to
existence of being and its integrity, then one most certainly and
prudently
can make #123 - JUDGEMENT.
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2: “This is not an answer {
#506 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #100, #10, #9, #5, #10, #200, #1] = apokrinomai
(G611): {UMBRA: #24 as #452 % #41 = #1} 1) to give an answer to a question
proposed, to answer; 2) to begin to speak, but always where something has
preceded (either said or done) to which the remarks refer;
}. It is gobbledegook.”
- an outward part or appearance: "the superficies of life"
#41 - TO BE {*ONTIC*} or #81 - NOT TO BE {#41 x 2 % #81 = #1} that is the
#123 - QUESTION {#41 x 3} which must be #369 - DETERMINED {#41 x 9}”
Firstly we are going to extend the OBLIGANS {} array that convey the
#41 x
ONTIC values which under Roman Empire HETEROS Governance was the binomial
marriage apparatus as objectively the TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 -
“Marriageable Maiden, Converting the Maiden” only.
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Obligans.pdf>
Thus in this example, we’re going to extend the numerical bounds of the
OBLIGANS {} array by the possibility of a non-unique CANON value and convey
14: {
thoth: "Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at Mabit; I deal
not fraudulently.",
[54 ,"With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord."], position: [11 ,"With
Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing."], time: [61 ,"With
Embellishment (no.
#61), self-love."], canon: 140,
ankh: 0
}
140 : [14]
2) Secondly we want to create a new DICTUM entry for each of the OBLIGANS
DICTUM: “I deal not fraudulently”
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
We’ve had our little break
Yes, you were in this nice building with those nurses and
nice men in white coats, weren't you?!
You are delusional as some clandestined neo-Nazi / Islamist would
be...
Post by dolf
It’s a fascinating concept that this morality correspondence ought to
@4: Sup: 9 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {#9}); Ego: 20 (#171),
You can see why it’s important to investigate the OBLIGANS {} array
spectrum so that governance around the world can protect themselves and
their citizens from such dishonesty as bestial Islamic onslaught.
Why else would BERGER NOIT be so intent to defame...
We may yet convey: “do you want more or less Moroccans” is as valid a
DICTUM: “I deal not fraudulently”
DICTUM: “I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES”
Which as IMMORALITY appears to be an impiety that is natural to them.
- dolf
We’ve had our little break after making a submission to the Financial
Services Royal Commission and it’s now time to return to a further
prototype update.
Our first priority is to visualise any REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR
ONTIC functionality which might occur within any GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET associated to Hebrew / Greek lexicon entries within our
trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon (cf: Immanuel Kant’s Critique
of Pure Reason published 1781 / 1787).
1) Firstly we are going to extend the OBLIGANS {} array that convey the #41
x ONTIC values which under Roman Empire HETEROS Governance was the binomial
marriage apparatus as objectively the TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 -
“Marriageable Maiden, Converting the Maiden” only.
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Obligans.pdf>
Thus in this example, we’re going to extend the numerical bounds of the
OBLIGANS {} array by the possibility of a non-unique CANON value and convey
14: {
thoth: "Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at Mabit; I deal
not fraudulently.",
virtue: [14 ,"With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but"],
tools: [54 ,"With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord."],
position: [11 ,"With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing."],
time: [61 ,"With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love."],
canon: 140,
ankh: 0
}
Post by dolf
140 : [14]
2) Secondly we want to create a new DICTUM entry for each of the OBLIGANS
DICTUM: “I deal not fraudulently”
3) Thirdly I then desire to propagate each GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION
SET with any instances of these DICTUM (s) which are then A PRIORI to any
ONTOLOGICAL circumscribing of the TAXI experience.
   Male: #427; Feme: #263
} // #506
#506 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #100, #10, #9, #5, #10, #200, #1] = apokrinomai
(G611): {UMBRA: #24 as #452 % #41 = #1} 1) to give an answer to a question
proposed, to answer; 2) to begin to speak, but always where something has
preceded (either said or done) to which the remarks refer
4) Whilst it is outside the scope of my prototype, this will then convey
the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {#9, #49, #45, #58} within the #41 x n as SEPTET
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS where the probability function () as hot
zones ought to apply.
9: {
thoth: "Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in Sutenhunen; I
am not a teller of lies.",
virtue: [9 ,"If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but"],
tools: [49 ,"If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees."],
position: [45 ,"As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but"],
time: [58 ,"As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside."],
canon: 161,
ankh: 0
}
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-11 23:54:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
THERE APPEARS AT FIRST GLANCE TO A SELF REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY EMBEDDED
WITHIN THE BIBLICAL TEXT ASSOCIATED TO THE ONTIC IMPETUS TO THE
ONTOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF *FOUNTAIN* WHERE %5 - #CENTRE and %20 - KAF as
HEBREW letter for KNOWLEDGE:

"Doth a fountain (G4077) send forth at the same place sweet water and
bitter?

Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries?

Either a vine, figs?

So can no fountain (G4077) both yield salt water and fresh.

Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you?

YOUTUBE: "KAF - Secrets of the Hebrew Letters"



YOUTUBE: "Alphabet of Kabbalah 20 The Hebrew Letter Kaf"



Let him show out of a good conversation his works with meekness of
wisdom." [James 3:11-13 (KJV)]

G4077@{
@1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
@2: Sup: 7 (#87); Ego: 8 (#88),
@3: Sup: 10 (#97); Ego: 3 (#91),
@4: Sup: 18 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 8 (#99),
@5: Sup: 56 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 38
(#137),
Male: #171; Feme: #137
} // #299

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #99 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;

THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am
not one of prating tongue.

#VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
#TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
#POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
#TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
#CANON: #157

#299 as [#80, #8, #3, #8, #200] = pege (G4077): {UMBRA: #6 as #99 % #41
= #17} 1) fountain, spring; 2) a well fed by a spring

Here is the updated OBLIGANS {} array as a JSON file:

<http://www.grapple369.com/obligans.json>

And its currently 0800 hours on the 12 August 2018 and the code is
currently only available within the develop.html version at the present
time:

<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>

And once we've included the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET
expansions, we'll release it into the general production versions
grapple.html and index.html

As surmised there were several repetitions which appear to be concerned
primarily with speech as seemingly conforming to the Biblical narrative:

"My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the
greater condemnation.

For in many things we offend all. If any man offend not in word, the
same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the whole body. Behold,
we put bits in the horses’ mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn
about their whole body.

Behold also the ships, which though they be so great, and are driven of
fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm,
whithersoever the governor listeth.

Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things.
Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth!

And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among
our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the
course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.

For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things
in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind: But the tongue can
no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.

Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men,
which are made after the similitude of God. Out of the same mouth
proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so
to be.

Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet water and bitter?

Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? either a vine, figs?

So can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh.

Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? Let him show out
of a good conversation his works with meekness of wisdom.

But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and
lie not against the truth.

This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish.

For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.
But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle,
and easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without
partiality, and without hypocrisy.

And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make
peace." [James 3:1-18 (KJV)]

45: [1],
68: [42],
84: [2],
86: [10],
102: [4],
104: [7],
115: [5],
130: [3],
139: [13],
140: [14, 16], // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15],
148: [12],
150: [28],
156: [21],
157: [17, 41], // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23],
161: [9],
166: [11],
168: [26],
169: [18],
171: [20],
173: [27],
175: [22],
177: [29],
180: [19],
181: [24, 35], // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6],
184: [36],
185: [25],
186: [31],
191: [32],
192: [39],
196: [37],
197: [33],
200: [8],
210: [30],
215: [34],
220: [38],
228: [40]

Such natural causality is to convey that the supranatural assimilation
with the MIND as ONE has now occurred which is exemplified by the
mathematical categories of understanding conveying a temporal relativity
and singularity of apperception.

IMHO

— I CHANCED UPON A LEVI’S JEAN SIGN

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 11 August 2018

<https://www.levi.com/US/en_US/>
<https://www.facebook.com/Levis/>

@ 1433 hours I was lucky to chance upon a Levi sign whilst passing a
local store (Sale, Victoria, Australia} and sought to buy some 501 jeans
👖 {

#263 as [#200, #20, #5, #30, #8] = skelos (G4628): {UMBRA: #12 as #525 %
#41 = #33} 1) the leg, from the hip to the toes inclusive;

} and the older male shop assistant said to me, “People generally have
problems with the buttons.”

To which I quipped, “I don’t have anything which needs to come out in a
hurry {

#462 as [#6, #20, #30, #6, #400] = kaleh (H3616): {UMBRA: #4 as #55 %
#41 = #14} 1) failing with desire, longing, longing for

} these days.”

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#462 / #399} / HETEROS {#426 / #381} / TORAH {#405
/ #411}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:3,row:6,col:6,nous:42&idea:{m,130}&idea:{f,142}&idea:{m,462}&idea:{f,399}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

And by 1623 hours {

#197 as [#2, #90, #100, #5] = batseq (H1216): {UMBRA: #2 as #192 % #41 =
#28} 1) (Qal) to swell, become blistered;

} how fortune changes ...

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#197 / #263} / HETEROS {#228 / #238} / TORAH {#204
/ #226}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:1,row:7,col:4,nous:2&idea:{m,2}&idea:{f,2}&idea:{m,197}&idea:{f,263}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

- dolf

Initial Post: 11 August 2018
If I may make a further postulation upon my earlier informal research
statement upon the shared hymeneal / racialism characteristic between
Islam
/ Fascism: “extend the OBLIGANS {} array that convey the #41 x ONTIC
values
which under Roman Empire HETEROS Governance was the binomial marriage
apparatus as objectively the TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 -
“Marriageable Maiden, Converting the Maiden” only.”
Part of the problem relates to the speech dynamic reflexive function ()
itself as we have noted earlier as a process of extrusion has the vowels
conforming to the same metaphysical / metempirical model {NORTH / SOUTH /
EAST / WEST} which religion itself deploys for its binomial 64 element
GIVEN THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law} of circa 1550 BCE, which contains the law of that
will: 7 x
24 *COURSES* *OF* *PRIESTLY* *DIVISIONS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth
cycle
= 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as
354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days
<— RATIONAL PI AS THE BASIS FOR RATIOCINATION IS IMPLICIT WITHIN THIS
COSMOLOGICAL COMPREHENSION
<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html?OVERVIEW>
We ought then to be able to deploy Hebrew (22) / Greek (24) Categories of
Understanding interchangeably and we also can use English.
BECAUSE THE ENGLISH VOWELS: A-E-I-O-U APPEAR TO BE DERIVED FROM THE
#A (#1) = {Inner?} - #SOUTH
#E (#5) = {Totality?} - #CENTRE
#I (#9) = {Sphere?} - #NORTH
#O (#60) = {Polarity?} - #WEST? {#SAMEK as the 15th Hebrew Letter}
#U (#300) = {Harmony?} - #EAST {ie. determined as such by Pythagorean
redaction method using the Greco-Roman magic square as frame of
reference}
You’ll notice from the Kabbalist notion of the #VOWELS which I have just
summarily conveyed above, that they may well conform to our RATIOCINATION
paradigm and thusly given the #231 / #351 inclusions within this
INDESTRUCTIBLE THOUGHT ATOM it then provides the best natural defence
The metempirical / metaphysical (ie. outside time) consideration is then
whether the English language itself is an extrusion of the INTELLECTUS AS
GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS par excellence.
However as we see below the ONTIC values for the SPEECH RESPONSE dynamic
below: #45 (3x3 = #15) are themselves trinomial as #81 element and the
discriminating NORM is #369.
The problem arises therefore that the Islamic / Fascism comparator can be
sustained upon the observation that there is a common deployment of the
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL within the PYTHAGOREAN notion of the HETEROS
theory of number.
But the #CENTRE point of contention is that Islamic belief establishes a
contrived ONTIC premise by deploying #FIVE sequential elements {#41 ...}
within the {3x3 = #123} array by a quadratic STOICHEION TRANSFORMATION of
this same #45 array as each totalling #135.
Thus whilst it is difficult to explain in WORDS, Islam attempts to impose
itself as claimed SUPERIORITY by being HOOKED into the #CENTRE of
CONSCIOUSNESS as VOLUNTARY WILL and against the natural order of
things as
OBLIGANS which are ONTIX PRINCIPLES of CIVIL SOCIETY that are DICTUMs
defined MATHEMATICALLY as NOUMENON function () of MIND / GODHEAD
UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;
THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine
appearance in
Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.
#VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
#TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
#POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
#TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
#CANON: #45
A. If one has the *ONTIC* mathematical premises which are central to
existence of being and its integrity, then one most certainly and
prudently
can make #123 - JUDGEMENT.
GOVERNMENT SHILL #2: “This is not an answer {
#506 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #100, #10, #9, #5, #10, #200, #1] = apokrinomai
(G611): {UMBRA: #24 as #452 % #41 = #1} 1) to give an answer to a question
proposed, to answer; 2) to begin to speak, but always where something has
preceded (either said or done) to which the remarks refer;
}. It is gobbledegook.”
- an outward part or appearance: "the superficies of life"
#41 - TO BE {*ONTIC*} or #81 - NOT TO BE {#41 x 2 % #81 = #1} that is the
#123 - QUESTION {#41 x 3} which must be #369 - DETERMINED {#41 x 9}”
Firstly we are going to extend the OBLIGANS {} array that convey the
#41 x
ONTIC values which under Roman Empire HETEROS Governance was the binomial
marriage apparatus as objectively the TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 -
“Marriageable Maiden, Converting the Maiden” only.
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Obligans.pdf>
Thus in this example, we’re going to extend the numerical bounds of the
OBLIGANS {} array by the possibility of a non-unique CANON value and convey
14: {
thoth: "Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at Mabit; I deal
not fraudulently.",
[54 ,"With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord."], position: [11 ,"With
Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing."], time: [61 ,"With
Embellishment (no.
#61), self-love."], canon: 140,
ankh: 0
}
140 : [14]
2) Secondly we want to create a new DICTUM entry for each of the OBLIGANS
DICTUM: “I deal not fraudulently”
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
We’ve had our little break
Yes, you were in this nice building with those nurses and
nice men in white coats, weren't you?!
You are delusional as some clandestined neo-Nazi / Islamist would
be...
Post by dolf
It’s a fascinating concept that this morality correspondence ought to
@4: Sup: 9 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {#9}); Ego: 20 (#171),
You can see why it’s important to investigate the OBLIGANS {} array
spectrum so that governance around the world can protect themselves and
their citizens from such dishonesty as bestial Islamic onslaught.
Why else would BERGER NOIT be so intent to defame...
We may yet convey: “do you want more or less Moroccans” is as valid a
DICTUM: “I deal not fraudulently”
DICTUM: “I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES”
Which as IMMORALITY appears to be an impiety that is natural to them.
- dolf
We’ve had our little break after making a submission to the Financial
Services Royal Commission and it’s now time to return to a further
prototype update.
Our first priority is to visualise any REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR
ONTIC functionality which might occur within any GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET associated to Hebrew / Greek lexicon entries within our
trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon (cf: Immanuel Kant’s Critique
of Pure Reason published 1781 / 1787).
1) Firstly we are going to extend the OBLIGANS {} array that convey the #41
x ONTIC values which under Roman Empire HETEROS Governance was the binomial
marriage apparatus as objectively the TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 -
“Marriageable Maiden, Converting the Maiden” only.
<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Obligans.pdf>
Thus in this example, we’re going to extend the numerical bounds of the
OBLIGANS {} array by the possibility of a non-unique CANON value and convey
14: {
thoth: "Oh Eater of Livers, who makest thine appearance at Mabit; I deal
not fraudulently.",
virtue: [14 ,"With Penetration (no. #14), grasping the one, but"],
tools: [54 ,"With Unity (no. #54), the Grand Accord."],
position: [11 ,"With Divergence (no. #11), self-loathing."],
time: [61 ,"With Embellishment (no. #61), self-love."],
canon: 140,
ankh: 0
}
Post by dolf
140 : [14]
2) Secondly we want to create a new DICTUM entry for each of the OBLIGANS
DICTUM: “I deal not fraudulently”
3) Thirdly I then desire to propagate each GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION
SET with any instances of these DICTUM (s) which are then A PRIORI to any
ONTOLOGICAL circumscribing of the TAXI experience.
   Male: #427; Feme: #263
} // #506
#506 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #100, #10, #9, #5, #10, #200, #1] = apokrinomai
(G611): {UMBRA: #24 as #452 % #41 = #1} 1) to give an answer to a question
proposed, to answer; 2) to begin to speak, but always where something has
preceded (either said or done) to which the remarks refer
4) Whilst it is outside the scope of my prototype, this will then convey
the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE {#9, #49, #45, #58} within the #41 x n as SEPTET
INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS where the probability function () as hot
zones ought to apply.
9: {
thoth: "Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in Sutenhunen; I
am not a teller of lies.",
virtue: [9 ,"If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but"],
tools: [49 ,"If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees."],
position: [45 ,"As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but"],
time: [58 ,"As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside."],
canon: 161,
ankh: 0
}
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-12 04:37:05 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
DOLF @ 2020 HOURS ON 11 AUGUST 2018: "GRAPPLE PROTOTYPE PROPOSED PLANS
FOR AN UPDATE ON 12 AUGUST 2018:

We’ve had our little break after making a submission to the Financial
Services Royal Commission and it’s now time to return to a further
prototype update.

Our first priority is to visualise any REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR
ONTIC functionality which might occur within any GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET associated to HEBREW / GREEK lexicon entries within our
trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon (cf: Immanuel Kant’s
Critique of Pure Reason published 1781 / 1787).

1) Firstly we are going to extend the OBLIGANS {} array that conveys the
#41 x *ONTIC* values which under Roman Empire HETEROS Governance was the
binomial marriage apparatus {ie. NORMA OBLIGANS} as objectively the
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 - MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN, CONVERTING THE
MAIDEN only.

Within this example, we’re going to extend the numerical bounds of the
OBLIGANS {} array by the possibility of a non-unique CANON value and
convey it as an array of any #41 possible values:

17: {
THOTH: "Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am not one of
prating tongue.",
VIRTUE: [17 ,"With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears."],
TOOLS: [57 ,"Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable."],
POSITION: [77 ,"With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but"],
TIME: [6 ,"With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition."],
CANON: 157,
ANKH: 0
}

Thusly there will be an entry:

157: [17]


2) Secondly we want to create a new DICTUM entry for each of the
OBLIGANS *ONTIC* proscriptions:

DICTUM: "I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE",

3) Thirdly I then desire to propagate each GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION
SET with any instances of these DICTUM (s) which are then A PRIORI to
any ONTOLOGICAL circumscribing of the TAXIS experience.

G4077@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 7 (#87); Ego: 8 (#88),
   @3: Sup: 10 (#97); Ego: 3 (#91),
   @4: Sup: 18 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 8 (#99),
   @5: Sup: 56 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 38
(#137),
   Male: #171; Feme: #137
} // #299

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #99 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;

THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; *I*
*AM* *NOT* *ONE* *OF* *PRATING* *TONGUE*.

    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157

#299 as [#80, #8, #3, #8, #200] = pege (G4077): {UMBRA: #6 as #99 % #41
= #17} 1) fountain, spring; 2) a well fed by a spring;

"Now Jacob's well {#299 as [#80, #8, #3, #8, #200] = pege (G4077):
fountain} was there. Jesus therefore, being wearied with his journey,
sat thus on the well {#299 as [#80, #8, #3, #8, #200] = pege (G4077):
fountain}: and it was about the sixth hour.

G1135@{
   @1: Sup: 3 (#3); Ego: 3 (#3),
   @2: Sup: 79 (#82); Ego: 76 (#79),
   @3: Sup: 48 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}); Ego: 50 (#129),
   @4: Sup: 49 (#179); Ego: 1 (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
   @5: Sup: 59 (#238); Ego: 10 (#140 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY {%14} /
I AM NOT AN EAVES-DROPPER {%16}),
   @6: Sup: 38 (#276); Ego: 60 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
   @7: Sup: 48 (#324); Ego: 10 (#210 - I AM NOT OF AGGRESSIVE HAND {%30}),
   @8: Sup: 17 (#341); Ego: 50 (#260),
   Male: #341; Feme: #260
} // #584

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #461 % #41 = #10 - Impossible Advice, What can Be Done?; I-Ching:
H30 - Cohesion, Radiance, Clinging to Brightness/Fire, The net; Tetra:
41 - Response;

THOTH MEASURE: #10 - Oh thou who orderest the flame, who makest thine
appearance in Memphis; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *ROBBER* *OF* *FOOD*.

    #VIRTUE: With Defectiveness (no. #10), selfishness and crookedness.
    #TOOLS: With Vastness (no. #50), fairmindedness and desirelessness.
    #POSITION: As to Branching Out (no. #9), it is the advance.
    #TIME: As to Holding Back (no. #17), it is the retreat.
    #CANON: #86 <-- *ELOHYM* *AS* *ALMIGHTY* *GOD*

#584 as [#3, #400, #50, #1, #10, #60, #10, #50] = gune (G1135): {UMBRA:
#24 as #461 % #41 = #10} 1) a woman of any age, whether a virgin, or
married, or a widow; 2) a wife; 2a) of a betrothed woman;

There cometh a woman {#584 as [#3, #400, #50, #1, #10, #60, #10, #50] =
gune (G1135): women} of Samaria {watch-mountain} to draw water: Jesus
{He is saved/A saviour; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign; one chosen
or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified} saith unto her, Give me to
drink. (For his disciples were gone away unto the city to buy meat.)"
[John 4:6-8 (KJV)]

H802@{
   @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
   @2: Sup: 36 (#42); Ego: 30 (#36),
   @3: Sup: 5 (#47); Ego: 50 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
   @4: Sup: 62 (#109); Ego: 57 (#143),
   @5: Sup: 72 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}); Ego: 10
(#153),
   @6: Sup: 11 (#192 - I AM NOT SWOLLEN WITH PRIDE {%39}); Ego: 20
(#173 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO UNNATURAL LUST {%27}),
   @7: Sup: 51 (#243); Ego: 40 (#213),
   Male: #243; Feme: #213
} // #456

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #306 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to
Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration/Wind, Ground,
Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;

THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the
Block; *I* *COMMIT* *NOT* *ADULTERY* *WITH* *ANOTHER'S* *WIFE*.

    #VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
    #TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
    #POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
    #TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
    #CANON: #180

#456 as [#6, #30, #50, #300, #10, #20, #40] = 'ishshah (H802): {UMBRA:
#0 as #306 % #41 = #19} 1) woman, wife, female; 1a) woman (opposite of
man); 1b) wife (woman married to a man); 1c) female (of animals); 1d)
each, every (pronoun);

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_157@{
@1: Sup: 17 (#17); Ego: 17 (#17),
@2: Sup: 74 (#91); Ego: 57 (#74),
@3: Sup: 70 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 77 (#151),
@4: Sup: 76 (#237); Ego: 6 (#157 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE
{%17} / I HAVE NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY {%41}),
Male: #237 - *USE* *OF* *FORCE*; Feme: #157
}

JOS [ISLAMIST] BERGER NOET (***@IAE.NL) @ 2026 HOURS ON 11 AUGUST
2018: "Yes, you were in this nice building with those nurses and nice
men in white coats, weren't you?!"

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
@1: Sup: 19 (#19); Ego: 19 (#19),
@2: Sup: 78 (#97); Ego: 59 (#78),
@3: Sup: 20 (#117); Ego: 23 (#101),
@4: Sup: 18 (#135); Ego: 79 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
Male: #135 - *ISLAMIC* STOICHEION TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE OF THIS
SAME #45 ARRAY WHERE EACH ROW IS TOTALLING #135; Feme: #180
}

DOLF @ 2136 HOURS ON 11 AUGUST 2018: "You are delusional as some
clandestined neo-Nazi / Islamist would be..."

"The woman {#584 as [#3, #400, #50, #1, #10, #60, #10, #50] = gune
(G1135): women} saith unto him, Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with, and
the well is deep: from whence then hast thou that living water? Art thou
greater than our father Jacob {that supplants, undermines; the heel},
which gave us the well, and drank thereof himself, and his children, and
his cattle?

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_86@{
@1: Sup: 10 (#10); Ego: 10 (#10),
@2: Sup: 60 (#70); Ego: 50 (#60),
@3: Sup: 69 (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS
{%13}); Ego: 9 (#69),
@4: Sup: 5 (#144); Ego: 17 (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}),
Male: #144; Feme: #86
}

Jesus {He is saved/A saviour; a deliverer} of Nazareth {Sovereign; one
chosen or set apart; separated; crowned; sanctified} answered and said
unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: But
whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall
never--thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a
well {#299 as [#80, #8, #3, #8, #200] = pege (G4077): fountain} of water
springing up into everlasting life." [John 4:13-14 (KJV)]

It’s a fascinating concept that this morality correspondence: #161 - I
AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9} ought to mathematically occur within teh
GREEK lexicon term: #506 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #100, #10, #9, #5, #10,
#200, #1] = apokrinomai (G611): {UMBRA: #24 as #452 % #41 = #1} 1) to
give an answer to a question proposed, to answer; 2) to begin to speak,
but always where something has preceded (either said or done) to which
the remarks refer;

G611@{
   @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
   @2: Sup: 81 (#82); Ego: 80 (#81),
   @3: Sup: 70 (#152); Ego: 70 (#151),
   @4: Sup: 9 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 20 (#171 -
I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
   @5: Sup: 28 (#189); Ego: 19 (#190),
   @6: Sup: 38 (#227); Ego: 10 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
   @7: Sup: 47 (#274); Ego: 9 (#209),
   @8: Sup: 52 (#326); Ego: 5 (#214),
   @9: Sup: 62 (#388); Ego: 10 (#224),
   @10: Sup: 19 (#407); Ego: 38 (#262),
   @11: Sup: 20 (#427); Ego: 1 (#263),
   Male: #427; Feme: #263
} // #506

4) Whilst it is outside the scope of my prototype, this will then convey
the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE [#9, #49, #45, #58]

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
   @1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
   @2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
   @3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
   @4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
   Male: #169; Feme: #161
}

DOLF @ 2148 HOURS ON 11 AUGUST 2018: "[Once again] it’s a fascinating
concept that this morality correspondence ought to mathematically occur:

@4: Sup: 9 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 20 (#171 - I AM
NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),

You can see why it’s important to investigate the OBLIGANS {} array
spectrum so that governance around the world can protect themselves and
their citizens from such dishonesty as bestial Islamic onslaught.

Why else would BERGER NOIT be so intent to defame...

We may yet convey: “*DO* *YOU* *WANT* *MORE* *OR* *LESS* *MOROCCANS*”:

#41 - TO BE {*ONTIC*} or #81 - NOT TO BE {#41 x 2 % #81 = #1} that is
the #123 - QUESTION {#41 x 3} which must be #369 - DETERMINED {#41 x 9}”

Is as valid a mathematical concept as:

DICTUM: “I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY”

DICTUM: “I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES”

Which as immorality appears to be an impiety that is [a] NATURAL [LAW]
unto them."

Within English this term 'NATURAL LAW' is frequently employed as
equivalent to the laws of nature, meaning the order which governs the
activities of the material universe. Among the Roman jurists natural law
designated those instincts and emotions common to man and the lower
animals, *SUCH* *AS* *THE* *INSTINCT* *OF* *SELF*-*PRESERVATION* *AND*
*LOVE* *OF* *OFFSPRING*. In its strictly ethical application—the sense
in which this article treats it—the natural law is the rule of conduct
which is prescribed to us by the Creator in the constitution of the
nature with which He has endowed us.

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Obligans.pdf>

The eternal law is God's wisdom, inasmuch as it is the directive norm of
all movement and action. When God willed to give existence to creatures,
He willed to ordain and direct them to an end. In the case of inanimate
things, this Divine direction is provided for in the nature which God
has given to each; in them determinism reigns. Like all the rest of
creation, man is destined by God to an end, and receives from Him a
direction towards this end. This ordination is of a character in harmony
with his free intelligent nature. In virtue of his intelligence and free
will, man is master of his conduct. Unlike the things of the mere
material world he can vary his action, act, or abstain from action, as
he pleases. Yet he is not a lawless being in an ordered universe. In the
very constitution of his nature, he too has a law laid down for him,
reflecting that ordination and direction of all things, which is the
eternal law. The rule, then, which God has prescribed for our conduct,
is found in our nature itself. Those actions which conform with its
tendencies, lead to our destined end, and are thereby constituted right
and morally good; those at variance with our nature are wrong and immoral.

The norm, however, of conduct is not some particular element or aspect
of our nature. The standard is our whole human nature with its manifold
relationships, considered as a creature destined to a special end.
Actions are wrong if, though subserving the satisfaction of some
particular need or tendency, they are at the same time incompatible with
that rational harmonious subordination of the lower to the higher which
reason should maintain among our conflicting tendencies and desires (see
GOOD). For example, to nourish our bodies is right; but to indulge our
appetite for food to the detriment of our corporal or spiritual life is
wrong. Self-preservation is right, but to refuse to expose our life when
the well-being of society requires it, is wrong. It is wrong to drink to
intoxication, for, besides being injurious to health, such indulgence
deprives one of the use of reason, which is intended by God to be the
guide and dictator of conduct. Theft is wrong, because it subverts the
basis of social life; and man's nature requires for its proper
development that he live in a state of society. There is, then, a double
reason for calling this law of conduct natural: first, because it is set
up concretely in our very nature itself, and second, because it is
manifested to us by the purely natural medium of reason. In both
respects it is distinguished from the Divine positive law, which
contains precepts not arising from the nature of things as God has
constituted them by the creative act, but from the arbitrary will of
God. This law we learn not through the unaided operation of reason, but
through the light of supernatural revelation.

We may now analyse the natural law into three constituents:

THE DISCRIMINATING NORM,
THE *BINDING* *NORM* (*NORMA* *OBLIGANS*), AND
THE MANIFESTING NORM.

The DISCRIMINATING NORM is, as we have just seen, human nature itself,
objectively considered. It is, so to speak, the book in which is written
the text of the law, and the classification of human actions into good
and bad. Strictly speaking, our nature is the proximate discriminating
norm or standard. The remote and ultimate norm, of which it is the
partial reflection and application, is the Divine nature itself, the
ultimate groundwork of the created order. The *BINDING* *OR*
*OBLIGATORY* *NORM* is the Divine authority, imposing upon the rational
creature the obligation of living in conformity with his nature, and
thus with the universal order established by the Creator. Contrary to
the Kantian theory that we must not acknowledge any other lawgiver than
conscience, the truth is that reason as conscience is only immediate
moral authority which we are called upon to obey, and conscience itself
owes its authority to the fact that it is the mouthpiece of the Divine
will and imperium. The MANIFESTING NORM (norma denuntians), which
determines the moral quality of actions tried by the discriminating
norm, is reason. Through this faculty we perceive what is the moral
constitution of our nature, what kind of action it calls for, and
whether a particular action possesses this requisite character. [New
Advent Catholic Encyclopedia <http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09076a.htm>]

DOLF @ 0223 HOURS ON 12 AUGUST 2018: "If I may make a further
postulation upon my earlier informal research statement about the shared
hymeneal / racialism characteristic between Islam / Fascism: “extend the
OBLIGANS {} array that convey the #41 x ONTIC values which under Roman
Empire HETEROS Governance was the binomial marriage apparatus {ie.
*BINDING* *OR* *OBLIGATORY* *NORM* as the presupposed Divine authority
imposed upon what is by nature} as objectively the TRANSFORMATION
PROTOTYPE of H54 - MARRIAGEABLE MAIDEN, CONVERTING THE MAIDEN only.”

Part of the problem relates to the speech dynamic reflexive function ()
itself as we have noted earlier as a process of extrusion has the vowels
conforming to the same metaphysical / metempirical model {NORTH /
SOUTH / EAST / WEST} which religion itself deploys for its binomial 64
element conception of natural GENESIS:

GIVEN THE *MAJOR* *PREMISE* {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law} of circa 1550 BCE, which contains the law of that will: 7
x 24 *COURSES* *OF* *PRIESTLY* *DIVISIONS* x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth
cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to the 'constant sequence of sun and
moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days

<— RATIONAL PI AS THE BASIS FOR RATIOCINATION IS IMPLICIT WITHIN THIS
COSMOLOGICAL COMPREHENSION

<http://www.grapple369.com/?OVERVIEW>

We ought then to be able to deploy Hebrew (22) / Greek (24) Categories
of Understanding interchangeably and we also can use English.

BECAUSE THE ENGLISH VOWELS: A-E-I-O-U APPEAR TO BE DERIVED FROM THE HEBREW:

#A (#1) = {Inner?} - #SOUTH
#E (#5) = {Totality?} - #CENTRE
#I (#9) = {Sphere?} - #NORTH
#O (#60) = {Polarity?} - #WEST? {#SAMEK as the 15th Hebrew Letter}
#U (#300) = {Harmony?} - #EAST {ie. determined as such by Pythagorean
redaction method using the Greco-Roman magic square as frame of reference}

You’ll notice from the Kabbalist notion of the #VOWELS which I have just
summarily conveyed above, that they may well conform to our
RATIOCINATION paradigm and thusly given the #231 / #351 inclusions
within this INDESTRUCTIBLE THOUGHT ATOM it then provides the best
natural defence against any religious extremist ideology: @1 / @5.

The metempirical / metaphysical (ie. outside time) consideration is then
whether the English language itself is an extrusion of the INTELLECTUS
AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTUS par excellence.

However as we see below the *ONTIC* values for the SPEECH RESPONSE
dynamic below: #45 (3x3 = #15) are themselves trinomial as #81 element
and the discriminating NORM is #369.

The problem arises therefore that the Islamic / Fascism comparator can
be sustained upon the economy observation that there is a common
deployment of the #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL within the PYTHAGOREAN
notion of the HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

38 45 40
43 41 39
42 37 44 = #123 / #369 {GRECO-ROMAN MAGIC SQUARE AGAINST WHICH THE
*EGYPTIAN* *ANKH* / *ROMAN* *IMPERIAL* *EMPIRE* / *JEWISH* *VASSAL*
*GOVERNANCE* *PROTOTYPES* ARE ASSIGNED}

But the #CENTRE point of contention is that Islamic belief establishes a
contrived ONTIC premise by deploying #FIVE sequential elements {

46 41 48
47 45 43
42 49 44 = #135 / #405 {FIRE - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS NORTH}

[#41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49] = #405

STOICHEION-NORTH@{
@1: Sup: 41 (#41); Ego: 41 (#41),
@2: Sup: 2 (#43); Ego: 42 (#83),
@3: Sup: 45 (#88); Ego: 43 (#126),
@4: Sup: 8 (#96); Ego: 44 (#170),
@5: Sup: 53 (#149); Ego: 45 (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34}),
@6: Sup: 18 (#167); Ego: 46 (#261),
@7: Sup: 65 (#232); Ego: 47 (#308),
@8: Sup: 32 (#264); Ego: 48 (#356),
@9: Sup: 81 (#345); Ego: 49 (#405),
Male: #345; Feme: #405
}

42 47 46
49 45 41
44 43 48 = #135 / #405 {EARTH - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS EAST}

[#47, #44, #41, #48, #45, #42, #49, #46, #43] = #405

STOICHEION-EAST@{
@1: Sup: 47 (#47); Ego: 47 (#47),
@2: Sup: 10 (#57); Ego: 44 (#91),
@3: Sup: 51 (#108); Ego: 41 (#132),
@4: Sup: 18 (#126); Ego: 48 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
@5: Sup: 63 (#189); Ego: 45 (#225),
@6: Sup: 24 (#213); Ego: 42 (#267),
@7: Sup: 73 (#286); Ego: 49 (#316),
@8: Sup: 38 (#324); Ego: 46 (#362),
@9: Sup: 81 (#405); Ego: 43 (#405),
Male: #405; Feme: #405
}
44 49 42
43 45 47
48 41 46 = #135 / #405 {AIR - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS SOUTH}

[#49, #48, #47, #46, #45, #44, #43, #42, #41] = #405

STOICHEION-SOUTH@{
@1: Sup: 49 (#49); Ego: 49 (#49),
@2: Sup: 16 (#65); Ego: 48 (#97),
@3: Sup: 63 (#128); Ego: 47 (#144),
@4: Sup: 28 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 46 (#190),
@5: Sup: 73 (#229); Ego: 45 (#235),
@6: Sup: 36 (#265); Ego: 44 (#279),
@7: Sup: 79 (#344); Ego: 43 (#322),
@8: Sup: 40 (#384); Ego: 42 (#364),
@9: Sup: 81 (#465); Ego: 41 (#405),
Male: #465; Feme: #405
}

48 43 44
41 45 49
46 47 42 = #135 / #405 {WATER - *ACCORDING* *TO* *ISLAMIC* *BELIEF* AS WEST}

[#43, #46, #49, #42, #45, #48, #41, #44, #47] = #405

STOICHEION-WEST@{
@1: Sup: 43 (#43); Ego: 43 (#43),
@2: Sup: 8 (#51); Ego: 46 (#89),
@3: Sup: 57 (#108); Ego: 49 (#138),
@4: Sup: 18 (#126); Ego: 42 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
@5: Sup: 63 (#189); Ego: 45 (#225),
@6: Sup: 30 (#219); Ego: 48 (#273),
@7: Sup: 71 (#290); Ego: 41 (#314),
@8: Sup: 34 (#324); Ego: 44 (#358),
@9: Sup: 81 (#405); Ego: 47 (#405),
Male: #405; Feme: #405
}

Within the {3x3 = #123} array by a quadratic STOICHEION TRANSFORMATION
PROTOTYPE of this same #45 array where each row is totalling #135 and
the MAGIC SUM is #405.

Thus whilst it is difficult to explain in WORDS, Islam attempts to
impose itself as claimed SUPERIORITY by being HOOKED into the #CENTRE of
CONSCIOUSNESS as VOLUNTARY WILL and against the NATURAL LAW as order
of things as OBLIGANS which are ONTIC PRINCIPLES of CIVIL SOCIETY that
are DICTUMs defined MATHEMATICALLY as NOUMENON function () of MIND /
GODHEAD.

G611@{
   @1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
   @2: Sup: 81 (#82); Ego: 80 (#81),
   @3: Sup: 70 (#152); Ego: 70 (#151),
   @4: Sup: 9 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 20 (#171 -
I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}),
   @5: Sup: 28 (#189); Ego: 19 (#190),
   @6: Sup: 38 (#227); Ego: 10 (#200 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF SACRED
PROPERTY {%8}),
   @7: Sup: 47 (#274); Ego: 9 (#209),
   @8: Sup: 52 (#326); Ego: 5 (#214),
   @9: Sup: 62 (#388); Ego: 10 (#224),
   @10: Sup: 19 (#407); Ego: 38 (#262),
   @11: Sup: 20 (#427); Ego: 1 (#263),
   Male: #427; Feme: #263
} // #506

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #452 % #41 = #1 - To Guide with Names, Reason's Realisation;
I-Ching: H58 - Joy, Open, Lake; Tetra: 24 - Joy;

THOTH MEASURE: #1 - Oh thou of long strides, who makest thine appearance
in Annu; *I* *AM* *NOT* *A* *DOER* *OF* *WRONG*.

    #VIRTUE: If it is Center (no. #1), then yang begins.
    #TOOLS: With Center (no. #1), it begins.
    #POSITION: If it is Response (no. #41), then yin is born.
    #TIME: With Full Circle (no. #2), it wheels back.
    #CANON: #45

A. If one has the *ONTIC* mathematical premises which are central to
existence of being and its integrity, then one most certainly and
prudently can make #123 - JUDGEMENT.

#506 as [#1, #80, #70, #20, #100, #10, #9, #5, #10, #200, #1] =
apokrinomai (G611): {UMBRA: #24 as #452 % #41 = #1} 1) to give an answer
to a question proposed, to answer; 2) to begin to speak, but always
where something has preceded (either said or done) to which the remarks
refer;

DOLF @ 0954 HOURS ON 12 AUGUST 2-18: "THERE APPEARS AT FIRST GLANCE TO
BE A SELF REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY EMBEDDED WITHIN THE BIBLICAL TEXT
ASSOCIATED TO THE *ONTIC* IMPETUS GIVEN TO THE ONTOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF
*FOUNTAIN* (G4077) WHERE THWRE IS ASSIGNED: %5 - #CENTRE and %20 - KAF
as the HEBREW letter for KNOWLEDGE:

45: [1]
68: [42]
84: [2]
86: [10]
102: [4]
104: [7]
115: [5]
130: [3]
139: [13]
140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15]
148: [12]
150: [28]
156: [21]
157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE
NO STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23]
161: [9]
166: [11]
168: [26]
169: [18]
171: [20]
173: [27]
175: [22]
177: [29]
180: [19]
181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6]
184: [36]
185: [25]
186: [31]
191: [32]
192: [39]
196: [37]
197: [33]
200: [8]
210: [30]
215: [34]
220: [38]
228: [40]

"DOTH A FOUNTAIN (G4077) SEND FORTH AT THE SAME PLACE SWEET WATER AND
BITTER?

CAN THE FIG TREE, MY BRETHREN, BEAR OLIVE BERRIES?

EITHER A VINE, FIGS?

SO CAN NO FOUNTAIN (G4077) BOTH YIELD SALT WATER AND FRESH.

WHO IS A WISE MAN AND ENDUED WITH KNOWLEDGE AMONG YOU?

YOUTUBE: "KAF - Secrets of the Hebrew Letters"

http://youtu.be/kjEbET42Rp4

YOUTUBE: "Alphabet of Kabbalah 20 The Hebrew Letter Kaf"

http://youtu.be/nmZoc2RX_JA

LET HIM SHOW OUT OF A GOOD CONVERSATION HIS WORKS WITH MEEKNESS OF
WISDOM." [James 3:11-13 (KJV)]

G4077@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 7 (#87); Ego: 8 (#88),
   @3: Sup: 10 (#97); Ego: 3 (#91),
   @4: Sup: 18 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 8 (#99),
   @5: Sup: 56 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 38
(#137),
   Male: #171; Feme: #137
} // #299

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #99 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid/Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;

THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am
not one of prating tongue.

    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157

#299 as [#80, #8, #3, #8, #200] = pege (G4077): {UMBRA: #6 as #99 % #41
= #17} 1) fountain, spring; 2) a well fed by a spring;

Here is the updated OBLIGANS {} array as a JSON file:

<http://www.grapple369.com/obligans.json>

And its currently 0800 hours on the 12 August 2018 and the code is
currently only available within the develop.html version at the present
time:

<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>

And once we've included the GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET
expansions, we'll release it into the general production versions
grapple.html and index.html

As surmised there were several repetitions which appear to be concerned
primarily with speech as seemingly conforming to the Biblical narrative:

"My brethren, be not many masters, knowing that we shall receive the
greater condemnation.

For in many things we offend all. If any man offend not in word, the
same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the whole body. Behold,
we put bits in the horses’ mouths, that they may obey us; and we turn
about their whole body.

Behold also the ships, which though they be so great, and are driven of
fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very small helm,
whithersoever the governor listeth.

Even so the tongue is a little member, and boasteth great things.
Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindleth!

And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among
our members, that it defileth the whole body, and setteth on fire the
course of nature; and it is set on fire of hell.

For every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things
in the sea, is tamed, and hath been tamed of mankind: But the tongue can
no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison.

Therewith bless we God, even the Father; and therewith curse we men,
which are made after the similitude of God. Out of the same mouth
proceedeth blessing and cursing. My brethren, these things ought not so
to be.

Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet water and bitter?

Can the fig tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? either a vine, figs?

So can no fountain both yield salt water and fresh.

Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? Let him show out
of a good conversation his works with meekness of wisdom.

But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and
lie not against the truth.

This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish.

For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work.
But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle,
and easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without
partiality, and without hypocrisy.

And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make
peace." [James 3:1-18 (KJV)]

Such natural causality is to convey that the supranatural assimilation
with the MIND as ONE has now occurred which is exemplified by the
mathematical categories of understanding conveying a temporal relativity
and singularity of apperception.

Beware the Hydra!

- dolf

A DRAFT REVISION OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE OBTAINED AS A PDF FROM THIS URL:

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Sociability.pdf>

Initial Post: 8 August 2018
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-13 01:15:36 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by dolf
We’ve had our little break after making a submission to the Financial
Services Royal Commission and it’s now time to return to a further
prototype update.
Who is "we"?
There aren't more of are there?
Post by dolf
Our first priority is to visualise any REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITOR
ONTIC functionality which might occur within any GNOMIC IMPERATIVE
INSTRUCTION SET associated to HEBREW / GREEK lexicon entries within our
trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon (cf: Immanuel Kant’s
Critique of Pure Reason published 1781 / 1787).
That's just gibberish.
The informal research task has been completed and we substantially convey
as factual the hypothetical postulate that the *ONTIC* premises as
meta-descriptor prototypes conveying NATURAL LAW of NORMA OBLIGANS as an
ethical construct of being / ousia are carried by the ONTOLOGICAL
experience of language as HEBREW / GREEK lexicon being CATEGORIES OF
UNDERSTANDING defined by a trinomial mathematical theoretical noumenon.

We publish our findings so that a peer review can be undertaken and the
core definitions can be utilised for political agreements without the need
to provide any substantial narrative of concise consensus agreement.

DOLF @ 0954 HOURS ON 12 AUGUST 2018: "THERE APPEARS AT FIRST GLANCE TO BE A
SELF REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY EMBEDDED WITHIN THE BIBLICAL TEXT ASSOCIATED TO
THE *ONTIC* IMPETUS GIVEN TO THE ONTOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF *FOUNTAIN* (G4077)
WHERE THERE IS ASSIGNED: %5 - #CENTRE and %20 - #KAF upon 11 SEPTEMBER 2001
as the 11th HEBREW letter designate for KNOWLEDGE:

<Loading Image...>

[IMAGE: THOTH MEASURES OF HYPERSPACE AND ‘OTH {24x7x13 = #2184 as 6D / #0 -
21 MARCH 1996} CYCLE OF THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS HAS IT ANY PERENNIAL
SIGNIFICANCE OVER PYTHAGOREAN REDACTION: 1-5-6-7-2-3-4-8-9 METHODOLOGY FOR
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE?]

45: [1]
68: [42]
84: [2]
86: [10]
102: [4]
104: [7]
115: [5]
130: [3]
139: [13]
140: [14, 16] // #14 - I DEAL NOT FRAUDULENTLY; #16 - I AM NOT AN
EAVES-DROPPER
146: [15]
148: [12]
150: [28]
156: [21]
157: [17, 41] // #17 - I AM NOT ONE OF PRATING TONGUE; #41 - I HAVE NO
STRONG DESIRE EXCEPT FOR MY OWN PROPERTY
158: [23]
161: [9]
166: [11]
168: [26]
169: [18]
171: [20]
173: [27]
175: [22]
177: [29]
180: [19]
181: [24, 35] // #24 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS OF
RIGHTEOUSNESS; #35 - I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING
182: [6]
184: [36]
185: [25]
186: [31]
191: [32]
192: [39]
196: [37]
197: [33]
200: [8]
210: [30]
215: [34]
220: [38]
228: [40]

"DOTH A FOUNTAIN (G4077) SEND FORTH AT THE SAME PLACE SWEET WATER AND
BITTER?

CAN THE FIG TREE, MY BRETHREN, BEAR OLIVE BERRIES?

EITHER A VINE, FIGS?

SO CAN NO FOUNTAIN (G4077) BOTH YIELD SALT WATER AND FRESH.

WHO IS A WISE MAN AND ENDUED WITH KNOWLEDGE AMONG YOU?

YOUTUBE: "KAF - Secrets of the Hebrew Letters"

http://youtu.be/kjEbET42Rp4

YOUTUBE: "Alphabet of Kabbalah 20 The Hebrew Letter Kaf"

http://youtu.be/nmZoc2RX_JA

LET HIM SHOW OUT OF A GOOD CONVERSATION HIS WORKS WITH MEEKNESS OF WISDOM."
[James 3:11-13 (KJV)]

G4077@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 7 (#87); Ego: 8 (#88),
   @3: Sup: 10 (#97); Ego: 3 (#91),
   @4: Sup: 18 (#115 - I AM NOT A SLAYER OF MEN {%5}); Ego: 8 (#99),
   @5: Sup: 56 (#171 - I AM NOT UNCHASTE WITH ANY ONE {%20}); Ego: 38
(#137),
   Male: #171; Feme: #137
} // #299

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #99 % #41 = #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable Maid/Maiden,
Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner;

THOTH MEASURE: #17 - Oh Aati, who makest thine appearance at Annu; I am not
one of prating tongue.

    #VIRTUE: With Holding Back (no. #17), to have fears.
    #TOOLS: Guardedness (no. #57) means to be impregnable.
    #POSITION: With Compliance (no. #77), orders upheld, but
    #TIME: With Contrariety (no. #6), mutual opposition.
    #CANON: #157

#299 as [#80, #8, #3, #8, #200] = pege (G4077): {UMBRA: #6 as #99 % #41 =
#17} 1) fountain, spring; 2) a well fed by a spring;

Here is the updated OBLIGANS {} array as a JSON file:

<http://www.grapple369.com/obligans.json>

- dolf
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-13 01:28:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Our next task is to implement the ANKH {} array that will convey each of
the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values which under Roman Empire HETEROS
Governance was the binomial marriage apparatus as objectively the
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 - “Marriageable Maiden, Converting the
Maiden” only.

And we’ll populate the relevant panel with the resolvePrototypes()
function.

Following which we’ll set about for the remainder of the AUGUST month doing
a rewrite and redaction of the existing code to enable FORMS{} based arrays
which will become objects that are dynamically loaded.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-13 05:42:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
I’m already considering an implement of the ANKH {} array that will convey
each of the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values in this manner where the
prototype: 0 conveys the presupposed non-existent PSEUDO-NINE prototype but
I’m thinking this ought to be referenced by the name of ‘node’.

var ANKH = {
9: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 1, Sup: 9}, {prototype: 0, plane: 1, Ego:
9}]
},
26: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 2, Ego: 17}]
},
35: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 2, Sup: 26}]
},
51: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 3, Ego: 25}]
},
84 : {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 4, Ego: 33}]
},
86: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 3, Sup: 51}]
},
89: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 4, Sup: 3}]
},
95: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 5, Ego: 11}]
},
103: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 5, Sup: 14}]
},
144: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 6, Ego: 49}]
},
166: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 6, Sup: 63}]
},
201: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 7, Ego: 57}]
},
205: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 7, Sup: 39}]
},
228: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 8, Sup: 23}]
},
266: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 8, Ego: 65}]
},
243: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 9, Sup: 15}]
},
339: {
HETEROS: [{prototype: 0, plane: 9, Ego:73}]
}
}

Thus the test expression:

alert(ANKH[339].HETEROS[0].Ego);

Will convey #73 as a reference to the HETEROS prototype which has a TELOS
value of #339.

However we are only at the preliminary stages of this functionality
implementation.

- dolf
Post by dolf
Our next task is to implement the ANKH {} array that will convey each of
the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values which under Roman Empire HETEROS
Governance was the binomial marriage apparatus as objectively the
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 - “Marriageable Maiden, Converting the
Maiden” only.
And we’ll populate the relevant panel with the resolvePrototypes()
function.
Following which we’ll set about for the remainder of the AUGUST month doing
a rewrite and redaction of the existing code to enable FORMS{} based arrays
which will become objects that are dynamically loaded.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-08-13 06:56:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
We note that the TORAH PSEUDO-NINE PROTOTYPE which is incremented by 3
does not correctly provide the property (which I had always presumed) of
each row having symmetry as #150

51 25 74 = 150 +
73 50 27 = 150 +
26 75 48 = 149 = 449

<Loading Image...>

Which is expected of the MAGIC SQUARES and inherent within the HETEROS
PSEUDO-NINE PROTOTYPE:

49 9 65 = 123 +
57 41 25 = 123 +
17 73 33 = 123 = 369

<Loading Image...>

And whether this dishonesty by the JEWISH VASSAL STATE then subject to
ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE and being evidence of *THEFT* conveyed within
the Apostle Paul's Epistle to the ROMANS:

"Thou that *preachest* *a* *man* *should* *not* *steal*, *dost* *thou*
*steal*?" [Romans 1:21 (KJV)]

Was this *FACT* was sufficient and justifiable cause for the DESTRUCTION
OF THE TEMPLE within JERUSALEM is not presently known but would seem
likely...

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#0 as #369)@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 26 (#35); Ego: 17 (#26),
@3: Sup: 51 (#86); Ego: 25 (#51),
@4: Sup: 3 (#89); Ego: 33 (#84),
@5: Sup: 44 (#133); Ego: 41 (#125),
@6: Sup: 12 (#145); Ego: 49 (#174),
@7: Sup: 69 (#214); Ego: 57 (#231),
@8: Sup: 53 (#267); Ego: 65 (#296),
@9: Sup: 45 (#312); Ego: 73 (#369),
Male: #312; Feme: #369
} // #369

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#0 as #449)@{
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 51 (#76); Ego: 26 (#51),
@3: Sup: 78 (#154); Ego: 27 (#78),
@4: Sup: 45 (#199); Ego: 48 (#126),
@5: Sup: 14 (#213); Ego: 50 (#176),
@6: Sup: 65 (#278); Ego: 51 (#227),
@7: Sup: 57 (#335); Ego: 73 (#300),
@8: Sup: 50 (#385); Ego: 74 (#374),
@9: Sup: 44 (#429); Ego: 75 (#449),
Male: #429; Feme: #449
} // #449

"Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy
boast of God,

And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent,
being instructed out of the law; And art confident that thou thyself art
a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, an
instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of
knowledge and of the truth in the law.

Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself?

Thou that *preachest* *a* *man* *should* *not* *steal*, *dost* *thou*
*steal*?

Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit
adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege?

Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law
dishonourest thou God?

For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it
is written." [Romans 2:17-24 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
I’m already considering an implement of the ANKH {} array that will convey
each of the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values in this manner where the
node: 0 conveys the presupposed non-existent PSEUDO-NINE prototype.
var ANKH = {
9: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 1, Ego: 9, Sup: 9}]
},
26: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 2, Ego: 17}]
},
35: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 2, Sup: 26}]
},
51: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 3, Ego: 25}]
},
78: {
TORAH: [{node: 1, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
84 : {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 4, Ego: 33}]
},
86: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 3, Sup: 51}]
},
87: {
TORAH: [{node: 2, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
89: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 4, Sup: 3}]
},
125: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 5, Ego: 41}]
},
96: {
TORAH: [{node: 3, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
99: {
HETEROS: [{node: 1, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
102: {
HETEROS: [{node: 2, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
105: {
HETEROS: [{node: 3, plane: 0, sum: true}],
TORAH: [{node: 5, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
108: {
HETEROS: [{node: 4, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
111: {
HETEROS: [{node: 5, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
113: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
114: {
HETEROS: [{node: 6, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
117: {
HETEROS: [{node: 7, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
120: {
HETEROS: [{node: 8, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
123: {
TORAH: [{node: 6, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
132: {
TORAH: [{node: 7, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
133: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 5, Sup: 44}]
},
141: {
TORAH: [{node: 8, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
145: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 6, Sup: 63}]
},
174: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 6, Ego: 49}]
},
214: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 7, Sup: 12}]
},
267: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 8, Sup: 53}]
},
231: {
HETEROS: [{node: 9, plane: 0, sum: true}],
TORAH: [{node: 0, plane: 7, Ego: 57}, {node: 9, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
296: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 8, Ego: 65}]
},
312: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 9, Sup: 45}]
},
339: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 9, Ego:73, sum: true}]
}
}

// alert(ANKH[339].HETEROS[0].Ego);
Post by dolf
alert(ANKH[339].HETEROS[0].Ego);
Will convey #73 as a reference to the HETEROS prototype which has a TELOS
value of #339.
However we are only at the preliminary stages of this functionality
implementation.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Our next task is to implement the ANKH {} array that will convey each of
the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values which under Roman Empire HETEROS
Governance was the binomial marriage apparatus as objectively the
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 - “Marriageable Maiden, Converting the
Maiden” only.
And we’ll populate the relevant panel with the resolvePrototypes()
function.
Following which we’ll set about for the remainder of the AUGUST month doing
a rewrite and redaction of the existing code to enable FORMS{} based arrays
which will become objects that are dynamically loaded.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-13 07:12:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
We note that the TORAH PSEUDO-NINE PROTOTYPE which is incremented by 3
does not correctly provide the property (which I had always presumed) of
each row having symmetry as #150

51 25 74 = 150 +
73 50 27 = 150 +
26 75 48 = 149 = 449

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

Which is expected of the MAGIC SQUARES and inherent within the HETEROS
PSEUDO-NINE PROTOTYPE:

49 9 65 = 123 +
57 41 25 = 123 +
17 73 33 = 123 = 369

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>

And whether this dishonesty by the JEWISH VASSAL STATE then subject to
ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE and being evidence of *THEFT* conveyed within
the Apostle Paul's Epistle to the ROMANS:

"Thou that *preachest* *a* *man* *should* *not* *steal*, *dost* *thou*
*steal*?" [Romans 1:21 (KJV)]

THAT this *FACT* was sufficient and justifiable cause for the
DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE within JERUSALEM is not presently known but
would seem likely...

HETEROS PROTOTYPE: (#0 as #369)@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 26 (#35); Ego: 17 (#26),
@3: Sup: 51 (#86); Ego: 25 (#51),
@4: Sup: 3 (#89); Ego: 33 (#84),
@5: Sup: 44 (#133); Ego: 41 (#125),
@6: Sup: 12 (#145); Ego: 49 (#174),
@7: Sup: 69 (#214); Ego: 57 (#231),
@8: Sup: 53 (#267); Ego: 65 (#296),
@9: Sup: 45 (#312); Ego: 73 (#369),
Male: #312; Feme: #369
} // #369

TORAH PROTOTYPE: (#0 as #449)@{
@1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
@2: Sup: 51 (#76); Ego: 26 (#51),
@3: Sup: 78 (#154); Ego: 27 (#78),
@4: Sup: 45 (#199); Ego: 48 (#126),
@5: Sup: 14 (#213); Ego: 50 (#176),
@6: Sup: 65 (#278); Ego: 51 (#227),
@7: Sup: 57 (#335); Ego: 73 (#300),
@8: Sup: 50 (#385); Ego: 74 (#374),
@9: Sup: 44 (#429); Ego: 75 (#449),
Male: #429; Feme: #449
} // #449

"Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy
boast of God,

And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent,
being instructed out of the law; And art confident that thou thyself art
a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, an
instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of
knowledge and of the truth in the law.

Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself?

Thou that *preachest* *a* *man* *should* *not* *steal*, *dost* *thou*
*steal*?

Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit
adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege?

Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law
dishonourest thou God?

For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it
is written." [Romans 2:17-24 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
I’m already considering an implement of the ANKH {} array that will convey
each of the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values in this manner where the
node: 0 conveys the presupposed non-existent PSEUDO-NINE prototype.
var ANKH = {
9: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 1, Ego: 9, Sup: 9}]
},
26: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 2, Ego: 17}]
},
35: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 2, Sup: 26}]
},
51: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 3, Ego: 25}]
},
78: {
TORAH: [{node: 1, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
84 : {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 4, Ego: 33}]
},
86: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 3, Sup: 51}]
},
87: {
TORAH: [{node: 2, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
89: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 4, Sup: 3}]
},
125: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 5, Ego: 41}]
},
96: {
TORAH: [{node: 3, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
99: {
HETEROS: [{node: 1, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
102: {
HETEROS: [{node: 2, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
105: {
HETEROS: [{node: 3, plane: 0, sum: true}],
TORAH: [{node: 5, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
108: {
HETEROS: [{node: 4, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
111: {
HETEROS: [{node: 5, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
113: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
114: {
HETEROS: [{node: 6, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
117: {
HETEROS: [{node: 7, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
120: {
HETEROS: [{node: 8, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
123: {
TORAH: [{node: 6, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
132: {
TORAH: [{node: 7, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
133: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 5, Sup: 44}]
},
141: {
TORAH: [{node: 8, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
145: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 6, Sup: 63}]
},
174: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 6, Ego: 49}]
},
214: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 7, Sup: 12}]
},
267: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 8, Sup: 53}]
},
231: {
HETEROS: [{node: 9, plane: 0, sum: true}],
TORAH: [{node: 0, plane: 7, Ego: 57}, {node: 9, plane: 0, sum: true}]
},
296: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 8, Ego: 65}]
},
312: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 9, Sup: 45}]
},
339: {
HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 9, Ego:73, sum: true}]
}
}

// alert(ANKH[339].HETEROS[0].Ego);
Post by dolf
alert(ANKH[339].HETEROS[0].Ego);
Will convey #73 as a reference to the HETEROS prototype which has a TELOS
value of #339.
However we are only at the preliminary stages of this functionality
implementation.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Our next task is to implement the ANKH {} array that will convey each of
the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values which under Roman Empire HETEROS
Governance was the binomial marriage apparatus as objectively the
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 - “Marriageable Maiden, Converting the
Maiden” only.
And we’ll populate the relevant panel with the resolvePrototypes()
function.
Following which we’ll set about for the remainder of the AUGUST month doing
a rewrite and redaction of the existing code to enable FORMS{} based arrays
which will become objects that are dynamically loaded.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-14 06:29:54 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
We have currently implemented a draft (untested) ANKH {} data set for
the ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE which is the meta-physical /
metempirical philosophical basis to the Pythagorean binomial HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>

However these still need to checked for data referential integrity...

Tomorrow's task will be to implement the JEWISH VASSAL GOVERNANCE
ASSOCIATED TO PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER
Post by dolf
We note that the TORAH PSEUDO-NINE PROTOTYPE which is incremented by 3
does not correctly provide the property (which I had always presumed) of
each row having symmetry as #150
51 25 74 = 150 +
73 50 27 = 150 +
26 75 48 = 149 = 449
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
Which is expected of the MAGIC SQUARES and inherent within the HETEROS
49  9 65 = 123 +
57 41 25 = 123 +
17 73 33 = 123 = 369
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
And whether this dishonesty by the JEWISH VASSAL STATE then subject to
ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE and being evidence of *THEFT* conveyed within
"Thou that *preachest* *a* *man* *should* *not* *steal*, *dost* *thou*
*steal*?" [Romans 1:21 (KJV)]
THAT this *FACT* was sufficient and justifiable cause for the
DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE within JERUSALEM is not presently known but
would seem likely...
    Male: #312; Feme: #369
} // #369
    Male: #429; Feme: #449
} // #449
"Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy
boast of God,
And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more excellent,
being instructed out of the law; And art confident that thou thyself art
a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, an
instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which hast the form of
knowledge and of the truth in the law.
Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself?
Thou that *preachest* *a* *man* *should* *not* *steal*, *dost* *thou*
*steal*?
Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit
adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege?
Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law
dishonourest thou God?
For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as it
is written." [Romans 2:17-24 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
I’m already considering an implement of the ANKH {} array that will convey
each of the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values in this manner where the
node: 0 conveys the presupposed non-existent PSEUDO-NINE prototype.
var ANKH = {
    9: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 1, Ego: 9, Sup: 9}]
    },
    26: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 2, Ego: 17}]
    },
    35: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 2, Sup: 26}]
    },
    51: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 3, Ego: 25}]
    },
    78: {
        TORAH: [{node: 1, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    84 : {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 4, Ego: 33}]
    },
    86: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 3, Sup: 51}]
    },
    87: {
        TORAH: [{node: 2, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    89: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 4, Sup: 3}]
    },
    125: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 5, Ego: 41}]
    },
    96: {
        TORAH: [{node: 3, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    99: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 1, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    102: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 2, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    105: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 3, plane: 0, sum: true}],
        TORAH: [{node: 5, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    108: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 4, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    111: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 5, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    113: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    114: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 6, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    117: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 7, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    120: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 8, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    123: {
        TORAH: [{node: 6, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    132: {
        TORAH: [{node: 7, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    133: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 5, Sup: 44}]
    },
    141: {
        TORAH: [{node: 8, plane: 0, sum: true}]
    },
    145: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 6, Sup: 63}]
    },
    174: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 6, Ego: 49}]
    },
    214: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 7, Sup: 12}]
    },
    267: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 8, Sup: 53}]
    },
    231: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 9, plane: 0, sum: true}],
true}]
    },
    296: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 8, Ego: 65}]
    },
    312: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 9, Sup: 45}]
    },
    339: {
        HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 9, Ego:73, sum: true}]
    }
}
// alert(ANKH[339].HETEROS[0].Ego);
Post by dolf
alert(ANKH[339].HETEROS[0].Ego);
Will convey #73 as a reference to the HETEROS prototype which has a TELOS
value of #339.
However we are only at the preliminary stages of this functionality
implementation.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Our next task is to implement the ANKH {} array that will convey each of
the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values which under Roman Empire HETEROS
Governance was the binomial marriage apparatus as objectively the
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 - “Marriageable Maiden, Converting the
Maiden” only.
And we’ll populate the relevant panel with the resolvePrototypes()
function.
Following which we’ll set about for the remainder of the AUGUST month doing
a rewrite and redaction of the existing code to enable FORMS{} based arrays
which will become objects that are dynamically loaded.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-14 22:47:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Thank-you for your update. I hope that your night-shift regime wasn't
too taxing.

I'm having continuous difficulties with PERSON 'B' whom due to his
maladjusted criminality has shown both a disdain for the probity of the
court and an unwillingness to adhere to the decorum which is mandated by
the ORDERS so I am hopeful that the matter will come to some finality
and there is substantial cause to criminally prosecute him.

ONCE AGAIN Lions Growl of Butchers Foul <***@gmail.com> YOU
ARE ADVISED TO CEASE ENGAGING WITHIN A CAUSE CÉLÈBRE BY ANONYMOUS
INTERNET #235 - DETRUDE AS CLAIMED  BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION OCCASIONING
RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE AS A LEGAL CLAIM WILL
AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE (IN THE TIME OF MY CONVENIENCE) BE MADE
AGAINST YOURSELF

<Loading Image...>

*CEASE* *YOUR* *ANONYMOUS* *INTERNET* #235 - *DETRUDE* *AS* *CLAIMED*
*BOER* / *ANZAC* *DEFAMATION* OCCASIONING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED
AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE
Post by dolf
We have currently implemented a draft (untested) ANKH {} data set for
the ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE which is the meta-physical /
metempirical philosophical basis to the Pythagorean binomial HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>
However these still need to checked for data referential integrity...
Tomorrow's task will be to implement the JEWISH VASSAL GOVERNANCE
ASSOCIATED TO PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER
Wow. I bet the World Gibberish Association is excited.
-- ADVICE GIVEN TO MR RAYMOND CAFE AND PARTICIPANTS WITHIN THE
WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD OF A LEGAL CLAIM OF BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION
OCCASIONING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND SEXUAL PREJUDICE

(c) 2018 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 14 August 2018

<https://www.facebook.com/MisterRaymond.Sale/>

This is to formerly advise MR RAYMOND CAFE and participants within the
WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD by means of the accompanying photographic
evidence to the contrary that a legal claim of BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION
occasioning racial and religious hatred and sexual prejudice will at
some time in the future (in the time of my convenience) be made against
yourselves and your residual ESTATES for an equivalent sum of an
INSURANCE CLAIM for DAMAGES (sought: $154 million) which as MATERIAL
DETAILS were made to the FINANCIAL SERVICES ROYAL COMMISSION AS EARLIER
SUBMISSIONS DATED 17 TO 20 JULY 2018 AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY THEM WITH AN
EMAIL @ 1234 HOURS 24 JULY 2018.

WHILST IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE THAT DOCUMENT A SUMMARY OF THE
CLAIM IS CONVEYED WITHIN THE DOCUMENT TITLED: "SOME FREE SPEECH IS A
SOCIAL DISEASE"

<http://www.grapple369.com/docs/Sociability.pdf>

Nous: #50
Time: 09:25 hrs
Date: 2018.8.14
Torah: [#4, #50, #10]@{
@1: Sup: 4 (#4); Ego: 4 (#4),
@2: Sup: 54 (#58); Ego: 50 (#54),
@3: Sup: 64 (#122); Ego: 10 (#64),
Male: #122; Feme: #64
} // #64

Dao: Fantasies of Avoiding Death, Value of Life
Tetra: #77 - Compliance
I-Ching: H2 - Pure Yin, Passive Principle/Earth, Field, The receptive,
Acquiescence, The flow

Latin: Invacandus {Sign of mercy} Alt: Haayah {Behold God} {

1. PROTECTS & CONSOLES. INSPIRES IN DECISIONS
2. JUSTICE AND LAWYERS
3. JUDGES
4. Eregbuo
}

Abiud {Father of praise}

Prototype: *HOMOIOS* {#433 / #346} / HETEROS {#433 / #346} / TORAH {#398
/ #369}

<http://www.grapple369.com?zen:2,row:4,col:7,nous:50&idea:{m,77}&idea:{f,104}&idea:{m,433}&idea:{f,346}&PROTOTYPE:HOMOIOS>

***@zen: 2, row: 4, col: 7, nous: 50 [Date: 2018.8.14, Time: 09:25
hrs, Super: #433 / #23 - Constancy of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness &
Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Ills to Be Cured, Arresting Decay,
Correcting, Work on what has been spoiled (decay), Decaying, Branch;
Tetra: 26 - Endeavour, Ego: #346 / #50 - Fantasies of Avoiding Death,
Value of Life; I-Ching: H2 - Pure Yin, Passive Principle/Earth, Field,
The receptive, Acquiescence, The flow; Tetra: 77 - Compliance]

H6696@{
@1: Sup: 50 (#50); Ego: 50 (#50),
@2: Sup: 59 (#109); Ego: 9 (#59),
@3: Sup: 65 (#174); Ego: 6 (#65),
@4: Sup: 22 (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 38 (#103),
Male: #196; Feme: #103
} // #346

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #296 % #41 = #9 - Inconstancy of Achievement, Practicing
Placidity; I-Ching: H7 - The Army, Leading, Troops; Tetra: 32 - Legion;

THOTH MEASURE: #9 - Oh Breaker of bones, who makest thine appearance in
Sutenhunen; I am not a teller of lies.

#VIRTUE: If it is Branching Out (no. #9), it comes, but
#TOOLS: If it is Flight (no. #49), it flees.
#POSITION: As. to Greatness (no. #45), it is the outside, but
#TIME: As to Closing In (no. #58), it is the inside.
#CANON: #161

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_161@{
@1: Sup: 9 (#9); Ego: 9 (#9),
@2: Sup: 58 (#67); Ego: 49 (#58),
@3: Sup: 22 (#89); Ego: 45 (#103),
@4: Sup: 80 (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS
{%18}); Ego: 58 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}),
Male: #169; Feme: #161
} // #161

#346 as [#50, #90, #6, #200] = tsuwr (H6696): {UMBRA: #14 as #296 % #41
= #9} 1) to bind, besiege, confine, cramp; 2) (Qal) *TO* *SHOW*
*HOSTILITY* *TO*, be an adversary, treat as foe; 3) (Qal) to form,
fashion, delineate; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to confine, secure; 1a2) to shut in,
beseige; 1a3) to shut up, enclose;

FROM THIS DAY OF 14 AUGUST 2018 IT IS IMMATERIAL WHETHER ANY OF THE
PARTIES WITHIN THE WELLINGTON LIQUOR ACCORD AGAINST WHICH THE LEGAL
CLAIM OF UNSOCIABILITY OCCASIONING RACIAL AND RELIGIOUS HATRED AND
SEXUAL PREJUDICE IS MADE CONTINUE TO LIVE OR DIE, AND REGARDLESS OF
INTENTION AS BOER / ANZAC DEFAMATION AND ACTION TO DISPOSE YOUR RESIDUAL
ESTATE AND PROPERTY AGAINST SUCH ABHORRENT CONDUCT OF UNLAWFUL
INHOSPITALITY AND AN ABJECT UNWILLINGNESS TO RESOLVE THE MATTER IN ANY
REGARD FOR THE DIGNITY OF PERSONS .

-- MR RAYMOND'S BISCUIT --

"OH YES DETAILS
AND EVERMORE IN.
SO MANY IT FAILS.
'TWAS SUCH A SIN.

CREME OF THE DO 💩.
WAS EVER SO FINE.
WHIPPED AVOCADO 🥑.
JUST SUBLIME."

YOUTUBE: "Anthony Hopkins as Harvey Kellogg in Road to Wellville - Hot
Biscuit!"



TROLLING_MILITIA@{
@1: Sup: 60 (#60); Ego: 16 (#16),
@2: Sup: 48 (#108); Ego: 7 (#23),
@3: Sup: 30 (#138); Ego: 80 (#103),
@4: Sup: 18 (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 10 (#113),
@5: Sup: 6 (#162); Ego: 76 (#189),
@6: Sup: 64 (#226); Ego: 81 (#270),
@7: Sup: 59 (#285); Ego: 35 (#305),
@8: Sup: 9 (#294); Ego: 61 (#366),
@9: Sup: 25 (#319); Ego: 43 (#409),
Male: #319; Feme: #409
}

If you are going to make rational and reasoned comment in refutation of
the LEGAL CLAIM made against ANY OF THE PARTIES WITHIN THE WELLINGTON
LIQUOR ACCORD then please do without any further #325 - DETRUDE as
defamation. However I know that since #168 - CONDEMNATION / #541 -
CONTEMN is coming your way this Remembrance / Armistice Day 11 November
Centennial 2018 that you must take any irrational means by self
justification to defame.

As Police independence within my matters are seriously prejudiced by an
unlawful liquor ban not undertaken in a prescribed manner relating a
reasonable objection made of a boisterous female customer within a
supposed quiet amenity reaching for an eating utensil as weapon incident
at the Star Hotel on 26 March 2017 I have no further confidence within
the Victoria Police addressing my matters of complaint.

<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

<Loading Image...>

Apart from reporting the matter to yourselves by mail only should you
stubbornly wish to take any action, I am intentioned to direct the
matter of BOER / ANZAC defamation and of racial hatred against this
person and yourselves to lawyers in due course.

- dolf

Initial Post: 14 August 2018

#MR #RAYMOND #CAFE #WELLINGTON #LIQUOR #ACCORD
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-17 02:43:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
We're currently behind in our planned implementation of the ANKH {} data
set for the ROMAN EMPIRE / JEWISH VASSAL GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPES and
anticipate having the rudimentary object completed today.  It will then
be necessary to write a test suit against the ANKH {} data set and any
esults from matrix("HETEROS", 1) function...

Following which we’ll set about for the remainder of the AUGUST month
doing a rewrite and redaction of the existing code to enable FORMS{}
based arrays which will become objects that are dynamically loaded.

And what I am currently looking at is the use of NPM resources and
Node.js however there is a need to both avoid extraneous code and
implement from a conceptual hierarchical start point which I feel ought
to be a redacted REQUEST (http) suit.

But that will take some more time to consider...
Post by dolf
We have currently implemented a draft (untested) ANKH {} data set for
the ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE which is the meta-physical /
metempirical philosophical basis to the Pythagorean binomial HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>
However these still need to checked for data referential integrity...
Tomorrow's task will be to implement the JEWISH VASSAL GOVERNANCE
ASSOCIATED TO PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER
Post by dolf
We note that the TORAH PSEUDO-NINE PROTOTYPE which is incremented by
3 does not correctly provide the property (which I had always
presumed) of each row having symmetry as #150
51 25 74 = 150 +
73 50 27 = 150 +
26 75 48 = 149 = 449
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
Which is expected of the MAGIC SQUARES and inherent within the
49  9 65 = 123 +
57 41 25 = 123 +
17 73 33 = 123 = 369
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
And whether this dishonesty by the JEWISH VASSAL STATE then subject
to ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE and being evidence of *THEFT* conveyed
"Thou that *preachest* *a* *man* *should* *not* *steal*, *dost*
*thou* *steal*?" [Romans 1:21 (KJV)]
THAT this *FACT* was sufficient and justifiable cause for the
DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE within JERUSALEM is not presently known but
would seem likely...
     Male: #312; Feme: #369
} // #369
     Male: #429; Feme: #449
} // #449
"Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest
thy boast of God,
And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more
excellent, being instructed out of the law; And art confident that
thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in
darkness, an instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which
hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law.
Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself?
Thou that *preachest* *a* *man* *should* *not* *steal*, *dost* *thou*
*steal*?
Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit
adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege?
Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law
dishonourest thou God?
For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as
it is written." [Romans 2:17-24 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
I’m already considering an implement of the ANKH {} array that will convey
each of the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values in this manner where the
node: 0 conveys the presupposed non-existent PSEUDO-NINE prototype.
var ANKH = {
     9: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 1, Ego: 9, Sup: 9}]
     },
     26: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 2, Ego: 17}]
     },
     35: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 2, Sup: 26}]
     },
     51: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 3, Ego: 25}]
     },
     78: {
         TORAH: [{node: 1, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     84 : {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 4, Ego: 33}]
     },
     86: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 3, Sup: 51}]
     },
     87: {
         TORAH: [{node: 2, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     89: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 4, Sup: 3}]
     },
     125: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 5, Ego: 41}]
     },
     96: {
         TORAH: [{node: 3, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     99: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 1, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     102: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 2, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     105: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 3, plane: 0, sum: true}],
         TORAH: [{node: 5, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     108: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 4, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     111: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 5, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     113: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     114: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 6, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     117: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 7, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     120: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 8, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     123: {
         TORAH: [{node: 6, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     132: {
         TORAH: [{node: 7, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     133: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 5, Sup: 44}]
     },
     141: {
         TORAH: [{node: 8, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     145: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 6, Sup: 63}]
     },
     174: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 6, Ego: 49}]
     },
     214: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 7, Sup: 12}]
     },
     267: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 8, Sup: 53}]
     },
     231: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 9, plane: 0, sum: true}],
         TORAH: [{node: 0, plane: 7, Ego: 57}, {node: 9, plane: 0,
sum: true}]
     },
     296: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 8, Ego: 65}]
     },
     312: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 9, Sup: 45}]
     },
     339: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 9, Ego:73, sum: true}]
     }
}
// alert(ANKH[339].HETEROS[0].Ego);
Post by dolf
alert(ANKH[339].HETEROS[0].Ego);
Will convey #73 as a reference to the HETEROS prototype which has a TELOS
value of #339.
However we are only at the preliminary stages of this functionality
implementation.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Our next task is to implement the ANKH {} array that will convey each of
the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values which under Roman Empire HETEROS
Governance was the binomial marriage apparatus as objectively the
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 - “Marriageable Maiden, Converting the
Maiden” only.
And we’ll populate the relevant panel with the resolvePrototypes()
function.
Following which we’ll set about for the remainder of the AUGUST month doing
a rewrite and redaction of the existing code to enable FORMS{} based arrays
which will become objects that are dynamically loaded.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS {#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE (translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist, expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-17 05:05:43 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by dolf
We're currently behind in our planned implementation of the ANKH {} data
set for the ROMAN EMPIRE / JEWISH VASSAL GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPES and
anticipate having the rudimentary object completed today.  It will then
be necessary to write a test suit against the ANKH {} data set and any
esults from matrix("HETEROS", 1) function...
This is postponed for today as I have a migraine
Post by dolf
Following which we’ll set about for the remainder of the AUGUST month
doing a rewrite and redaction of the existing code to enable FORMS{}
based arrays which will become objects that are dynamically loaded.
And what I am currently looking at is the use of NPM resources and
Node.js however there is a need to both avoid extraneous code and
implement from a conceptual hierarchical start point which I feel ought
to be a redacted REQUEST (http) suit.
This option is not available to me as requires a self-managed VPS
solution so we'll have to examine only client side solutions such as JQuery
Post by dolf
But that will take some more time to consider...
Post by dolf
We have currently implemented a draft (untested) ANKH {} data set for
the ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPE which is the meta-physical /
metempirical philosophical basis to the Pythagorean binomial HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.
<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>
However these still need to checked for data referential integrity...
Tomorrow's task will be to implement the JEWISH VASSAL GOVERNANCE
ASSOCIATED TO PYTHAGOREAN BINOMIAL HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER
Post by dolf
We note that the TORAH PSEUDO-NINE PROTOTYPE which is incremented by
3 does not correctly provide the property (which I had always
presumed) of each row having symmetry as #150
51 25 74 = 150 +
73 50 27 = 150 +
26 75 48 = 149 = 449
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Jewish-Vassal-Roman-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
Which is expected of the MAGIC SQUARES and inherent within the
49  9 65 = 123 +
57 41 25 = 123 +
17 73 33 = 123 = 369
<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ANKH-Fascist-Roman-Catholic-Empire-Governance.jpeg>
And whether this dishonesty by the JEWISH VASSAL STATE then subject
to ROMAN EMPIRE GOVERNANCE and being evidence of *THEFT* conveyed
"Thou that *preachest* *a* *man* *should* *not* *steal*, *dost*
*thou* *steal*?" [Romans 1:21 (KJV)]
THAT this *FACT* was sufficient and justifiable cause for the
DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE within JERUSALEM is not presently known but
would seem likely...
     Male: #312; Feme: #369
} // #369
     Male: #429; Feme: #449
} // #449
"Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest
thy boast of God,
And knowest his will, and approvest the things that are more
excellent, being instructed out of the law; And art confident that
thou thyself art a guide of the blind, a light of them which are in
darkness, an instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, which
hast the form of knowledge and of the truth in the law.
Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself?
Thou that *preachest* *a* *man* *should* *not* *steal*, *dost* *thou*
*steal*?
Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit
adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege?
Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law
dishonourest thou God?
For the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you, as
it is written." [Romans 2:17-24 (KJV)]
Post by dolf
I’m already considering an implement of the ANKH {} array that will convey
each of the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values in this manner where the
node: 0 conveys the presupposed non-existent PSEUDO-NINE prototype.
var ANKH = {
     9: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 1, Ego: 9, Sup: 9}]
     },
     26: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 2, Ego: 17}]
     },
     35: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 2, Sup: 26}]
     },
     51: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 3, Ego: 25}]
     },
     78: {
         TORAH: [{node: 1, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     84 : {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 4, Ego: 33}]
     },
     86: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 3, Sup: 51}]
     },
     87: {
         TORAH: [{node: 2, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     89: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 4, Sup: 3}]
     },
     125: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 5, Ego: 41}]
     },
     96: {
         TORAH: [{node: 3, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     99: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 1, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     102: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 2, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     105: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 3, plane: 0, sum: true}],
         TORAH: [{node: 5, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     108: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 4, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     111: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 5, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     113: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     114: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 6, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     117: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 7, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     120: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 8, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     123: {
         TORAH: [{node: 6, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     132: {
         TORAH: [{node: 7, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     133: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 5, Sup: 44}]
     },
     141: {
         TORAH: [{node: 8, plane: 0, sum: true}]
     },
     145: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 6, Sup: 63}]
     },
     174: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 6, Ego: 49}]
     },
     214: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 7, Sup: 12}]
     },
     267: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 8, Sup: 53}]
     },
     231: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 9, plane: 0, sum: true}],
         TORAH: [{node: 0, plane: 7, Ego: 57}, {node: 9, plane: 0,
sum: true}]
     },
     296: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 8, Ego: 65}]
     },
     312: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 9, Sup: 45}]
     },
     339: {
         HETEROS: [{node: 0, plane: 9, Ego:73, sum: true}]
     }
}
// alert(ANKH[339].HETEROS[0].Ego);
Post by dolf
alert(ANKH[339].HETEROS[0].Ego);
Will convey #73 as a reference to the HETEROS prototype which has a TELOS
value of #339.
However we are only at the preliminary stages of this functionality
implementation.
- dolf
Post by dolf
Our next task is to implement the ANKH {} array that will convey each of
the HETEROS / TORAH PROTOTYPE values which under Roman Empire HETEROS
Governance was the binomial marriage apparatus as objectively the
TRANSFORMATION PROTOTYPE of H54 - “Marriageable Maiden, Converting the
Maiden” only.
And we’ll populate the relevant panel with the resolvePrototypes()
function.
Following which we’ll set about for the remainder of the AUGUST month doing
a rewrite and redaction of the existing code to enable FORMS{} based arrays
which will become objects that are dynamically loaded.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-08-17 09:09:02 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Give it a rest—you are not capable of comprehending the subject and its
nomenclature and therefore any response from you is presumptive unreasoned
opinionated impertinence.

If you continue in your racial / religious hatred and sexual prejudices I
will raise the matter at the local Magistrates Court so as to obtain advice
for Court Orders to prohibit you engaging in any further BOER / ANZAC
defamation as anonymous Internet cause célèbre.

- dolf
Post by dolf
We're currently behind in our planned implementation of the ANKH {} data
set for the ROMAN EMPIRE / JEWISH VASSAL GOVERNANCE PROTOTYPES and
Oh no, the World Gibberish Association must be disappointed!
Post by dolf
anticipate having the rudimentary object completed today. 
Yay! The World Gibberish Association must be reassured!
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-18 23:51:39 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
I swear by Almighty God that if you ever say something of substance I might
add it to my next chapter this Yom Kippur...
Post by dolf
If you continue in your racial / religious hatred and sexual prejudices I
will raise the matter at the local Magistrates Court so as to obtain advice
for Court Orders to prohibit you engaging in any further BOER / ANZAC
defamation as anonymous Internet cause célèbre.
Could you please secretly videotape the proceedings and then upload the
video to your /infamia/ folder so we can view the results?
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
dolf
2018-09-19 00:10:40 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
So how long been talking to your dick, that is if you can still see it
past your belly?
Post by dolf
Post by dolf
If you continue in your racial / religious hatred and sexual prejudices I
will raise the matter at the local Magistrates Court so as to obtain advice
for Court Orders to prohibit you engaging in any further BOER / ANZAC
defamation as anonymous Internet cause célèbre.
Could you please secretly videotape the proceedings and then upload the
video to your /infamia/ folder so we can view the results?
I swear by Almighty God that if you ever say something of substance I might
add it to my next chapter this Yom Kippur...
I swear by almighty god that if you ever manage to figure out how to stop top-posting I will stop calling you an idiot.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2018-09-18 22:01:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Since updating to Apple iPhone iOS 12.0 yesterday, I've lost the
highlight / copy function of any GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET
within the expanded formIDEA view.  And so accordingly the first task
this morning was to implement a Clipboard copy() function.

To do so, all you'll need to now do is click the anchored text area,
which in the examples below are either the: 'Watch0: 2.5.6.39.0' or
'Strongs: 2.5.6.39.H2179' reference and a dialog will convey that it has
been added to the clipboard.

Watch0: 2.5.6.39.0@{
    @1: Sup: 39 (#39); Ego: 39 (#39),
    @2: Sup: 78 (#117); Ego: 39 (#78),
    @3: Sup: 27 (#144); Ego: 30 (#108),
    @4: Sup: 73 (#217); Ego: 46 (#154),
    @5: Sup: 67 (#284); Ego: 75 (#229),
    @6: Sup: 41 (#325); Ego: 55 (#284),
    @7: Sup: 72 (#397); Ego: 31 (#315),
    @8: Sup: 51 (#448); Ego: 60 (#375),
    @9: Sup: 57 (#505); Ego: 6 (#381),
    Male: #505; Feme: #381
}

Strongs: 2.5.6.39.H2179@{
    @1: Sup: 6 (#6); Ego: 6 (#6),
    @2: Sup: 13 (#19); Ego: 7 (#13),
    @3: Sup: 63 (#82); Ego: 50 (#63),
    @4: Sup: 65 (#147); Ego: 2 (#65),
    @5: Sup: 60 (#207); Ego: 76 (#141),
    @6: Sup: 19 (#226); Ego: 40 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE
WORDS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
    Male: #226; Feme: #181
}

This will rapidly assist in communicating these ideas.

That STRONGS entry is associated with the following:

*#505 as [#6, #7, #50, #2, #400, #40]*=zanab(*H2179*):*{UMBRA: #1 as #59
% #41 = #18}**1)*to cut off;*1a)*(Piel) to attack the rear, smite the tail;

*T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:*

*UMBRA: #59 % #41 =#18*- Origin of Ethical Concepts, Palliation of
Vulgarity; I-Ching:*H33*- Withdrawal, Retiring, Retreat, Yielding;
Tetra:*49*- Flight;

*THOTH MEASURE:**#18*- Oh Tutuf, who makest thine appearance in Ati; I
trouble myself only with my own affairs.

*#VIRTUE:*As to Waiting (no. #18), it exits.
*#TOOLS:*As to Closing in (no. #58), it enters.
*#POSITION:*As to Release (no. #21), it is softness, but
*#TIME:*As to Hardness (no. #72), it is leathery toughness.
*#CANON:#169*

*ONTIC_OBLIGANS_169@*{
*@1*: Sup: 18 (*#18*); Ego: 18 (*#18*),
*@2*: Sup: 76 (*#94*); Ego: 58 (*#76*),
*@3*: Sup: 16 (*#110*); Ego: 21 (*#97*),
*@4*: Sup: 7 (*#117*); Ego: 72 (*#169**-**I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY
OWN AFFAIRS*{*%18*}),
*Male:**#117*;*Feme:**#169*
} //*#169*
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS {#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE (translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist, expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Government Shill #2
2018-09-18 22:14:01 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by dolf
Since updating to Apple iPhone iOS 12.0 yesterday, I've lost the
highlight / copy function of any GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET
within the expanded formIDEA view.  And so accordingly the first task
this morning was to implement a Clipboard copy() function.
To do so, all you'll need to now do is click the anchored text area,
which in the examples below are either the: 'Watch0: 2.5.6.39.0' or
'Strongs: 2.5.6.39.H2179' reference and a dialog will convey that it has
been added to the clipboard.
The most amazing thing is that you appear to seriously believe this means
something to anyone other than yourself.

In reality is just grappledegook, your very own version of gobbledegook.

Shill #2
--
http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_sounds/hg/looney.wav
dolf
2018-09-18 23:22:31 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
The software function seems to work fine for me and so it conforms entirely
to a logical proposition...

Strongs: 2.5.6.39.H127@{
@1: Sup: 1 (#1); Ego: 1 (#1),
@2: Sup: 5 (#6); Ego: 4 (#5),
@3: Sup: 45 (#51); Ego: 40 (#45 - I AM NOT A DOER OF WRONG {%1}),
@4: Sup: 40 (#91); Ego: 76 (#121),
@5: Sup: 60 (#151); Ego: 20 (#141),
@6: Sup: 19 (#170); Ego: 40 (#181 - I LEND NOT A DEAF EAR TO THE WORDS
OF RIGHTEOUSNESS {%24} / I AM NOT ONE WHO CURSETH THE KING {%35}),
Male: #170; Feme: #181
}

<http://www.grapple369.com/develop.html>
Post by Government Shill #2
Post by dolf
Since updating to Apple iPhone iOS 12.0 yesterday, I've lost the
highlight / copy function of any GNOMIC IMPERATIVE INSTRUCTION SET
within the expanded formIDEA view.  And so accordingly the first task
this morning was to implement a Clipboard copy() function.
To do so, all you'll need to now do is click the anchored text area,
which in the examples below are either the: 'Watch0: 2.5.6.39.0' or
'Strongs: 2.5.6.39.H2179' reference and a dialog will convey that it has
been added to the clipboard.
The most amazing thing is that you appear to seriously believe this means
something to anyone other than yourself.
In reality is just grappledegook, your very own version of gobbledegook.
Shill #2
--
http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_sounds/hg/infantile-porn
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Loading...