Discussion:
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
(too old to reply)
Michael Ejercito
2017-08-13 12:52:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottesville-riots/

Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots


Is there a clear, complete, objective account of what happened in
Charlottesville? I can’t find one. I have read about “clashes” between
protesters and “counter-protesters,” who we are told outnumbered the white
nationalist group protesting the removal of General Lee’s statue by about
2-1. What does that mean? Was the white nationalist rally peaceful,
regardless of the racist slogans they were hurling? Were the
counter-protesters just shouting back, or more physical? I see references to
the “fray.” What fray? The key word seems to be that the white nationalists
“sparked’ violence by marching. Do we now say that the civil rights marchers
in Selma sparked the violence, and not the counter-protest racists. or is
the theory that which ever group has the less popular position “sparks” the
violence?
My suspicions are that the vagueness of the news media reports is a
deliberate effort by the news media to avoid assigning any responsibility to
Antifa thugs for the escalation into violence.

Obviously the automobile driven into the anti-white nationalist, counter
protest crowd was a criminal act. Since this was done by the racists, it
became the focus of all news reports, as if this was the only violence.
Was it? Somehow I doubt that.

Again, a counter-protest group “incites violence” as much as a protest
group. The reaction from the news media and the political pundits appears to
ignore the basic fact that Americans have the right to demonstrate and
express their support for repugnant ideas as well as ideas most of us
approve of. This was settled (I thought) with National Socialist Party of
America v. Village of Skokie, 432 U.S. 43 (1977).
Apparently not.

President Trump’s statement regarding the riot was this:
“We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of
hatred, bigotry and violence, on many sides. On many sides. It’s been going
on for a long time in our country. Not Donald Trump, not Barack Obama. This
has been going on for a long, long time…We ALL must be united & condemn all
that hate stands for. There is no place for this kind of violence in
America. Lets come together as one!”

The immediate reaction by the newsmedia was that the statement asserted a
false equivalency. CNN’s Chris Cillizza wrote,

“Both sides don’t scream racist and anti-Semitic things at people with whom
they disagree. They don’t base a belief system on the superiority of one
race over others. They don’t get into fistfights with people who don’t see
things their way. They don’t create chaos and leave a trail of injured
behind them. Arguing that “both sides do it” deeply misunderstands the hate
and intolerance at the core of this “Unite the Right” rally. These people
are bigots. They are hate-filled. This is not just a protest where things,
unfortunately, got violent. Violence sits at the heart of their warped
belief system.”

Both sides do “do it,” however, and when “it” is violence and refusal to
allow a group with opposing views make their statements, there is no high
ground. The starting point from the left is “the white nationalists are
wrong, so they don’t deserve the same rights we do.” Yes, they do, and among
those rights is the opportunity to protest whatever they choose without
being attacked. “These people are bigots.” So what? They have the right to
express their views. “They are hate-filled.” And the counter-protesters were
not “hate-filled”? Or was the President supposed to distinguish that as good
hate?

David Gergen on CNN was even worse. “[The President] made it very, very
clear by equating the violence on both sides as being sort of equivalent to
each other…,” Gergen said. “He’s made it very clear he’s going to defend to
the extent that he feels he can- people who are radical extremists and I
think that’s a terrible mistake on his part.”
Note what these words mean. Gergen says that the President should make it
“clear” that violence against white nationalists is better violence than
when white nationalists strike out at those trying to disrupt their protest.
The duty of the President is to protect the Constitution, and the
Constitution says that even radical extremists have civil rights. It also
says the government shouldn’t restrict those rights, and the Supreme Court
says this means the government shouldn’t officially chill one group of
citizens’ freedom of protest and expression.

Does that mean a President shouldn’t say it’s all right for one group to
express hate and use violence because the United States of America approves
of its position, while a group with less favored views will be held to a
different standard? Yes, it does. But this is exactly what President Trump
is being criticized for not saying, by Gergen, Cillizza and others.

Gergen’s interviewer, Ana Cabrera, began by describing the white
nationalists as a hate group that “incites violence.” False. As a matter of
law, a group does not incite violence by stating an unpopular position that
makes others want to attack it.
This is the First Amendment cancelling trick used to censor conservative
speakers on campuses: “You can’t speak because your awful ideas will make
people hurt you.”

Over on Fox News, former governor and Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee
was right for a change, saying about Trump’s remarks,
“And so what is he supposed to say? Is he supposed to do what Barack Obama
used to do and jump to conclusions and make a decision like he did in
Ferguson, Missouri, which turned out to be totally untrue? The President has
to be careful in taking steps. I thought what he condemned was what we all
could immediately condemn and that was the violence, the car some coward in
a car drove into innocent people to try and kill them. And he condemned
that! What else is he supposed to do at that point?”

Huckabee is correct that Obama habitually jumped into local law enforcement
matters and started declaring heroes and villains before the evidence was
in. This is not the President’s role, and is in fact an abuse of power and
position.

In contrast to the President’s correct restraint, we have Virginia’s
governor Terry McAuliffe, who used the power and influence of his office to
declare that people holding views he does not approve of are not welcome in
the Old Dominion. In the midst of some patriotic grandstanding, he said…
“You are not wanted in this great commonwealth. Shame on you….There is no
place for you here. There is no place for you in America.”

This is leftist fascism, by definition. Who is Terry McAuliffe, or Virginia,
or anyone, to say who can or should have a “place” in the United States of
America? How is this statement applied to white nationalists any different
legally or ethically from applying it to Muslims, or lesbians, or abortion
advocates, or Catholics, Jews or libertarians?

It isn’t. The entire point of the Bill of Rights is that the government does
not get to tell us what to thing, what we can chant, what we can protest,
and where we can live.

McAuliffe just proved Trump’s point.
!Jones
2017-08-13 20:15:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
x-no-idiots: yes

On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 05:52:00 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "Michael
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottesville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
Is there a clear, complete, objective account of what happened in
Charlottesville?
There usually isn't. No matter who describes the events, they will be
filtered and interpreted through that person's beliefs and biases.
The author suspects a "deliberate effort by the news media to avoid
assigning any responsibility to Antifa thugs for the escalation into
violence", which is, in itself, a biased statement.

But things have changed WRT "free speech", have they not? In the
strict legal sense, we still have the first amendment; however, one
will be attacked if one offends anyone. For example, an athelete will
be suspended for any insensitive remark. If a university professor
utters a politically incorrect statement, the prof will soon be
retired.

But let's get back to the confederate states, shall we? The
confederacy fought for slavery at a time when the tide of history had
shifted. The confederacy expected the European nations to recognize
them as a sovereign nation; in fact, everything depended on that
happening... but it didn't. By the 1860s, Europe had universally
abolished slavery and could not support slavery in the confederate
states. Thus, the north rolled over 'em like a tractor over a toad
and did so with impunity.

The south made two *big* mistakes: first, the north was able to couch
the war in terms of slavery... and it *was*; anything else was
negotiable. Second, the south shot first at Ft. Sumpter... *BIG*
mistake! The south started it!

The biggest mistake, though, was to lose the war. In any other
country, Jefferson Davis, Robert Lee, and Nathan Forrest (et. al.)
would have been ignominiously hung for sedition; however, we didn't do
that; this is good, IMO.

But, you know... we *won*! Why do we have to see their statues
raised? We won; you lost... take your fucking flag off the roof of
our courthouse. Take down those statues... move 'em to private
property is fine. They're all going, so get used to it. March and
protest all you want; it's a done deal.

Jones
Wile E. Coyote
2017-08-13 21:55:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by !Jones
x-no-idiots: yes
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 05:52:00 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "Michael
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottes
ville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
Is there a clear, complete, objective account of what happened in
Charlottesville?
There usually isn't. No matter who describes the events, they will be
filtered and interpreted through that person's beliefs and biases.
The author suspects a "deliberate effort by the news media to avoid
assigning any responsibility to Antifa thugs for the escalation into
violence", which is, in itself, a biased statement.
But things have changed WRT "free speech", have they not? In the
strict legal sense, we still have the first amendment; however, one
will be attacked if one offends anyone. For example, an athelete will
be suspended for any insensitive remark. If a university professor
utters a politically incorrect statement, the prof will soon be
retired.
But let's get back to the confederate states, shall we? The
confederacy fought for slavery at a time when the tide of history had
shifted. The confederacy expected the European nations to recognize
them as a sovereign nation; in fact, everything depended on that
happening... but it didn't. By the 1860s, Europe had universally
abolished slavery and could not support slavery in the confederate
states. Thus, the north rolled over 'em like a tractor over a toad
and did so with impunity.
The south made two *big* mistakes: first, the north was able to couch
the war in terms of slavery... and it *was*; anything else was
negotiable. Second, the south shot first at Ft. Sumpter... *BIG*
mistake! The south started it!
The biggest mistake, though, was to lose the war. In any other
country, Jefferson Davis, Robert Lee, and Nathan Forrest (et. al.)
would have been ignominiously hung for sedition; however, we didn't do
that; this is good, IMO.
But, you know... we *won*! Why do we have to see their statues
raised? We won; you lost... take your fucking flag off the roof of
our courthouse. Take down those statues... move 'em to private
property is fine. They're all going, so get used to it. March and
protest all you want; it's a done deal.
Jones
You douchebags are always looking backwards to stoke some grievance.
--
It's time for the students to step up their game and kill people like
Coulter.

Siri Cruise <***@yahoo.com> April 25, 2017
Carolina Reb
2017-08-13 22:42:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by !Jones
x-no-idiots: yes
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 05:52:00 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "Michael
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottes
ville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
Is there a clear, complete, objective account of what happened in
Charlottesville?
There usually isn't. No matter who describes the events, they will be
filtered and interpreted through that person's beliefs and biases.
The author suspects a "deliberate effort by the news media to avoid
assigning any responsibility to Antifa thugs for the escalation into
violence", which is, in itself, a biased statement.
But things have changed WRT "free speech", have they not? In the
strict legal sense, we still have the first amendment; however, one
will be attacked if one offends anyone. For example, an athelete will
be suspended for any insensitive remark. If a university professor
utters a politically incorrect statement, the prof will soon be
retired.
But let's get back to the confederate states, shall we? The
confederacy fought for slavery at a time when the tide of history had
shifted. The confederacy expected the European nations to recognize
them as a sovereign nation; in fact, everything depended on that
happening... but it didn't. By the 1860s, Europe had universally
abolished slavery and could not support slavery in the confederate
states. Thus, the north rolled over 'em like a tractor over a toad
and did so with impunity.
The south made two *big* mistakes: first, the north was able to couch
the war in terms of slavery... and it *was*; anything else was
negotiable. Second, the south shot first at Ft. Sumpter... *BIG*
mistake! The south started it!
The biggest mistake, though, was to lose the war. In any other
country, Jefferson Davis, Robert Lee, and Nathan Forrest (et. al.)
would have been ignominiously hung for sedition; however, we didn't do
that; this is good, IMO.
But, you know... we *won*! Why do we have to see their statues
raised? We won; you lost... take your fucking flag off the roof of
our courthouse. Take down those statues... move 'em to private
property is fine. They're all going, so get used to it. March and
protest all you want; it's a done deal.
Jones
You douchebags are always looking backwards to stoke some grievance.
--
It's time for the students to step up their game and kill people like
Coulter.
It is time for the Gook to
get back to Manila.
The Peeler
2017-08-13 23:00:47 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 15:42:58 -0700 (PDT), our resident senile nazi homo,
"All Bark & No Bite", aka Humpin Hampton, aka Caroloony Reb, the subnormal
moron and attested schizo from the States, wrote:

<FLUSH the disgusting senile nazi homo swine's usual disgusting sick nazi
homo bullshit unread>

Keep your FAGGOT stench out of straight people's ngs, you disgusting senile
nazi homo swine!

F'up to your homegroup
--
Cock-crazed Hampton: "...do I have a dick or a pussy?"
MID: <ef123e80-982c-46b3-9ff4-***@googlegroups.com>
Michael Ejercito
2017-08-14 18:02:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Carolina Reb
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by !Jones
x-no-idiots: yes
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 05:52:00 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "Michael
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottes
ville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
Is there a clear, complete, objective account of what happened in
Charlottesville?
There usually isn't. No matter who describes the events, they will be
filtered and interpreted through that person's beliefs and biases.
The author suspects a "deliberate effort by the news media to avoid
assigning any responsibility to Antifa thugs for the escalation into
violence", which is, in itself, a biased statement.
But things have changed WRT "free speech", have they not? In the
strict legal sense, we still have the first amendment; however, one
will be attacked if one offends anyone. For example, an athelete will
be suspended for any insensitive remark. If a university professor
utters a politically incorrect statement, the prof will soon be
retired.
But let's get back to the confederate states, shall we? The
confederacy fought for slavery at a time when the tide of history had
shifted. The confederacy expected the European nations to recognize
them as a sovereign nation; in fact, everything depended on that
happening... but it didn't. By the 1860s, Europe had universally
abolished slavery and could not support slavery in the confederate
states. Thus, the north rolled over 'em like a tractor over a toad
and did so with impunity.
The south made two *big* mistakes: first, the north was able to couch
the war in terms of slavery... and it *was*; anything else was
negotiable. Second, the south shot first at Ft. Sumpter... *BIG*
mistake! The south started it!
The biggest mistake, though, was to lose the war. In any other
country, Jefferson Davis, Robert Lee, and Nathan Forrest (et. al.)
would have been ignominiously hung for sedition; however, we didn't do
that; this is good, IMO.
But, you know... we *won*! Why do we have to see their statues
raised? We won; you lost... take your fucking flag off the roof of
our courthouse. Take down those statues... move 'em to private
property is fine. They're all going, so get used to it. March and
protest all you want; it's a done deal.
Jones
You douchebags are always looking backwards to stoke some grievance.
--
It's time for the students to step up their game and kill people like
Coulter.
It is time for the Gook to
get back to Manila.
Some of them go to Manila.

some of them miscegenate with cute girls.

It is NEVER time for you to miscegenate with cute girls.


Michael
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-08-15 13:07:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:02:06 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Carolina Reb
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by !Jones
x-no-idiots: yes
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 05:52:00 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "Michael
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottes
ville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
Is there a clear, complete, objective account of what happened in
Charlottesville?
There usually isn't. No matter who describes the events, they will be
filtered and interpreted through that person's beliefs and biases.
The author suspects a "deliberate effort by the news media to avoid
assigning any responsibility to Antifa thugs for the escalation into
violence", which is, in itself, a biased statement.
But things have changed WRT "free speech", have they not? In the
strict legal sense, we still have the first amendment; however, one
will be attacked if one offends anyone. For example, an athelete will
be suspended for any insensitive remark. If a university professor
utters a politically incorrect statement, the prof will soon be
retired.
But let's get back to the confederate states, shall we? The
confederacy fought for slavery at a time when the tide of history had
shifted. The confederacy expected the European nations to recognize
them as a sovereign nation; in fact, everything depended on that
happening... but it didn't. By the 1860s, Europe had universally
abolished slavery and could not support slavery in the confederate
states. Thus, the north rolled over 'em like a tractor over a toad
and did so with impunity.
The south made two *big* mistakes: first, the north was able to couch
the war in terms of slavery... and it *was*; anything else was
negotiable. Second, the south shot first at Ft. Sumpter... *BIG*
mistake! The south started it!
The biggest mistake, though, was to lose the war. In any other
country, Jefferson Davis, Robert Lee, and Nathan Forrest (et. al.)
would have been ignominiously hung for sedition; however, we didn't do
that; this is good, IMO.
But, you know... we *won*! Why do we have to see their statues
raised? We won; you lost... take your fucking flag off the roof of
our courthouse. Take down those statues... move 'em to private
property is fine. They're all going, so get used to it. March and
protest all you want; it's a done deal.
Jones
You douchebags are always looking backwards to stoke some grievance.
--
It's time for the students to step up their game and kill people like
Coulter.
It is time for the Gook to
get back to Manila.
Some of them go to Manila.
YOU are going to Manila...and SOON, insh'Allah!
Post by Michael Ejercito
some of them miscegenate with cute girls.
Any WHITE slut which miscegenates with a gook is guilty of BESTIALITY.
Post by Michael Ejercito
It is NEVER time for you to miscegenate with cute girls.
YOU are EXEMPT from miscegenating with ANYONE except niggers from
Compton!

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)

- -





"We CAN hide forever."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he will
NEVER prove where he infests or give his real jew name

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
Michael Ejercito
2017-08-15 13:50:38 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:02:06 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Carolina Reb
Post by Wile E. Coyote
You douchebags are always looking backwards to stoke some grievance.
--
It's time for the students to step up their game and kill people like
Coulter.
It is time for the Gook to
get back to Manila.
Some of them go to Manila.
YOU are going to Manila...and SOON, insh'Allah!
Not that you can show.
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
some of them miscegenate with cute girls.
Any WHITE slut which miscegenates with a gook is guilty of BESTIALITY.
Wrong.

In some cases, it is matrimonial.
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
It is NEVER time for you to miscegenate with cute girls.
YOU are EXEMPT from miscegenating with ANYONE except niggers from
Compton!
Not that you can show.


Michael
!Jones
2017-08-15 14:34:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
x-no-idiots: yes

On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:50:38 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "Michael
Post by Michael Ejercito
Not that you can show.
Michael
Ain't that lot a *hoot*?
Carolina Reb
2017-08-15 17:05:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by !Jones
x-no-idiots: yes
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:50:38 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "Michael
Post by Michael Ejercito
Not that you can show.
Michael
Ain't that lot a *hoot*?
I figured that the pale-skin woman
who died when hit by that sad sack
"neo-Nazi's" car was another from
the LQBTCNZ community, celebrating
with her fellow protected minorities,"
but just learned she had a Negro
boyfriend. Figures. Her momma must
be proud.

http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=3242#p10950
The Peeler
2017-08-15 18:27:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:05:15 -0700 (PDT), our resident senile nazi homo,
"All Bark & No Bite", aka Humpin Hampton, aka Caroloony Reb, the subnormal
moron and attested schizo from the States, wrote:

<FLUSH the disgusting senile nazi homo swine's usual disgusting sick nazi
homo bullshit unread>

Fuck off to your homegroup, you disgusting senile nazi homo swine!

F'up
--
Cock-crazed Hampton: "...do I have a dick or a pussy?"
MID: <ef123e80-982c-46b3-9ff4-***@googlegroups.com>
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-08-16 13:51:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:05:15 -0700 (PDT), Carolina Reb
Post by Carolina Reb
Post by !Jones
x-no-idiots: yes
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:50:38 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "Michael
Post by Michael Ejercito
Not that you can show.
Michael
Ain't that lot a *hoot*?
I figured that the pale-skin woman
who died when hit by that sad sack
"neo-Nazi's" car was another from
the LQBTCNZ community, celebrating
with her fellow protected minorities,"
but just learned she had a Negro
boyfriend. Figures. Her momma must
be proud.
http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=3242#p10950
Probably a jewess. They're into that kind of shit.

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)

- -





"We CAN hide forever."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he will
NEVER prove where he infests or give his real jew name

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson"/etc)
2017-08-16 14:16:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>,
A shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Probably a
"Probably", you sick, filthy, degenerate, thieving, 'tarded,
shiteating, pissdrinking, donkeydicksucking, grannyfucking,
jizzlicking, motherless pile of sub-excrement nazoid dreck who
takes dozens of muzzie dicks up his arse and throat on an hourly
basis PEDO?
The Peeler
2017-08-16 16:13:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 06:51:20 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Probably a jewess. They're into that kind of shit.
Is it about sex and shit again, dreckserb? Then it's YOU who is into that
kind of shit and who is PROJECTING, yet again!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
"The Jews" about dumb anal psychotic Razovic:
"He just likes to have Jews and other minorities kick him around and bloody
him up a bit every day, so he can blame them for all his misfortunes."
MID: <***@4ax.com>
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-08-16 13:51:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by !Jones
x-no-idiots: yes
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:50:38 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "Michael
Post by Michael Ejercito
Not that you can show.
Michael
Ain't that lot a *hoot*?
Hay! Did you see CNN chief rabbi Volf Blitzstein shit a jew b'rick on
camera when Trump assigned equal blame to the Alt Left i.e .jews?

LOLOK!

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)

- -





"We CAN hide forever."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he will
NEVER prove where he infests or give his real jew name

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson"/etc)
2017-08-16 14:08:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>,
A shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Hay!
What's the matter, old pedo? That two year old was too fast for you? LOL!
The Peeler
2017-08-16 16:13:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 14:08:26 +0000 (UTC), Sick old pedo Andrew AndrzejBaron
Post by Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson"/etc)
A shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Hay!
What's the matter, old pedo? That two year old was too fast for you? LOL!
LOL
The Peeler
2017-08-16 16:13:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 06:51:20 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by !Jones
Post by Michael Ejercito
Not that you can show.
Michael
Ain't that lot a *hoot*?
Hay! Did you see CNN chief rabbi Volf Blitzstein shit a jew b'rick on
camera when Trump assigned equal blame to the Alt Left i.e .jews?
He can see YOU making a total ass of yourself and giving ALL nazis a bad
name, Retardovic! LOL
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
LOLOK!
"LOLOK"??? Is that the sound you make when you choke on dick, cocksucking
Razovic?
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
Shadow about dumb anal serb bitch Razovic:
"The razodick is like dog shit on the pavement - it's ugly, it stinks and
looks just like razodick the racist idiot. A case of bad serbian gene
pool. "
MID: <59627a41$0$59159$b1db1813$***@news.astraweb.com>
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-08-16 13:51:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:50:38 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:02:06 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by Carolina Reb
Post by Wile E. Coyote
You douchebags are always looking backwards to stoke some grievance.
--
It's time for the students to step up their game and kill people like
Coulter.
It is time for the Gook to
get back to Manila.
Some of them go to Manila.
YOU are going to Manila...and SOON, insh'Allah!
Not that you can show.
YOU do the showing when WHITE people demand it, asshole!
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
some of them miscegenate with cute girls.
Any WHITE slut which miscegenates with a gook is guilty of BESTIALITY.
Wrong.
Anything BUT wrong.
Post by Michael Ejercito
In some cases, it is matrimonial.
There IS no matrimony between different species.
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
It is NEVER time for you to miscegenate with cute girls.
YOU are EXEMPT from miscegenating with ANYONE except niggers from
Compton!
Not that you can show.
Who ELSE would want to miscegenate with a slant eyed needledicked
mongoloid???

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)

- -





"We CAN hide forever."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he will
NEVER prove where he infests or give his real jew name

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson"/etc)
2017-08-16 14:21:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>,
A shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
YOU do the showing when WHITE
YOU are NOT White, sick old pedo!
The Peeler
2017-08-16 16:13:56 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 06:51:21 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Shein's jew aliash)", farted again:

<FLUSH all the psychotic BULLSHIT unread>

...and nothing's left, again! LOL
--
Klaus Schadenfreude about poor dumb anal Razovic:
"That is the beauty of his abject stupidity. It's so pure and
unadulterated. Like it springs forth from the very universal Source of
Dumb."
MID: <***@4ax.com>
Michael Ejercito
2017-08-16 17:35:20 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:50:38 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:02:06 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
Some of them go to Manila.
YOU are going to Manila...and SOON, insh'Allah!
Not that you can show.
YOU do the showing when WHITE people demand it, asshole!
So you concede that you are unable to show that your claim is true.
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
some of them miscegenate with cute girls.
Any WHITE slut which miscegenates with a gook is guilty of BESTIALITY.
Wrong.
Anything BUT wrong.
Post by Michael Ejercito
In some cases, it is matrimonial.
There IS no matrimony between different species.
They are not different species.
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
It is NEVER time for you to miscegenate with cute girls.
YOU are EXEMPT from miscegenating with ANYONE except niggers from
Compton!
Not that you can show.
Who ELSE would want to miscegenate with a slant eyed needledicked
mongoloid???
Your argument assumes that I am needledicked.


Michael
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-08-17 13:43:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 10:35:20 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:50:38 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:02:06 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
Some of them go to Manila.
YOU are going to Manila...and SOON, insh'Allah!
Not that you can show.
YOU do the showing when WHITE people demand it, asshole!
So you concede that you are unable to show that your claim is true.
So you concede that YOU are the one who has to do the showing.
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
some of them miscegenate with cute girls.
Any WHITE slut which miscegenates with a gook is guilty of BESTIALITY.
Wrong.
Anything BUT wrong.
Post by Michael Ejercito
In some cases, it is matrimonial.
There IS no matrimony between different species.
They are not different species.
They are like, TOTALLY different species.
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
It is NEVER time for you to miscegenate with cute girls.
YOU are EXEMPT from miscegenating with ANYONE except niggers from
Compton!
Not that you can show.
Who ELSE would want to miscegenate with a slant eyed needledicked
mongoloid???
Your argument assumes that I am needledicked.
Michael
You ARE needledicked. ALL you subhuman gooks are! Why the greek
would you think that YOU are any different?

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)

- -

"We CAN hide forever."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he will
NEVER prove where he infests or give his real jew name

Iudaei orbem terrarum infestant.
- correct Latin

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson"/etc)
2017-08-17 14:01:45 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <***@4ax.com>,
A shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
So you concede that YOU
So you concede that YOU eat shit, rape kiddies, pimp your mother, and
peddle defective, pirated software!
The Peeler
2017-08-17 17:22:06 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 06:43:29 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Shein's jew aliash)", farted again:

<FLUSH psychopath's psychopathic blather unread>
--
Nefesh describing anal Razovic:
"REVD NEMO pudding and pie,
Kiss the boys and make them cry,
When the girls come out to play,
REVD NEMO runs away."
MID: <fa38b042-8f6d-4757-908e-***@googlegroups.com>
The Peeler
2017-08-15 18:00:55 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:07:26 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Some of them go to Manila.
YOU are going to Manila...and SOON, insh'Allah!
WHEN, poor psychotic idiot? LMAO!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
some of them miscegenate with cute girls.
Any WHITE slut which miscegenates with a gook is guilty of BESTIALITY.
WHY can't you fuck, you poor housebound sexually crippled idiot? LOL
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
It is NEVER time for you to miscegenate with cute girls.
YOU are EXEMPT from miscegenating with ANYONE except niggers from
Compton!
You are OBVIOUSLY talking about YOURSELF, already again, poor dumb anal
Razovic! LOL
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
Shadow about dumb anal serb bitch Razovic:
"The razodick is like dog shit on the pavement - it's ugly, it stinks and
looks just like razodick the racist idiot. A case of bad serbian gene
pool. "
MID: <59627a41$0$59159$b1db1813$***@news.astraweb.com>
NEMO
2017-08-15 22:06:08 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
In article <c01c5aab-6862-4d1a-a5b2-***@googlegroups.com>,
Carolina Reb <***@att.net> wrote:

[flush]

Leading US neo-Nazi jailed for child porn possession
----------------------------------------------------
Kevin Alfred Strom (born 1956 in Anchorage, Alaska) is the former
Managing Director of National Vanguard, a Charlottesville-based
organization that has been described as a racist, white separatist,
homophobic, and a Neo-Nazi hate group by the Southern Poverty Law
Center and the Anti-Defamation League.[1][2] Strom resigned from
National Vanguard in July 2006.[3] National Vanguard reportedly
disbanded on March 14, 2007, and its website has been dormant since
that time. In 2008 Strom pleaded guilty to possession of ten images
of child pornography and was sentenced to 23 months in prison.[4]
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Alfred_Strom
Carolina Reb
2017-08-15 22:17:49 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by NEMO
[flush]
Leading US neo-Nazi jailed for child porn possession
----------------------------------------------------
Kevin Alfred Strom (born 1956 in Anchorage, Alaska) is the former
Managing Director of National Vanguard, a Charlottesville-based
organization that has been described as a racist, white separatist,
homophobic, and a Neo-Nazi hate group by the Southern Poverty Law
Center and the Anti-Defamation League.[1][2] Strom resigned from
National Vanguard in July 2006.[3] National Vanguard reportedly
disbanded on March 14, 2007, and its website has been dormant since
that time. In 2008 Strom pleaded guilty to possession of ten images
of child pornography and was sentenced to 23 months in prison.[4]
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Alfred_Strom
The Jewish obsession with feces
is very disturbing, and very real.
In fact, it is openly admitted by
many Jews.

Loading Image...

The late Dr. William Pierce of the
National Alliance made these remarks
in an April 2001 radio broadcast/
article entitled Shocking Differences:

“This is something I first noticed
when I was a junior high school student
in Dallas, Texas. The school I attended
was in one of Dallas’ wealthier suburbs,
and there were a number of Jews in the
school. What I and several of my classmates
noticed about the Jews was their uniquely
Jewish sense of humor. One doesn’t expect
much delicacy in the jokes told by 14-year
-olds, of course, but the thing that made
the jokes that appealed especially to the
Jews stand out was their scatological
content. Nearly every Jewish joke involved
excrement in one way or another. As I
said, this Jewish tendency was so
pronounced that I and my Gentile
classmates noticed it and commented
on it, even though we didn’t understand
it. And it wasn’t that we had an exceptionally
large number of budding Howard Sterns among
our Jewish classmates. The inclination toward
scatology is a general Jewish characteristic.
Jews themselves, including Jewish psychologists,
have commented on this Jewish trait often,
explaining it in terms of the collective
Jewish experience throughout history. It
is real, and it is quite noticeable.”

https://theendofzion.com/the-fecal-fixation-of-the-chosen-ones/

*
Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson"/etc)
2017-08-15 22:20:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Carolina Reb
obsession with feces
THINK, you old loon:

A movement with shit-colored uniforms, led by a shiteater.

Yes folks, FOUR leading experts concluded: Shitler ate shit!

-------------------------------------------------------------

"He is an extreme masochist who derives sexual pleasure from
having a woman squat over him while she uriniates or defecates
on his face."


Quoted from

"A Psychological Analysis of Adolph Hitler"

Walter C. Langer, Harvard

With the collaboration of
Prof. Henry A. Murr, Harvard Psychological Clinic
Dr. Ernst Kris, New School for Social Research
Dr. Bertram D. Lawin, New York Psychoanalytic Institute

http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/h/hitler-adolf/oss-papers/text/oss-profile-04-06.html

Some believe that he [Hitler] is entirely immune from such impulses.
Some believe that he is a chronic masturbator. Some believe that
he derives his sexual pleasure [Page 138] through voyeurism. Many
believe that he is completely impotent. Others, and these are perhaps
in the majority, that he is homosexual. It is probably true that he is
impotent but he is certainiy not homosexual in the ordinary sense of
the term. His perversion has quite a different nature which few have
guessed. He is an extreme masochist who derives sexual pleasure from
having a woman squat over him while she uriniates or defecates on his
face. (Strasser, 919; see also 931, 932)*

[*Note: There may be some people who would question the reliability of
any information given by Otto Strasser because of his reputation. It
is perhaps because of his reputation that he came by this information
which had been so carefully guarded. He also supplied the interviewer
with a great deal of other information concerning Hitler which
checked very closely with that of other informants. As far as this
study is concerned we have no reason to question his sincerity.]

Although this perversion is not a common one, it is not unknown in
clinical work, particularly in its incipient stages. The four
collaborators on this study, in addition to Dr. De Saussure who
learned of the perversion from other sources, have all had experience
with cases of this type. All five agree that their information as
given is probably true in view of their clinical experience and their
knowledge of Hitler's character. In the following section further
evidence of its validition will be cited. At the present moment it is
sufficient to recognize the influence that this perversion must have
on the conscious mental life of Hitler.
The Peeler
2017-08-15 22:58:12 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 15:17:49 -0700 (PDT), our resident senile nazi homo,
"All Bark & No Bite", aka Humpin Hampton, aka Caroloony Reb, the subnormal
moron and attested schizo from the States, wrote:

<FLUSH the disgusting senile nazi homo swine's usual disgusting sick nazi
homo bullshit unread>

Keep your FAGGOT stench out of straight people's ngs, you disgusting senile
nazi homo swine!

F'up to your homegroup
--
Cock-crazed nazi homo Hampton can't get enough:
"Buttfucking is not enough"
MID: <6a74169e-98fc-472b-9414-***@googlegroups.com>
Mr. B1ack
2017-08-14 02:50:27 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 21:55:33 -0000 (UTC), "Wile E. Coyote"
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by !Jones
x-no-idiots: yes
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 05:52:00 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "Michael
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottes
ville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
Is there a clear, complete, objective account of what happened in
Charlottesville?
There usually isn't. No matter who describes the events, they will be
filtered and interpreted through that person's beliefs and biases.
The author suspects a "deliberate effort by the news media to avoid
assigning any responsibility to Antifa thugs for the escalation into
violence", which is, in itself, a biased statement.
But things have changed WRT "free speech", have they not? In the
strict legal sense, we still have the first amendment; however, one
will be attacked if one offends anyone. For example, an athelete will
be suspended for any insensitive remark. If a university professor
utters a politically incorrect statement, the prof will soon be
retired.
But let's get back to the confederate states, shall we? The
confederacy fought for slavery at a time when the tide of history had
shifted. The confederacy expected the European nations to recognize
them as a sovereign nation; in fact, everything depended on that
happening... but it didn't. By the 1860s, Europe had universally
abolished slavery and could not support slavery in the confederate
states. Thus, the north rolled over 'em like a tractor over a toad
and did so with impunity.
The south made two *big* mistakes: first, the north was able to couch
the war in terms of slavery... and it *was*; anything else was
negotiable. Second, the south shot first at Ft. Sumpter... *BIG*
mistake! The south started it!
The biggest mistake, though, was to lose the war. In any other
country, Jefferson Davis, Robert Lee, and Nathan Forrest (et. al.)
would have been ignominiously hung for sedition; however, we didn't do
that; this is good, IMO.
But, you know... we *won*! Why do we have to see their statues
raised? We won; you lost... take your fucking flag off the roof of
our courthouse. Take down those statues... move 'em to private
property is fine. They're all going, so get used to it. March and
protest all you want; it's a done deal.
Jones
You douchebags are always looking backwards to stoke some grievance.
They have to look backwards because real life
offers them *nothing*.

Those confederates at least thought they were
fighting the good fight for the right reasons. They
did not see themselves as agents of evil but as
warriors for a desireable vision of America.
Hindsight is always 20/20 of course ... but for
the soldiers and people THEN, the standards
of truth and justice and morality THEN, the
Confederacy seemed the righter option.

So, as fellow Americans SURE they were doing
the right thing, we give them a modicum of respect.
Don't have to love them, just don't be so quick to
judge them by modern standards.

I notice the Italians haven't torn down the works
of the old Romans - vicious genocidal slave-
abusing conquerors that they were.

Now the NAZIs ... they had to hide a lot of their
evils because they KNEW they were evils, not
civilized by the standards/ethics/morality of the
time. Same for the Russian commies. Fine to
tear apart their mouments and memories IMHO.
!Jones
2017-08-14 03:36:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
x-no-idiots: yes

On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:50:27 -0400, in talk.politics.guns Mr. B1ack
Post by Mr. B1ack
Those confederates at least thought they were
fighting the good fight for the right reasons. They
did not see themselves as agents of evil but as
warriors for a desireable vision of America.
Hindsight is always 20/20 of course ... but for
the soldiers and people THEN, the standards
of truth and justice and morality THEN, the
Confederacy seemed the righter option.
So, as fellow Americans SURE they were doing
the right thing, we give them a modicum of respect.
Don't have to love them, just don't be so quick to
judge them by modern standards.
I notice the Italians haven't torn down the works
of the old Romans - vicious genocidal slave-
abusing conquerors that they were.
Now the NAZIs ... they had to hide a lot of their
evils because they KNEW they were evils, not
civilized by the standards/ethics/morality of the
time. Same for the Russian commies. Fine to
tear apart their mouments and memories IMHO.
I believe your point is valid and I would never suggest a
disrespectful tone. We should give honor to the confederate soldiers
by all means! OTOH, the fact that they believed slavery to be an
ethical institution does not make it thus; I can cause myself believe
just about anything if I work hard enough at it. There is an old
saying that goes something like: "most people claim to be seeking
truth when what they really want is reassurance that what they already
believe is true..." or some variation on that.

Another uncomfortable fact that the liberals tend to forget is that
the southern cotton industry didn't enslave Nigerians; if you look at
early Nigerian literature, you find that their culture had the idea of
ownership of another human being. The people were sold into slavery
via a legal transaction in Nigeria... mostly by their parents. During
the first half of the 19th century, Nigeria was quite wealthy compared
to most other African countries.

But, by 1860, the US south really should have seen "the writing on the
wall". There were only two countries (US and Brazil) that were still
importing slaves and public opinion was swinging sharply against it in
the US. The only way that the south could have seceded successfully
was to have been recognized by the European nations; particularly,
England could have broken the blockade. The confederate states sent
envoys to Europe in 1861 who were simply ignored because they
represented slavery.

Thus, I believe that it is fair to say that they should have
questioned their position more deeply. There had been a paradigm
shift... a sea change... the tide of history was flowing against them
and they should have discerned this without wiping out 20% of our
nation's population at the time. The south should have asked for
terms of peace when England rejected them because it was effectively
over. Actually, they had a strong barganing position just then after
Manassas(#1) and Ball's Bluff, both of which were clear southern
victories. They didn't have to drag it out for another four bloody
years when the eventual outcome was no longer in much doubt.

Do you wonder how Atlanta would feel about a statue of Sherman
downtown?

Jones
Wile E. Coyote
2017-08-14 13:30:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by !Jones
OTOH, the fact that they believed slavery to be an
ethical institution does not make it thus;
Facts not in evidence: cite proof that the majority of fighters, officers and
men

1) owned slaves
2) thought owning slaves was moral
--
It's time for the students to step up their game and kill people like
Coulter.

Siri Cruise <***@yahoo.com> April 25, 2017
Mr. B1ack
2017-08-14 20:33:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 13:30:32 -0000 (UTC), "Wile E. Coyote"
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by !Jones
OTOH, the fact that they believed slavery to be an
ethical institution does not make it thus;
Facts not in evidence: cite proof that the majority of fighters, officers and
men
1) owned slaves
2) thought owning slaves was moral
He's not going to find much evidence - though
if he finds even ONE case he'll say it proves
his assertion for ALL.

In the agricultural south, the 'morality' of slavery
took 2nd place to the economic *necessity* ... ie
at the prices they were getting for their products
they couldn't stay in business without slaves. The
northern bloc of states had kind of been rigging
prices for awhile too ... making sure profit margins
for southern products would be quite small. It was
one of the main reasons for the war.

Thirty years earlier when the UK abolished slavery
the govt there made huge payouts to slave owners
to compensate them for both the cost of the slaves
and the calculated impact on expenses which
adopting wage-earning labor would entail. In the
USA there wasn't much talk of any such deal.

Finally there was the "outnumbered" problem ... the
slaves outnumbered the masters in lots of places,
and freed slaves might be vengeful. This power-
reversal was the main reason the KKK was formed.

All this left the south in a rock/hard-place position.

So they fought.

Sure, many southerners did NOT see any huge moral
problem with slavery. "Blacks" were "not real humans"
according to a lot of philosophical/religious thought at
the time, so it was OK to own them. Judging by the
laws and actions in the northern states AFTER the
war, the "non-human" theory still prevailed, justifying
all sorts of Jim-Crow rules.

Nothing in the north/south slave/anti-slave situation
was simple. The victors later portrayed it as such, as
a simple morality play, but that was a convenient lie.

The USA *should* have followed the British lead and
method by the early 1840s - but didn't. Cultural inertia
is hard to overcome as are fears of change. As such
we set ourselves up for a bad solution 20 years later.
Hindsight 20/20 ... but to the people then and there it
all seemed murky and unsure.
!Jones
2017-08-14 23:52:41 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
x-no-idiots: yes

On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:33:48 -0400, in talk.politics.guns Mr. B1ack
Post by Mr. B1ack
He's not going to find much evidence - though
if he finds even ONE case he'll say it proves
his assertion for ALL.
I don't like this style of reply; however, I don't have a clue what
you're talking about. Who is "he", please?
Post by Mr. B1ack
In the agricultural south, the 'morality' of slavery
took 2nd place to the economic *necessity* ... ie
at the prices they were getting for their products
they couldn't stay in business without slaves. The
northern bloc of states had kind of been rigging
prices for awhile too ... making sure profit margins
for southern products would be quite small. It was
one of the main reasons for the war.
Thirty years earlier when the UK abolished slavery
the govt there made huge payouts to slave owners
to compensate them for both the cost of the slaves
and the calculated impact on expenses which
adopting wage-earning labor would entail. In the
USA there wasn't much talk of any such deal.
Well, it was much more than just the UK. For example, France had
abolished slavery in 1794, almost four decades before England did so
in 1833. Neither country, though, had a slave-based economy. England
had ceased importing slaves by 1807. I am unaware of any "huge
payouts to slave owners" because there were relatively few slaves in
England.
Post by Mr. B1ack
Finally there was the "outnumbered" problem ... the
slaves outnumbered the masters in lots of places,
and freed slaves might be vengeful. This power-
reversal was the main reason the KKK was formed.
You don't read much, do you? The KKK formed well *after* the Civil
War sometime during the reconstruction; history has it forming in
Pulaski, TN sometime around 1867 or '68... or so. The thirteenth
amendment had long been ratified by then.
Post by Mr. B1ack
All this left the south in a rock/hard-place position.
So they fought.
Sure, many southerners did NOT see any huge moral
problem with slavery. "Blacks" were "not real humans"
according to a lot of philosophical/religious thought at
the time, so it was OK to own them. Judging by the
laws and actions in the northern states AFTER the
war, the "non-human" theory still prevailed, justifying
all sorts of Jim-Crow rules.
Nothing in the north/south slave/anti-slave situation
was simple. The victors later portrayed it as such, as
a simple morality play, but that was a convenient lie.
The USA *should* have followed the British lead and
method by the early 1840s - but didn't. Cultural inertia
is hard to overcome as are fears of change. As such
we set ourselves up for a bad solution 20 years later.
Hindsight 20/20 ... but to the people then and there it
all seemed murky and unsure.
The south did have its apologists for slavery; however, anti-slavery
forces were clearly gaining momentum. The US, in general, was feeling
the global shift against slavery.

I never suggested that it was simple; I'm saying that the southern
leaders could have and should have seen it coming. The north wasn't
exactly blameless and should have been expected to have shouldered the
cost... which would have been a bargain compared to the cost of a war!

When you get down to it, the War of 1812 was all about slavery;
England had ruled the slave trade illegal in 1807 and was trying to
shut it down (well, they were trying to shut down the Dutch
participation, anyway). The Texas Revolution (and the Alamo...
remember that?) was all about slavery; slavery was flatly
unconstitutional in Mexico and the US immigrants were bringing slaves.
By 1860, the US stood almost alone as a slave state. (Yes, Brazil
still had legal slavery; however, the US was the big importer.)

But there were *way* too many indications that the "slave party" was
over and the south should have been tooling up for years; instead,
they ignored history and dug in their heels.

That may be human nature and I can, in many ways, relate; however, do
we really want to build a bunch of monuments to 'em?

Jones
!Jones
2017-08-15 14:13:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
x-no-idiots: yes

On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 16:33:48 -0400, in talk.politics.guns Mr. B1ack
Post by Mr. B1ack
In the agricultural south, the 'morality' of slavery
took 2nd place to the economic *necessity* ... ie
at the prices they were getting for their products
they couldn't stay in business without slaves. The
northern bloc of states had kind of been rigging
prices for awhile too ... making sure profit margins
for southern products would be quite small. It was
one of the main reasons for the war.
Another important point is that the *reason* cotton prices were so low
was because the south was over-producing. The objective is to have
what's known as a "market clearing" supply; that is, don't produce so
much that you flood the market. The north had not been "rigging"
cotton prices because they simply had no control over the European
markets and the cotton shipped from southern ports.

I would guess that the Europeans were watching the political
developments in the US closely and could see that we were on the verge
of... err... "domestic issues"; therefore, they took advantage of the
low prices and stockpiled cotton. This fact hurt the south badly
because everything depended on European recognition. The south was
counting on England needing cotton badly enough to ignore the issue of
slavery; however, the war broke out at a time of European cotton glut,
so they just waited it out.

Thus, the issue ties back to slavery: cotton prices were low because
slavery facilitated over-production.

Jones
Scout
2017-08-15 01:31:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by !Jones
OTOH, the fact that they believed slavery to be an
ethical institution does not make it thus;
Facts not in evidence: cite proof that the majority of fighters, officers and
men
1) owned slaves
2) thought owning slaves was moral
For that matter why did the US continue to have slaves and would for another
4 years after the end of the Civil War?

Meanwhile, look at the bigotry and discrimination among Union troops for
blacks who wished to serve.
!Jones
2017-08-15 14:18:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
x-no-idiots: yes

On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:31:00 -0400, in talk.politics.guns "Scout"
Post by Scout
For that matter why did the US continue to have slaves and would for another
4 years after the end of the Civil War?
Meanwhile, look at the bigotry and discrimination among Union troops for
blacks who wished to serve.
After December 6, 1865, no person in the United States was a slave.
Now, if you lived so far back in the swamp that they had to haul in
sunlight with a mule team, maybe it didn't matter; however, slavery
was over in 1865.

Bigotry and racism do not end at a political boundary.

Jones
Scout
2017-08-15 01:31:48 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Wile E. Coyote
Post by !Jones
OTOH, the fact that they believed slavery to be an
ethical institution does not make it thus;
Facts not in evidence: cite proof that the majority of fighters, officers and
men
1) owned slaves
2) thought owning slaves was moral
Well, I know General Grant owned slaves....oh, sorry, wrong side.
!Jones
2017-08-15 14:33:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
x-no-idiots: yes

On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:31:48 -0400, in talk.politics.guns "Scout"
Post by Scout
Well, I know General Grant owned slaves....oh, sorry, wrong side.
There exists one handwritten document wherein U.S. Grant freed a slave
previously owned (probably) by his father-in-law which he (probably)
inherited; we don't know much about it. It is suggested that Grant
had to assert ownership before he could execute the document freeing
the man. There is simply no other evidence of slave dealings by
Grant.

Grant's in-law family were slave-holders and the wife was served by at
least one personal servant who was probably owned by her father.
There is no evidence of either General Grant or his wife ever owning
slaves or participating in the practice.

Jones
Mr. B1ack
2017-08-15 21:33:52 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by !Jones
x-no-idiots: yes
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 22:50:27 -0400, in talk.politics.guns Mr. B1ack
Post by Mr. B1ack
Those confederates at least thought they were
fighting the good fight for the right reasons. They
did not see themselves as agents of evil but as
warriors for a desireable vision of America.
Hindsight is always 20/20 of course ... but for
the soldiers and people THEN, the standards
of truth and justice and morality THEN, the
Confederacy seemed the righter option.
So, as fellow Americans SURE they were doing
the right thing, we give them a modicum of respect.
Don't have to love them, just don't be so quick to
judge them by modern standards.
I notice the Italians haven't torn down the works
of the old Romans - vicious genocidal slave-
abusing conquerors that they were.
Now the NAZIs ... they had to hide a lot of their
evils because they KNEW they were evils, not
civilized by the standards/ethics/morality of the
time. Same for the Russian commies. Fine to
tear apart their mouments and memories IMHO.
I believe your point is valid and I would never suggest a
disrespectful tone. We should give honor to the confederate soldiers
by all means! OTOH, the fact that they believed slavery to be an
ethical institution does not make it thus;
Agreed ... but that's a more MODERN perspective
on the institution. In 1860 it was a point of live debate,
before that there wasn't even much debate. Slavery
had been ubiquitous ... even those fine Hebrew kings
of old had lots of slaves. If you lost the war ... well ...
tuff titty - to the salt mines with you. OUR reality and
THEIR reality were not equivalent.

At least they'd quit burning 'witches' ...
Post by !Jones
I can cause myself believe
just about anything if I work hard enough at it. There is an old
saying that goes something like: "most people claim to be seeking
truth when what they really want is reassurance that what they already
believe is true..." or some variation on that.
There's a lot of psychological truth to that. While
the physical world may be a constant, the *human*
world, the *human* "reality", is far more a concensus
thing. "Everybody thinks X ... so ...".

Hey, in the 1600s those witches were REAL - and
if you were stupid enough to doubt it and SAY so
you'd wind up swingin' in the breeze next to some.
All manner of 'reason' and social custom revolved
around the SURE-NUF *TRUTH* that evil magic
was loose in the world.

Every generation likes to imagine that *IT* has
finally arrived at enlightenment ... that *IT* finally
understands everything. Can't fool *US*. Those
before - rubes, fools, barbarians and idiots !

[and then I see everyone fall for the same old
tricks that have been used for thousands of years]
Post by !Jones
Another uncomfortable fact that the liberals tend to forget is that
the southern cotton industry didn't enslave Nigerians; if you look at
early Nigerian literature, you find that their culture had the idea of
ownership of another human being. The people were sold into slavery
via a legal transaction in Nigeria... mostly by their parents. During
the first half of the 19th century, Nigeria was quite wealthy compared
to most other African countries.
Native Africans were instrumental, vital, to the slave trade.
They did all the work - whitey just collected the product and
shipped it west.

But nobody wants to think about that - ruins the "narrative" ...

OTOH, there *was* a demand in the west - fed mostly by
those with agricultural labor-intensive ambitions. Wasn't
hard to sell 'em on the idea of slaves ...
Post by !Jones
But, by 1860, the US south really should have seen "the writing on the
wall".
Well, maybe they did. It's always been an open question
as to how long slavery would have persisted if there had
not been a war ... or even how long it would have lasted
if the Confederacy had actually won its freedom.
Post by !Jones
There were only two countries (US and Brazil) that were still
importing slaves and public opinion was swinging sharply against it in
the US. The only way that the south could have seceded successfully
was to have been recognized by the European nations; particularly,
England could have broken the blockade. The confederate states sent
envoys to Europe in 1861 who were simply ignored because they
represented slavery.
The USA tended to follow the British lead. Once the
war of 1812 was kinda forgotten/forgiven all things
British became VERY fashionable. Dickens was
received as a literary hero - very successful book
tours here.

I think slavery was destined to go away - soon -
regardless. The public thinking, the 'reality', was
swinging that way. The economic advantages of
slaves - especially with a 'freedom' movement in
progress - was rapidly shrinking. Alas for the
southern farmers, and "outnumbered" whites,
there WERE some practical issues that needed
to be addressed.

The Brits PAID people to free their slaves, thus
lessening any economic impact. They also gave
freed slaves a small stipend in various forms so
they'd be able to start a new life. However in
the UK there weren't ENOUGH slaves so that
anybody wondered about a huge vengeful
ex-slave mob showing up.
Post by !Jones
Thus, I believe that it is fair to say that they should have
questioned their position more deeply.
I think they were ... but in 1860 it was still a work
in progress. Some things you can change just
by snapping your fingers, but slavery and the
whole economic/social/philosophical mass
associated with it was not something so
instantly or easily dealt with. In many ways
the post-war "emancipation" was a disaster,
no plan, no followthrough. "You're free now -
see ya !". Many modern evils had their roots
in that moment.
Post by !Jones
There had been a paradigm
shift... a sea change... the tide of history was flowing against them
and they should have discerned this without wiping out 20% of our
nation's population at the time. The south should have asked for
terms of peace when England rejected them because it was effectively
over. Actually, they had a strong barganing position just then after
Manassas(#1) and Ball's Bluff, both of which were clear southern
victories. They didn't have to drag it out for another four bloody
years when the eventual outcome was no longer in much doubt.
Do you wonder how Atlanta would feel about a statue of Sherman
downtown?
Sherman was a real meanie ....

I can see why 'blacks' don't love all those statues of
Confederate heros ... but the 'solutions' to that are
often just as divisive as slavery/racism itself -
reopening old wounds as they say. Oh, and there
are plenty of 'professional race-baiters' who profit
from all that ..........

Anyway ... at least you DISCUSSED this issue
instead of SCREAMING slogans and accusations
as has become the usenet norm. Cheers.
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-08-14 13:53:25 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 05:52:00 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottesville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
But dreckgook...you're EXEMPT from ethics!

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)

- -





"We CAN hide forever."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he will
NEVER prove where he infests or give his real jew name

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
The Peeler
2017-08-14 16:49:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 06:53:25 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottesville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
But dreckgook...you're EXEMPT from ethics!
Your master Michael keeps TEACHING you ethics, dreckserb!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
bosodeniro to dumb anal Razovic:
"Are you a glutton for abuse or just fucking lonely?"
Message-ID: <a7ee72c3-7388-4040-bc6a-***@googlegroups.com>
Michael Ejercito
2017-08-14 17:57:58 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 05:52:00 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottesville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
But dreckgook...you're EXEMPT from ethics!
Mangina, you yet again fail to address the content of the post.


Michael
!Jones
2017-08-14 18:20:10 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
x-no-idiots: yes

On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:57:58 -0700, in talk.politics.guns "Michael
Post by Michael Ejercito
Mangina, you yet again fail to address the content of the post.
Is there something special about *this* time?
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-08-15 13:07:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:57:58 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 05:52:00 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottesville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
But dreckgook...you're EXEMPT from ethics!
Mangina, you yet again fail to address the content of the post.
Michael
Dreckgook, greek the post, greek its content, greek the poster and
greek you, you slant eyed mongoloid.

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)

- -





"We CAN hide forever."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he will
NEVER prove where he infests or give his real jew name

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
Michael Ejercito
2017-08-15 13:51:32 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:57:58 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 05:52:00 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottesville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
But dreckgook...you're EXEMPT from ethics!
Mangina, you yet again fail to address the content of the post.
Michael
Dreckgook, greek the post, greek its content, greek the poster and
greek you, you slant eyed mongoloid.
Nithing, no wonder your life is buggered.


Michael
The Jews
2017-08-15 14:01:51 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:51:32 -0700, "Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Dreckgook, greek the post, greek its content, greek the poster and
greek you, you slant eyed mongoloid.
Nithing, no wonder your life is buggered.
You know he's typing with one hand when he posts, right?

Ewwwwwwww!

LOL


"Don't ask me questions!"

-Poor dumb anal Razovic,
each time he was asked how he would
like me to prove my name
and where I live.

happy zombie about retarded Razovic:
"i always wondered what would happen if somone with an iq well under 100
posted to usenet. now i know."
MID: <***@4ax.com>

"Gordon? Who the fuck is Gordon??? Och aye the noo!"
- Gordon, after an especially heavy night of glue huffing and sodomizing himself.
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>

Iudaeis rectores orbis terrarum
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-08-16 13:51:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:51:32 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 10:57:58 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
"jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 05:52:00 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottesville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
But dreckgook...you're EXEMPT from ethics!
Mangina, you yet again fail to address the content of the post.
Michael
Dreckgook, greek the post, greek its content, greek the poster and
greek you, you slant eyed mongoloid.
Nithing, no wonder your life is buggered.
Michael
Dreckgook, no wonder you get greeked senseless at the Queen Mary
parking lot every weekend!

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)

- -





"We CAN hide forever."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he will
NEVER prove where he infests or give his real jew name

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
The Peeler
2017-08-16 16:14:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 06:51:21 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Nithing, no wonder your life is buggered.
Michael
Dreckgook, no wonder you get greeked senseless at the Queen Mary
parking lot every weekend!
Dreckserb, stop projecting your OWN faggotry onto all those that are
superior to you and straight and sane unlike you!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
The top 5 truths about poor dumb Razovic, our colostomy bag wearing resident
psychopath, aka "The Rectum":

the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
she can't get out of the house anymore,
she got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
she can't FUCK anymore,
she got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!
Michael Ejercito
2017-08-21 16:39:43 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Peeler
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 06:51:21 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Nithing, no wonder your life is buggered.
Michael
Dreckgook, no wonder you get greeked senseless at the Queen Mary
parking lot every weekend!
Dreckserb, stop projecting your OWN faggotry onto all those that are
superior to you and straight and sane unlike you!
What else is he going to do?


Michael
The Peeler
2017-08-21 17:32:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Dreckserb, stop projecting your OWN faggotry onto all those that are
superior to you and straight and sane unlike you!
What else is he going to do?
Michael
Good question!
Michael Ejercito
2017-08-26 18:58:00 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Dreckserb, stop projecting your OWN faggotry onto all those that are
superior to you and straight and sane unlike you!
What else is he going to do?
Michael
Good question!
he is afraid to answer.


Michael
The Peeler
2017-08-26 19:01:53 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Dreckserb, stop projecting your OWN faggotry onto all those that are
superior to you and straight and sane unlike you!
What else is he going to do?
Michael
Good question!
he is afraid to answer.
Michael
COWARDICE being her hallmark!
Michael Ejercito
2017-08-30 19:53:22 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
What else is he going to do?
Michael
Good question!
he is afraid to answer.
Michael
COWARDICE being her hallmark!
Cowardice, dishonesty, and invincible ignorance are hallmarks of Nazi
nithings.


Michael
The Peeler
2017-08-30 20:55:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
What else is he going to do?
Michael
Good question!
he is afraid to answer.
Michael
COWARDICE being her hallmark!
Cowardice, dishonesty, and invincible ignorance are hallmarks of Nazi
nithings.
Michael
...and of every single one of them! They are only "courageous" when they
hugely outnumber defenseless weak persons.
Michael Ejercito
2017-09-03 16:18:31 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
he is afraid to answer.
Michael
COWARDICE being her hallmark!
Cowardice, dishonesty, and invincible ignorance are hallmarks of Nazi
nithings.
Michael
...and of every single one of them! They are only "courageous" when they
hugely outnumber defenseless weak persons.
They were afraid to go after ONE black man!


Michael
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-09-04 13:38:15 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 3 Sep 2017 09:18:31 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
[FLUHS Grik skata]

Watch, it anus!
Post by Michael Ejercito
They were afraid to go after ONE black man!
Michael
The uppity coon posted a FAKE name and FAKE address using a sockpuppet
so that nobody COULD go after him, dreckgook! The subhuman cowardice
has been latterly replicated with Klaun 'Unglück' Shittinb'ricks
LYING about where he infests.

BTW NOBODY would even BOTHER going after a GBLTP ladyboy like you!

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)

- -

" I don't even have the heart to tell him I've never infested
Arizona."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he lied
from the very beginning, A jew scam, as expected

Iudaei orbem terrarum infestant.
- correct Latin

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
The Peeler
2017-09-04 16:56:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 04 Sep 2017 06:38:15 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
Cowardice, dishonesty, and invincible ignorance are hallmarks of Nazi
nithings.
Michael
...and of every single one of them! They are only "courageous" when they
hugely outnumber defenseless weak persons.
They were afraid to go after ONE black man!
Michael
The uppity coon posted a FAKE name and FAKE address using a sockpuppet
so that nobody COULD go after him, dreckgook! The subhuman cowardice
has been latterly replicated with Klaun 'Unglück' Shittinb'ricks
LYING about where he infests.
ROTFLOL!!! Coming up with yet MORE excuses (or rather LIES), you abject
LYING COWARD?
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
BTW NOBODY would even BOTHER going after a GBLTP ladyboy like you!
1. He's nothing of the kind! 2. You don't manage to hide your abject
COWARDICE!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
"The Jews" with regard to dumb anal Razovic:
"Population of earth: 7,442,000,000,000
Number of people superior to Gordon: 7,441,999,999,999"
MID: <***@4ax.com>

LOL
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-08-31 13:51:28 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 12:53:22 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
[FLUHS Grik skata]

Watch, it anus!
Post by Michael Ejercito
Cowardice, dishonesty, and invincible ignorance are hallmarks of Nazi
nithings.
Michael
Ainlungus, depravity and invincible judenliebe are hallmarks of slant
eyed shabbos goy assholes such as you, dreckgook.

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)

- -

" I don't even have the heart to tell him I've never infested
Arizona."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he lied
from the very beginning, A jew scam, as expected

Iudaei orbem terrarum infestant.
- correct Latin

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
The Jews
2017-08-31 13:54:26 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Gordon Radovich [***@tiscali.co.uk], the anally-obsessed,
unemployable, impotent, glue-huffing rope-dodging pedophile
nazi-wannabe Serbian coprophiliac, proven by White Nationalist
Scholars to be inferior to Asian peoples, tried to cover up his abject
fear of the fascist-slapping, nazi-tormenting, totalitarian-taunting,
superior Jews that torture him daily, and reveal his complete and
total ignorance, and expose his countless excuses to avoid getting
Nuremberged®, took time out of his busy schedule of felching his
mother for spending money and then masturbating to kiddie porn to lie
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Ainlungus, depravity and invincible judenliebe are hallmarks of slant
eyed shabbos goy assholes such as you, dreckgook.
Looks like Gordon forgets that Asians have been determined by White
Scholars to be his superiors!

ROFLMJAO


"Don't ask me questions!"

-Poor dumb anal Razovic,
each time he was asked how he would
like me to prove my name
and where I live.

"I think Asians are objectively superior to Whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society."
-Jared Taylor, White Nationalist "scholar" and Gordon's Hero.

"As for the ridiculous hundred million Slavs, we will mould the best of them as we see fit, and we will isolate the rest of them in their own pig-styes; and anyone who talks about cherishing the local inhabitants and civilising them, goes straight off into a concentration camp!"
Adolph Hitler, speaking about Slavic Untermensch like Gordon, 6 August 1942.


happy zombie about retarded Razovic:
"i always wondered what would happen if somone with an iq well under 100
posted to usenet. now i know."
MID: <***@4ax.com>

"Gordon? Who the fuck is Gordon??? Och aye the noo!"
- Gordon, after an especially heavy night of glue huffing and sodomizing himself.
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>

"Population of earth: 7,442,000,000,000
Number of people superior to Gordon: 7,441,999,999,999"

Iudaeis rectores orbis terrarum
Michael Ejercito
2017-09-04 16:45:19 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Jews
unemployable, impotent, glue-huffing rope-dodging pedophile
nazi-wannabe Serbian coprophiliac, proven by White Nationalist
Scholars to be inferior to Asian peoples, tried to cover up his abject
fear of the fascist-slapping, nazi-tormenting, totalitarian-taunting,
superior Jews that torture him daily, and reveal his complete and
total ignorance, and expose his countless excuses to avoid getting
Nuremberged®, took time out of his busy schedule of felching his
mother for spending money and then masturbating to kiddie porn to lie
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Ainlungus, depravity and invincible judenliebe are hallmarks of slant
eyed shabbos goy assholes such as you, dreckgook.
Looks like Gordon forgets that Asians have been determined by White
Scholars to be his superiors!
I can understand why he and his fellow dreckvolk are jealous of Asians.

https://www.chinasmack.com/chinese-mans-life-with-beautiful-ukrainian-wife-envied


Chinese Man’s Life with Beautiful Ukrainian Wife Envied

by Joe
Monday, December 8, 2014, 9:47 pm


Chinese-Mans-Life-with-Beautiful-Ukrainian-Wife-Envied-01

From NetEase:

The attack of the academic failure: Chinese young man marries beautiful 18
year-old Ukrainian girl.

12 years ago, Mei Aicai only scored 320 points on the Gaokao examination
[out of 750 points]. With this, he thought his academic career was over, and
suddenly found himself at a loss for what to do. At that point, a friend
dragged him along to go study abroad in Ukraine, and even though he thought
Ukraine was in Africa at the time and couldn’t speak a single word of the
language there, Mei Aicai still boarded the flight to this strange new
country, never imagining that once he went, he would be there for 12 years…

Chinese-Mans-Life-with-Beautiful-Ukrainian-Wife-Envied-02

Chinese-Mans-Life-with-Beautiful-Ukrainian-Wife-Envied-03

Chinese-Mans-Life-with-Beautiful-Ukrainian-Wife-Envied-04

Chinese-Mans-Life-with-Beautiful-Ukrainian-Wife-Envied-05

Anxiety – he only knew one Russian phrase before leaving the country [going
abroad]

For Mei Aicai, Ukraine was an unknown country, and initially thought this
country was in Africa.

”Before I left the country, I went to Shijiazhuang and learned Russian for a
month, but ultimately only learned “hello, I want water”. When I got on the
plane, I was really nervous, not knowing what would be waiting for me in an
unknown country,” Mei Aicai said.

Upon arriving in Ukraine, Mei Aicai took a preparatory course at the local
university, and because he didn’t speak the language, he made a mockery of
himself. “When I first arrived, I saw black bread in the store. I thought it
was made with chocolate and bought a whole bunch, but when I took a bite, it
was both bitter and hard, like a rock. In the end, I had to throw it all
away,” Mei Aicai said.

Another time, Mei Aicai went to the hair salon for a haircut and had a lot
of trouble describing the hairstyle he wanted to the barber. Eventually, he
resorted to buying a pair of scissors and used a mirror to cut his own hair.
Russian words are very long, and its grammar is even more complex, with many
Ukrainians themselves not even fully understanding it. Mei Aicai couldn’t
understand anything during class, as the professor had a deep accent, and to
him it all sounded like someone selling lamb skewers.

Chinese-Mans-Life-with-Beautiful-Ukrainian-Wife-Envied-06

A lonely life – tomatoes scrambled with egg was a luxury for him

To outsiders, Mei Aicai must have come from a rich household to be able to
go abroad, but in reality his parents were average working class people. He
chose to go to Ukraine because the cost of a university education was
similar to China, and moreover visas were also relatively easy to obtain.

Although his family was not wealthy, Mei Aicai didn’t grow up in hardship
either, but when he arrived in Ukraine, the first problem he had to solve
was how to feed himself. During the winter in Ukraine, vegetables are very
expensive, the price tags all listed prices in kilograms, and no matter what
Mei Aicai looked at, he felt he couldn’t afford anything.

“Only after going out in the world did I slowly understand my parents’
hardships. For the first two years, the things I ate the most were potatoes
and cabbage, as these two things are the cheapest in Ukraine. Only during
Chinese New Year was I willing to buy two tomatoes. At the time, I thought
tomato scrambled with egg was a luxurious meal.”

Although it was hard, Mei Aicai quickly became independent, and as someone
who had never cooked before at home, he gradually learned how to even cook a
few specialties. Mei Aicai said: “The first year abroad, what I felt most
was loneliness and helplessness, and everyday I wanted to go [back] home. At
that time, I did not have a phone or a computer, so I eagerly waited for the
weekends when I could go to the internet cafe to chat with my family”.

Chinese-Mans-Life-with-Beautiful-Ukrainian-Wife-Envied-07

Adjusting – playing ping pong opened a new world for him

After graduating from his 1 year preparatory course, Mei Aicai stupidly
chose to attend the Karkov Academy of Fine Arts, and he became the only
student in the school who didn’t know how to draw.

During the first semester at the academy, he spent most of his time playing
video games and skipping class. Mei Aicai felt he didn’t have a goal in
life, and wanted to make a change. So, everyday he went to the gymnasium to
play ping pong and, as a result, he made many Ukrainian friends, and his
Russian also gradually improved.

Most importantly, Mei Aicai also represented the academy and won 3rd place
in the Karkov University Student Competition, a first in the academy’s 100
year-old history. After winning the prize, Mei Aicai’s life entered a new
era. An athletic teacher regarded him greatly, placed his picture in the
school halls, and more and more Ukrainian students and teachers came to him
to play ping pong.

Though ping pong, Mei Aicai even found a girlfriend, and began to work hard
at his major under her encouragement. Over the next few years, Mei Aicai did
well in his core studies, his Russian greatly improved, and he consistently
aced his athletics.

Chinese-Mans-Life-with-Beautiful-Ukrainian-Wife-Envied-08

Happiness – in both love and career

On the Autohome BBS, Mei Aicai’s threads about his life in Ukraine have
reached hundreds of thousands, even millions of views. People all relished
in discussing his beautiful wife, and it was through his wife’s support that
Mei Aicai started his own business.

When Ukrainian women get married, they take their husband’s name. Mei Aicai’s
wife’s name is Mei Dasha and she is still attending high school. According
to Ukrainian law, women can marry at the age of 17.

”She may be young but her views are very mature. At school, she is a good
student with excellent grades and at home, she is a good wife, keeping our
home neat and tidy, doing the laundry and cooking.” Talking about his wife,
Mei Aicai has nothing but praise for her.

A happy home life left Mei Aicai with less to worry about, so he had more
time to devote to his business. He quit his previous job as an animator and
chose to start his own business. Currently, he is running a company engaged
in the import/export of equipment and foodstuffs.

According to him, doing business in Ukraine requires little entertainment
and socializing, where even taking a client out is unnecessary, so even now
Mei Aicai does not drink or smoke, but Ukrainians have high standards when
it comes to quality of work.

Because he is in the import/export business, Mei Aicai spends a lot of time
each day communicating with people in China, but luckily he can stay at home
and simply turn on his computer to work.

”Some people think I am very successful, but I feel my greatest happiness
comes from my family. I come home everyday on time to eat with my wife, and
afterward we go for a walk. I feel this kind of life is very happy, and next
year we are planning to have our first baby,” Mei Aicai said.
The Peeler
2017-09-04 17:22:09 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Jews
Looks like Gordon forgets that Asians have been determined by White
Scholars to be his superiors!
I can understand why he and his fellow dreckvolk are jealous of Asians.
https://www.chinasmack.com/chinese-mans-life-with-beautiful-ukrainian-wife-envied
Chinese Man’s Life with Beautiful Ukrainian Wife Envied
All dumb anal Razovic got is her "life" as a Usenet assclown! LOL
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-09-05 13:07:24 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 09:45:19 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
[fluhs jew lies/shite]
Post by Michael Ejercito
I can understand why he and his fellow dreckvolk are jealous of Asians.
I can see why you envy WHITE people and their ethics, integrity and
morals...characteristics from which you as a Flip Chinaman are EXEMPT!
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://www.chinasmack.com/chinese-mans-life-with-beautiful-ukrainian-wife-envied
Chinese Man’s Life with Beautiful Ukrainian Wife Envied
Chinaman's life with Chinese wife NEVER envied. Have you SEEN what
they look like after the age of 25?

LOLOK!

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)
- -

" I don't even have the heart to tell him I've never infested
Arizona."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he lied
from the very beginning, A jew scam, as expected

Iudaei orbem terrarum infestant.
- correct Latin

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
The Peeler
2017-09-05 17:52:57 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 05 Sep 2017 06:07:24 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Jews
Looks like Gordon forgets that Asians have been determined by White
Scholars to be his superiors!
I can understand why he and his fellow dreckvolk are jealous of Asians.
https://www.chinasmack.com/chinese-mans-life-with-beautiful-ukrainian-wife-envied
Chinese Man’s Life with Beautiful Ukrainian Wife Envied
Chinaman's life with Chinese wife NEVER envied. Have you SEEN what
they look like after the age of 25?
They ALL look better than you and are happier than you, you butt-ugly
housebound sexual cripple!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
LOLOK!
"LOLOK"??? Is that the sound you make when you choke on dick, cocksucking
Razovic?
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
bosodeniro to dumb anal Razovic:
"Are you a glutton for abuse or just fucking lonely?"
Message-ID: <a7ee72c3-7388-4040-bc6a-***@googlegroups.com>
The Jews
2017-09-07 11:43:04 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Gordon Radovich [***@tiscali.co.uk], the anally-obsessed,
unemployable, impotent, glue-huffing rope-dodging pedophile
nazi-wannabe Serbian coprophiliac, proven by White Nationalist
Scholars to be inferior to Asian peoples, tried to cover up his abject
fear of the fascist-slapping, nazi-tormenting, totalitarian-taunting,
superior Jews that torture him daily, and reveal his complete and
total ignorance, and expose his countless excuses to avoid getting
Nuremberged®, took time out of his busy schedule of felching his
mother for spending money and then masturbating to kiddie porn to lie
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
I can see why you envy WHITE people and their ethics, integrity and
morals...
We can see why YOU do. I bet it really stung to find out that Hitler
considered you less than an animal.

Of course, so do the animals.

[chuckle]


"Don't ask me questions!"

-Poor dumb anal Razovic,
each time he was asked how he would
like me to prove my name
and where I live.

"I think Asians are objectively superior to Whites by just about any measure that you can come up with in terms of what are the ingredients for a successful society."
-Jared Taylor, White Nationalist "scholar" and Gordon's Hero.

"As for the ridiculous hundred million Slavs, we will mould the best of them as we see fit, and we will isolate the rest of them in their own pig-styes; and anyone who talks about cherishing the local inhabitants and civilising them, goes straight off into a concentration camp!"
Adolph Hitler, speaking about Slavic Untermensch like Gordon, 6 August 1942.


happy zombie about retarded Razovic:
"i always wondered what would happen if somone with an iq well under 100
posted to usenet. now i know."
MID: <***@4ax.com>

"Gordon? Who the fuck is Gordon??? Och aye the noo!"
- Gordon, after an especially heavy night of glue huffing and sodomizing himself.
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>

"Population of earth: 7,442,000,000,000
Number of people superior to Gordon: 7,441,999,999,999"

Iudaeis rectores orbis terrarum
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-09-07 13:43:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 04:43:04 -0700, Klaun 'Unglück' Shittinb'ricks
<***@world-infestation.org> wrote:

Grüss Gott, Unglück!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
I can see why you envy WHITE people and their ethics, integrity and
morals...
You can see why *I* do. You bet it really stung to find out that Hitler
considered us less than animals.
Of course, the animals were not surprised.
Of COURSE, Unglück!

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)
- -

" I don't even have the heart to tell him I've never infested
Arizona."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he lied
from the very beginning, A jew scam, as expected

Iudaei orbem terrarum infestant.
- correct Latin

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
The Peeler
2017-09-07 16:42:07 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 06:43:07 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by The Jews
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
I can see why you envy WHITE people and their ethics, integrity and
morals...
We can see why YOU do. I bet it really stung to find out that Hitler
considered you less than an animal.
Of course, so do the animals.
[chuckle]
Of COURSE, my Unglück! But why do you have to rub it in?
Because it's FUN to do, you inferior Slavic cretin!
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
Anal Razovic's motto:
"An enema for every constipated anus."
MID: <***@4ax.com>
Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson"/etc)
2017-09-08 17:51:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
A shiteating cowardly nazoid sub-louse PEDO named Andrew "Andrzej"
Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson"/etc") wrote:

[sub-drivel flushed]

Go peddle some more defective, (pirated?) software, Andrzej...

<quote>

Original Microsoft CD in jewel case with CD key sticker on the back.
Full version.
GBP 30=00 incl recorded delivery postage.
(sorry, spamtrap in original message)
e-mail to: ***@ukgateway.net

</quote>

"LOMP"!

Sick old pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Ron Jacobson"/etc)
2017-08-31 15:00:21 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Make that LOL^2!
The Peeler
2017-08-31 15:59:46 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 06:51:28 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
What else is he going to do?
Michael
Good question!
he is afraid to answer.
Michael
COWARDICE being her hallmark!
Cowardice, dishonesty, and invincible ignorance are hallmarks of Nazi
nithings.
Ainlungus, depravity and invincible judenliebe are hallmarks of slant
eyed shabbos goy assholes such as you, dreckgook.
What a LOAD of sick psychotic BULLSHIT again!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
More from dumb anal Goran Razovic's anal world:
"In excremento veritas."
MID: <***@4ax.com>
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-08-27 13:10:16 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:58:00 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
[FLUHS Grik skata]

Watch, it anus!
Post by Michael Ejercito
he is afraid to answer.
Michael
YOU are afraid to take your slimy gook tongue out of the collective
jew rectum!

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)
- -

" I don't even have the heart to tell him I've never infested
Arizona."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he lied
from the very beginning, A jew scam, as expected

Iudaei orbem terrarum infestant.
- correct Latin

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
The Peeler
2017-08-27 17:58:13 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 06:10:16 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Dreckserb, stop projecting your OWN faggotry onto all those that are
superior to you and straight and sane unlike you!
What else is he going to do?
Michael
Good question!
he is afraid to answer.
Michael
YOU are afraid to take your slimy gook tongue out of the collective
jew rectum!
Dreckserb, stop projecting your OWN faggotry onto all those that are
superior to you and straight and sane unlike you!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
Shadow to deviated subnormal G. Razovic:
"Your brain has yet to develop from licking mens
arseholes to female vaginas."
MID: <57584081$0$3636$b1db1813$***@news.astraweb.com>
jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
2017-08-22 14:14:29 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:39:43 -0700, "NOT Michael Ejercito"
[FLUHS Grik skata]

Watch, it anus!
Post by Michael Ejercito
What else is he going to do?
Michael
What else are YOU going to do apart from carrying on zsucking jew
ani/recti?

Cheers!

RJ (preferred jew aliash)

- -

"We CAN hide forever."
- Klaun Shittinb'ricks (1940 - ), acknowledging that he will
NEVER prove where he infests or give his real jew name

Iudaei orbem terrarum infestant.
- correct Latin

"Die Juden sind unser Unglück!"
- Heinrich von Treitschke (1834 - 1896)

"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out
because I was not a Socialist. Then they came for the Trade
Unionists, and I did not speak out because I was not a Trade
Unionist. Then they came for the jews, and I did not speak out
because I did not give a shit. Then they came for me and there
wasn't a single commie bastard left to speak for me."
- Martin Niemöller (1892 - 1984)

Illuc nisi Dei gratia vadam.
- Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe (? - )
The Peeler
2017-08-22 16:16:34 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 07:14:29 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Post by The Peeler
Dreckserb, stop projecting your OWN faggotry onto all those that are
superior to you and straight and sane unlike you!
What else is he going to do?
Michael
What else are YOU going to do apart from carrying on zsucking jew
ani/recti?
Like I said, dreckserb: stop projecting your OWN faggotry onto all those
that are superior to you and straight and sane unlike you!
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
"The Jews" with regard to dumb anal Razovic:
"Population of earth: 7,442,000,000,000
Number of people superior to Gordon: 7,441,999,999,999"
MID: <***@4ax.com>

LOL
The Peeler
2017-08-15 18:01:11 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Tue, 15 Aug 2017 06:07:26 -0700, serbian bitch Razovic, the resident
psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, making an ass
of herself as "jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry'
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Post by Michael Ejercito
Mangina, you yet again fail to address the content of the post.
Michael
Dreckgook, greek the post, greek its content, greek the poster and
greek you, you slant eyed mongoloid.
Dreckserb, instead, your "life" keeps "greeking" YOU ...and obviously VERY
hard, EVERY day! <VBG>
Post by jew pedophile Ron Jacobson (jew pedophile Baruch 'Barry' Shein's jew aliash)
Cheers!
BTW, "cheers"??? Is that what you say when you are about to swallow nazi
jizz, you housebound cocksucking wanker? <BG>
--
"The Jews" with regard to dumb anal Razovic:
"Population of earth: 7,442,000,000,000
Number of people superior to Gordon: 7,441,999,999,999"
MID: <***@4ax.com>

LOL
Carolina Reb
2017-08-14 22:29:33 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://ethicsalarms.com/2017/08/13/ethics-observations-on-the-charlottesville-riots/
Ethics Observations On The Charlottesville Riots
Is there a clear, complete, objective account of what happened in
Charlottesville? I can’t find one. I have read about “clashes” between
protesters and “counter-protesters,” who we are told outnumbered the white
nationalist group protesting the removal of General Lee’s statue by about
2-1. What does that mean? Was the white nationalist rally peaceful,
regardless of the racist slogans they were hurling? Were the
counter-protesters just shouting back, or more physical? I see references to
the “fray.” What fray? The key word seems to be that the white nationalists
“sparked’ violence by marching. Do we now say that the civil rights marchers
in Selma sparked the violence, and not the counter-protest racists. or is
the theory that which ever group has the less popular position “sparks” the
violence?
My suspicions are that the vagueness of the news media reports is a
deliberate effort by the news media to avoid assigning any responsibility to
Antifa thugs for the escalation into violence.
Obviously the automobile driven into the anti-white nationalist, counter
protest crowd was a criminal act. Since this was done by the racists, it
became the focus of all news reports, as if this was the only violence.
Was it? Somehow I doubt that.
Again, a counter-protest group “incites violence” as much as a protest
group. The reaction from the news media and the political pundits appears to
ignore the basic fact that Americans have the right to demonstrate and
express their support for repugnant ideas as well as ideas most of us
approve of. This was settled (I thought) with National Socialist Party of
America v. Village of Skokie, 432 U.S. 43 (1977).
Apparently not.
“We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of
hatred, bigotry and violence, on many sides. On many sides. It’s been going
on for a long time in our country. Not Donald Trump, not Barack Obama. This
has been going on for a long, long time…We ALL must be united & condemn all
that hate stands for. There is no place for this kind of violence in
America. Lets come together as one!”
The immediate reaction by the newsmedia was that the statement asserted a
false equivalency. CNN’s Chris Cillizza wrote,
“Both sides don’t scream racist and anti-Semitic things at people with whom
they disagree. They don’t base a belief system on the superiority of one
race over others. They don’t get into fistfights with people who don’t see
things their way. They don’t create chaos and leave a trail of injured
behind them. Arguing that “both sides do it” deeply misunderstands the hate
and intolerance at the core of this “Unite the Right” rally. These people
are bigots. They are hate-filled. This is not just a protest where things,
unfortunately, got violent. Violence sits at the heart of their warped
belief system.”
Both sides do “do it,” however, and when “it” is violence and refusal to
allow a group with opposing views make their statements, there is no high
ground. The starting point from the left is “the white nationalists are
wrong, so they don’t deserve the same rights we do.” Yes, they do, and among
those rights is the opportunity to protest whatever they choose without
being attacked. “These people are bigots.” So what? They have the right to
express their views. “They are hate-filled.” And the counter-protesters were
not “hate-filled”? Or was the President supposed to distinguish that as good
hate?
David Gergen on CNN was even worse. “[The President] made it very, very
clear by equating the violence on both sides as being sort of equivalent to
each other…,” Gergen said. “He’s made it very clear he’s going to defend to
the extent that he feels he can- people who are radical extremists and I
think that’s a terrible mistake on his part.”
Note what these words mean. Gergen says that the President should make it
“clear” that violence against white nationalists is better violence than
when white nationalists strike out at those trying to disrupt their protest.
The duty of the President is to protect the Constitution, and the
Constitution says that even radical extremists have civil rights. It also
says the government shouldn’t restrict those rights, and the Supreme Court
says this means the government shouldn’t officially chill one group of
citizens’ freedom of protest and expression.
Does that mean a President shouldn’t say it’s all right for one group to
express hate and use violence because the United States of America approves
of its position, while a group with less favored views will be held to a
different standard? Yes, it does. But this is exactly what President Trump
is being criticized for not saying, by Gergen, Cillizza and others.
Gergen’s interviewer, Ana Cabrera, began by describing the white
nationalists as a hate group that “incites violence.” False. As a matter of
law, a group does not incite violence by stating an unpopular position that
makes others want to attack it.
This is the First Amendment cancelling trick used to censor conservative
speakers on campuses: “You can’t speak because your awful ideas will make
people hurt you.”
Over on Fox News, former governor and Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee
was right for a change, saying about Trump’s remarks,
“And so what is he supposed to say? Is he supposed to do what Barack Obama
used to do and jump to conclusions and make a decision like he did in
Ferguson, Missouri, which turned out to be totally untrue? The President has
to be careful in taking steps. I thought what he condemned was what we all
could immediately condemn and that was the violence, the car some coward in
a car drove into innocent people to try and kill them. And he condemned
that! What else is he supposed to do at that point?”
Huckabee is correct that Obama habitually jumped into local law enforcement
matters and started declaring heroes and villains before the evidence was
in. This is not the President’s role, and is in fact an abuse of power and
position.
In contrast to the President’s correct restraint, we have Virginia’s
governor Terry McAuliffe, who used the power and influence of his office to
declare that people holding views he does not approve of are not welcome in
the Old Dominion. In the midst of some patriotic grandstanding, he said…
“You are not wanted in this great commonwealth. Shame on you….There is no
place for you here. There is no place for you in America.”
This is leftist fascism, by definition. Who is Terry McAuliffe, or Virginia,
or anyone, to say who can or should have a “place” in the United States of
America? How is this statement applied to white nationalists any different
legally or ethically from applying it to Muslims, or lesbians, or abortion
advocates, or Catholics, Jews or libertarians?
It isn’t. The entire point of the Bill of Rights is that the government does
not get to tell us what to thing, what we can chant, what we can protest,
and where we can live.
McAuliffe just proved Trump’s point.
UKs American colonies were on the wrong
track from the start. Newly independent
UK colony constitution declared livestock
(slaves) one-fifth of a person. How absurd!
What about the rest of the livestock? Cows?
Horses? Pigs? Should they have been counted
as one-fifth of a person also? USofA was
doomed from the very start.


The Peeler
2017-08-14 22:40:03 UTC
Permalink
Raw Message
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 15:29:33 -0700 (PDT), our resident senile nazi homo,
"All Bark & No Bite", aka Humpin Hampton, aka Caroloony Reb, the subnormal
moron and attested schizo from the States, wrote:

<FLUSH the disgusting senile nazi homo swine's usual disgusting sick nazi
homo bullshit unread>

Fuck off to your homegroup, you disgusting senile nazi homo swine!

F'up
--
Caroloony KEEPS revealing her homosexuality:
"Seeking Kinky Single Males"
MID: <539bd0e0-55d2-4ed5-9689-***@googlegroups.com>
Loading...