Discussion:
First Circuit Court of Appeals: No Right to Bear Arms Outside the Home in Massachusetts
Add Reply
Michael Ejercito
2018-11-07 13:18:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/11/kat-ainsworth/first-circuit-court-of-appeals-no-right-to-bear-arms-outside-the-home-in-massachusetts/

First Circuit Court of Appeals: No Right to Bear Arms Outside the Home in
Massachusetts
BY KAT AINSWORTH |NOV 06, 2018 |91 COMMENTS
FACEBOOK


“(T)he First Circuit of the US Court of Appeals ruled that the right to
self-defense is at its “zenith inside the home,” and the right is “plainly
more circumscribed” outside.


“The “core right” protected by the Second Amendment is for citizens to use
arms in defense of home, the court said in its decision. “Public carriage of
firearms for self-defense falls outside the perimeter of this core right.”

“The state’s firearms license statute “takes into account the heightened
needs of some individuals to carry firearms for self-defense and balances
those needs” against public safety demands, the court added.” – Gintautas
Dumcius in Firearm restrictions in Boston and Brookline don’t violate Second
Amendment, appeals court says



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
max headroom
2018-11-07 16:05:23 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/11/kat-ainsworth/first-circuit-court-of-appeals-no-right-to-bear-arms-outside-the-home-in-massachusetts/
First Circuit Court of Appeals: No Right to Bear Arms Outside the Home in
Massachusetts
BY KAT AINSWORTH |NOV 06, 2018 |91 COMMENTS
FACEBOOK
"(T)he First Circuit of the US Court of Appeals ruled that the right to
self-defense is at its "zenith inside the home," and the right is "plainly
more circumscribed" outside.
"The "core right" protected by the Second Amendment is for citizens to use
arms in defense of home, the court said in its decision. "Public carriage of
firearms for self-defense falls outside the perimeter of this core right."
"The state's firearms license statute "takes into account the heightened
needs of some individuals to carry firearms for self-defense and balances
those needs" against public safety demands, the court added." - Gintautas
Dumcius in Firearm restrictions in Boston and Brookline don't violate Second
Amendment, appeals court says
Ya have to wonder what part of "self-defense" the court doesn't understand.
Mr. B1ack
2018-11-07 23:15:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:05:23 -0800, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/11/kat-ainsworth/first-circuit-court-of-appeals-no-right-to-bear-arms-outside-the-home-in-massachusetts/
First Circuit Court of Appeals: No Right to Bear Arms Outside the Home in
Massachusetts
BY KAT AINSWORTH |NOV 06, 2018 |91 COMMENTS
FACEBOOK
"(T)he First Circuit of the US Court of Appeals ruled that the right to
self-defense is at its "zenith inside the home," and the right is "plainly
more circumscribed" outside.
"The "core right" protected by the Second Amendment is for citizens to use
arms in defense of home, the court said in its decision. "Public carriage of
firearms for self-defense falls outside the perimeter of this core right."
"The state's firearms license statute "takes into account the heightened
needs of some individuals to carry firearms for self-defense and balances
those needs" against public safety demands, the court added." - Gintautas
Dumcius in Firearm restrictions in Boston and Brookline don't violate Second
Amendment, appeals court says
Ya have to wonder what part of "self-defense" the court doesn't understand.
Yankee lefties can't even spell it. They think it's
your duty to be hacked to death waiting for the
cops to get finished at the doughnut shop.
max headroom
2018-11-08 00:13:04 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:05:23 -0800, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/11/kat-ainsworth/first-circuit-court-of-appeals-no-right-to-bear-arms-outside-the-home-in-massachusetts/
First Circuit Court of Appeals: No Right to Bear Arms Outside the Home in
Massachusetts
BY KAT AINSWORTH |NOV 06, 2018 |91 COMMENTS
FACEBOOK
"(T)he First Circuit of the US Court of Appeals ruled that the right to
self-defense is at its "zenith inside the home," and the right is "plainly
more circumscribed" outside.
"The "core right" protected by the Second Amendment is for citizens to use
arms in defense of home, the court said in its decision. "Public carriage of
firearms for self-defense falls outside the perimeter of this core right."
"The state's firearms license statute "takes into account the heightened
needs of some individuals to carry firearms for self-defense and balances
those needs" against public safety demands, the court added." - Gintautas
Dumcius in Firearm restrictions in Boston and Brookline don't violate Second
Amendment, appeals court says
Ya have to wonder what part of "self-defense" the court doesn't understand.
Yankee lefties can't even spell it. They think it's
your duty to be hacked to death waiting for the
cops to get finished at the doughnut shop.
Well hell, they got a strong union, ya know?
Mr. B1ack
2018-11-08 06:29:03 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 16:13:04 -0800, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Post by Mr. B1ack
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:05:23 -0800, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/11/kat-ainsworth/first-circuit-court-of-appeals-no-right-to-bear-arms-outside-the-home-in-massachusetts/
First Circuit Court of Appeals: No Right to Bear Arms Outside the Home in
Massachusetts
BY KAT AINSWORTH |NOV 06, 2018 |91 COMMENTS
FACEBOOK
"(T)he First Circuit of the US Court of Appeals ruled that the right to
self-defense is at its "zenith inside the home," and the right is "plainly
more circumscribed" outside.
"The "core right" protected by the Second Amendment is for citizens to use
arms in defense of home, the court said in its decision. "Public carriage of
firearms for self-defense falls outside the perimeter of this core right."
"The state's firearms license statute "takes into account the heightened
needs of some individuals to carry firearms for self-defense and balances
those needs" against public safety demands, the court added." - Gintautas
Dumcius in Firearm restrictions in Boston and Brookline don't violate Second
Amendment, appeals court says
Ya have to wonder what part of "self-defense" the court doesn't understand.
Yankee lefties can't even spell it. They think it's
your duty to be hacked to death waiting for the
cops to get finished at the doughnut shop.
Well hell, they got a strong union, ya know?
Hey, policing is *dangerous* ... no point in rushing
into anything dontchknow. Give the perp plenty of
time to finish chopping-up the victims and leave
the scene :-)

That's LeftyWorld for ya.
tRudy Crayola
2018-11-08 08:36:57 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by max headroom
Post by Mr. B1ack
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:05:23 -0800, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/11/kat-ainsworth/first-circuit-court-of-appeals-no-right-to-bear-arms-outside-the-home-in-massachusetts/
First Circuit Court of Appeals: No Right to Bear Arms Outside the Home in
Massachusetts
BY KAT AINSWORTH |NOV 06, 2018 |91 COMMENTS
FACEBOOK
"(T)he First Circuit of the US Court of Appeals ruled that the right to
self-defense is at its "zenith inside the home," and the right is "plainly
more circumscribed" outside.
"The "core right" protected by the Second Amendment is for citizens to use
arms in defense of home, the court said in its decision. "Public carriage of
firearms for self-defense falls outside the perimeter of this core right."
"The state's firearms license statute "takes into account the heightened
needs of some individuals to carry firearms for self-defense and balances
those needs" against public safety demands, the court added." - Gintautas
Dumcius in Firearm restrictions in Boston and Brookline don't violate Second
Amendment, appeals court says
Ya have to wonder what part of "self-defense" the court doesn't understand.
Yankee lefties can't even spell it. They think it's
your duty to be hacked to death waiting for the
cops to get finished at the doughnut shop.
Well hell, they got a strong union, ya know?
Usually Teamsters. And not about to piss off their fellow teamsters in
the Gangsters chapter.
--
Rudy's Nut & Fruit farm- Sacramento
dolf
2018-11-08 13:48:25 UTC
Reply
Permalink
— AMERICAN MAGGOTS INVADE OZ GROUP IN TIME FOR ANOTHER #419 - SLAUGHTER:

Clearly the American MAGGOTS had invaded the AUSTRALIAN GROUPS because they
sensed another #419 - SLAUGHTER in their own country for the sacrifice upon
the altar of political opportunism.

THE NEO-NAZI was observed making identical CONTENT within *TARGETED*
unrelated COMMENT
Keep the propaganda up lads—but can’t Americans solve some of your problems
without Australian assistance.
There has just been another shooting reported on the breaking news as
another American expressing their opinion...
Man caught after five days on run after Perth Halloween shooting
https://www.watoday.com.au/national/western-australia/man-caught-after-five-days-on-run-after-perth-halloween-shooting-20181105-p50e0o.html
He will face Armadale Magistrates Court on Monday charged with, with
intent to harm did an act which endangered the life of a person,
possess unlicensed firearm, possess unlicensed ammunition, discharge a
firearm to cause fear, possess a prohibited drug (methylamphetamine)
and no authority to drive.
Meth would explain why so many Aussies in aus.politics are the way
they are. Might explain Fran's looks and Dechucka's defense of
antifa.
All the way with LBJ
- dolf
How does them having a public meeting allow for the antifa to react?
The leftists have a right to protest the Nazis' assembly.
IN WARNING ABOUT FAR-RIGHT IN EUROPE, MACRON MENTIONS HITLER

<https://www.voanews.com/a/in-warning-about-far-right-in-europe-macron-mentions-hitler/4646243.html>

Well said Mr Macron and I draw your attention between the nexus actions of
a demiurge upon 9 June 2018:

#289 as [#5, #70, #9, #200, #5] = `atarah (H5850): {UMBRA: #7 as #284 % #41
= #38} 1) *CROWN*, *WREATH*;

UMBRA: #284 % #41 = #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching: H62
- Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the
small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence;

And the removal of #312 - DRIED WREATHS upon 5 November 2018:

***@zen: 3, row: 6, col: 7, nous: 74 [Date: 2018.11.5, Super: #506 /
#38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching: H62 - Minor
Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the small,
Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence, Ego: #512 / #74 - Controlling
Feelings, Overcome Delusion; I-Ching: H29 - The Constant Sink Hole, Gorge,
The abyss, Repeated entrapment; Tetra: 80 - Labouring]

As considerations which can only be determined by my Intellectual Property
whereby we are able to produce JSON objects which define the human sapient
cognitive function:

<‪http://www.grapple369.com/objects/gizmo.json‬>

The central premise for ontic necessity as moral prescriptive and
epistemological impetus for the syncretic process of knowledge articulation
(I hope that I have said it correctly):

<‪http://www.grapple369.com/objects/obligans.json‬>

The gestational #288 - UMBRAL schematics of chimeric opportunism which
circumscribes the wicked heterodox iniquity as the blasphemy of
Institutional religious belief such as Roman Catholicism / Islam etc:

<http://www.grapple369.com/objects/umbra.json>

The predominant transformation prototypes which provide a cogent unity of
apperception with our perennialist antiquity:

<‪http://www.grapple369.com/objects/transform-prototypes.json‬>

Individual sapience has a prerogative over the religious economy which is
established upon a binomial apparatus of Institutional religious belief,
non-belief or disbelief.

To say nothing of PRINCIPLES such as which are embodied within the
CONSTITUTION by benevolence of Queen Victoria’s Letters Patent 29 October
1900.

WE HAVE NEVER HEARD ANY RELIGIONISTS SPEAK OF #902 - RULE OF LAW: EGALITE /
#492 - VOLUNTARY FREE WILL: LIBERTÉ or #391 - HOMOGENEOUS CIVIL SOCIETY:
FRATERNITÉ.

#2184 - (#390 + #312 + #390) = #1092 as ‘OTH CYCLE of 3 x #364 / 4 = #273 -
*MOMENT*

#364 - ADMITTANCE +
#312 - RESISTANCE {*DRIED* *WREATHS* / RUSSIAN CONTRADICTIONS ON NOVICHOK
#274 - PERFUME POISONING} +
#728 - REACTANCE +
#390 - BRITISH CROWN (CALENDAR (NEW STYLE) ACT 1750 / ROYAL ASSENT: 27 MAY
1751) / AMERICAN INDEPENDENCE (4 JULY 1776) +
#390 - *WREATHS* / ROBBERS / EXTORTION = #2184 {#24 x #7 x #13 - PRIESTLY
SERVICE DIVISIONS TO JERUSALEM TEMPLE FROM 1550 BCE - [LUKE 1:5]}

That it is true to say all such religious beliefs are established upon
tenuous foundations and their day of judgement is coming.

Our State Attorney General can take no action because the Victorian
Government entered caretaker mode @ 1800 hours on 30 October 2018.

Such that my #390 - WREATH initiative @ 0300 hours on 27 October 2018 and
supporting actions alone will have to carry the day.

In that regard the Legal Practice was entirely reckless...

The anonymous poster is as a jingoist engaged within psychosexual
prejudices as falsehoods and irrationality undeniably a neo-Nazi.

To say nothing of PRINCIPLES such as the CONSTITUTION

WE HAVE NEVER HEARD YOU SPEAK OF #902 - RULE OF LAW: EGALITE / #492 -
VOLUNTARY FREE WILL: LIBERTÉ or #391 - HOMOGENEOUS CIVIL SOCIETY:
FRATERNITÉ

HEY YANKY IS THAT A GUN IN YOUR POCKET AS CONFEDERATE AMBITION YOU STILL
HAVE?

YOUTUBE: "Battle Hymn of the Republic"



Too bad you were on the wrong side and such a tune means two-hoots {ie.
don't give a shit} to you...

What a stupid ignorant prick you are—that poem was written in response to
an American veteran as a rampant rabid neo-Nazi troll named EDMUND BURKE
and such is conveyed by the term “hawt”

It’s an entendre poem as prognostication (eg. Pumpkin 🎃 as Halloween and
NUN being the TOAD Catholic who is currently 3 November 2018 being expelled
from the Phillipines for disrespect to #902 - RULE OF LAW (*CATHOLICS*
*LIKE* - *ISIS* *BELIEVE**THEY* *ARE* *SUPERIOR* *TO* *SUCH*) — do your own
Google search for how long ago it was written but here is a clue 28 March,
2017) which is beyond your intellectual capability and hence why you have
resorted to a sexual context...

It’s the human equivalent of mad cows disease and they cannot be reasoned
with.

Such that a bullet to the head for TREASON is the only logical and humane
outcome for them and we owe such to the #288 - REMEMBRANCE of our WAR DEAD
in this CENTENNIAL MEMORIAL YEAR 2018...

Your Kernel Edmund Burke says “CEASE YOUR MASTICATION OF PROCRASTINATION
AND GIVE SOME SERVICE TODAY.”

Such matters of gravitas are not to be trifled with by glib “blows boys”
vacuity made of SUI JURIS / MEMBRUM VIRILE entitlements ...

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/>

— ODE TO TRUMP'S FANNY —

"WHAT A *COZE*
IS THIS BIZ;
YANK MY HOSE;
FOR SOME JIZ;

I'M A GRUNT
SHE A TOAD.
DRY OLD ***@NT
TILL I LOAD.

SHE'S A NUN
WHAT A PUMPKIN
SO MUCH FUN
AT THE ***@MPKIN

HITS THE SPOT
JUST TO DUMP
AWFULLY HAWT
T'IS MY FRUMP."

*COZE*
- a friendly talk, a chat;
- to converse in a friendly way;
- [French origin of 1820-30]: derived from causer to chat, Old French: to
reason, expound; from Latin: causārī to plead a cause, plead as an excuse,
derivative of causa cause;
- Word of the Day for 28 March, 2017; Courtesy: www.dictionary.com

REDUCTIO AD TRUMPIUM@{
@1: Sup: 5 (#5); Ego: 73 (#73),
@2: Sup: 2 (#7); Ego: 39 (#112),
@3: Sup: 43 (#50); Ego: 22 (#134),
@4: Sup: 45 (#95); Ego: 64 (#198),
@5: Sup: 3 (#98); Ego: 46 (#244),
@6: Sup: 4 (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}); Ego: 49 (#293),
@7: Sup: 29 (#131); Ego: 55 (#348),
@8: Sup: 10 (#141); Ego: 64 (#412),
@9: Sup: 63 (#204); Ego: 49 (#461),
@10: Sup: 36 (#240); Ego: 47 (#508),
@11: Sup: 2 (#242); Ego: 54 (#562),
@12: Sup: 58 (#300); Ego: 57 (#619),
@13: Sup: 70 (#370); Ego: 44 (#663),
@14: Sup: 38 (#408); Ego: 69 (#732),
@15: Sup: 65 (#473); Ego: 69 (#801),
@16: Sup: 37 (#510); Ego: 8 (#809),
@17: Sup: 1 (#511); Ego: 16 (#825),
Male: #511; Feme: #825
}

AARON KATERSKY (ABC NEWS) @ 1416 HOURS (ET) ON 2 NOVEMBER 2018: “ALEC
BALDWIN ARRESTED AFTER PUNCHING STRANGER IN FIGHT OVER PARKING SPOT:

— ARSE BANDITS —
[Written 14 June 2017]

"YEAH BROILJAB
HOUSE OF NEEDLES? {#810 - FOR EXPLANATION SEE BELOW}
PARK IT HERE
SLICE AND STAB
BUNCH OF WEASELS
NO LAW TO FEAR"

YOUTUBE: "SNL wishes you a 'Merry Christmas' from the Trump White House"



Actor Alec Baldwin is in police custody and expected to be charged with
assault after punching someone following what officials described as a
dispute near his East 10th Street home in New York City's East Village."
[<https://abcnews.go.com/US/News/alec-baldwin-charged-assault-york-allegedly-punching-domestic/story?id=58929828>]

EXCERPT FROM POEM BY CHRISTINE ROSSETTI PRIOR 1862 / ADAPTION BY DOLF BOEK
17 JUNE 2017 {@13 - #810 - *A* *NEEDLE* / IT WILL BE LATE TO COUNSEL THEN
OR PREY UPON IMPISH SCHEMES OF HELL}

SEE ALSO: "SAME SEX MARRIAGE / LEST WE FORGET / WORLD WAR ONE CENTENNIAL
2018 / SUGGESTED CAUSE FOR NEEDLES IN STRAWBERRY FOOD CONTAMINATION"

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Strawberry%20Needle%20Food%20Contamination.pdf>

G3860@{
   @1: Sup: 80 (#80); Ego: 80 (#80),
   @2: Sup: 81 (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 1 (#81),
   @3: Sup: 19 (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19});
Ego: 19 (#100),
   @4: Sup: 24 (#204); Ego: 5 (#105),
   @5: Sup: 28 (#232); Ego: 4 (#109),
   @6: Sup: 17 (#249); Ego: 70 (#179),
   @7: Sup: 55 (#304); Ego: 38 (#217),
   @8: Sup: 56 (#360); Ego: 1 (#218),
   @9: Sup: 25 (#385); Ego: 50 (#268),
   Male: #385; Feme: #268
} // #511

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #1050 % #41 = #25 - What's behind it all?, Imaging the Mysterious;
I-Ching: H62 - Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding,
Preponderance of the small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 10 - Defectiveness,
Distortion;

THOTH MEASURE: #25 - Oh high-voiced one, who makest thy appearance in
Unsit; *I* *AM* *NOT* *BOISTEROUS* *IN* *BEHAVIOUR*.

    #VIRTUE: Contention (no. #25) means the shih are impartial.
    #TOOLS: Inner (no. #65) means the women are partial.
    #POSITION: With Going to Meet (no. #42), one knows what preceded.
    #TIME: With Eternal (no. #53), one sees the later issue.
    #CANON: #185

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_185@{
   @1: Sup: 25 (#25); Ego: 25 (#25),
   @2: Sup: 9 (#34); Ego: 65 (#90),
   @3: Sup: 51 (#85); Ego: 42 (#132),
   @4: Sup: 23 (#108); Ego: 53 (#185 - I AM NOT BOISTEROUS IN BEHAVIOUR
{%25}),
   Male: #108; Feme: #185
} // #185

#511 as [#80, #1, #100, #5, #4, #70, #200, #1, #50] = paradidomi (G3860):
{UMBRA: #24 as #1050 % #41 = #25} 1) to give into the hands (of another);
2) to give over into (one's) power or use; 3) to commit, to commend; 4) to
deliver verbally; 5) to permit allow; 2a) to deliver to one something to
keep, use, take care of, manage; 2b) *TO* *DELIVER* *UP* *ONE* *TO*
*CUSTODY*, *TO* *BE* *JUDGED*, *CONDEMNED*, *PUNISHED*, *SCOURGED*,
*TORMENTED*, *PUT* *TO* *DEATH*; 2c) to deliver up treacherously; 2c1) by
betrayal to cause one to be taken; 2c2) to deliver one to be taught,
moulded; 4a) commands, rites; 4b) to deliver by narrating, to report; 5a)
when the fruit will allow that is when its ripeness permits; 5b) gives
itself up, presents itself;

YOUTUBE: "Monty Python: What have the Romans ever done for us?"



"AND WHEN THEY WERE COME, THEY SAY UNTO HIM, MASTER, WE KNOW THAT THOU ART
TRUE, AND CAREST FOR NO MAN: FOR THOU REGARDEST NOT THE PERSON OF MEN, BUT
TEACHEST THE WAY OF GOD IN TRUTH: IS IT LAWFUL TO GIVE TRIBUTE TO CAESAR,
OR NOT?" [Mark 12:14 (KJV)]

<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/8%20Vinegarette%2020181031.pdf>

- dolf
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:05:23 -0800, "max headroom"
Post by Michael Ejercito
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/11/kat-ainsworth/first-circuit-court-of-appeals-no-right-to-bear-arms-outside-the-home-in-massachusetts/
First Circuit Court of Appeals: No Right to Bear Arms Outside the Home in
Massachusetts
BY KAT AINSWORTH |NOV 06, 2018 |91 COMMENTS
FACEBOOK
"(T)he First Circuit of the US Court of Appeals ruled that the right to
self-defense is at its "zenith inside the home," and the right is "plainly
more circumscribed" outside.
"The "core right" protected by the Second Amendment is for citizens to use
arms in defense of home, the court said in its decision. "Public carriage of
firearms for self-defense falls outside the perimeter of this core right."
"The state's firearms license statute "takes into account the heightened
needs of some individuals to carry firearms for self-defense and balances
those needs" against public safety demands, the court added." - Gintautas
Dumcius in Firearm restrictions in Boston and Brookline don't violate Second
Amendment, appeals court says
Ya have to wonder what part of "self-defense" the court doesn't understand.
Yankee lefties can't even spell it. They think it's
your duty to be hacked to death waiting for the
cops to get finished at the doughnut shop.
Well hell, they got a strong union, ya know?
Usually Teamsters. And not about to piss off their fellow teamsters in
the Gangsters chapter.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN*
*CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a
robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private “Saint Andrews” Street on the edge of the Central Business District
dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as
a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS as DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993),
first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie.
Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven
visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis
[James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to
extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS
REALITY OF HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO [iOS] SAPIEN [T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS
Michael Ejercito
2018-11-08 13:11:58 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Mr. B1ack
On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 08:05:23 -0800, "max headroom"
Post by max headroom
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/11/kat-ainsworth/first-circuit-court-of-appeals-no-right->>>to-bear-arms-outside-the-home-in-massachusetts/
First Circuit Court of Appeals: No Right to Bear Arms Outside the Home in
Massachusetts
BY KAT AINSWORTH |NOV 06, 2018 |91 COMMENTS
FACEBOOK
"(T)he First Circuit of the US Court of Appeals ruled that the right to
self-defense is at its "zenith inside the home," and the right is "plainly
more circumscribed" outside.
"The "core right" protected by the Second Amendment is for citizens to use
arms in defense of home, the court said in its decision. "Public carriage of
firearms for self-defense falls outside the perimeter of this core right."
"The state's firearms license statute "takes into account the heightened
needs of some individuals to carry firearms for self-defense and balances
those needs" against public safety demands, the court added." - Gintautas
Dumcius in Firearm restrictions in Boston and Brookline don't violate Second
Amendment, appeals court says
Ya have to wonder what part of "self-defense" the court doesn't understand.
Yankee lefties can't even spell it. They think it's
your duty to be hacked to death waiting for the
cops to get finished at the doughnut shop.
Indeed.

My longtime Usenet ally, Chris Morton, noted this.

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/11/kat-ainsworth/first-circuit-court-of-appeals-no-right-to-bear-arms-outside-the-home-in-massachusetts/#comment-4114858

1. As is the case everywhere in this country, police in MA have no legal
duty to protect you as an individual, no liability if they fail to protect
you as an individual and no physical ability in the first place. Depending
upon who you are, they may not even WANT to.

2. As usual, the unspoken motto is: “We don’t have to protect you and we won’t
let you protect yourself.”

3. Remember these things when you vote today.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
Michael Ejercito
2018-11-12 13:45:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2018/11/kat-ainsworth/first-circuit-court-of-appeals-no-right-to-bear-arms-outside-the-home-in-massachusetts/

First Circuit Court of Appeals: No Right to Bear Arms Outside the Home in
Massachusetts
BY KAT AINSWORTH |NOV 06, 2018 |91 COMMENTS
FACEBOOK


“(T)he First Circuit of the US Court of Appeals ruled that the right to
self-defense is at its “zenith inside the home,” and the right is “plainly
more circumscribed” outside.


“The “core right” protected by the Second Amendment is for citizens to use
arms in defense of home, the court said in its decision. “Public carriage of
firearms for self-defense falls outside the perimeter of this core right.”

“The state’s firearms license statute “takes into account the heightened
needs of some individuals to carry firearms for self-defense and balances
those needs” against public safety demands, the court added.” – Gintautas
Dumcius in Firearm restrictions in Boston and Brookline don’t violate Second
Amendment, appeals court says

Loading...