Discussion:
Holocaust Revisionism in 60 Seconds
Add Reply
Susan Cohen
2022-01-08 20:26:41 UTC
Reply
Permalink
By Thomas Dalton, PhD – Wake Up From Your Slumber Oct 27, 2012

On the traditional view, the Holocaust was the deliberate murder of
some 6 million Jews by the Nazi regime during World War II. Hitler’s
intention all along was to kill the Jews, and many died in
specially-constructed gas chambers. The corpses were burned in
crematoriums, and the ashes scattered. Some of the most infamous
extermination camps—Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec—were completely
dismantled and have all but vanished, as have the remains of the
victims.

Revisionists believe, on the other hand, that there was never an
intention to kill the Jews; rather, the Nazis simply wanted them out
of Germany. They believe that there were no homicidal gas chambers,
and that the number of Jews who died during the war, from all causes,
comes to less than 1 million—and perhaps only 500,000 or so.

Traditionalists call revisionists “Holocaust deniers,” because, they
say, the revisionists deny that the Holocaust happened. But this is
obviously a misleading claim. Revisionists accept that Hitler wanted
a Germany free of Jews, and that he forcibly removed many of them,
seized their property, and sent many others to labor camps. They also
accept that Hitler knew that many Jews would die in the process.
Depending on your definition, this could certainly count as a
“holocaust.” Revisionists do deny, however, that 6 million died, and
they do deny that the Nazis constructed homicidal gas chambers. They
do not deny that a tragedy happened to the Jews, nor do they deny that
many thousands of them died.

SOME TROUBLING FACTS
So, how can the average person begin to check these claims, to see
where the truth lies? Start with the “6 million” figure. How
plausible, in general, is this number? The war in Europe ran for
roughly 2,000 days (or 5½ years: Sept 1939 to April 1945). If the
Germans killed 6 million Jews, then they must have averaged 3,000 per
day—every day, 365 days a year, for five and a half straight years.
And of course they also must have burned, buried, or otherwise
disposed of those same 3,000 bodies per day. This fact, in itself,
seems highly implausible, especially given all the other urgencies of
war.

But isn’t the “6 million” figure documented in hundreds of history
books? The number itself is, but not the details. Given all we
supposedly know about this event, one would expect that there would be
a clear and concise breakdown of the number, showing roughly where,
and how, 6 million died. Experts like Raul Hilberg claim that there
are three main categories of deaths: camps (primarily the 6 main
“death camps”), shootings, and ghettos. So, the experts should be
able to show us how many died in camps, how many by shooting, and how
many in the ghettos—such that the numbers add up to 6 million. But
they cannot do this. The reader is invited to look at any mainstream
published source for this information; it does not exist. One can
find numbers individually for each camp, or each ghetto, but virtually
never any total to 6 million. This strongly implies that there are
serious problems with the overall picture.

Furthermore, the “6 million” number has a history that long precedes
WW2. One can find various accounts of “6 million suffering Jews” as
far back as the 1860s. In major newspapers like the New York Times
and the Times of London we find about 2 dozen occurrences of that
number in the six decades before Hitler even came to power (in 1933).
And it shows up another 2 dozen times before the end of the war—a
miracle if it were true. This all suggests that the number was more
symbolic than factual.

THE CONTEXT
The situation in Germany prior to 1933, back to at least the 1850s,
was of a dominant Jewish minority, vastly disproportional to their
size of 1-2% of the population. This is very well documented, for
press, entertainment, academia, and several sectors of business. Given
the tragedy of WWI and the crushing war reparations, among other
things, it is understandable that Hitler and others wanted to
completely remove the Jews from German society. And in fact this is,
apparently, all they ever wanted—ethnic cleansing. Hitler’s first
letter on the topic, from 1920, speaks directly to this need to remove
them. Same with all his speeches through the 1930s, even into the war
years.

Hitler, Goebbels, and others used words like vernichtung and
ausrottung, which are flamboyant terms for removal or elimination. But
they do not entail murder. The press always translates these terms in
English as ‘extermination’ or ‘annihilation,’ in a literal or physical
sense. But the press was doing that for decades before Hitler. NY
Times articles dating back to the 1870s decry the “extermination,”
“annihilation,”, and even “holocaust” against the Jews in various
countries—it really is striking how common this theme is. Again, one
senses that any action against Jews is portrayed in the harshest
possible terms.

THE GAS CHAMBERS
The gassing story is rife with problems. Allegedly, the Nazis crammed
up to two thousand people into enclosed rooms—some underground—and
dumped cyanide pellets on them. But this is senseless, because (a)
the rooms generally had neither windows or ventilation, to vent the
poisonous gas, (b) the pellets would keep emitting poison for hours,
killing anyone who went inside, and (c) there is no plausible way to
remove the bodies in a timely manner. The Dachau camp has, today, a
single gas chamber with two metal chutes for the gas pellets. However,
just 20 meters away are five delousing rooms (for clothing and bed
linens), each with a well-engineered cyanide gas circulation machine.
It makes no sense to use a ridiculous method to kill people, when a
proper one existed in the very same building.

And for all that, cyanide gas killed only about 1 million Jews, we are
told—all at Auschwitz. By contrast, more than 2 million were gassed
with “exhaust gas from diesel engines.” Not only is this even less
workable than gas pellets, but it is nearly impossible to kill someone
in any reasonable time with diesel exhaust—not enough carbon monoxide
in it. Some traditionalists now argue that they were gasoline
engines, with higher monoxide content. But this does not solve the
many practical problems and inefficiencies of pumping engine exhaust
gas, of any kind, into a sealed room.

Killing thousands per day is one problem; disposing of the bodies is
another. How do you completely eliminate a corpse? The usual line
is: burned in a crematorium. But the crematoria all were designed
with individual person ovens, and each took about an hour to burn one
body. All of Auschwitz had a total of about 50 ovens, and thus could
dispose of perhaps 50 x 20 hours = 1,000 bodies per day. And that’s
at the largest of all death camps. Smaller camps like Treblinka,
Sobibor, and Belzec had precisely zero ovens. Hence all the bodies,
we are told, were burned in the open air, over big log fires. But
this seems to be technically impossible, at the rate claimed—up to
6,500 per day.

Furthermore, crematoria and open-air fires create a lot of smoke—smoke
that would be visible from both ground and air. As it happens, we
have 10 reconnaissance air photos of Auschwitz from 1944. Of all
these, only one photo shows even a single smoking crematorium chimney.
Four photos show small fires burning, but only from one very small
corner of the camp. Evidence of mass burning is strikingly absent.

SURVIVORS?
But what about all the Holocaust witnesses? Well—what, after all, did
the victims witness? Enforced evacuation and encampment (true),
people dying en route (true), people catching typhus and dying in the
camps (true), dead bodies stacked in and around the crematoria (true),
people separated from family members and disappearing (true). And all
this amidst a major war. Such true facts get mixed with rumor and
wild speculation, and suddenly we get stories of 2,000 Jews getting
gassed in a basement of a crematorium, “5 million dead at Auschwitz”
(NY Times), “6 million exterminated,” etc. These are the kinds of
issues that true Holocaust researchers should be investigating.

Further Reading:
Dalton, Thomas. 2009. Debating the Holocaust: A New Look at Both
Sides. (debatingtheholocaust.com).

Rudolf, Germar. 2010. Lectures on the Holocaust.
(www.germarrudolf.com, or www.vho.org)

Rudolf, Germar. 2003. Dissecting the Holocaust (2nd ed.)
(www.germarrudolf.com, or www.vho.org)

Source
The Peeler
2022-01-08 20:42:14 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sat, 08 Jan 2022 15:26:41 -0500, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married
Post by Susan Cohen
By Thomas Dalton, PhD – Wake Up From Your Slumber Oct 27, 2012
Who's Thomas Dalton?

Oh, yeah! An author for National Vanguard!

BRUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!!

Who's Loose Sphincter, the gay nazi whore (FORGING as Susan Cohen)?

Check this:

Anti-virus firm AVG <***@avg.com> addressing Loose Sphincter on Usenet:

"Hello from AVG.

Please stop advertising us. We don't want to be associated with neo-Nazi
scum like you and RichA, no matter whether you use our product or not.

And fix your fucking sig separator!

Sincerely, AVG."
--
Loose Sphincter about his passion:
" I love eating the Shit out of Poor Helpless Dumb Goran Razovic! LOL"
MID: <***@4ax.com>
Dhu on Gate
2022-01-09 18:52:49 UTC
Reply
Permalink
The NAZIiest NAZI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Dirlewanger

Dhu
--
Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglaise.
C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-)
Susan Cohen
2022-01-09 19:15:56 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Dhu on Gate
The NAZIiest NAZI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Dirlewanger
Dhu
A true monster indeed; but he killed thousands,not millions. Revisionism
is NOT denial. We just don't accept the b.s. that everyone has been
forced to take as gospel.
Dhu on Gate
2022-01-09 19:51:38 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Post by Susan Cohen
Post by Dhu on Gate
The NAZIiest NAZI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Dirlewanger
Dhu
A true monster indeed; but he killed thousands,not millions. Revisionism
is NOT denial. We just don't accept the b.s. that everyone has been
forced to take as gospel.
The problem with your "revisions" is they don't fit
NAZI theory, let alone historic practice. NAZI *theory*
holds that it's OK to murder people to take their lands
and to use slaves to extinction, and that's what they did.

Dhu
--
Je suis Canadien. Ce n'est pas Francais ou Anglaise.
C'est une esp`ece de sauvage: ne obliviscaris, vix ea nostra voco;-)
The Peeler
2022-01-09 20:22:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:15:56 -0500, Loose Sphincter, the unhappily married
Post by Susan Cohen
Post by Dhu on Gate
The NAZIiest NAZI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oskar_Dirlewanger
Dhu
A true monster indeed; but he killed thousands,not millions. Revisionism
is NOT denial. We just don't accept the b.s. that everyone has been
forced to take as gospel.
"We", you delusional gay nazitard? There's no "we" you! NOBODY, but NOBODY,
identifies with you! Even your own anti-virus provider considered you scum!
Even your miserable wife considers you scum! LOL
--
Anti-virus firm AVG <***@avg.com> addressing Loose Sphincter on Usenet:

"Hello from AVG.

Please stop advertising us. We don't want to be associated with neo-Nazi
scum like you and RichA, no matter whether you use our product or not.

And fix your fucking sig separator!

Sincerely, AVG."
Loading...