Discussion:
More Kubrick? Proof Apollo Flag Was Added Later oh no! mommmmmmy!
(too old to reply)
Warhol
2012-04-17 13:47:18 UTC
Permalink
More Kubrick? Proof Apollo Flag Was Added Later oh no! mommmmmmy!


More Kubrick? Proof Apollo Flag Was Added Later
By Ted Twietmeyer
4-14-12

http://www.rense.com/general95/morekubrick.html


I found this staged photo in a UK documentary titled "IN HIS OWN WORDS:
BUZZ ALDRIN 40 YEARS LATER."

The flag pole absolutely has NO shadow. You can see the astronaut's
shadow, the large black Lunar Lander shadow in the background but no
shadow from the pole. This was clearly added to the photo later

Loading Image...

Above image was snipped without modification from source image. Flag was
clearly added to photo later (studio shot.)

Loading Image...

flag pole base enlarged.png Enlargement 300% with no other processing.
The anti-gravity flagpole stands on the Lunar surface with no shadow
without it being planted in the Moon's surface. Truly amazing. Jagged
line extending from the pole to the right edge is apparently from
footprints, not the pole itself. Bottom edge of pole is perfectly flat,
which would not happen if it was actually inserted into the Lunar surface

Loading Image...

Original unaltered screen capture from video "IN HIS OWN WORDS: BUZZ
ALDRIN 40 YEARS LATER." While UPI.com is shown

at


here by the network as the source for the photo, I doubt UPI did this.
They just used what NASA gave them.


Ted Twietmeyer
***@frontiernet.net


amazing ...that .. people still believe Lunatics...
Eugene Griessel
2012-04-17 14:44:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Warhol
More Kubrick? Proof Apollo Flag Was Added Later oh no! mommmmmmy!
BULLSHIT!!!!!!!


To report Warhol to the Belgian Police please use:
https://www.ecops.be/webforms/Default.aspx?Lang=EN

Holocaust denial and anti-semitism is a crime in Belgium,

to report him to his Usenet Service provider:
***@eternal-september.org

for inappropriate and off-topic posting.

A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
MarkA
2012-04-17 16:14:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Eugene Griessel
Post by Warhol
More Kubrick? Proof Apollo Flag Was Added Later oh no! mommmmmmy!
BULLSHIT!!!!!!!
https://www.ecops.be/webforms/Default.aspx?Lang=EN
Holocaust denial and anti-semitism is a crime in Belgium,
for inappropriate and off-topic posting.
A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
I would never report someone for holocaust denialism, or anti-semitism.
I would ridicule their beliefs, instead. I know that people can be
induced to believe pretty stupid shit, but outlawing such beliefs is no
solution.
--
MarkA
Keeper of Things Put There Only Just The Night Before
About eight o'clock
HVAC
2012-04-17 17:29:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by MarkA
Post by Eugene Griessel
A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
I would never report someone for holocaust denialism, or anti-semitism.
I would ridicule their beliefs, instead. I know that people can be
induced to believe pretty stupid shit, but outlawing such beliefs is no
solution.
As a pragmatic libertarian, I agree with you.

However, Warhole seems to be crying out for help.
Anyone reporting him is doing him a favor.
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl

Warhol
2012-04-17 18:22:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by HVAC
Post by MarkA
Post by Eugene Griessel
A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
I would never report someone for holocaust denialism, or anti-semitism.
I would ridicule their beliefs, instead. I know that people can be
induced to believe pretty stupid shit, but outlawing such beliefs is no
solution.
As a pragmatic libertarian, I agree with you.
However, Warhole seems to be crying out for help.
Anyone reporting him is doing him a favor.
And for what would you like to report me??? for posting threads about
NASA??? or Einstein a plagiarist? ha ha ha... you inglorious bastards
and lunatics have to stand up much sooner to make any case against this
baby lion, the fear of NASA and Fake yids pretending been Semites...
This while they are a breed of all kind of inglorious bastard belonging
to any race... converts who try to claim up a religion that doesn't
belong them and for that they are committing horrible crimes against the
Palestinians and claim up that land as their holy land without any
evidence that that holy land is even located there... and btw where is
the messiah who led them out all those lands where they lived under
heavy oppression... yeah where is the messiah of yids, who led the
exodus??... hah... yids you are standing on quick sand vs a warhol is
standing on Rock... and I says to you... I see you in hell... and I pity
you.

By the way I am only reposting an article I found on Rense.com... I am
not even the author of the original post... So why reporting me for just
because i put the subject for discussion up??? what law prohibits me of
asking questions or to discusses a subject??? can anyone explain...
Eugene Griessel
2012-04-17 18:26:36 UTC
Permalink
Op Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:22:55 +0200, Warhol <***@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Unbelievable pile of stinking PIGSHIT!


To report Warhol to the Belgian Police please use:
https://www.ecops.be/webforms/Default.aspx?Lang=EN

Holocaust denial and anti-semitism is a crime in Belgium,

to report him to his Usenet Service provider:
***@eternal-september.org

for inappropriate and off-topic posting.

A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
panamfloyd@hotmail.com rade
2012-04-17 20:27:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Warhol
Post by HVAC
Post by MarkA
Post by Eugene Griessel
A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
I would never report someone for holocaust denialism, or anti-semitism.
I would ridicule their beliefs, instead. I know that people can be
induced to believe pretty stupid shit, but outlawing such beliefs is no
solution.
As a pragmatic libertarian, I agree with you.
However, Warhole seems to be crying out for help.
Anyone reporting him is doing him a favor.
And for what would you like to report me???
For being mentally unstable. You need help before you hurt yourself--
or somebody else.

snip

-Panama Floyd, Atlanta.
aa#2015, Member Knights of BAAWA!
"..the prayer cloth of one aeon is the doormat of the next."
-Mark Twain

Religious societies are *less* moral than secular ones:
http://www.rationalist.com.au/archive/73/p20-27_paul_ar73_web.pdf
Tony Dragon
2012-04-17 20:37:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Warhol
Post by HVAC
Post by MarkA
Post by Eugene Griessel
A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
I would never report someone for holocaust denialism, or anti-semitism.
I would ridicule their beliefs, instead. I know that people can be
induced to believe pretty stupid shit, but outlawing such beliefs is no
solution.
As a pragmatic libertarian, I agree with you.
However, Warhole seems to be crying out for help.
Anyone reporting him is doing him a favor.
And for what would you like to report me??? for posting threads about
NASA??? or Einstein a plagiarist? ha ha ha... you inglorious bastards
and lunatics have to stand up much sooner to make any case against this
baby lion, the fear of NASA and Fake yids pretending been Semites...
This while they are a breed of all kind of inglorious bastard belonging
to any race... converts who try to claim up a religion that doesn't
belong them and for that they are committing horrible crimes against the
Palestinians and claim up that land as their holy land without any
evidence that that holy land is even located there... and btw where is
the messiah who led them out all those lands where they lived under
heavy oppression... yeah where is the messiah of yids, who led the
exodus??... hah... yids you are standing on quick sand vs a warhol is
standing on Rock... and I says to you... I see you in hell... and I pity
you.
By the way I am only reposting an article I found on Rense.com... I am
not even the author of the original post... So why reporting me for just
because i put the subject for discussion up??? what law prohibits me of
asking questions or to discusses a subject??? can anyone explain...
Is this post available in English?
Eugene Griessel
2012-04-17 20:40:09 UTC
Permalink
Op Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:37:57 +0100, Tony Dragon
Post by Tony Dragon
Post by Warhol
By the way I am only reposting an article I found on Rense.com... I am
not even the author of the original post... So why reporting me for just
because i put the subject for discussion up??? what law prohibits me of
asking questions or to discusses a subject??? can anyone explain...
Is this post available in English?
It not the Warhol fluent in English on duty it would appear - but the
more Dutch one.

Eugene L Griessel

"Cult today, religion tomorrow."
Warhol
2012-04-18 10:40:57 UTC
Permalink
Ha ha ha... you inglorious bastards are like hyena's turning around
me... beware I may bite you..


I THOUGHT THERE WERE 3-4 OR MORE PIGS REPLYING IN THE PAST!
YOU MAY BE CORRECT!
HE CERTAINLY IS INSANE ENOUGH TO SHOW MULTIPLE PERSONALITIES!
ALL FULL OF HATE, OF COURSE!
Saul Levy
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:40:09 +0200, Eugene Griessel
Post by Eugene Griessel
Op Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:37:57 +0100, Tony Dragon
Post by Tony Dragon
Post by Warhol
By the way I am only reposting an article I found on Rense.com... I am
not even the author of the original post... So why reporting me for just
because i put the subject for discussion up??? what law prohibits me of
asking questions or to discusses a subject??? can anyone explain...
Is this post available in English?
It not the Warhol fluent in English on duty it would appear - but the
more Dutch one.
Eugene L Griessel
"Cult today, religion tomorrow."
Eugene Griessel
2012-04-18 10:48:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Warhol
Ha ha ha... you inglorious bastards are like hyena's turning around
And you just love it you vainglorious bastard - seeing its the only
attention you are ever likely to get.
Post by Warhol
me... beware I may bite you..
Using what for teeth? The don't work in a vacuum you know.


To report Warhol to the Belgian Police please use:
https://www.ecops.be/webforms/Default.aspx?Lang=EN

Holocaust denial and anti-semitism is a crime in Belgium,

to report him to his Usenet Service provider:
***@eternal-september.org

for inappropriate and off-topic posting.

A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
Warhol
2012-04-18 16:17:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Eugene Griessel
Post by Warhol
Ha ha ha... you inglorious bastards are like hyena's turning around
And you just love it you vainglorious bastard - seeing its the only
attention you are ever likely to get.
Post by Warhol
me... beware I may bite you..
Using what for teeth?  The don't work in a vacuum you know.
To report Warhol to the Belgian Police please use:https://www.ecops.be/webforms/Default.aspx?Lang=EN
Holocaust denial and anti-semitism is a crime in Belgium,
for inappropriate and off-topic posting.
A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
You have been reported for spam and repetitive post...

"***@eternal-september.org"

Received: by 10.68.227.230 with SMTP id sd6mr2147266pbc.
8.1334746096706;
Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r9ni70102pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!
feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!
mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eugene Griessel <***@dynagen.co.za>
Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,alt.atheism,soc.culture.israel
Subject: Re: More Kubrick? Proof Apollo Flag Was Added Later oh no!
mommmmmmy!
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:48:24 +0200
Organization: Noordhoek Henge and Solstice Society
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <jmjs95$8r6$***@dont-email.me>
<***@4ax.com> <pan.
***@nowhere.invalid> <jmk990$otu
$***@hvac.motzarella.org> <jmkcdv$f10$***@dont-email.me>
<***@bt.com>
<***@4ax.com>
<***@4ax.com> <jmm5no$d7v$***@dont-
email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-
host="dlZKkJ2MdWDO8n65itupGA";
logging-data="15250"; mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-
september.org"; posting-
account="U2FsdGVkX18qaCQ5LDi1WyVTeiZwSxlug7vvOowJ0nM="
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652
Eugene Griessel
2012-04-18 16:21:26 UTC
Permalink
Op Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:17:01 -0700 (PDT), Warhol <***@hotmail.com>
wrote:



To report Warhol to the Belgian Police please use:
https://www.ecops.be/webforms/Default.aspx?Lang=EN

Holocaust denial and anti-semitism is a crime in Belgium,

to report him to his Usenet Service provider:
***@eternal-september.org

for inappropriate and off-topic posting.

A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
HVAC
2012-04-18 16:24:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Eugene Griessel
https://www.ecops.be/webforms/Default.aspx?Lang=EN
Holocaust denial and anti-semitism is a crime in Belgium,
for inappropriate and off-topic posting.
A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
You're really starting to get to Warhole. He is upset.
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://youtu.be/CjO7kBqTFqo
Tony Dragon
2012-04-18 17:30:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Warhol
Ha ha ha... you inglorious bastards are like hyena's turning around
me... beware I may bite you..
http://youtu.be/f6GKNpzrSww
I THOUGHT THERE WERE 3-4 OR MORE PIGS REPLYING IN THE PAST!
YOU MAY BE CORRECT!
HE CERTAINLY IS INSANE ENOUGH TO SHOW MULTIPLE PERSONALITIES!
ALL FULL OF HATE, OF COURSE!
Saul Levy
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:40:09 +0200, Eugene Griessel
Post by Eugene Griessel
Op Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:37:57 +0100, Tony Dragon
Post by Tony Dragon
Post by Warhol
By the way I am only reposting an article I found on Rense.com... I am
not even the author of the original post... So why reporting me for just
because i put the subject for discussion up??? what law prohibits me of
asking questions or to discusses a subject??? can anyone explain...
Is this post available in English?
It not the Warhol fluent in English on duty it would appear - but the
more Dutch one.
Eugene L Griessel
"Cult today, religion tomorrow."
Is this post available in English?
Warhol
2012-04-17 17:18:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Eugene Griessel
Post by Warhol
More Kubrick? Proof Apollo Flag Was Added Later oh no! mommmmmmy!
BULLSHIT!!!!!!!
To report Warhol to the Belgian Police please use:https://www.ecops.be/webforms/Default.aspx?Lang=EN
Holocaust denial and anti-semitism is a crime in Belgium,
for inappropriate and off-topic posting.
A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
You have been reported for spam and repetitive post...

Received: by 10.68.135.106 with SMTP id pr10mr390405pbb.
3.1334673869319;
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Path: r9ni66889pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!
feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!
mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eugene Griessel <***@dynagen.co.za>
Newsgroups:
alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,alt.atheism,soc.culture.israel
Subject: Re: More Kubrick? Proof Apollo Flag Was Added Later oh no!
mommmmmmy!
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:44:34 +0200
Organization: Noordhoek Henge and Solstice Society
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
References: <jmjs95$8r6$***@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-
host="zXFqA4IL2YPyl7iVY7EL1w";
logging-data="30121"; mail-complaints-to="***@eternal-
september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19LaizQu4FxG6AH5K+5zQ/
27+cltHp5u7c="
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.652
Cancel-Lock: sha1:o10fV43XMRHSPW65Z+81grSnMU8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Post by Eugene Griessel
More Kubrick? Proof Apollo Flag Was Added Later oh no! mommmmmmy!
Eugene Griessel
2012-04-17 17:33:41 UTC
Permalink
Op Tue, 17 Apr 2012 10:18:01 -0700 (PDT), Warhol <***@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Pure and utter HORSESHIT!


To report Warhol to the Belgian Police please use:
https://www.ecops.be/webforms/Default.aspx?Lang=EN

Holocaust denial and anti-semitism is a crime in Belgium,

to report him to his Usenet Service provider:
***@eternal-september.org

for inappropriate and off-topic posting.

A Usenet terrorist deserves nothing less.
NEMO
2012-04-17 19:38:49 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 17, 9:47 am, Warhol <***@hotmail.com> wrote:


Later oh no! mommmmmmy!


\\\\\Y/////
^
()
oIIo


Gobble - gobble, gobble - gobble, slurp - slurp!


Gulp - gulp!

amazing ...that .. people still believe Lunatics...
Brad Guth
2012-04-17 23:23:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Warhol
More Kubrick? Proof Apollo Flag Was Added Later oh no! mommmmmmy!
More Kubrick? Proof Apollo Flag Was Added Later
By Ted Twietmeyer
4-14-12
http://www.rense.com/general95/morekubrick.html
BUZZ ALDRIN 40 YEARS LATER."
The flag pole absolutely has NO shadow. You can see the astronaut's
shadow, the large black Lunar Lander shadow in the background but no
shadow from the pole. This was clearly added to the photo later
http://www.rense.com/general95/flag%20pole%20base.jpg
Above image was snipped without modification from source image. Flag was
clearly added to photo later (studio shot.)
http://www.rense.com/general95/flag%20pole%20base%20enlarged.jpg
flag pole base enlarged.png Enlargement 300% with no other processing.
The anti-gravity flagpole stands on the Lunar surface with no shadow
without it being planted in the Moon's surface. Truly amazing. Jagged
line extending from the pole to the right edge is apparently from
footprints, not the pole itself. Bottom edge of pole is perfectly flat,
which would not happen if it was actually inserted into the Lunar surface
http://www.rense.com/general95/Flag%20with%20no%20shadow.jpg
Original unaltered screen capture from video "IN HIS OWN WORDS: BUZZ
ALDRIN 40 YEARS LATER." While UPI.com is shown
http://youtu.be/1j9Fo7XayCg
here by the network as the source for the photo, I doubt UPI did this.
They just used what NASA gave them.
Ted Twietmeyer
amazing ...that .. people still believe Lunatics...
Infomercial eye-candy like this is what makes their media and textbook
'Marry go Round' so much more fun.

Lots of other stuff about those NASA/Apollo Kodak moments do not add
up. But sadly 99.9% of Americans and perhaps 99.9999% of most
everyone else doesn't even know what photographic film or
transparencies are, much less understand how mastering additional
images to suit is accomplished prior to PhotoShop.

Google search: apollo flag

Select images, and it's the third one in the top row.

I doubt it's an original, but then nothing in those NASA/Apollo
archives is a good digital scan of an original either.

Basically all of those Kodak moments are at risk of being corrupted or
even doctored to suit. The NASA/Apollo era of science about our moon
was their lowest priority.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Ernie
2012-04-17 23:40:00 UTC
Permalink
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
Brad Guth
2012-04-18 00:33:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
jonathan
2012-04-18 01:36:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.

..........


It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.


http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
Brad Guth
2012-04-18 03:43:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.

Here's the original:
Loading Image...
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40

Here's the contrast and color saturation enhanced copy:
Loading Image...
joeturn
2012-04-18 06:53:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
 http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Brad Guth
2012-04-18 12:14:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by joeturn
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
 http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg-Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://youtu.be/kFAZoVGxqY4
You still don't understand film, but apparently neither does our NASA.

Photon physics isn't conditional, nor does it pretend being Atheist by
acting/reacting exactly like a Semite.

Do you even know what a secondary/recoil photon is? (most here don't
seem to have a clue)

I can read a newspaper at night (almost plain as day) by moonlight, so
where's all that bluish earthshine that's 50 fold greater?

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Bast
2012-04-18 13:43:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brad Guth
Post by joeturn
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg-Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
http://youtu.be/kFAZoVGxqY4
You still don't understand film, but apparently neither does our NASA.
Photon physics isn't conditional, nor does it pretend being Atheist by
acting/reacting exactly like a Semite.
Do you even know what a secondary/recoil photon is? (most here don't
seem to have a clue)
I can read a newspaper at night (almost plain as day) by moonlight, so
where's all that bluish earthshine that's 50 fold greater?
The same people who think the moon landings happened as we were told, also
think the Economy is doing GREAT.
HVAC
2012-04-18 15:19:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bast
The same people who think the moon landings happened as we were told, also
think the Economy is doing GREAT.
M O O N That spells GREAT!
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://youtu.be/CjO7kBqTFqo
Eugene Griessel
2012-04-18 15:23:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by HVAC
Post by Bast
The same people who think the moon landings happened as we were told, also
think the Economy is doing GREAT.
M O O N That spells GREAT!
The same people who think the moon landings never happened as we all
witnessed, are stupid enough to compare them to the Economy.


Eugene L Griessel

I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol.
HVAC
2012-04-18 16:27:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Eugene Griessel
Post by HVAC
M O O N That spells GREAT!
The same people who think the moon landings never happened as we all
witnessed, are stupid enough to compare them to the Economy.
Bast is good with almost any kooky conspiracy.

His 9/11 rants seems to be that product of a hashish smoker.


His other rants are REALLY kooky.
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://youtu.be/CjO7kBqTFqo
Brad Guth
2012-04-18 18:41:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bast
Post by Brad Guth
Post by joeturn
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
http://youtu.be/kFAZoVGxqY4
You still don't understand film, but apparently neither does our NASA.
Photon physics isn't conditional, nor does it pretend being Atheist by
acting/reacting exactly like a Semite.
Do you even know what a secondary/recoil photon is? (most here don't
seem to have a clue)
I can read a newspaper at night (almost plain as day) by moonlight, so
where's all that bluish earthshine that's 50 fold greater?
The same people who think the moon landings happened as we were told, also
think the Economy is doing GREAT.
Zionist Nazi oligarchs and their Rothschilds always think everything
is going perfectly fine and dandy. It seems we never get to elect or
appoint any of them, perhaps because their incest bloodline of wealth
and authority is always above anyone we might otherwise care to elect
or appoint.

Raw solar UV photons cause a natural reaction of producing secondary/
recoil photons which we can clearly see, as a bluish/purple color
emitting from anything that's sufficiently reactive, of which those
Apollo missions had plenty of their very own reactive "right stuff" in
addition to anything of what the local paramagnetic terrain of that
physically dark moon had to offer.

For some reason those unfiltered Kodak film loaded cameras were always
selectively colorblind (even with their color film), unless all UV
reactive materials and local elements became inert due to that extreme
heat, hard vacuum plus local X-rays and gamma in addition to the
electro-fluorescing sodium they didn’t seem to know anything about.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Dean
2012-04-18 22:05:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Bast
Post by Brad Guth
Post by joeturn
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
http://youtu.be/kFAZoVGxqY4
You still don't understand film, but apparently neither does our NASA.
Photon physics isn't conditional, nor does it pretend being Atheist by
acting/reacting exactly like a Semite.
Do you even know what a secondary/recoil photon is? (most here don't
seem to have a clue)
I can read a newspaper at night (almost plain as day) by moonlight, so
where's all that bluish earthshine that's 50 fold greater?
The same people who think the moon landings happened as we were told, also
think the Economy is doing GREAT.
Zionist Nazi oligarchs and their Rothschilds always think everything
is going perfectly fine and dandy.  It seems we never get to elect or
appoint any of them, perhaps because their incest bloodline of wealth
and authority is always above anyone we might otherwise care to elect
or appoint.
Raw solar UV photons cause a natural reaction of producing secondary/
recoil photons which we can clearly see, as a bluish/purple color
emitting from anything that's sufficiently reactive, of which those
Apollo missions had plenty of their very own reactive "right stuff" in
addition to anything of what the local paramagnetic terrain of that
physically dark moon had to offer.
For some reason those unfiltered Kodak film loaded cameras were always
selectively colorblind (even with their color film), unless all UV
reactive materials and local elements became inert due to that extreme
heat, hard vacuum plus local X-rays and gamma in addition to the
electro-fluorescing sodium they didn’t seem to know anything about.
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Cutting and pasting technical terms must give you a real thrill. I
work with UV reactive materials all day, every day and I'm telling you
that you are full of crap. Wouldn't you be happier in one of the
racist conspiracy groups?
HVAC
2012-04-18 23:28:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dean
Cutting and pasting technical terms must give you a real thrill. I
work with UV reactive materials all day, every day and I'm telling you
that you are full of crap. Wouldn't you be happier in one of the
racist conspiracy groups?
LOL
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://youtu.be/CjO7kBqTFqo
Brad Guth
2012-04-19 04:35:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Bast
Post by Brad Guth
Post by joeturn
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
http://youtu.be/kFAZoVGxqY4
You still don't understand film, but apparently neither does our NASA.
Photon physics isn't conditional, nor does it pretend being Atheist by
acting/reacting exactly like a Semite.
Do you even know what a secondary/recoil photon is? (most here don't
seem to have a clue)
I can read a newspaper at night (almost plain as day) by moonlight, so
where's all that bluish earthshine that's 50 fold greater?
The same people who think the moon landings happened as we were told, also
think the Economy is doing GREAT.
Zionist Nazi oligarchs and their Rothschilds always think everything
is going perfectly fine and dandy.  It seems we never get to elect or
appoint any of them, perhaps because their incest bloodline of wealth
and authority is always above anyone we might otherwise care to elect
or appoint.
Raw solar UV photons cause a natural reaction of producing secondary/
recoil photons which we can clearly see, as a bluish/purple color
emitting from anything that's sufficiently reactive, of which those
Apollo missions had plenty of their very own reactive "right stuff" in
addition to anything of what the local paramagnetic terrain of that
physically dark moon had to offer.
For some reason those unfiltered Kodak film loaded cameras were always
selectively colorblind (even with their color film), unless all UV
reactive materials and local elements became inert due to that extreme
heat, hard vacuum plus local X-rays and gamma in addition to the
electro-fluorescing sodium they didn’t seem to know anything about.
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Cutting and pasting technical terms must give you a real thrill.  I
work with UV reactive materials all day, every day and I'm telling you
that you are full of crap.  Wouldn't you be happier in one of the
racist conspiracy groups?
Wouldn't you care to put-up or shut-up?

Flags, moon-suits, painted aluminum, bare aluminum, anodized aluminum,
mylar foils and assorted surface elements of metallicity were all
perfectly UV inert?

How about all of that bluish earthshine that was never recorded,
scientifically measured or otherwise quantified?

How did each and every NASA/Apollo mission entirely miss the sodium?

Where the hell did all the local X-rays and gamma go?

How did they manage to keep hiding the planet Venus?

Was Sirius(A) having a few bad days?

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Dean
2012-04-19 10:24:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Bast
Post by Brad Guth
Post by joeturn
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
http://youtu.be/kFAZoVGxqY4
You still don't understand film, but apparently neither does our NASA.
Photon physics isn't conditional, nor does it pretend being Atheist by
acting/reacting exactly like a Semite.
Do you even know what a secondary/recoil photon is? (most here don't
seem to have a clue)
I can read a newspaper at night (almost plain as day) by moonlight, so
where's all that bluish earthshine that's 50 fold greater?
The same people who think the moon landings happened as we were told, also
think the Economy is doing GREAT.
Zionist Nazi oligarchs and their Rothschilds always think everything
is going perfectly fine and dandy.  It seems we never get to elect or
appoint any of them, perhaps because their incest bloodline of wealth
and authority is always above anyone we might otherwise care to elect
or appoint.
Raw solar UV photons cause a natural reaction of producing secondary/
recoil photons which we can clearly see, as a bluish/purple color
emitting from anything that's sufficiently reactive, of which those
Apollo missions had plenty of their very own reactive "right stuff" in
addition to anything of what the local paramagnetic terrain of that
physically dark moon had to offer.
For some reason those unfiltered Kodak film loaded cameras were always
selectively colorblind (even with their color film), unless all UV
reactive materials and local elements became inert due to that extreme
heat, hard vacuum plus local X-rays and gamma in addition to the
electro-fluorescing sodium they didn’t seem to know anything about.
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Cutting and pasting technical terms must give you a real thrill.  I
work with UV reactive materials all day, every day and I'm telling you
that you are full of crap.  Wouldn't you be happier in one of the
racist conspiracy groups?
Wouldn't you care to put-up or shut-up?
Flags, moon-suits, painted aluminum, bare aluminum, anodized aluminum,
mylar foils and assorted surface elements of metallicity were all
perfectly UV inert?
How about all of that bluish earthshine that was never recorded,
scientifically measured or otherwise quantified?
How did each and every NASA/Apollo mission entirely miss the sodium?
Where the hell did all the local X-rays and gamma go?
How did they manage to keep hiding the planet Venus?
Was Sirius(A) having a few bad days?
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Nothing is "perfectly uv-inert" you idiot. Why don't you get an
education and stop babbling?
Warhol
2012-04-19 11:01:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dean
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Dean
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Bast
Post by Brad Guth
Post by joeturn
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
http://youtu.be/kFAZoVGxqY4
You still don't understand film, but apparently neither does our NASA.
Photon physics isn't conditional, nor does it pretend being Atheist by
acting/reacting exactly like a Semite.
Do you even know what a secondary/recoil photon is? (most here don't
seem to have a clue)
I can read a newspaper at night (almost plain as day) by moonlight, so
where's all that bluish earthshine that's 50 fold greater?
The same people who think the moon landings happened as we were told, also
think the Economy is doing GREAT.
Zionist Nazi oligarchs and their Rothschilds always think everything
is going perfectly fine and dandy. It seems we never get to elect or
appoint any of them, perhaps because their incest bloodline of wealth
and authority is always above anyone we might otherwise care to elect
or appoint.
Raw solar UV photons cause a natural reaction of producing secondary/
recoil photons which we can clearly see, as a bluish/purple color
emitting from anything that's sufficiently reactive, of which those
Apollo missions had plenty of their very own reactive "right stuff" in
addition to anything of what the local paramagnetic terrain of that
physically dark moon had to offer.
For some reason those unfiltered Kodak film loaded cameras were always
selectively colorblind (even with their color film), unless all UV
reactive materials and local elements became inert due to that extreme
heat, hard vacuum plus local X-rays and gamma in addition to the
electro-fluorescing sodium they didn’t seem to know anything about.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Cutting and pasting technical terms must give you a real thrill. I
work with UV reactive materials all day, every day and I'm telling you
that you are full of crap. Wouldn't you be happier in one of the
racist conspiracy groups?
Wouldn't you care to put-up or shut-up?
Flags, moon-suits, painted aluminum, bare aluminum, anodized aluminum,
mylar foils and assorted surface elements of metallicity were all
perfectly UV inert?
How about all of that bluish earthshine that was never recorded,
scientifically measured or otherwise quantified?
How did each and every NASA/Apollo mission entirely miss the sodium?
Where the hell did all the local X-rays and gamma go?
How did they manage to keep hiding the planet Venus?
Was Sirius(A) having a few bad days?
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Nothing is "perfectly uv-inert" you idiot. Why don't you get an
education and stop babbling?
and why don't you with some evidence of your claims????
Dean
2012-04-19 18:57:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Warhol
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Bast
Post by Brad Guth
Post by joeturn
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
http://youtu.be/kFAZoVGxqY4
You still don't understand film, but apparently neither does our NASA.
Photon physics isn't conditional, nor does it pretend being Atheist by
acting/reacting exactly like a Semite.
Do you even know what a secondary/recoil photon is? (most here don't
seem to have a clue)
I can read a newspaper at night (almost plain as day) by moonlight, so
where's all that bluish earthshine that's 50 fold greater?
The same people who think the moon landings happened as we were told, also
think the Economy is doing GREAT.
Zionist Nazi oligarchs and their Rothschilds always think everything
is going perfectly fine and dandy.  It seems we never get to elect or
appoint any of them, perhaps because their incest bloodline of wealth
and authority is always above anyone we might otherwise care to elect
or appoint.
Raw solar UV photons cause a natural reaction of producing secondary/
recoil photons which we can clearly see, as a bluish/purple color
emitting from anything that's sufficiently reactive, of which those
Apollo missions had plenty of their very own reactive "right stuff" in
addition to anything of what the local paramagnetic terrain of that
physically dark moon had to offer.
For some reason those unfiltered Kodak film loaded cameras were always
selectively colorblind (even with their color film), unless all UV
reactive materials and local elements became inert due to that extreme
heat, hard vacuum plus local X-rays and gamma in addition to the
electro-fluorescing sodium they didn’t seem to know anything about.
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
  Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Cutting and pasting technical terms must give you a real thrill.  I
work with UV reactive materials all day, every day and I'm telling you
that you are full of crap.  Wouldn't you be happier in one of the
racist conspiracy groups?
Wouldn't you care to put-up or shut-up?
Flags, moon-suits, painted aluminum, bare aluminum, anodized aluminum,
mylar foils and assorted surface elements of metallicity were all
perfectly UV inert?
How about all of that bluish earthshine that was never recorded,
scientifically measured or otherwise quantified?
How did each and every NASA/Apollo mission entirely miss the sodium?
Where the hell did all the local X-rays and gamma go?
How did they manage to keep hiding the planet Venus?
Was Sirius(A) having a few bad days?
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
  Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Nothing is "perfectly uv-inert" you idiot.  Why don't you get an
education and stop babbling?
and why don't you with some evidence of your claims????
Warhole, if we want more shit out of you, we'll squeeze your ass.
HVAC
2012-04-19 20:03:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dean
Warhole, if we want more shit out of you, we'll squeeze your ass.
Head?
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://youtu.be/CjO7kBqTFqo
Dean
2012-04-20 01:37:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dean
Warhole, if we want more shit out of you, we'll squeeze your ass.
Head?
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit http://youtu.be/CjO7kBqTFqo
Same location on him.
BDK
2012-04-19 22:48:13 UTC
Permalink
In article <12c4e7aa-6563-4c24-98f9-4f3d8b863aa6
@w5g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>, ***@gmail.com says...
Post by Dean
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Bast
Post by Brad Guth
Post by joeturn
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
http://youtu.be/kFAZoVGxqY4
You still don't understand film, but apparently neither does our NASA.
Photon physics isn't conditional, nor does it pretend being Atheist by
acting/reacting exactly like a Semite.
Do you even know what a secondary/recoil photon is? (most here don't
seem to have a clue)
I can read a newspaper at night (almost plain as day) by moonlight, so
where's all that bluish earthshine that's 50 fold greater?
The same people who think the moon landings happened as we were told, also
think the Economy is doing GREAT.
Zionist Nazi oligarchs and their Rothschilds always think everything
is going perfectly fine and dandy.  It seems we never get to elect or
appoint any of them, perhaps because their incest bloodline of wealth
and authority is always above anyone we might otherwise care to elect
or appoint.
Raw solar UV photons cause a natural reaction of producing secondary/
recoil photons which we can clearly see, as a bluish/purple color
emitting from anything that's sufficiently reactive, of which those
Apollo missions had plenty of their very own reactive "right stuff" in
addition to anything of what the local paramagnetic terrain of that
physically dark moon had to offer.
For some reason those unfiltered Kodak film loaded cameras were always
selectively colorblind (even with their color film), unless all UV
reactive materials and local elements became inert due to that extreme
heat, hard vacuum plus local X-rays and gamma in addition to the
electro-fluorescing sodium they didn?t seem to know anything about.
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / ?Guth Usenet?
Cutting and pasting technical terms must give you a real thrill.  I
work with UV reactive materials all day, every day and I'm telling you
that you are full of crap.  Wouldn't you be happier in one of the
racist conspiracy groups?
Wouldn't you care to put-up or shut-up?
Flags, moon-suits, painted aluminum, bare aluminum, anodized aluminum,
mylar foils and assorted surface elements of metallicity were all
perfectly UV inert?
How about all of that bluish earthshine that was never recorded,
scientifically measured or otherwise quantified?
How did each and every NASA/Apollo mission entirely miss the sodium?
Where the hell did all the local X-rays and gamma go?
How did they manage to keep hiding the planet Venus?
Was Sirius(A) having a few bad days?
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / ?Guth Usenet?
Nothing is "perfectly uv-inert" you idiot. Why don't you get an
education and stop babbling?
Babbling is the way of the Guthball.
--
BDK- Head FUD-Master Blaster.
Brad Guth
2012-04-25 20:54:18 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dean
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Bast
Post by Brad Guth
Post by joeturn
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg-Hidequoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
http://youtu.be/kFAZoVGxqY4
You still don't understand film, but apparently neither does our NASA.
Photon physics isn't conditional, nor does it pretend being Atheist by
acting/reacting exactly like a Semite.
Do you even know what a secondary/recoil photon is? (most here don't
seem to have a clue)
I can read a newspaper at night (almost plain as day) by moonlight, so
where's all that bluish earthshine that's 50 fold greater?
The same people who think the moon landings happened as we were told, also
think the Economy is doing GREAT.
Zionist Nazi oligarchs and their Rothschilds always think everything
is going perfectly fine and dandy.  It seems we never get to elect or
appoint any of them, perhaps because their incest bloodline of wealth
and authority is always above anyone we might otherwise care to elect
or appoint.
Raw solar UV photons cause a natural reaction of producing secondary/
recoil photons which we can clearly see, as a bluish/purple color
emitting from anything that's sufficiently reactive, of which those
Apollo missions had plenty of their very own reactive "right stuff" in
addition to anything of what the local paramagnetic terrain of that
physically dark moon had to offer.
For some reason those unfiltered Kodak film loaded cameras were always
selectively colorblind (even with their color film), unless all UV
reactive materials and local elements became inert due to that extreme
heat, hard vacuum plus local X-rays and gamma in addition to the
electro-fluorescing sodium they didn’t seem to know anything about.
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Cutting and pasting technical terms must give you a real thrill.  I
work with UV reactive materials all day, every day and I'm telling you
that you are full of crap.  Wouldn't you be happier in one of the
racist conspiracy groups?
Wouldn't you care to put-up or shut-up?
Flags, moon-suits, painted aluminum, bare aluminum, anodized aluminum,
mylar foils and assorted surface elements of metallicity were all
perfectly UV inert?
How about all of that bluish earthshine that was never recorded,
scientifically measured or otherwise quantified?
How did each and every NASA/Apollo mission entirely miss the sodium?
Where the hell did all the local X-rays and gamma go?
How did they manage to keep hiding the planet Venus?
Was Sirius(A) having a few bad days?
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Nothing is "perfectly uv-inert" you idiot.
Exactly, and yet nothing of those NASA/Apollo missions or of the naked
moon itself was ever the least bit reacting to the raw UV illumination
that had to be there. At least we still have nothing from those
unfiltered Kodak moments giving any indications of UV secondary/recoil
photons. It's as though their lunar surface illumination was derived
from Xenon arc lamps (including their shadow fill-in lighting).

There wasn't even any hint of bluish earthshine, and otherwise color
saturations of the moon and even those of Earth were unusually
pastel. Of course without access to those original frames of Kodak
film, it's impossible to apply any degree of independently
authenticated forensics.

http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Keith W
2012-04-19 07:46:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dean
Post by Brad Guth
For some reason those unfiltered Kodak film loaded cameras were
always selectively colorblind (even with their color film), unless
all UV reactive materials and local elements became inert due to
that extreme heat, hard vacuum plus local X-rays and gamma in
addition to the electro-fluorescing sodium they didn’t seem to know
anything about.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Cutting and pasting technical terms must give you a real thrill. I
work with UV reactive materials all day, every day and I'm telling you
that you are full of crap. Wouldn't you be happier in one of the
racist conspiracy groups?
There is also the minor fact that most of the photos were filtered.
The Hasselblads used were fitted with detachable 4000- to 6000
angstrom visual-range filters as well as polarizing filters.

Keith
joeturn
2012-04-25 14:11:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keith W
Post by Brad Guth
For some reason those unfiltered Kodak film loaded cameras were
always selectively colorblind (even with their color film), unless
all UV reactive materials and local elements became inert due to
that extreme heat, hard vacuum plus local X-rays and gamma in
addition to the electro-fluorescing sodium they didn’t seem to know
anything about.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
Cutting and pasting technical terms must give you a real thrill.  I
work with UV reactive materials all day, every day and I'm telling you
that you are full of crap.  Wouldn't you be happier in one of the
racist conspiracy groups?
There is also the minor fact that most of the photos were filtered.
The Hasselblads used were fitted with detachable 4000- to 6000
angstrom visual-range filters as well as polarizing filters.
Keith- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Speaking of photos have you saw this recent photo of Travon Martin and
our First Lady?

http://www.contactmusic.com/photo/regina-king-and-son-ian-alexander-jr-18th-annual-race-to-erase-ms_5646011
joeturn
2012-04-18 16:03:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brad Guth
Post by joeturn
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / "Guth Usenet"
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/images/print/AS11/40/5874.jpg
 http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/catalog/70mm/magazine/?40
 http://askphysics.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Buzz.jpg-Hidequoted text -
- Show quoted text -
http://youtu.be/kFAZoVGxqY4
You still don't understand film, but apparently neither does our NASA.
Photon physics isn't conditional, nor does it pretend being Atheist by
acting/reacting exactly like a Semite.
Do you even know what a secondary/recoil photon is? (most here don't
seem to have a clue)
I can read a newspaper at night (almost plain as day) by moonlight, so
where's all that bluish earthshine that's 50 fold greater?
 http://groups.google.com/groups/search
 http://translate.google.com/#
 Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The real nasa film supports your claim Kubric took that clumbsy
simulation and made it into an almost believable occurence.

This link tells you how the NAZIs from project paperclip claimed
redstone arsenal their new home,later to be renamed NASA as it grew
out of proportion spending tax dollars for sky/spywars.Building rocket
ships the moon and space voyagers was a coverup everyone involved knew
that was a complete impossibility due to the radiation problem.



http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/R/Redstone_Arsenal.html


HVAC
2012-04-18 10:27:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brad Guth
Post by jonathan
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
That extremely skinny shadow lacks contrast, and there's still no hint
of any secondary/recoil UV photons.
Brad: You can see in UV ?







PS-No wonder he doesn't talk to me!
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://youtu.be/CjO7kBqTFqo
Warhol
2012-04-18 06:52:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
you Lunatic will fall in fire... I am warning you... SURRENDER NOW or
DIE WALKING THE PLANK... CONFESS... CONFESS or you finish in hell

WANTED DEAD or ALIVE! BECAUSE THEY ARE LUNATICS
Loading Image...

Surrender now Lunatic or you fall in fire this time

Loading Image...


Warhol Le Bar Ba Rosa...
Loading Image...
Bast
2012-04-18 13:39:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
..........
It has a shadow, the sun is from the left.
It should have a shadow,...but it doesn't.
Warhol
2012-04-18 06:23:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brad Guth
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
It proves that official looking images can be doctored to suit, and
that no photographic doctor was ever any better than those of Kodak
that worked for our Zionist Nazi run DARPA/NASA.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”
This proves NASA is nothing more than scam... Liars... Deceivers...
criminals(think all astronuts they killed to keep the secret of the
demon hidden).... thieves... Lunatics... a cheat... Chickens... Hoaxers
bastards Nobody likes a liar, a thief, a cheater, or a coward. Nobody –
not even God.

and they don't have Rockets which are capable to fly in vacuum space...

“He tests the good and the bad alike; if anyone cheats, God’s outraged.”
(Psalm 11:5 The Message).

“But as for the cowards, the faithless and the corrupt, the murderers,
the traffickers in sex and sorcery, the worshippers of idols and all
liars – their inheritance is in the lake which burns with fire and
sulphur” (Rev.21:8, New Living Testament).

God sees, God knows, and He is outraged. In but a short time He will
answer all of this – and we will know that He is the Lord. They will
know it, too.

And those who practice such things will be named for what they are –
Liars, Thieves, Cheats and Cowards. Their honor will turn to shame,
their pride will turn to disgrace, their laughter will turn to sorrow,
and their estate will come to ruin.

So…if you’ve been lied to, stolen from, cheated on, or left by cowards
to face the onslaught alone – God has His eye on you. He is standing
with you, and will see you through it all.

“He everywhere hath sway, and all things serve His might;
His every act pure blessing is, His path unsullied light.
We comprehend Him not, yet earth and heaven tell
God sits as sovereign on the throne and ruleth all things well.”
— Warhol Le Bar..
Seth lePod
2012-04-18 03:42:51 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 17, 4:40 pm, "Ernie" <***@webtv.net> wrote:

,,
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
Ah! FINALLY <whap!> I've figured out
how this thread works.

Craziest guy wins.

Seth
Bast
2012-04-18 13:37:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ernie
This proves the moon landings were hoaxed. Ernie
This proves nothing,...the fact is NASA cant prove anything either.
Same old tired arguments that we should believe them based on FAITH ALONE,
and a handful of clearly doctored photos.

I still ask how come NASA, got so stupid for the last 50 years and forgot
how to get back there, with NO casualties ?
....Yet they can't even keep the shuttles up ?
HVAC
2012-04-18 15:21:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bast
I still ask how come NASA, got so stupid for the last 50 years and forgot
how to get back there, with NO casualties ?
....Yet they can't even keep the shuttles up ?
The same problem afflicted both programs. No money.
--
"OK you cunts, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl
http://youtu.be/CjO7kBqTFqo
Eugene Griessel
2012-04-18 15:27:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by HVAC
Post by Bast
I still ask how come NASA, got so stupid for the last 50 years and forgot
how to get back there, with NO casualties ?
....Yet they can't even keep the shuttles up ?
The same problem afflicted both programs. No money.
Yep - the original shuttle fleet was due to be replaced by 1990 with
bigger and better craft. However the purse ran dry, the original
shuttles went way over budget and never even began to fulfill the "one
launch a week" ideal they were designed around and the cost, instead
of being way cheaper than a throw-away rocket, ended up way more
expensive.


Eugene L Griessel

Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie!'
till you can find a rock.
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...