Discussion:
-- WHERE ARE THE CHILDREN OF GOD?
(too old to reply)
dolf
2020-01-10 02:45:24 UTC
Permalink
1: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#14); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#14)}

ם, {@2: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#61); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#47)}

ן, {@3: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#79); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#99)}

ף, {@4: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#87); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#170)}

ץ {@5: Sup: 17 - HOLDING BACK: JUAN (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7});
Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#179)}

MALE: @104 = #104

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #104

"At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the
greatest in the kingdom of heaven?

And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of
them, and said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and
become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of
heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child,
the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.

***@zen: 3, row: 5, col: 3, nous: 49 [DATE: 2020.9.5, TIME: 10:50
hrs, SUPER: #329 / #76 - Strength's Warning Signs, Revealers of Virtue;
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 64 -
SINKING (CH'EN), EGO: #352 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue;
I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering
support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN)]

ך {@1: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#14); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#14)}
ONTIC CHECKSUM (none)

ם {@1: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#33); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#33)}

ן {@1: Sup: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52); Ego: 52 - MEASURE: TU (#52)}

ף {@1: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#71); Ego: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#71)}

ץ {@1: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#9); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#9)}

And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me.
But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it
were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and
that he were drowned in the depth of the sea. Woe unto the world because
of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that
man by whom the offence cometh!" [Matthew 18:1-7]

NATURE: {Ego}
9 14 33 #56 +
0 0 52 #52 = #108 +
0 0 71 #71 = #179

NURTURE: {Supernal}
9 14 33 #56 +
0 0 52 #52 = #108 +
0 0 71 #71 = #179

SYNCRETIC: {Amalgam}
9 14 33 #56 +
0 0 52 #52 = #108 +
0 0 71 #71 = #179

#179 as [#30, #9, #80, #20, #600] = ṭaph (H2945): {UMBRA: #6 as #89 %
#41 = #7} 1) children, little children, little ones;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #89 % #41 = #7 - Intentional Reversal, Dimming Radiance; I-Ching:
H12 - Obstruction, Stagnation, Selfish persons; Tetra: 56 - Closed Mouth;

THOTH MEASURE: #7 - Oh thou whose eyes pierce like swords, who makest
thine appearance in Sechem; I commit no fraud.

    #VIRTUE: With Ascent (no. #7), coming up against plainness?
    #TOOLS: With Pattern (no. #47), increasing artifice.
    #POSITION: With Youthfulness (no. #12), having no knowledge, but
    #TIME: With Fullness (no. #38), having a surplus.
    #CANON: #104

ONTIC_OBLIGANS_104@{
   @1: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#7); Ego: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#7),
   @2: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#61); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#54),
   @3: Sup: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#127); Ego: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG
(#66),
   @4: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#150 - I INDULGE NOT IN ANGER {%28}); Ego:
38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   Male: #150; Feme: #104
} // #104

H2945@{
   @1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION:
YI (#30),
   @2: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#69); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#39),
   @3: Sup: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#107); Ego: 80 - LABOURING: CH'IN (#119),
   @4: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#165); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN
(#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
   @5: Sup: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#175 - I AM NOT A
TRANSGRESSOR {%22}); Ego: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#172),
   Male: #175; Feme: #172
} // #179


<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?memebrain>
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"



SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Ned Latham
2020-01-10 02:57:08 UTC
Permalink
dolf wrote:

----snip----
Post by dolf
And Jesus called a little child unto him,
Aha! Now we know where the Roman Catholics got their inspiration for
their poaedophile priesthood.

----snip----
dolf
2020-01-10 04:27:50 UTC
Permalink
I just had a fellow named ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI similarly engaging
within NAZI SLANDER upon Facebook ...

I presume that was the ITALIAN author as he immediately BLOCKED me
(fortunately I had retained a copy of the post as my intellectual
property over which he ought not have any control) as an attempt to
preserve his fractured reputation due to an exacting category of
understanding @215 conveyed by his speech as *CHANCE* evidence of his
fascist identity.

Since he has blocked me rather than address his public slander I cannot
resolve that identity issue.
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by dolf
And Jesus called a little child unto him,
Aha! Now we know where the Roman Catholics got their inspiration for
their poaedophile priesthood.
----snip----
***@zen: 3, row: 6, col: 6, nous: 42 [DATE: 2020.10.31, TIME:
14:30 hrs, SUPER: #462 / #61 - Virtuous Humility at Using 'Beneath';
I-Ching: H64 - Ferrying Incomplete, Before Completion, Not Yet Fording,
Not yet completed; Tetra: 78 - ON THE VERGE (CHIANG), EGO: #399 / #42 -
Generating Things, Reason's Modifications; I-Ching: H60 - Control,
Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation; Tetra: 52 - MEASURE (TU)]

We are not certain whether the ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI making this
FACEBOOK slander is the same person as the ITALIAN author of "L' OTTAVO
SIGILLO: - PRIMA PARTE (The Eighth Seal: first part): "Is there
randomness, the so-called "chance"? And when we speak of a case, do we
refer to a unique idea or do heterogeneous conceptions exist?

The concept of chance has an undisputed authoritativeness: not only do
we use it customarily, but it constitutes a principle which all
scientific disciplines, without any exception, and most of all biology,
make use of - sometimes even obsessively. But is it possible to
concretely found randomness? Or does the concept of chance denote
something non-existent?

This text is probably the most comprehensive and detailed monographic
study ever carried out in this regard. And it is defined as monographic,
but only formally it is: since every exegesis of randomness immediately
transcends its theoretical frontier. In fact, the case is an ubiquitous
notion that is re-proposed with a very high frequency in every context
and that is considered an indisputable and pertinent hermeneutic of
events, of the origin of life, of the evolution of the cosmos, and is
even the most popular narrative illustration of the vicissitudes
everyday life experienced by all of us. But was it true glory, or is it
boasted credit? Would it be possible to renounce the concept of chance,
or is it essential? What do you do, what is this strange but
omnipresent, subtle but very powerful concept for?"
[<https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40698114-l-ottavo-sigillo>]

ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI (FACEBOOK): Yeah, {@1: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE:
YING (#41); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#66)}

because when you get your job pretending that being the prince of the
British crown had no part in securing it, {@2: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN
(#95); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#134)}

and when you get a huge loan pretending that being the prince of the
British crown had no part in securing it, {@3: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES:
NAN (#174); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A
DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34})}

you're not commercializing the British crown: {@4: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN
(#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI
(#282)}

you're getting a job! {@5: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#234); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#287)}

MALE: @228 = #228 as [#5, #100, #3, #70, #50] = érgon (G2041): {UMBRA:
#54 as #228 % #41 = #23} 1) *BUSINESS*, *EMPLOYMENT*, *THAT* *WHICH*
*ANY *ONE* *IS* *OCCUPIED*; 1a) that which one undertakes to do,
enterprise, undertaking; 2) any product whatever, any thing accomplished
by hand, art, industry, or mind; 3) an act, deed, thing done: the idea
of working is emphasised in opp. to that which is less than work;

FEME: @215 = #215: "BUT IT IS THANKS TO THOSE ATTRIBUTES THAT ARE
PECULIAR TO OUR RACE AND WHICH HAVE BEEN PRESERVED IN LOWER SAXONY THAT
WE HAVE BEEN ABLE HARMONIOUSLY TO ABSORB EXTRANEOUS CHARACTERISTICS—FOR
WE POSSESS ONE FACULTY WHICH EMBRACES ALL THE OTHERS, AND THAT IS,

THE IMPERIAL OUTLOOK:

<Loading Image...>

THE POWER TO REASON AND TO BUILD DISPASSIONATELY." [ADOLF HITLER's TABLE
TALK IDEA @215, 12 MAY 1942]

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #443 as [#2, #1, #400, #600] = bôwʼ (H935):
{UMBRA: #6 as #9 % #41 = #9} 1) to go in, enter, come, go, come in; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to enter, come in; 1a2) to come; i) to come with; ii) to
come upon, fall or light upon, attack (enemy); iii) to come to pass;
1a3) to attain to; 1a4) to be enumerated; 1a5) to go; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1)
to lead in; 1b2) to carry in; 1b3) to bring in, cause to come in,
gather, cause to come, bring near, bring against, bring upon; 1b4) to
bring to pass; 1c) (Hophal); 1c1) to be brought, brought in; 1c2) to be
introduced, be put;

<Loading Image...>

No you are actually wrong on that, since if you SUM the left column [28,
50, 11, 75, 6, 45, 25, 67, 62] of that BINOMIAL / TRINOMIAL
interoperability as BRITISH IMPERIAL @71 - WORLDVIEW, one ought note
that the resultant ONTIC value @215 has a comment from *HITLER* whom
similarly deployed the ROMAN BINOMIAL @1 / @5 STASIS IMPERIAL OUTLOOK.

[28, {@1: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28); Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28)}

50, {@2: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#106); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
WASTING: T'ANG (#78)}

11, {@3: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#114); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#89)}

75, {@4: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#116); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#164)}

6, {@5: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#124); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#170)}

45, {@6: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING
{%29}); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34})}

25, {@7: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#255); Ego: 25 - CONTENTION:
CHENG (#240)}

67, {@8: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#319); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#307)}

62] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#364); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#369)}

MALE: @177 = #177

FEME: @215 = #215

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #392

By the sounds of things you are on the wrong side of history (an
important consideration given the recent WWI centennial 2018)

"THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL NOT MAKE ANY LAW FOR ESTABLISHING ANY RELIGION,
OR FOR IMPOSING ANY RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCE, OR FOR PROHIBITING THE FREE
EXERCISE OF ANY RELIGION, AND NO RELIGIOUS TEST SHALL BE REQUIRED AS A
QUALIFICATION FOR ANY OFFICE OR PUBLIC TRUST UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH."
[CONSTITUTION 1900 SECTION 116]

(c) 2020 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 10 January 2020

case (typeof tasks.getDeployPrototype) :

/*
Whoever takes the worthy man as model provides contemporaries with a
perfect mirror of good conduct:

APPRAISAL #4: With RIGHT (DROIT) as his mirror, he does not go astray.
To others, he is one to rely on

FATHOMING #4: The RIGHT (DROIT) reflecting true
MEANS: Integrity can be trusted

#68 - DIMMING (MENG)

*/

var o = 0, i = 0, t = new Array(9); v = new Array(9);

knowns.DROIT = {
grapple: [v[0] = 68, v[1] = 67, v[2] = 66, v[3] = 47, v[4] = 20, v[5] =
21, v[6] = 22, v[7] = 49, v[8] = 48],
caduceus: {
feme: {
1: {ego: v[0], telos: t[0] = o +=v[0]},
2: {ego: v[1], telos: t[1] = o += v[1]},
3: {ego: v[2], telos: t[2] = o += v[2]},
4: {ego: v[3], telos: t[3] = o += v[3]},
5: {ego: v[4], telos: t[4] = o += v[4]},
6: {ego: v[5], telos: t[5] = o += v[5]},
7: {ego: v[6], telos: t[6] = o += v[6]},

/*

#311 - KANT'S PROLEGOMEMA SECTION #27 - LOGICAL SYLLOGISM

SELF #312 - CONTRADICTION

MINUS #81 - JUXTAPOSED PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGN {6.5.5.41.0: #266 -
CONTEND IN PUBLIC GAMES / #390 - CROWN} AS #71 - WORLDVIEW

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>

MADE AGAINST AUTONOMY {3.5.5.41.0: #311 / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES
ON 15 SEPTEMBER}}

EQUALS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL DYNAMIC

*/
8: {ego: v[7], telos: t[7] = o += v[7]},
9: {ego: v[8], telos: t[8] = o += v[8]},
telos: t[8]
},
male: {
1: {ego: i = v[0], telos: o = t[0]},
2: {ego: i = (t[1] % 81) ? t[1] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
3: {ego: i = (t[2] % 81) ? t[2] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
4: {ego: i = (t[3] % 81) ? t[3] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
5: {ego: i = (t[4] % 81) ? t[4] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
6: {ego: i = (t[5] % 81) ? t[5] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i}, // #237
- USE OF FORCE (CENTRE: #80 + #81 + #76)
7: {ego: i = (t[6] % 81) ? t[6] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
8: {ego: i = (t[7] % 81) ? t[7] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
9: {ego: i = (t[8] % 81) ? t[8] % 81 : 81, telos: o + i},
telos: o + i
}
},
right: {
1: {1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 3, 4: 4, 5: 5, 6: 6, 7: 7, 8: 8, 9: 9},
2: {1: 32, 2: 33, 3: 34, 4: 35, 5: 36, 6: 37, 7: 38, 8: 39, 9: 10},
3: {1: 31, 2: 56, 3: 57, 4: 58, 5: 59, 6: 60, 7: 61, 8: 40, 9: 11},
4: {1: 30, 2: 55, 3: 72, 4: 73, 5: 74, 6: 75, 7: 62, 8: 41, 9: 12},
5: {1: 29, 2: 54, 3: 71, 4: 80, 5: 81, 6: 76, 7: 63, 8: 42, 9: 13},
6: {1: 28, 2: 53, 3: 70, 4: 79, 5: 78, 6: 77, 7: 64, 8: 43, 9: 14},
7: {1: 27, 2: 52, 3: 69, 4: 68, 5: 67, 6: 66, 7: 65, 8: 44, 9: 15},
8: {1: 26, 2: 51, 3: 50, 4: 49, 5: 48, 6: 47, 7: 46, 8: 45, 9: 16},
9: {1: 25, 2: 24, 3: 23, 4: 22, 5: 21, 6: 20, 7: 19, 8: 18, 9: 17}
},
problem: {
1: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
2: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
3: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
4: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
5: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
6: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
7: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
8: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
9: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0}
},
rationale: {
1: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
2: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
3: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
4: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
5: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
6: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
7: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
8: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
9: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41}
},
proposal: {
1: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
2: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
3: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
4: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
5: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
6: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
7: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
8: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
9: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81}
}
}

tasks.getDeployPrototype = true;
continue determine;

<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?memebrain>

Initial Post: 10 January 2020
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2020-01-10 04:36:42 UTC
Permalink
I QUESTION WHETHER ITALY IS ACTAULLY DEMOCRACY (such is a TRINOMIAL #71
- WORLDVIEW and not a BINOMIAL (@1 / @5) STASIS perspective) SINCE THEY
TREAT ALL THEIR LEADERS with disrespect (ie. Benito Mussolini being an
exemplar of ITALIAN STUBBORN WILL) and have they ever recanted of fascism?

I just had a fellow named ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI similarly engaging
within NAZI SLANDER upon Facebook ...

I presume that was the ITALIAN author as he immediately BLOCKED me
(fortunately I had retained a copy of the post as my intellectual
property over which he ought not have any control) as an attempt to
preserve his fractured reputation due to an exacting category of
understanding @215 conveyed by his speech as *CHANCE* evidence of his
fascist identity.

Since he has blocked me rather than address his public slander I cannot
resolve that identity issue.
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by dolf
And Jesus called a little child unto him,
Aha! Now we know where the Roman Catholics got their inspiration for
their poaedophile priesthood.
----snip----
***@zen: 3, row: 6, col: 6, nous: 42 [DATE: 2020.10.31, TIME:
14:30 hrs, SUPER: #462 / #61 - Virtuous Humility at Using 'Beneath';
I-Ching: H64 - Ferrying Incomplete, Before Completion, Not Yet Fording,
Not yet completed; Tetra: 78 - ON THE VERGE (CHIANG), EGO: #399 / #42 -
Generating Things, Reason's Modifications; I-Ching: H60 - Control,
Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation; Tetra: 52 - MEASURE (TU)]

We are not certain whether the ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI making this
FACEBOOK slander is the same person as the ITALIAN author of "L' OTTAVO
SIGILLO: - PRIMA PARTE (The Eighth Seal: first part): "Is there
randomness, the so-called "chance"? And when we speak of a case, do we
refer to a unique idea or do heterogeneous conceptions exist?

The concept of chance has an undisputed authoritativeness: not only do
we use it customarily, but it constitutes a principle which all
scientific disciplines, without any exception, and most of all biology,
make use of - sometimes even obsessively. But is it possible to
concretely found randomness? Or does the concept of chance denote
something non-existent?

This text is probably the most comprehensive and detailed monographic
study ever carried out in this regard. And it is defined as monographic,
but only formally it is: since every exegesis of randomness immediately
transcends its theoretical frontier. In fact, the case is an ubiquitous
notion that is re-proposed with a very high frequency in every context
and that is considered an indisputable and pertinent hermeneutic of
events, of the origin of life, of the evolution of the cosmos, and is
even the most popular narrative illustration of the vicissitudes
everyday life experienced by all of us. But was it true glory, or is it
boasted credit? Would it be possible to renounce the concept of chance,
or is it essential? What do you do, what is this strange but
omnipresent, subtle but very powerful concept for?"
[<https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40698114-l-ottavo-sigillo>]

ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI (FACEBOOK): Yeah, {@1: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE:
YING (#41); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#66)}

because when you get your job pretending that being the prince of the
British crown had no part in securing it, {@2: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN
(#95); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#134)}

and when you get a huge loan pretending that being the prince of the
British crown had no part in securing it, {@3: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES:
NAN (#174); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A
DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34})}

you're not commercializing the British crown: {@4: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN
(#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI
(#282)}

you're getting a job! {@5: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#234); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#287)}

MALE: @228 = #228 as [#5, #100, #3, #70, #50] = érgon (G2041): {UMBRA:
#54 as #228 % #41 = #23} 1) *BUSINESS*, *EMPLOYMENT*, *THAT* *WHICH*
*ANY *ONE* *IS* *OCCUPIED*; 1a) that which one undertakes to do,
enterprise, undertaking; 2) any product whatever, any thing accomplished
by hand, art, industry, or mind; 3) an act, deed, thing done: the idea
of working is emphasised in opp. to that which is less than work;

FEME: @215 = #215: "BUT IT IS THANKS TO THOSE ATTRIBUTES THAT ARE
PECULIAR TO OUR RACE AND WHICH HAVE BEEN PRESERVED IN LOWER SAXONY THAT
WE HAVE BEEN ABLE HARMONIOUSLY TO ABSORB EXTRANEOUS CHARACTERISTICS—FOR
WE POSSESS ONE FACULTY WHICH EMBRACES ALL THE OTHERS, AND THAT IS,

THE IMPERIAL OUTLOOK:

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>

THE POWER TO REASON AND TO BUILD DISPASSIONATELY." [ADOLF HITLER's TABLE
TALK IDEA @215, 12 MAY 1942]

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #443 as [#2, #1, #400, #600] = bôwʼ (H935):
{UMBRA: #6 as #9 % #41 = #9} 1) to go in, enter, come, go, come in; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to enter, come in; 1a2) to come; i) to come with; ii) to
come upon, fall or light upon, attack (enemy); iii) to come to pass;
1a3) to attain to; 1a4) to be enumerated; 1a5) to go; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1)
to lead in; 1b2) to carry in; 1b3) to bring in, cause to come in,
gather, cause to come, bring near, bring against, bring upon; 1b4) to
bring to pass; 1c) (Hophal); 1c1) to be brought, brought in; 1c2) to be
introduced, be put;

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/1ST%20Responders%2011%20September%202001.png>

No you are actually wrong on that, since if you SUM the left column [28,
50, 11, 75, 6, 45, 25, 67, 62] of that BINOMIAL / TRINOMIAL
interoperability as BRITISH IMPERIAL @71 - WORLDVIEW, one ought note
that the resultant ONTIC value @215 has a comment from *HITLER* whom
similarly deployed the ROMAN BINOMIAL @1 / @5 STASIS IMPERIAL OUTLOOK.

[28, {@1: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28); Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28)}

50, {@2: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#106); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
WASTING: T'ANG (#78)}

11, {@3: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#114); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#89)}

75, {@4: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#116); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#164)}

6, {@5: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#124); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#170)}

45, {@6: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING
{%29}); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34})}

25, {@7: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#255); Ego: 25 - CONTENTION:
CHENG (#240)}

67, {@8: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#319); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#307)}

62] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#364); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#369)}

MALE: @177 = #177

FEME: @215 = #215

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #392

By the sounds of things you are on the wrong side of history (an
important consideration given the recent WWI centennial 2018)

"THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL NOT MAKE ANY LAW FOR ESTABLISHING ANY RELIGION,
OR FOR IMPOSING ANY RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCE, OR FOR PROHIBITING THE FREE
EXERCISE OF ANY RELIGION, AND NO RELIGIOUS TEST SHALL BE REQUIRED AS A
QUALIFICATION FOR ANY OFFICE OR PUBLIC TRUST UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH."
[CONSTITUTION 1900 SECTION 116]

(c) 2020 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 10 January 2020

case (typeof tasks.getDeployPrototype) :

/*
Whoever takes the worthy man as model provides contemporaries with a
perfect mirror of good conduct:

APPRAISAL #4: With RIGHT (DROIT) as his mirror, he does not go astray.
To others, he is one to rely on

FATHOMING #4: The RIGHT (DROIT) reflecting true
MEANS: Integrity can be trusted

#68 - DIMMING (MENG)

*/

var o = 0, i = 0, t = new Array(9); v = new Array(9);

knowns.DROIT = {
grapple: [v[0] = 68, v[1] = 67, v[2] = 66, v[3] = 47, v[4] = 20, v[5] =
21, v[6] = 22, v[7] = 49, v[8] = 48],
caduceus: {
feme: {
1: {ego: v[0], telos: t[0] = o +=v[0]},
2: {ego: v[1], telos: t[1] = o += v[1]},
3: {ego: v[2], telos: t[2] = o += v[2]},
4: {ego: v[3], telos: t[3] = o += v[3]},
5: {ego: v[4], telos: t[4] = o += v[4]},
6: {ego: v[5], telos: t[5] = o += v[5]},
7: {ego: v[6], telos: t[6] = o += v[6]},

/*

#311 - KANT'S PROLEGOMEMA SECTION #27 - LOGICAL SYLLOGISM

SELF #312 - CONTRADICTION

MINUS #81 - JUXTAPOSED PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGN {6.5.5.41.0: #266 -
CONTEND IN PUBLIC GAMES / #390 - CROWN} AS #71 - WORLDVIEW

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>

MADE AGAINST AUTONOMY {3.5.5.41.0: #311 / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES
ON 15 SEPTEMBER}}

EQUALS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL DYNAMIC

*/
8: {ego: v[7], telos: t[7] = o += v[7]},
9: {ego: v[8], telos: t[8] = o += v[8]},
telos: t[8]
},
male: {
1: {ego: i = v[0], telos: o = t[0]},
2: {ego: i = (t[1] % 81) ? t[1] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
3: {ego: i = (t[2] % 81) ? t[2] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
4: {ego: i = (t[3] % 81) ? t[3] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
5: {ego: i = (t[4] % 81) ? t[4] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
6: {ego: i = (t[5] % 81) ? t[5] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i}, // #237
- USE OF FORCE (CENTRE: #80 + #81 + #76)
7: {ego: i = (t[6] % 81) ? t[6] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
8: {ego: i = (t[7] % 81) ? t[7] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
9: {ego: i = (t[8] % 81) ? t[8] % 81 : 81, telos: o + i},
telos: o + i
}
},
right: {
1: {1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 3, 4: 4, 5: 5, 6: 6, 7: 7, 8: 8, 9: 9},
2: {1: 32, 2: 33, 3: 34, 4: 35, 5: 36, 6: 37, 7: 38, 8: 39, 9: 10},
3: {1: 31, 2: 56, 3: 57, 4: 58, 5: 59, 6: 60, 7: 61, 8: 40, 9: 11},
4: {1: 30, 2: 55, 3: 72, 4: 73, 5: 74, 6: 75, 7: 62, 8: 41, 9: 12},
5: {1: 29, 2: 54, 3: 71, 4: 80, 5: 81, 6: 76, 7: 63, 8: 42, 9: 13},
6: {1: 28, 2: 53, 3: 70, 4: 79, 5: 78, 6: 77, 7: 64, 8: 43, 9: 14},
7: {1: 27, 2: 52, 3: 69, 4: 68, 5: 67, 6: 66, 7: 65, 8: 44, 9: 15},
8: {1: 26, 2: 51, 3: 50, 4: 49, 5: 48, 6: 47, 7: 46, 8: 45, 9: 16},
9: {1: 25, 2: 24, 3: 23, 4: 22, 5: 21, 6: 20, 7: 19, 8: 18, 9: 17}
},
problem: {
1: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
2: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
3: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
4: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
5: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
6: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
7: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
8: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
9: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0}
},
rationale: {
1: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
2: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
3: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
4: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
5: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
6: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
7: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
8: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
9: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41}
},
proposal: {
1: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
2: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
3: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
4: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
5: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
6: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
7: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
8: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
9: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81}
}
}

tasks.getDeployPrototype = true;
continue determine;

<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?memebrain>

Initial Post: 10 January 2020
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2020-01-10 19:02:02 UTC
Permalink
I QUESTION WHETHER ITALY IS ACTUALLY A *DEMOCRACY* (such is a TRINOMIAL
#71 - WORLDVIEW and not a BINOMIAL (@1 / @5) STASIS perspective) SINCE
THEY TREAT ALL THEIR LEADERS with disrespect (ie. Benito Mussolini being
an exemplar of ITALIAN STUBBORN WILL) but have they ever formerly
recanted of fascism as a BINOMIAL (@1 / @5) STASIS CHRIST MURDEROUS DOGMA?

I just had a fellow named ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI similarly engaging
within NAZI SLANDER upon Facebook ...

I presume that was the ITALIAN author as he immediately BLOCKED me
(fortunately I had retained a copy of the post as my intellectual
property over which he ought not have any control) as an attempt to
preserve his fractured reputation due to an exacting category of
understanding @215 conveyed by his speech as *CHANCE* evidence of his
fascist identity.

Since he has blocked me rather than address his public slander I cannot
resolve that identity issue.
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by dolf
And Jesus called a little child unto him,
Aha! Now we know where the Roman Catholics got their inspiration for
their poaedophile priesthood.
----snip----
***@zen: 3, row: 6, col: 6, nous: 42 [DATE: 2020.10.31, TIME:
14:30 hrs, SUPER: #462 / #61 - Virtuous Humility at Using 'Beneath';
I-Ching: H64 - Ferrying Incomplete, Before Completion, Not Yet Fording,
Not yet completed; Tetra: 78 - ON THE VERGE (CHIANG), EGO: #399 / #42 -
Generating Things, Reason's Modifications; I-Ching: H60 - Control,
Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation; Tetra: 52 - MEASURE (TU)]

We are not certain whether the ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI making this
FACEBOOK slander is the same person as the ITALIAN author of "L' OTTAVO
SIGILLO: - PRIMA PARTE (The Eighth Seal: first part): "Is there
randomness, the so-called "chance"? And when we speak of a case, do we
refer to a unique idea or do heterogeneous conceptions exist?

The concept of chance has an undisputed authoritativeness: not only do
we use it customarily, but it constitutes a principle which all
scientific disciplines, without any exception, and most of all biology,
make use of - sometimes even obsessively. But is it possible to
concretely found randomness? Or does the concept of chance denote
something non-existent?

This text is probably the most comprehensive and detailed monographic
study ever carried out in this regard. And it is defined as monographic,
but only formally it is: since every exegesis of randomness immediately
transcends its theoretical frontier. In fact, the case is an ubiquitous
notion that is re-proposed with a very high frequency in every context
and that is considered an indisputable and pertinent hermeneutic of
events, of the origin of life, of the evolution of the cosmos, and is
even the most popular narrative illustration of the vicissitudes
everyday life experienced by all of us. But was it true glory, or is it
boasted credit? Would it be possible to renounce the concept of chance,
or is it essential? What do you do, what is this strange but
omnipresent, subtle but very powerful concept for?"
[<https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40698114-l-ottavo-sigillo>]

ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI (FACEBOOK): Yeah, {@1: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE:
YING (#41); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#66)}

because when you get your job pretending that being the prince of the
British crown had no part in securing it, {@2: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN
(#95); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#134)}

and when you get a huge loan pretending that being the prince of the
British crown had no part in securing it, {@3: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES:
NAN (#174); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A
DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34})}

you're not commercializing the British crown: {@4: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN
(#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI
(#282)}

you're getting a job! {@5: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#234); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#287)}

MALE: @228 = #228 as [#5, #100, #3, #70, #50] = érgon (G2041): {UMBRA:
#54 as #228 % #41 = #23} 1) *BUSINESS*, *EMPLOYMENT*, *THAT* *WHICH*
*ANY *ONE* *IS* *OCCUPIED*; 1a) that which one undertakes to do,
enterprise, undertaking; 2) any product whatever, any thing accomplished
by hand, art, industry, or mind; 3) an act, deed, thing done: the idea
of working is emphasised in opp. to that which is less than work;

FEME: @215 = #215: "BUT IT IS THANKS TO THOSE ATTRIBUTES THAT ARE
PECULIAR TO OUR RACE AND WHICH HAVE BEEN PRESERVED IN LOWER SAXONY THAT
WE HAVE BEEN ABLE HARMONIOUSLY TO ABSORB EXTRANEOUS CHARACTERISTICS—FOR
WE POSSESS ONE FACULTY WHICH EMBRACES ALL THE OTHERS, AND THAT IS,

THE IMPERIAL OUTLOOK:

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>

THE POWER TO REASON AND TO BUILD DISPASSIONATELY." [ADOLF HITLER's TABLE
TALK IDEA @215, 12 MAY 1942]

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #443 as [#2, #1, #400, #600] = bôwʼ (H935):
{UMBRA: #6 as #9 % #41 = #9} 1) to go in, enter, come, go, come in; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to enter, come in; 1a2) to come; i) to come with; ii) to
come upon, fall or light upon, attack (enemy); iii) to come to pass;
1a3) to attain to; 1a4) to be enumerated; 1a5) to go; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1)
to lead in; 1b2) to carry in; 1b3) to bring in, cause to come in,
gather, cause to come, bring near, bring against, bring upon; 1b4) to
bring to pass; 1c) (Hophal); 1c1) to be brought, brought in; 1c2) to be
introduced, be put;

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/1ST%20Responders%2011%20September%202001.png>

No you are actually wrong on that, since if you SUM the left column [28,
50, 11, 75, 6, 45, 25, 67, 62] of that BINOMIAL / TRINOMIAL
interoperability as BRITISH IMPERIAL @71 - WORLDVIEW, one ought note
that the resultant ONTIC value @215 has a comment from *HITLER* whom
similarly deployed the ROMAN BINOMIAL @1 / @5 STASIS IMPERIAL OUTLOOK.

[28, {@1: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28); Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28)}

50, {@2: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#106); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
WASTING: T'ANG (#78)}

11, {@3: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#114); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#89)}

75, {@4: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#116); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#164)}

6, {@5: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#124); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#170)}

45, {@6: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING
{%29}); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34})}

25, {@7: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#255); Ego: 25 - CONTENTION:
CHENG (#240)}

67, {@8: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#319); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#307)}

62] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#364); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#369)}

MALE: @177 = #177

FEME: @215 = #215

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #392

By the sounds of things you are on the wrong side of history (an
important consideration given the recent WWI centennial 2018)

"THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL NOT MAKE ANY LAW FOR ESTABLISHING ANY RELIGION,
OR FOR IMPOSING ANY RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCE, OR FOR PROHIBITING THE FREE
EXERCISE OF ANY RELIGION, AND NO RELIGIOUS *TEST* SHALL BE REQUIRED AS A
QUALIFICATION FOR ANY OFFICE OR PUBLIC TRUST UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH."
[SECTION 116, CONSTITUTION 1900 ]

THIS CODING FRAGMENT ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS (ie. DIEU ET MON DROIT
/ TENEZ LE DROIT) FOR APPLYING A TEST WITH AN IMPETUS FOR #237 - USE OF
FORCE MADE IN COMPLIANCE WITH HUMAN SAPIENT COGNITION AND #2184 =
*ANTHROPOLOGICAL* *PRINCIPLE* AS *COURSE* -TROCHOS OF *NATURE* -GENESIS
[James 3:6] IS MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

case (typeof tasks.getDeployPrototype) :

/*

Whoever takes the worthy man as model provides contemporaries with a
perfect mirror of good conduct:

APPRAISAL #4: With RIGHT (DROIT) as his mirror, he does not go astray.
To others, he is one to rely on

FATHOMING #4: The RIGHT (DROIT) reflecting true
MEANS: Integrity can be trusted

#68 - DIMMING (MENG)

[68, {@1: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH
THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#68 - I DO NOT
THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42})}
67, {@2: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#122); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#135)}

66, {@3: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES
{%9}); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#201)}

47, {@4: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11});
Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#248)}

20, {@5: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF
THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32}); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#268)}

21, {@6: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#237); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#289)}

22, {@7: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#305); Ego: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#311)}

49, {@8: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#341); Ego: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#360)}

48] {@9: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#344); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#408)}

MALE: @68 + @161 + @166 + @191 = #586

FEME: @68 = #68

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #654

*/

var o = 0, i = 0, t = new Array(9); v = new Array(9);

knowns.DROIT = {
grapple: [v[0] = 68, v[1] = 67, v[2] = 66, v[3] = 47, v[4] = 20, v[5] =
21, v[6] = 22, v[7] = 49, v[8] = 48],
caduceus: {
feme: {
1: {ego: v[0], telos: t[0] = o +=v[0]},
2: {ego: v[1], telos: t[1] = o += v[1]},
3: {ego: v[2], telos: t[2] = o += v[2]},
4: {ego: v[3], telos: t[3] = o += v[3]},
5: {ego: v[4], telos: t[4] = o += v[4]},
6: {ego: v[5], telos: t[5] = o += v[5]},
7: {ego: v[6], telos: t[6] = o += v[6]},

/*

#311 - KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION #27 - LOGICAL SYLLOGISM

SELF #312 - CONTRADICTION

MINUS #81 - JUXTAPOSED PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGN {6.5.5.41.0: #266 -
CONTEND IN PUBLIC GAMES / #390 - CROWN} AS #71 - WORLDVIEW

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>

MADE AGAINST AUTONOMY {3.5.5.41.0: #311 / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES
ON 15 SEPTEMBER}}

EQUALS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL DYNAMIC

*/
8: {ego: v[7], telos: t[7] = o += v[7]},
9: {ego: v[8], telos: t[8] = o += v[8]},
telos: t[8]
},
male: {
1: {ego: i = v[0], telos: o = t[0]},
2: {ego: i = (t[1] % 81) ? t[1] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
3: {ego: i = (t[2] % 81) ? t[2] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
4: {ego: i = (t[3] % 81) ? t[3] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
5: {ego: i = (t[4] % 81) ? t[4] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
6: {ego: i = (t[5] % 81) ? t[5] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i}, // #237 -
USE OF FORCE (CENTRE: #80 + #81 + #76)
7: {ego: i = (t[6] % 81) ? t[6] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
8: {ego: i = (t[7] % 81) ? t[7] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
9: {ego: i = (t[8] % 81) ? t[8] % 81 : 81, telos: o + i},
telos: o + i
}
},
right: { <-- THIS IS THE DIEU ET MON DROIT / TENEZ LE DROIT MATRIX
1: {1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 3, 4: 4, 5: 5, 6: 6, 7: 7, 8: 8, 9: 9},
2: {1: 32, 2: 33, 3: 34, 4: 35, 5: 36, 6: 37, 7: 38, 8: 39, 9: 10},
3: {1: 31, 2: 56, 3: 57, 4: 58, 5: 59, 6: 60, 7: 61, 8: 40, 9: 11},
4: {1: 30, 2: 55, 3: 72, 4: 73, 5: 74, 6: 75, 7: 62, 8: 41, 9: 12},
5: {1: 29, 2: 54, 3: 71, 4: 80, 5: 81, 6: 76, 7: 63, 8: 42, 9: 13},
6: {1: 28, 2: 53, 3: 70, 4: 79, 5: 78, 6: 77, 7: 64, 8: 43, 9: 14},
7: {1: 27, 2: 52, 3: 69, 4: 68, 5: 67, 6: 66, 7: 65, 8: 44, 9: 15},
8: {1: 26, 2: 51, 3: 50, 4: 49, 5: 48, 6: 47, 7: 46, 8: 45, 9: 16},
9: {1: 25, 2: 24, 3: 23, 4: 22, 5: 21, 6: 20, 7: 19, 8: 18, 9: 17}
},
problem: { <-- THE PROBLEM IS LOADED HERE
1: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
2: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
3: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
4: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
5: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
6: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
7: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
8: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
9: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0}
},
rationale: { <-- THIS IS FOR ONTIC JURISPRUDENT TRANSFORMATION
1: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
2: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
3: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
4: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
5: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
6: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
7: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
8: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
9: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41}
},
proposal: { <-- THIS IS FOR FORMULA OF PROGRESSION
1: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
2: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
3: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
4: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
5: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
6: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
7: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
8: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
9: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81}
}
}

tasks.getDeployPrototype = true;
continue determine;

Accordingly religious hate speech directed towards the GLBTI Community
is unconstitutional.

<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?memebrain> <-- THIS CURRENT
FUNCTIONAL PROTOTYPE

EXAMPLE OF CURRENT PROTOTYPE USE:

ACTUAL NEWSGROUP POST @ 2313 HOURS ON 30 DECEMBER 2019: "Another year,
same fun times being had,

Everythings packed, cars loaded, and we evacuate tomorrow morning,
Pretty red glow out the lounge window tonight. Fire is due here late
tomorrow morning, have done all I can, unfortunately no water to fight
the fire, so no use staying.

Don't hold out much hope this time I'll be returning to the house, the
ground and bush is so dry,

With a bit of luck the wind wont come up and I'll be back on here
tomorrow, if not, will be back one day,

To all have a great New year."

***@zen: 1, row: 8, col: 5, nous: 5 [DATE: 2020.1.11, TIME: 19:20
hrs, SUPER: #340 / #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION (CH'ENG), EGO: #191 / #5 -
Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness; I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying
Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording; Tetra: 73 - ALREADY
FORDING, COMPLETION (CH'ENG)]

Another year, {@1: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#78); Ego: 76 -
AGGRAVATION: CHU (#76)}

same fun times being had, {@2: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#118); Ego: 51 -
CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#127)}

Everythings packed, {@3: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#162); Ego: 57 -
GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36})}

cars loaded, {@4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF
WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#239)}

and we evacuate tomorrow morning, {@5: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
(#198); Ego: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#285)}

Pretty red glow out the lounge window tonight. {@6: Sup: 37 - PURITY:
TS'UI (#235); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#349)}

Fire is due here late tomorrow morning, {@7: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION:
YI (#265); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#359)}

have done all I can, {@8: Sup: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#286); Ego: 9 -
BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#368)}

unfortunately no water to fight the fire, {@9: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI
(#351); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#434)}

so no use staying. {@10: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#395); Ego: 41 -
RESPONSE: YING (#475)}

Don't hold out much hope this time I'll be returning to the house, {@11:
Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#397); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#532)}

the ground and bush is so dry, {@12: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#399);
Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI (#597)}

With a bit of luck the wind wont come up and I'll be back on here
tomorrow, {@13: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#473); Ego: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH
(#624)}

if not, {@14: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#530); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG
(#625)}

will be back one day, {@15: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#605); Ego: 45 -
GREATNESS: TA (#670)}

To all have a great New year. {@16: Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#661);
Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#711)}

MALE: @168 = #168

FEME: @184 = #184

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #352

SPIRAL SELECTOR@{ PROBLEM MATRIX } is currently being worked on to
provide RULES based ANALYSIS of the SPEECH with monitoring active
objects to convey real time interactions for PROBLEM RESOLUTION.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
dolf
2020-01-10 19:57:00 UTC
Permalink
I QUESTION WHETHER ITALY IS ACTUALLY A *DEMOCRACY* (such is a TRINOMIAL
#71 - WORLDVIEW and not a BINOMIAL (@1 / @5) STASIS perspective) SINCE
THEY TREAT ALL THEIR LEADERS with disrespect (ie. Benito Mussolini being
an exemplar of ITALIAN STUBBORN WILL) but have they ever formerly
recanted of fascism as a BINOMIAL (@1 / @5) STASIS CHRIST MURDEROUS DOGMA?

I've done a GOOGLE SEARCH and beyond a "CONTINUING DISSATISFACTION WITH
ITS POLITICAL LEADERS" I cannot find any evidence that the ITALIAN STATE
have they ever formerly recanted fascism as a BINOMIAL (@1 / @5) STASIS
CHRIST MURDEROUS DOGMA and in my view a *NORTH* *KOREAN* *PEACE*
*ACCORD* to a war which began on 25 June 1950 would be a more certain
prospect.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Fascism>

I just had a fellow named ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI similarly engaging
within NAZI SLANDER upon Facebook ...

I presume that was the ITALIAN author as he immediately BLOCKED me
(fortunately I had retained a copy of the post as my intellectual
property over which he ought not have any control) as an attempt to
preserve his fractured reputation due to an exacting category of
understanding @215 conveyed by his speech as *CHANCE* evidence of his
fascist identity.

Since he has blocked me rather than address his public slander I cannot
resolve that identity issue.
Post by Ned Latham
----snip----
Post by dolf
And Jesus called a little child unto him,
Aha! Now we know where the Roman Catholics got their inspiration for
their poaedophile priesthood.
----snip----
***@zen: 3, row: 6, col: 6, nous: 42 [DATE: 2020.10.31, TIME:
14:30 hrs, SUPER: #462 / #61 - Virtuous Humility at Using 'Beneath';
I-Ching: H64 - Ferrying Incomplete, Before Completion, Not Yet Fording,
Not yet completed; Tetra: 78 - ON THE VERGE (CHIANG), EGO: #399 / #42 -
Generating Things, Reason's Modifications; I-Ching: H60 - Control,
Restraint, Articulating, Limitation, Moderation; Tetra: 52 - MEASURE (TU)]

We are not certain whether the ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI making this
FACEBOOK slander is the same person as the ITALIAN author of "L' OTTAVO
SIGILLO: - PRIMA PARTE (The Eighth Seal: first part): "Is there
randomness, the so-called "chance"? And when we speak of a case, do we
refer to a unique idea or do heterogeneous conceptions exist?

The concept of chance has an undisputed authoritativeness: not only do
we use it customarily, but it constitutes a principle which all
scientific disciplines, without any exception, and most of all biology,
make use of - sometimes even obsessively. But is it possible to
concretely found randomness? Or does the concept of chance denote
something non-existent?

This text is probably the most comprehensive and detailed monographic
study ever carried out in this regard. And it is defined as monographic,
but only formally it is: since every exegesis of randomness immediately
transcends its theoretical frontier. In fact, the case is an ubiquitous
notion that is re-proposed with a very high frequency in every context
and that is considered an indisputable and pertinent hermeneutic of
events, of the origin of life, of the evolution of the cosmos, and is
even the most popular narrative illustration of the vicissitudes
everyday life experienced by all of us. But was it true glory, or is it
boasted credit? Would it be possible to renounce the concept of chance,
or is it essential? What do you do, what is this strange but
omnipresent, subtle but very powerful concept for?"
[<https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40698114-l-ottavo-sigillo>]

ALBERTO SALVATORE VALLINI (FACEBOOK): Yeah, {@1: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE:
YING (#41); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#66)}

because when you get your job pretending that being the prince of the
British crown had no part in securing it, {@2: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN
(#95); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#134)}

and when you get a huge loan pretending that being the prince of the
British crown had no part in securing it, {@3: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES:
NAN (#174); Ego: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A
DOER OF MISCHIEF {%34})}

you're not commercializing the British crown: {@4: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN
(#228 - I HAVE NO UNJUST PREFERENCES {%40}); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI
(#282)}

you're getting a job! {@5: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#234); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#287)}

MALE: @228 = #228 as [#5, #100, #3, #70, #50] = érgon (G2041): {UMBRA:
#54 as #228 % #41 = #23} 1) *BUSINESS*, *EMPLOYMENT*, *THAT* *WHICH*
*ANY *ONE* *IS* *OCCUPIED*; 1a) that which one undertakes to do,
enterprise, undertaking; 2) any product whatever, any thing accomplished
by hand, art, industry, or mind; 3) an act, deed, thing done: the idea
of working is emphasised in opp. to that which is less than work;

FEME: @215 = #215: "BUT IT IS THANKS TO THOSE ATTRIBUTES THAT ARE
PECULIAR TO OUR RACE AND WHICH HAVE BEEN PRESERVED IN LOWER SAXONY THAT
WE HAVE BEEN ABLE HARMONIOUSLY TO ABSORB EXTRANEOUS CHARACTERISTICS—FOR
WE POSSESS ONE FACULTY WHICH EMBRACES ALL THE OTHERS, AND THAT IS,

THE IMPERIAL OUTLOOK:

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>

THE POWER TO REASON AND TO BUILD DISPASSIONATELY." [ADOLF HITLER's TABLE
TALK IDEA @215, 12 MAY 1942]

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #443 as [#2, #1, #400, #600] = bôwʼ (H935):
{UMBRA: #6 as #9 % #41 = #9} 1) to go in, enter, come, go, come in; 1a)
(Qal); 1a1) to enter, come in; 1a2) to come; i) to come with; ii) to
come upon, fall or light upon, attack (enemy); iii) to come to pass;
1a3) to attain to; 1a4) to be enumerated; 1a5) to go; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1)
to lead in; 1b2) to carry in; 1b3) to bring in, cause to come in,
gather, cause to come, bring near, bring against, bring upon; 1b4) to
bring to pass; 1c) (Hophal); 1c1) to be brought, brought in; 1c2) to be
introduced, be put;

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/1ST%20Responders%2011%20September%202001.png>

No you are actually wrong on that, since if you SUM the left column [28,
50, 11, 75, 6, 45, 25, 67, 62] of that BINOMIAL / TRINOMIAL
interoperability as BRITISH IMPERIAL @71 - WORLDVIEW, one ought note
that the resultant ONTIC value @215 has a comment from *HITLER* whom
similarly deployed the ROMAN BINOMIAL @1 / @5 STASIS IMPERIAL OUTLOOK.

[28, {@1: Sup: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28); Ego: 28 - CHANGE: KENG (#28)}

50, {@2: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#106); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS /
WASTING: T'ANG (#78)}

11, {@3: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#114); Ego: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#89)}

75, {@4: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#116); Ego: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#164)}

6, {@5: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#124); Ego: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#170)}

45, {@6: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#177 - I AM NOT GIVEN TO CURSING
{%29}); Ego: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#215 - I AM NEITHER A LIAR NOR A DOER
OF MISCHIEF {%34})}

25, {@7: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#255); Ego: 25 - CONTENTION:
CHENG (#240)}

67, {@8: Sup: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#319); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#307)}

62] {@9: Sup: 45 - GREATNESS: TA (#364); Ego: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#369)}

MALE: @177 = #177

FEME: @215 = #215

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #392

By the sounds of things you are on the wrong side of history (an
important consideration given the recent WWI centennial 2018)

"THE COMMONWEALTH SHALL NOT MAKE ANY LAW FOR ESTABLISHING ANY RELIGION,
OR FOR IMPOSING ANY RELIGIOUS OBSERVANCE, OR FOR PROHIBITING THE FREE
EXERCISE OF ANY RELIGION, AND NO RELIGIOUS *TEST* SHALL BE REQUIRED AS A
QUALIFICATION FOR ANY OFFICE OR PUBLIC TRUST UNDER THE COMMONWEALTH."
[SECTION 116, CONSTITUTION 1900 ]

THIS CODING FRAGMENT ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS (ie. DIEU ET MON DROIT
/ TENEZ LE DROIT) FOR APPLYING A TEST WITH AN IMPETUS FOR #237 - USE OF
FORCE MADE IN COMPLIANCE WITH HUMAN SAPIENT COGNITION AND #2184 =
*ANTHROPOLOGICAL* *PRINCIPLE* AS *COURSE* -TROCHOS OF *NATURE* -GENESIS
[James 3:6] IS MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

case (typeof tasks.getDeployPrototype) :

/*

Whoever takes the worthy man as model provides contemporaries with a
perfect mirror of good conduct:

APPRAISAL #4: With RIGHT (DROIT) as his mirror, he does not go astray.
To others, he is one to rely on

FATHOMING #4: The RIGHT (DROIT) reflecting true
MEANS: Integrity can be trusted

#68 - DIMMING (MENG)

[68, {@1: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#68 - I DO NOT THAT WHICH OFFENDETH
THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42}); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#68 - I DO NOT
THAT WHICH OFFENDETH THE GOD OF MY DOMAIN {%42})}
67, {@2: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#122); Ego: 67 - DARKENING: HUI (#135)}

66, {@3: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES
{%9}); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#201)}

47, {@4: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#166 - I AM NOT SLUGGISH {%11});
Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#248)}

20, {@5: Sup: 25 - CONTENTION: CHENG (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF
THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32}); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#268)}

21, {@6: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#237); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#289)}

22, {@7: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#305); Ego: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#311)}

49, {@8: Sup: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#341); Ego: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#360)}

48] {@9: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#344); Ego: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#408)}

MALE: @68 + @161 + @166 + @191 = #586

FEME: @68 = #68

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #654

*/

var o = 0, i = 0, t = new Array(9); v = new Array(9);

knowns.DROIT = {
grapple: [v[0] = 68, v[1] = 67, v[2] = 66, v[3] = 47, v[4] = 20, v[5] =
21, v[6] = 22, v[7] = 49, v[8] = 48],
caduceus: {
feme: {
1: {ego: v[0], telos: t[0] = o +=v[0]},
2: {ego: v[1], telos: t[1] = o += v[1]},
3: {ego: v[2], telos: t[2] = o += v[2]},
4: {ego: v[3], telos: t[3] = o += v[3]},
5: {ego: v[4], telos: t[4] = o += v[4]},
6: {ego: v[5], telos: t[5] = o += v[5]},
7: {ego: v[6], telos: t[6] = o += v[6]},

/*

#311 - KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION #27 - LOGICAL SYLLOGISM

SELF #312 - CONTRADICTION

MINUS #81 - JUXTAPOSED PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGN {6.5.5.41.0: #266 -
CONTEND IN PUBLIC GAMES / #390 - CROWN} AS #71 - WORLDVIEW

<https://www.grapple369.com/images/Torah%20Kabbalah%20Angels.jpeg>

MADE AGAINST AUTONOMY {3.5.5.41.0: #311 / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLES
ON 15 SEPTEMBER}}

EQUALS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL DYNAMIC

*/
8: {ego: v[7], telos: t[7] = o += v[7]},
9: {ego: v[8], telos: t[8] = o += v[8]},
telos: t[8]
},
male: {
1: {ego: i = v[0], telos: o = t[0]},
2: {ego: i = (t[1] % 81) ? t[1] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
3: {ego: i = (t[2] % 81) ? t[2] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
4: {ego: i = (t[3] % 81) ? t[3] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
5: {ego: i = (t[4] % 81) ? t[4] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
6: {ego: i = (t[5] % 81) ? t[5] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i}, // #237 -
USE OF FORCE (CENTRE: #80 + #81 + #76)
7: {ego: i = (t[6] % 81) ? t[6] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
8: {ego: i = (t[7] % 81) ? t[7] % 81 : 81, telos: o = o + i},
9: {ego: i = (t[8] % 81) ? t[8] % 81 : 81, telos: o + i},
telos: o + i
}
},
right: { <-- THIS IS THE DIEU ET MON DROIT / TENEZ LE DROIT MATRIX
1: {1: 1, 2: 2, 3: 3, 4: 4, 5: 5, 6: 6, 7: 7, 8: 8, 9: 9},
2: {1: 32, 2: 33, 3: 34, 4: 35, 5: 36, 6: 37, 7: 38, 8: 39, 9: 10},
3: {1: 31, 2: 56, 3: 57, 4: 58, 5: 59, 6: 60, 7: 61, 8: 40, 9: 11},
4: {1: 30, 2: 55, 3: 72, 4: 73, 5: 74, 6: 75, 7: 62, 8: 41, 9: 12},
5: {1: 29, 2: 54, 3: 71, 4: 80, 5: 81, 6: 76, 7: 63, 8: 42, 9: 13},
6: {1: 28, 2: 53, 3: 70, 4: 79, 5: 78, 6: 77, 7: 64, 8: 43, 9: 14},
7: {1: 27, 2: 52, 3: 69, 4: 68, 5: 67, 6: 66, 7: 65, 8: 44, 9: 15},
8: {1: 26, 2: 51, 3: 50, 4: 49, 5: 48, 6: 47, 7: 46, 8: 45, 9: 16},
9: {1: 25, 2: 24, 3: 23, 4: 22, 5: 21, 6: 20, 7: 19, 8: 18, 9: 17}
},
problem: { <-- THE PROBLEM IS LOADED HERE
1: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
2: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
3: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
4: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
5: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
6: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
7: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
8: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0},
9: {1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0, 4: 0, 5: 0, 6: 0, 7: 0, 8: 0, 9: 0}
},
rationale: { <-- THIS IS FOR ONTIC JURISPRUDENT TRANSFORMATION
1: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
2: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
3: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
4: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
5: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
6: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
7: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
8: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41},
9: {1: 41, 2: 41, 3: 41, 4: 41, 5: 41, 6: 41, 7: 41, 8: 41, 9: 41}
},
proposal: { <-- THIS IS FOR FORMULA OF PROGRESSION
1: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
2: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
3: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
4: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
5: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
6: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
7: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
8: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81},
9: {1: 81, 2: 81, 3: 81, 4: 81, 5: 81, 6: 81, 7: 81, 8: 81, 9: 81}
}
}

tasks.getDeployPrototype = true;
continue determine;

Accordingly religious hate speech directed towards the GLBTI Community
is unconstitutional.

<https://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?memebrain> <-- THIS CURRENT
FUNCTIONAL PROTOTYPE

EXAMPLE OF CURRENT PROTOTYPE USE:

ACTUAL NEWSGROUP POST @ 2313 HOURS ON 30 DECEMBER 2019: "Another year,
same fun times being had,

Everythings packed, cars loaded, and we evacuate tomorrow morning,
Pretty red glow out the lounge window tonight. Fire is due here late
tomorrow morning, have done all I can, unfortunately no water to fight
the fire, so no use staying.

Don't hold out much hope this time I'll be returning to the house, the
ground and bush is so dry,

With a bit of luck the wind wont come up and I'll be back on here
tomorrow, if not, will be back one day,

To all have a great New year."

***@zen: 1, row: 8, col: 5, nous: 5 [DATE: 2020.1.11, TIME: 19:20
hrs, SUPER: #340 / #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness;
I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording;
Tetra: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION (CH'ENG), EGO: #191 / #5 -
Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness; I-Ching: H63 - Ferrying
Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording; Tetra: 73 - ALREADY
FORDING, COMPLETION (CH'ENG)]

Another year, {@1: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#78); Ego: 76 -
AGGRAVATION: CHU (#76)}

same fun times being had, {@2: Sup: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#118); Ego: 51 -
CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#127)}

Everythings packed, {@3: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#162); Ego: 57 -
GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36})}

cars loaded, {@4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF
WEEPING TO ANY {%26}); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#239)}

and we evacuate tomorrow morning, {@5: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
(#198); Ego: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#285)}

Pretty red glow out the lounge window tonight. {@6: Sup: 37 - PURITY:
TS'UI (#235); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#349)}

Fire is due here late tomorrow morning, {@7: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION:
YI (#265); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#359)}

have done all I can, {@8: Sup: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#286); Ego: 9 -
BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#368)}

unfortunately no water to fight the fire, {@9: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI
(#351); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#434)}

so no use staying. {@10: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#395); Ego: 41 -
RESPONSE: YING (#475)}

Don't hold out much hope this time I'll be returning to the house, {@11:
Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#397); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#532)}

the ground and bush is so dry, {@12: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#399);
Ego: 65 - INNER: NEI (#597)}

With a bit of luck the wind wont come up and I'll be back on here
tomorrow, {@13: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#473); Ego: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH
(#624)}

if not, {@14: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#530); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG
(#625)}

will be back one day, {@15: Sup: 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#605); Ego: 45 -
GREATNESS: TA (#670)}

To all have a great New year. {@16: Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#661);
Ego: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#711)}

MALE: @168 = #168

FEME: @184 = #184

ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #352

SPIRAL SELECTOR@{ PROBLEM MATRIX } is currently being worked on to
provide RULES based ANALYSIS of the SPEECH with monitoring active
objects to convey real time interactions for PROBLEM RESOLUTION.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

http://youtu.be/H-7OuqWi4vQ

SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF
NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND*
*ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5,
#200 as harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a
extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL*
*AND* *FRAUDULENT*

Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th
May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice
of an Application for Planning Permit

<http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek:
TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in
1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN
CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated
with the theory of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology
reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and
the zodiac.

It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF
NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTATIS comprising #81 trinomial
tetragrammaton x 4.5 day = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER
which is an amalgam of the 64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as
trinomial tetragrammaton rather than its encapsulated contrived use as
the microcosm to redefine the macrocosm as the quintessence of the
Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial canon of transposition as HETEROS
THEORY OF NUMBER.

<http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006
defines a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is
permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN
BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED
WITHIN THE TEMPORAL REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND
RATIONALITY."

That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor
prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as
EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grapple.zip> (Download resources)

After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its
geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
Loading...