Post by The Peeler
On Thu, 08 Aug 2019 05:52:07 -0700, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
Post by Grikboxer®
Jackson, Missippi Mayor Chokwe Antar Lumumba condemned the raids as
"dehumanising and ineffective".
'Chokwe Antar Lumumba'???
Another non-white superior to you, poor inferior nazoid pedophilic
They ALL are superior to the mangina.
Now here is jack Marshall asking if the "Woke" ABA will abandon "Innocent
Until Proven Guilty" in Sexual Assault cases.
Will The “Woke” American Bar Association Endorse Reject “Innocent Until
Proven Guilty” In Sexual Assault Cases?
AUGUST 7, 2019 / JACK MARSHALL
Sadly, I wouldn’t be surprised.
This is the main reason that I am no longer a member of the ABA, which has
become more political and partisan with each passing year. I have often
presented ethics courses for ABA sections in the past, and will probably do
so in the future. But the legal profession is one of many that has lost its
ethical bearings of late, and the resolution its largest and most
prestigious association will consider this week (the ABA’s annual convention
begins today) is proof.
Here is the resolution (emphasis mine):
RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges legislatures and courts to
define consent in sexual assault cases as the assent of a person who is
competent to give consent to engage in a specific act of sexual penetration,
oral sex, or sexual contact, to provide that consent is expressed by words
or action in the context of all the circumstances, and to reject any
requirement that sexual assault victims have a legal burden of verbal or
This is essentially the same standard that the Obama administration forced
upon colleges and universities with its infamous “Dear Colleague” letter,
resulting in many male students being persecuted, punished, suspended, or
expelled without due process, based on an institutionalized bias in favor of
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers effectively expressed
how sinister the resolution is in a statement issued on July 25, stating in
The criminal defense lawyer association notes elsewhere in its letter that
this definition would necessarily undermine the Fifth Amendment right to
remain silent, since “[t]he resolution will often force the defendant to
testify in order to present evidence that consent was expressed.”
The NACDL also points out that the American Law Institute proposed revising
its l Model Penal Code to include an affirmative consent standard. The ALI’s
membership rejected that proposal, as it should have, and did so
The ABA membership is more politically diverse—and principled—that the
official posturings of the association itself suggests. I suspect, and hope,
that this abomination of a resolution, which would be a disgrace for any
legal organization to endorse, will fail. The fact that such a resolution
would even make it to the voting stage is one more ominous piece of evidence
that the progressive forces seeking to weaken the Bill of Rights are
infiltrating all of our professions and institutions.
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.