2018-04-08 01:20:36 UTC
Read again my final corrected post..
What is idealism of socialism and nationalism ?
I think i have found it !
Socialism comes from weakness and insecurity and it wants to have
"compassion" on its people that are more weak and more insecure , but
its idealism comes from the fact that compassion is put as a "high"
priority that bring socialism , but at the same time optimization and
efficiency of economy and the system is "reported" again and again in
favor of compassion of the social side. And the idealism of this acts
of socialism is the fact that socialism is thinking "love" and
compassion , but it is not being "pragmatism" and "responsability" of
efficiency and optimization like in UK.
Nationalism is the same, it comes from weakness and insecurity and it
thinks that having a "bigger" central government is better because of
insecurity and weakness , so it gives rise to more burocracy and/or more
nationalisations and/or more protectionism that are also inefficient and
that can hurt the global economy. this is the same
with Donald Trump that wants to "protect" america from "insecurity",
Donald Trump thinks that his too much protectionism and more nationalism
kind of thinking is the right solution, but this can hurt and this can
hurt global economy.
Please read again the rest of my previous thoughts to understand more:
Here is the most important ideas that have given rise to nationalism and
When you are more "insecure" and you are more "weak",
you need to be security and this gives rise to nationalism that wants
to bring security by being too nationalistic that is inefficient or/and
you need also to be "compassion" towards your
people that are more weak and more insecure, so this gives rise to
socialism that is more "idealistic" and that is not pragmatism
of efficiency and optimization like in UK.
Also i said the following:
This is a very interesting subject, one of the fondation ideas
of philosophy is that there is rationalism and there is empiricism,
rationalism is like the "theory", and alone it can give problems,
this is why pragmatism also dictates that we have also to know how to be
both rationalism and empiricism to be a better or be a better system,
this bring a very interesting "analogy", look at socialism of
Algeria, i think socialism of Algeria is not pragmatic, but
it is like the deficiency of being only rationalism !
because socialism is more based on idealism ! it is
based more on the "theory" that is more idealistic, and this
is not pragmatic, because being pragmatic is being "efficiency"
and being efficiency is being efficiency of both rationalism
and empiricism ! this is also the defect of the "Syrian" regime,
the actual Russia has almost the same defect because it is archaism of
"nationalism" that is inefficient and that is less pragmatic than the
UK governance that is pragmatic and more Elitist and that follows the
way of efficiency and optimization. Here is what i have posted about
Russia that is an inefficient country:
About Russia's economy...
Why Switzerland was ranked the most economically free nation in Europe ?
The important characteristics of Switzerland are:
1. Rule of law
2. Optimization of the Government size
3. Regulatory efficiency
4. Open markets
Read more here:
So now about "Russia", Russia lacks many of the requirements for strong
economy, read the following to notice it:
"Russia’s transition from a centrally planned economy to a more
market-based system has stalled, and the country remains predominantly
statist. Further economic reforms have been subordinated to the
imperatives of political stability and government longevity. The private
sector has been marginalized by structural and institutional constraints
caused by ever-growing government encroachment into the marketplace.
Large state-owned institutions and an inefficient public sector dominate
the economy. The judiciary is vulnerable to corruption, and weak
protection of property rights undermines prospects for optimal long-term
Also i said the following:
About nationalism and socialism..
I will do again political philosophy so that you will be
able to understand our world better..
I think socialism and nationalism that is more archaic today are ideas
of the past, the context of the past that was more "insecure" and more
"weakness" has given rise to socialism and to nationalism that is more
archaic today , and now you are able to understand deeply politics, the
problem also of the Syrian regime and of the Algerian regime and Russian
regime and the like is like the problem of the "past" ! since they are
third world countries and countries that are "weak" and more "insecure",
this weakness and insecurity is the same "context" of the past that has
given rise to socialism and to nationalism that is archaism today, this
insecurity and weakness of those countries give rise again to socialism
and/or nationalism that is archaic inside there
system, this is why those countries that are more weak and more
insecure are still blocked into those kind of inefficient socialist and
nationalistic regimes , so the way out of those regimes is to enhance
there "economies", so they must adhere to the way of optimization and
efficiency of there economy and there system like in UK to be able to
transcend there living conditions !
Amine Moulay Ramdane.